YouTuber Ethan Klein calls for bombing of NRA conference
(thepostmillennial.com)
Comments (122)
sorted by:
That guy is a great example why you need guns to defend yourself: the left is violent, filled with hate and wants you
deadmostly-peacefully blown into pieces.Whenever they ask "why would you need an AR-15?" I just to reply to protect myself from people like you.
I just tell them to go fuck themselves because adults don't need to justify why they want to buy something with their own money. Once you start giving reason, you've already lost. Founding Fathers in America told King George to eat a platter of dicks, so it's enough of a reason for me.
To quote FPC "Fuck you, no"
You might need a more powerful cartridge.
The biggest problem here is that it doesn't matter that they are mentally ill retards, or useless degenerate oafs (like Ethan here), if they still have a gun, you can still get shot by them.
It just doesn't matter if your are Chad McSexybody, Doctor of Applied Masculinity. A soyboy with a .22 can still shoot you in the head and kill you. Leftists have a mentality of resentment mongering to the point of violent revenge fantasies (their rage against God and Life itself), and you aren't going to be able to see that coming until the dude with a "Smash The Patriarchy And Chill" shirt draws down on you without saying a word because you were wearing a Cincinnati Reds hat that he assumed was a Trump hat.
That's why you don't wear your alignment identifiable on you. People have been killed over MAGA hats already. Be the grey man (but not the Grey Man in all tacticool catalog gear)
The "Gray man" approach actively rejects all "taticool" gear in favor of concealment. Iwb holsters, compact handguns, spare mag holders that look like a pocket knife clip in your pocket.
Tactical gear is for LARPing in the woods.
That guys is an example of so many things. Pulling out, not drinking during a pregnancy, why you shouldn’t sniff glue, opening windows when using cleaning supplies, the pro choice movement a reason to exist, etc.
An organization that gets blamed for acts it’s members do not commit.
And - somehow! - even less critical thought. It seems impossible, but here we are.
I expect precisely as much outrage from the ruling class as it showed when Ukraine shelled Donetsk with cluster munitions.
All of modern politics in the West is just the Friend-Enemy Distinction, nothing more.
Even Russians (namely the DNR supreme comrade on Rassiya 1) quickly admitted it was debris from a shot down missile.
https://tass.com/emergencies/1421677
It's like when the Ukrainians hit a plane which exploded over Kiev on first night and caused a lot of damage just by that. https://youtube.com/watch?v=WGnwaK0z_e8
Similar situations occured in countless other places. In WWII many people were even killed on the ground by friendly anti-air fire. "Battle of Los Angeles" resulted in damage and casualties as they were shooting AAA at phantoms.
Very nice, but this was only one of the instances. It was also the avowed goal of the Ukrainian leaders.
"Our children will go to school and nursery school, and theirs will sit in basement!"
I could make the fatuous point that "if Putin had said this", but we both know that the corrupt tyrants in the West only pretend to care about their "human rights" when it is to their political benefit.
Which brings us back to the only thing that counts. Friend-enemy. Russia bombing Mariupol very bad. Ukraine bombing Donetsk very good.
Maybe compare how Donetsk (on any date, beyond the airport zone obliterated by both sides and the villages just to the west of it that the Russians destroyed) and Mariupol (now) look like. Aerial and sat photos, skylines, things like that. Or Mariupol on February 23 to the one just 3 months later (Donetsk airport went for 9 months and then it was for 7 years in these villages). Do it before making more dumbfuck attempts to equalize things.
Can we remain on good terms even while disagreeing?
As for equating, I'm not. Obviously, Russia has tons more firepower than the Kiev regime, and the situation is completely different as Ukraine never had any hope of retaking Donetsk. If there were an active offensive, and the DNR decided to use the city as a human shield like Azov did Mariupol (which I do expect), then I expect the city to be reduced to rubble to thunderous applause from the same people who professionally bemoan the fate of Mariupol.
