It’s gonna be a lot longer than 15 minutes unfortunately. Dude’s clearly a member of the Biden regime (even if they try to pretend it’s not so).
The amount of airtime and sponsorship deals and endorsements etc this faggot gets, the way he’s everywhere constantly and on TV all the time apparently bankrolled by no one in particular stinks to high heaven. He’s annoying and talentless, even for a gay guy. At least Freddy Mercury and Elton John could sing. This dude and his cringe are so inorganic and inauthentic, the only place he could have come from is the OBiden war room.
Well, he has the same idea of freedom that most Americans do now: "everything I like should be permitted, or maybe even compulsory, and everything I don't should send you straight to jail."
Unfortunately, that goes for all sides, but the left has really turned the dial to 11 on this philosophy.
I don't understand why our civics education has failed so badly, but if you don't think your neighbor should be allowed to do whatever the fuck they want as long as it doesn't hurt somebody else, even if you don't personally like it, you're not really understanding the concept of freedom.
Now, now, remember that it’s much sillier than that. During BLM they used “white silence is black violence” as a slogan. So both words and not words are violence.
"Do as thou wilt, as long as no one sees it" is how we got here. There's no such thing as "doesn't hurt somebody else," because a sick mind in private contributes to a sick body politic in public, which harms everyone.
Well there's your problem, one man's sin is another man's righteousness. I'm pretty sure the Muslims who blew up the World Trade Center thought they were righteous. And you'd find no shortage of people even today who agree with them. There literally isn't a single army in the history of mankind that didn't go to war thinking they were fighting for righteousness.
You're describing a theocracy, which was explicitly rejected by our founders, and only works if the vast majority of the population shares exactly the same religion and values.
And also isn't very free, because we're right back to "everything I like should be permitted, or maybe even compulsory, and everything I don't should send you straight to jail."
That kind of postmodernist subjectivism is, once again, precisely how we got to such a shitty point in our society.
This isn't subjective. Some things are just inherently evil. This isn't a pet peeve and trying to consign moral disagreements as such is disingenuous at best.
Crossdressing should be illegal to do in public, and concealing your biological sex for the purposes of entrapping others should be punishable by death. Not because I don't like it, but because the Venn diagram of crossdressers and pedophiles is practically a circle.
And only by the grace of Allah can we absolve our sins, right? I've heard that song and dance before. Except, you know, that song and dance are both sicknesses and sin. You probably even use computers, when we KNOW that such things are sinful.
I don't understand why our civics education has failed so badly
Because it was removed from most public schools over a period of about 50 years beginning in the late '60s, natch, when public education was taken over by the left.
He's the sort of guy who should be sent to those Nazi and Japanese doctors doing horribly unethical experiments in WWII as a test subject. I bet they could really dig into what the fuck is wrong in the head with his kind.
He is a twinky gay man who lives for the flamboyancy of that lifestyle. There is nothing new or special about him, only that the flagrant degeneracy seen at Pride Parades from gays has become passe. So he one upped it to get more attention.
Its literally just homo attention seeking, the same as always.
Nothing. The answer is nothing. Because there really isn't any major biological component, it's primarily social. Were there some chemical or hormonal component, it could be resolved through chemical or hormonal means. But there isn't. Or at least, modern medicine insists there isn't.
Although all becomings are already molecular, including becoming-woman, it must be said that all becomings begin with and pass through becoming-woman. It is the key to all the other becomings. When the man of war disguises himself as a woman, flees disguised as a girl, hides as a girl, it is not a shameful, transitory incident in his life. To hide, to camouflage oneself, is a warrior function, and the line of flight attracts the enemy, traverses something and puts what it traverses to flight; the warrior arises in the infinity of a line of flight. Although the femininity of the man of war is not accidental, it should not be thought of as structural, or regulated by a correspondence of relations. It is difficult to see how the correspondence between the two relations "man-war" and "woman-marriage" could entail an equivalence between the warrior and the girl as a woman who refuses to marry. It is just as difficult to see how the general bisexuality, or even homosexuality, of military societies could explain this phenomenon, which is no more imitative than it is structural, representing instead an essential anomie of the man of war.
The rites of transvestism or female impersonation in primitive societies in which a man becomes a woman are not explainable by a social organization that places the given relations in correspondence, or by a psychic organization that makes the woman desire to become a man just as the man desires to become a woman. Social structure and psychic identification leave too many special factors unaccounted for: the linkage, unleashing, and communication of the becomings triggered by the transvestite; the power (puissance) of the resultant becoming-animal; and above all the participation of these becomings in a specific war machine.
— Deleuze & Guattari - A Thousand Plateaus, 1987
A social contagion can become cover for a strategic operation. It is a tactic that is older than the Bible.
If one can derail a man's most primal desires towards something absurd, couldn't you reroute it for a more strategic purpose?
He’s definitely not a woman, but he’s neither a man. A man actually owns up to who they really are, doesn’t play make believe, and doesn’t force other people to play along with him.
I'd never call Mulvaney a man. He's a histrionic faggot.
