One of the times where Imp is right about them. I have yet to meet in the flesh a man that wholeheartedly supports this retardation. Not to say they don't exist, but even dudes I know who spout all the talking points just try to awkwardly change the subject if it comes up.
No one truly likes trannies. Their "allies" can virtue signal all they want, but when it comes down to dating a trans "woman," all the brainwashing barriers break down.
In public, my friend goes along with the narrative 100% and gets visibly angry when I speak heresy. In private, he makes fun of trannies and uses their real names and pronouns.
It is absolutely a defense mechanism for almost everyone who isn't a woman under the age of 30.
I don't approve of it, but I do understand. All it takes is being caught on camera saying YWNBAW and you're unhireable in almost every field for at least a couple years. We're both in comp sci, which is riddled with trannies. If word ever got out how I really feel about them, my only option would be to learn Chinese.
I can totally relate and sympathize with an up and coming professional having to virtue signal just to survive in clown world, but what did you mean by this?
my friend... gets visibly angry when I speak heresy
Is that in private or in public? Have you asked why he is reacting that way? If you feel free to "speak heresy" then he should get enough of a confidence boost in your presence to do the same (or just smile and nod) - unless he looks down on you and would prefer to be friends with other fake people.
I can't tell if he's just really good at pretending to be mad at le heckin transphobia or if he's mad at me risking revealing our power level, but he's definitely not happy when I do it.
He's also in a position to lose much more if he gets unpersoned, whereas I'm really not. There's no way he's ever going to be open with his beliefs, at least not while troons are the de facto priesthood class.
And you know what? He could have easily fucked both those bitches after the show, too. For all the bullshit women like this spew out of their mouth holes, deep down they want nothing more than to fuck a strong man who will tell them to shut the fuck up.
If you look at Reddit, it's all simp numales who think the path to pussy is to agree with women and be submissive to them. They're almost all virgins.
If you look at Reddit, it's all simp numales who think the path to pussy is to agree with women and be submissive to them.
Don't forget the progressive holy sacrament of therapy. As if Chad and Tyrone were incels until they booked their first therapy session. It's something only a Faggitor would believe.
"ACKTUALLEH~?"
This is the point where you know you can coast and be extremely cocky in a conversation with an npc woman, the pullstring programming is on full display - you have messed with empty normie doctrine and a hysterical meltdown is imminent.
Cockiness is the epitome of masculine superiority, embrace it and you will never lose.
Step 1: Send all your strong young men to die overseas in war after war for nearly 100 years
Step 2: Fill all leadership positions with the remainders - weaklings, women, and people with PTSD
Step 3: Weimerica
Not that many Americans actually die in our wars. And when they come back it tends to be a career boost if anything. Politicians, more than average, are veterans (it seems to me; I don't have statistics on this).
Additionally, when one sees the prospect of military service as a step on a career path rather than a duty or a calling, I am in favor of doubting the value of their service, both to the nation and as an indicator of their character.
A man in my battalion had the life goal of doing 20 for the military pension, 2 years in his state house for that pension, and then 20 at the post office to retire at 50 with three pensions.
It doesn't boost everyone, and of course you're right about damage. I've also seen it clean people up who otherwise would have been doing drugs and whatnot.
Its like north korea. Population is told to believe in something or risk being killed. In north korea, its kim jung un being god. In the west, its girls can have dicks and guys can give birth.
Now i dont know about you guys, buy its several magnitudes more sane to believe kim jung un is a god than to believe whatever crap the west is pushing lol.
When did not preferring something turn into hate? He said he didn't want to have sex with a trans male. He didn't say he wanted to put them in death camps or beat them up for fun.
Remember, No Means No, except when a woman doesn't want it to mean no. This includes when a woman wants you to read her mind and go further than her saying no, this includes when you have boundaries, and as shown in this video right here it includes when the woman isn't even involved at all.
LOL! Even with the “trans rise” 97%+ of men in every study would never consider fucking a troon. Sexuality is “malleable” for a very small demographic of mentally ill people and women who larp as lesbians for a few years out of social stigma.
Sexuality is malleable in the same way MK Ultra proved your sense of self is malleable. Targeted abuse that forces your brain to cope results in a perversion of the original.
The social media echo chambers are pretty good about reinforcing the psychosis long enough to make the rest of society deal with trans fallout and psychological waste-products.
There was a study a couple years back that said 98% of straight men wouldn't date a troon. It was wrong of course because the other 2% aren't straight by definition. The sick thing is that there are enough homosexual degenerates in the world for trannies to have a decent sized dating pool. The trannies create their own problems by expecting the gay men who are into them to pretend that it's a straight relationship. For all their whining they're more interested in forcing people to deny reality as part of their fetish than actually dating.