So I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of the West, who condemn the shelling of civilians and the use of cluster munitions only when it's their enemy doing and almost never their friend.
It's all about friends vs. enemies, nothing more.
Ukraine was on the brink of retaking Donetsk in August 2014 (advancing from all directions except the airport where they were holding waiting for the final push, even the link with Luhansk was severed) when the totally-not-Russian armored forces poured in across the border and destroyed a bunch of mostly police units at Ilovaisk, and the ceasefire began after the shock of this. Go see the maps between April and September.
Why do you say "Russia" and not "Moscow regime"?
The fuck you talk, "use the city as a human shield"? To defend it? Even Mariupol was defended in 2014, just the defense was broken in 1 day because the Russian city commandant "Chechen" (not really a Chechen, just a veteran of Chechnya) left them without command and they all broke and run/hid/surrendered (defeated by Azov who came armed with only rifles, grenades and machineguns with no military backup, there was no need for "firepower", just a daring raid in few dump trucks straight to the enemy HQ). Is the tardadion kicking in again? Get a fucking grip.
It wasn't "shelling of civilians" even according to the official Russian narrative, but feel free to continue sperging it in the years ahead (it was months ago, a single incident) for your beating-negros whatabboutry.
How sad that the rebels lost Slaviansk and Severeodonetsk, which are only now being won back at great cost to the civilian population.
Russia is less contemptible than Ukraine, because it has not prostituted itself to the world's bully, Anyway, everyone hates Russia, but Ukraine is somehow sacred despite its many Nazi memorials, the Azov Batallion and its war crimes.
In an open field, the Ukrainian army would lose in about 2 seconds. Which is why they hole up in apartment buildings and supermarkets, and then cry about 'evil Russia' when they are struck.
Every week or so, pro-Russian sources post images which they say is the result of shelling of Donetsk. So what is your claim here precisely? That Ukraine does nothing wrong, and that it does not target civilians, despite Poroshenko's own bragging about how the children of Donbas have to sit in the basement?
And even American propaganda sites have admitted that their client uses cluster munitions on Donetsk... even 8 years ago. Not 'months' ago.
Why is it 'whataboutism' to bring up anything bad that the Americans and their clients do? Am I justifying the bad things Russia did? No. Just saying that the Americans have absolutely no standing here, and neither do their clients.
You hate Ukraine, but Russia is somehow sacred despite its many Soviet memorials (that they restore in Ukraine as they conquer), the Dzerzhinsky Division, the literal Chekists.
Btw Azov isn't a battalion since 2014. Also is a pretty clean unit actually. (No, really. Yes, I am completely serious, and you believe in a meme.)
Seconds, lmao. You talk like Comrade General Kadyrov (now also an army general and not just of the police) threatening to conquer Poland in "6 seconds". You've become culturally an Islamic Communist too. How do you feel about it?
And the war is mostly fought in open fields and villages and forests.
Yes, you do justify. And you're "how sad" on how the worshippers of Lenin and Stalin have lost most of the territories they seized in 2014 so they need to reconquer it now with their artillery barrages and murder-loot-rape spree zachistkas.
Here's the problem with this. Ukraine denies even firing the missile.
If there was a military target beyond Donetsk (which, why would there be, that isn't anywhere near the actual fighting) that the missile was going to strike, and Russia agreed they shot down the Tochka-U, then both parties would essentially come to reconciliation on the topic that it was just a shitty situation.
Even if the argument is made that Ukraine could just have every reason to lie about it, that they are lying suggests that the target actually was somewhere in Donetsk. Given the proximity of the missile debris to the blast zone, it wasn't traveling much farther than from where it was hit.
There are a plenty of military targets inside Donetsk.
