Step 1: Send all your strong young men to die overseas in war after war for nearly 100 years
Step 2: Fill all leadership positions with the remainders - weaklings, women, and people with PTSD
Step 3: Weimerica
Not that many Americans actually die in our wars. And when they come back it tends to be a career boost if anything. Politicians, more than average, are veterans (it seems to me; I don't have statistics on this).
Additionally, when one sees the prospect of military service as a step on a career path rather than a duty or a calling, I am in favor of doubting the value of their service, both to the nation and as an indicator of their character.
A man in my battalion had the life goal of doing 20 for the military pension, 2 years in his state house for that pension, and then 20 at the post office to retire at 50 with three pensions.
It doesn't boost everyone, and of course you're right about damage. I've also seen it clean people up who otherwise would have been doing drugs and whatnot.
When did we stop putting guys like this charge and put 'muh feelings' people like this airhead in charge because this is just facts.
Step 1: Send all your strong young men to die overseas in war after war for nearly 100 years
Step 2: Fill all leadership positions with the remainders - weaklings, women, and people with PTSD
Step 3: Weimerica
Yeah, at least in the medieval era they had the right idea:
Put all your retards and random people you got and just gave a pike (long pointy stick) to right at the front.
Put all your seasoned experienced warriors behind them.
Let the retards and randoms soak up the arrows and initial charge, then send in your experienced guys behind them to mop up/provide a breakthrough
If any survivors up front and they showed skills, they get to be further back the next battle.
Not that many Americans actually die in our wars. And when they come back it tends to be a career boost if anything. Politicians, more than average, are veterans (it seems to me; I don't have statistics on this).
Looking at congress its about 20% veterans.
Mostly officers, and those don't really count.
Additionally, when one sees the prospect of military service as a step on a career path rather than a duty or a calling, I am in favor of doubting the value of their service, both to the nation and as an indicator of their character.
A man in my battalion had the life goal of doing 20 for the military pension, 2 years in his state house for that pension, and then 20 at the post office to retire at 50 with three pensions.
Indeed that seems more than average. IdK maybe in the past more people joined up though.
It doesn't boost everyone, and of course you're right about damage. I've also seen it clean people up who otherwise would have been doing drugs and whatnot.