Would you settle for "Immature cross dressing male"?
Hey! Drew Barrymore called it a woman and that’s good enough for me!
Man you've got to get over your teenage crush.
Unfortunately, he's male.
Fortunately, he might 41% himself off a cliff
I might have to start going to church if god smites this faggot.
He's done it before, in real time.
Agreed. He lost the privilege of that title.
He used to be on some TV shows playing the stereotypical gay guy so your assessment isn't even wrong.
As soon as it stops being profitable for him to play a troon, he will be a man again instantly.
We can only dream and hope.
It’s gonna be a lot longer than 15 minutes unfortunately. Dude’s clearly a member of the Biden regime (even if they try to pretend it’s not so).
The amount of airtime and sponsorship deals and endorsements etc this faggot gets, the way he’s everywhere constantly and on TV all the time apparently bankrolled by no one in particular stinks to high heaven. He’s annoying and talentless, even for a gay guy. At least Freddy Mercury and Elton John could sing. This dude and his cringe are so inorganic and inauthentic, the only place he could have come from is the OBiden war room.
Well, he has the same idea of freedom that most Americans do now: "everything I like should be permitted, or maybe even compulsory, and everything I don't should send you straight to jail."
Unfortunately, that goes for all sides, but the left has really turned the dial to 11 on this philosophy.
I don't understand why our civics education has failed so badly, but if you don't think your neighbor should be allowed to do whatever the fuck they want as long as it doesn't hurt somebody else, even if you don't personally like it, you're not really understanding the concept of freedom.
“… as long as it doesn’t hurt somebody else …” is where your logic and theirs conflicts. They consider words to be violence.
Not to mention that they consider harming others their birthright.
Well that is a unique "feature" of the left where somehow words got conflated with physical violence
Now, now, remember that it’s much sillier than that. During BLM they used “white silence is black violence” as a slogan. So both words and not words are violence.
"Do as thou wilt, as long as no one sees it" is how we got here. There's no such thing as "doesn't hurt somebody else," because a sick mind in private contributes to a sick body politic in public, which harms everyone.
There is only sin and righteousness.
Well there's your problem, one man's sin is another man's righteousness. I'm pretty sure the Muslims who blew up the World Trade Center thought they were righteous. And you'd find no shortage of people even today who agree with them. There literally isn't a single army in the history of mankind that didn't go to war thinking they were fighting for righteousness.
You're describing a theocracy, which was explicitly rejected by our founders, and only works if the vast majority of the population shares exactly the same religion and values.
And also isn't very free, because we're right back to "everything I like should be permitted, or maybe even compulsory, and everything I don't should send you straight to jail."
More than a few states still had state religions after 1788.
That kind of postmodernist subjectivism is, once again, precisely how we got to such a shitty point in our society.
This isn't subjective. Some things are just inherently evil. This isn't a pet peeve and trying to consign moral disagreements as such is disingenuous at best.
Crossdressing should be illegal to do in public, and concealing your biological sex for the purposes of entrapping others should be punishable by death. Not because I don't like it, but because the Venn diagram of crossdressers and pedophiles is practically a circle.
And only by the grace of Allah can we absolve our sins, right? I've heard that song and dance before. Except, you know, that song and dance are both sicknesses and sin. You probably even use computers, when we KNOW that such things are sinful.
Because it was removed from most public schools over a period of about 50 years beginning in the late '60s, natch, when public education was taken over by the left.
https://archive.ph/HQvCA
Dylan Mulvaney‘s existence is the best argument in favor of bringing back gay bashing.
He's a little gay girlfriend to the girls, and men are doing a good enough job of shunning.
Attention-whore says something intentionally over the top for attention? What IS the world coming to....
He's the sort of guy who should be sent to those Nazi and Japanese doctors doing horribly unethical experiments in WWII as a test subject. I bet they could really dig into what the fuck is wrong in the head with his kind.
He is a twinky gay man who lives for the flamboyancy of that lifestyle. There is nothing new or special about him, only that the flagrant degeneracy seen at Pride Parades from gays has become passe. So he one upped it to get more attention.
Its literally just homo attention seeking, the same as always.
Nothing. The answer is nothing. Because there really isn't any major biological component, it's primarily social. Were there some chemical or hormonal component, it could be resolved through chemical or hormonal means. But there isn't. Or at least, modern medicine insists there isn't.
"GAAAAAAAYYYYY"
sooner or later they'll stop using words.
— Deleuze & Guattari - A Thousand Plateaus, 1987
A social contagion can become cover for a strategic operation. It is a tactic that is older than the Bible.
If one can derail a man's most primal desires towards something absurd, couldn't you reroute it for a more strategic purpose?
hahaha what a faggot
Matt Walsh was saying people performing with lizzo should be arrested. He has no place to talk
I would like to read more about this.
Yeah I can get behind that.
He’s definitely not a woman, but he’s neither a man. A man actually owns up to who they really are, doesn’t play make believe, and doesn’t force other people to play along with him.
Miniman.
I think you should be arrested Dylan-with-a-dick
I hope Dylan is the first one in the stack.