My cousin is gay. About 5 years ago, before the tranny push was in full swing, his boyfriend announced that he wanted to go through the operation to "become a woman". I wasn't very familiar with the guy, but I still asked him: "Are you sure you want to do that?". Since it was around Christmas time, I didn't argue any further than that and let him be. That was the last time I saw him, because my cousin didn't agree with his decision and had let him know that ahead of time. When he went to "transition", they broke up.
Not all gays want to have to deal with this shit.
(On a side note, here's another anecdote about that guy. During a discussion, he mentioned that he'd received a fine for hundreds of dollars from a cop, because his car's windows were tinted too dark. Confused, I said: "Wait, what I don't understand, is why a garage would tint your windows darker than what's legal. Can't you hold them responsible for your ticket?" To that, he responded: "Oh, they made me sign a discharge." My immediate response was to call him an idiot.)
Absolutely correct. Gay guys are into dick and they want the other dude's dick to work. Troomer pill induced ED and stinkditches don't appeal to most gay guys. Plus a lot of them know not to stick their dick in crazy. Some of them are such coomers that they don't give a fuck though. My main point is that fucking a biological male is gay regardless of what the biological male does to himself or calls himself.
There is no such thing as "sexual orientation" or sexuality. The (two) sexes are oriented to each other. Anything else is an abnormality that results in degenerate behaviors.
I still don’t get why this is a controversial statement. Maybe my brain is stuck in the 80s/90s mindset
It’s only controversial to troons and their female sycophants because they want to force their delusions into you to be “accepted”.
We should start arranging for FtM troons to hit on these female sycophants. It would tell us all we need to know.
One of the times where Imp is right about them. I have yet to meet in the flesh a man that wholeheartedly supports this retardation. Not to say they don't exist, but even dudes I know who spout all the talking points just try to awkwardly change the subject if it comes up.
No one truly likes trannies. Their "allies" can virtue signal all they want, but when it comes down to dating a trans "woman," all the brainwashing barriers break down.
you spelt psychopath wrong
It's only "controversial" as of the last few years to actual trannies + their "ally" useful idiot women.
I suspect the number of true believers is miniscule. A lot of it is going along with the bullshit to avoid being ostracized.
In public, my friend goes along with the narrative 100% and gets visibly angry when I speak heresy. In private, he makes fun of trannies and uses their real names and pronouns.
It is absolutely a defense mechanism for almost everyone who isn't a woman under the age of 30.
I dunno man. I couldn't be friends with someone like that.
I don't approve of it, but I do understand. All it takes is being caught on camera saying YWNBAW and you're unhireable in almost every field for at least a couple years. We're both in comp sci, which is riddled with trannies. If word ever got out how I really feel about them, my only option would be to learn Chinese.
You ever think the reason why it's not acceptable is because everyone thinks it's not acceptable?
Guarantee more than half the people around you think the same, and nobody has the balls to say it.
It doesn't matter if more than half the people agree with me. What matters is if the people in power do, and they don't.
I’m not losing my fucking job because some mentally ill faggot can’t handle reality. And that’s the place we are in as a society.
At work, I play the game. But everyone who knows me outside of work knows that I’m mocking these faggots daily.
Work the arts scene in Seattle. You learn it well.
I can totally relate and sympathize with an up and coming professional having to virtue signal just to survive in clown world, but what did you mean by this?
Is that in private or in public? Have you asked why he is reacting that way? If you feel free to "speak heresy" then he should get enough of a confidence boost in your presence to do the same (or just smile and nod) - unless he looks down on you and would prefer to be friends with other fake people.
I can't tell if he's just really good at pretending to be mad at le heckin transphobia or if he's mad at me risking revealing our power level, but he's definitely not happy when I do it.
He's also in a position to lose much more if he gets unpersoned, whereas I'm really not. There's no way he's ever going to be open with his beliefs, at least not while troons are the de facto priesthood class.
Because the left has never met a rape culture it didn't like.
"Islam is right about women!"
"No wait not like that!"
Cult orthodoxy.
You're basically uttering heresy in front of the devout.
More like all of human history until circa eight years ago mindset.
True. Very true
And you know what? He could have easily fucked both those bitches after the show, too. For all the bullshit women like this spew out of their mouth holes, deep down they want nothing more than to fuck a strong man who will tell them to shut the fuck up.
If you look at Reddit, it's all simp numales who think the path to pussy is to agree with women and be submissive to them. They're almost all virgins.
Not if he has brains.
He shouldn't but he could have
don't stick the dick in crazy
Counterpoint: crazy in the head, crazy in the bed.
Don't forget the progressive holy sacrament of therapy. As if Chad and Tyrone were incels until they booked their first therapy session. It's something only a Faggitor would believe.
Most therapists are jews and women, too. No wonder the Left preaches that everyone needs to be in therapy.
"ACKTUALLEH~?" This is the point where you know you can coast and be extremely cocky in a conversation with an npc woman, the pullstring programming is on full display - you have messed with empty normie doctrine and a hysterical meltdown is imminent.
Cockiness is the epitome of masculine superiority, embrace it and you will never lose.
When did we stop putting guys like this charge and put 'muh feelings' people like this airhead in charge because this is just facts.
Step 1: Send all your strong young men to die overseas in war after war for nearly 100 years
Step 2: Fill all leadership positions with the remainders - weaklings, women, and people with PTSD
Step 3: Weimerica
Yeah, at least in the medieval era they had the right idea:
Put all your retards and random people you got and just gave a pike (long pointy stick) to right at the front.
Put all your seasoned experienced warriors behind them.
Let the retards and randoms soak up the arrows and initial charge, then send in your experienced guys behind them to mop up/provide a breakthrough
If any survivors up front and they showed skills, they get to be further back the next battle.
Not that many Americans actually die in our wars. And when they come back it tends to be a career boost if anything. Politicians, more than average, are veterans (it seems to me; I don't have statistics on this).
Looking at congress its about 20% veterans.
Mostly officers, and those don't really count.
Additionally, when one sees the prospect of military service as a step on a career path rather than a duty or a calling, I am in favor of doubting the value of their service, both to the nation and as an indicator of their character.
A man in my battalion had the life goal of doing 20 for the military pension, 2 years in his state house for that pension, and then 20 at the post office to retire at 50 with three pensions.
Officers or the John McCain types who really want to milk all the valor from being a net negative to both their country and their brothers.
Indeed that seems more than average. IdK maybe in the past more people joined up though.
It doesn't boost everyone, and of course you're right about damage. I've also seen it clean people up who otherwise would have been doing drugs and whatnot.
Better not post this on Faggit. It hits too close to home for Spez the tranny fucker.
Is this what makes one an “absolute chad” now? Refusing to fuck a man?
Its like north korea. Population is told to believe in something or risk being killed. In north korea, its kim jung un being god. In the west, its girls can have dicks and guys can give birth.
Now i dont know about you guys, buy its several magnitudes more sane to believe kim jung un is a god than to believe whatever crap the west is pushing lol.
When did not preferring something turn into hate? He said he didn't want to have sex with a trans male. He didn't say he wanted to put them in death camps or beat them up for fun.
He needs to run for President
Remember, No Means No, except when a woman doesn't want it to mean no. This includes when a woman wants you to read her mind and go further than her saying no, this includes when you have boundaries, and as shown in this video right here it includes when the woman isn't even involved at all.
simulation runners are laughing that we're a few cunt punts from utopia
LOL! Even with the “trans rise” 97%+ of men in every study would never consider fucking a troon. Sexuality is “malleable” for a very small demographic of mentally ill people and women who larp as lesbians for a few years out of social stigma.
Sexuality is malleable in the same way MK Ultra proved your sense of self is malleable. Targeted abuse that forces your brain to cope results in a perversion of the original.
And like MK Ultra and Money’s experiments the concept has massively failed aside from those you can constantly keep in the feedback loop.
The social media echo chambers are pretty good about reinforcing the psychosis long enough to make the rest of society deal with trans fallout and psychological waste-products.
And maybe that's the point.
There was a study a couple years back that said 98% of straight men wouldn't date a troon. It was wrong of course because the other 2% aren't straight by definition. The sick thing is that there are enough homosexual degenerates in the world for trannies to have a decent sized dating pool. The trannies create their own problems by expecting the gay men who are into them to pretend that it's a straight relationship. For all their whining they're more interested in forcing people to deny reality as part of their fetish than actually dating.
My cousin is gay. About 5 years ago, before the tranny push was in full swing, his boyfriend announced that he wanted to go through the operation to "become a woman". I wasn't very familiar with the guy, but I still asked him: "Are you sure you want to do that?". Since it was around Christmas time, I didn't argue any further than that and let him be. That was the last time I saw him, because my cousin didn't agree with his decision and had let him know that ahead of time. When he went to "transition", they broke up.
Not all gays want to have to deal with this shit.
(On a side note, here's another anecdote about that guy. During a discussion, he mentioned that he'd received a fine for hundreds of dollars from a cop, because his car's windows were tinted too dark. Confused, I said: "Wait, what I don't understand, is why a garage would tint your windows darker than what's legal. Can't you hold them responsible for your ticket?" To that, he responded: "Oh, they made me sign a discharge." My immediate response was to call him an idiot.)
Absolutely correct. Gay guys are into dick and they want the other dude's dick to work. Troomer pill induced ED and stinkditches don't appeal to most gay guys. Plus a lot of them know not to stick their dick in crazy. Some of them are such coomers that they don't give a fuck though. My main point is that fucking a biological male is gay regardless of what the biological male does to himself or calls himself.
I have a gay gamer friend. He hates twinks and trans. Only like manly mans.
There is no such thing as "sexual orientation" or sexuality. The (two) sexes are oriented to each other. Anything else is an abnormality that results in degenerate behaviors.