What do you mean "actual fighting"? Are Russians not striking all over the country, since hour 1 and every day and night with planes and missiles? What the fuck is this thinking? Russian targets inside Russia were also attacked, as they should be. Fucking Moscow is full of targets, if only it could be only reached (Americans destroyed all of Ukrainian strategic forces decades ago - hundreds of strategic missiles and cruise missiles for heavy bombers along with the bombers themselves, not just the nuclear warheads). Vladivostok is full of targets.
You don't use AP cluster munitions on targets in a city.
Why did the Russians never had a problem with this until now all of sudden with a shameless hypocrisy? (And then continued it, and cluster firebombing, and FAE shelling.)
Russians have a problem with it when it is directed at them, not so much when they or their allies are the ones doing it.
Just like the Americans.
But Russia does not claim to be 'the arsenal of democracy' or the bastion of human rights, or to bring 'freedom and democracy' to Libya and Syria.
And actually Russia claimed very lofty things about their interventions in Syria and Libya.
They also for example made a propaganda feature film about the ridicalously evil (even their flag motif is a skull in a cartoonish and probably self aware "are we baddies") Wagner mercenary group about how they save oppressed Africans or something.
Wagner guys' own movies: https://twitter.com/syrianportal/status/1198679835259879424 (a fragment)
American press and people simply hysterize about American crimes, real or alleged or imagined, all the time.
Just look at the recent reaction to the restart of 6 Days of Fallujah.
A FAE shelling of a city center: https://twitter.com/Osinttechnical/status/1528854337837215744
You probably never.even heard about this one, because it's so common and not an exception to sperg about months later.
A bunch of allied POWS died of starvation and typhus in camps because the allies kept on bombing German supply lines.
I believe there was an EU-sponsored peace agreement for early elections the day before he was violently overthrown.
BTW, what right does the EU have to want another country's leader removed? None. But they, like the Americans, go around the word pretending they have the right to rule it.
Yes, I am fully aware of the role that scum like Guy Verhofstadt played.
Ukraine is right on the border of the EU, not "around the world".
Leftists: Right wing people are too violent to own guns, so just let the cops protect you! Give up your guns!
Also leftists: Defund the police!
also also leftists: God I want to murder people who disagree with me, and you're evil if you don't stand there to get stabbed to death
also also also leftists: let criminals roam free and actively enable and import them, while punishing people for standing up to them
Oddly enough, point #2 is looking more solid by the day.
Defund the police, buy a gun instead.
The problem is their version of defund the police is to replace it with their own state thugs instead.
Its one of those Leftist talking points that everyone should agree on, but if you work with them on it the alternative is worse. Like their anti-corpo stances, or even some of the overpriced healthcare.
Defund some police. I'm not on either side of the retards in the acab/thin blue line debate.
Some are worthless, some aren't. Fire the useless ones, hire better ones.
That's far too sensible of an approach, it'll never work.
Leftists don't want compromise, they want submission.
It's why I'm done trying to even pretend like I give two fucks what they say. They're just flat fucking evil.
You're anti white racist. You are beyond evil.
Don't defund police, de-unionize police.
Their union prevents the firing of the bad ones.
No, no it's not.
Good lord, Ethan is retarded.
Do it you fat pussy. Lets get this revolution started
If he feels that strongly, he could always just go there and sit down. Probably have the same effect.
I don't think he wants to sink the whole state [yet].
Leftists go on shows followed by millions of people and call for conservatives to be murdered and then wonder why we want guns.
Trump tells people to be peaceful and to go home = insurrection, banned from twitter
Leftist tells his millions of followers to murder conservatives = YouTube approved and probably monetized
Soy dude's desperate cry for attention. His view count must really be tanking.
Took a quick look. His videos seem to get half a million views, minimum.
Thats a smart thing to do, threatening people who make it publicly known they're armed to the teeth.
At least the NRA being a fucking joke and nothing more than controlled opposition kind of tempers the take.
To think I once watched the losers content...
Why?
I honestly don't even remember
If it actually happens, I believe he's on the hook for incitement.
A leftist on the hook for something? That'll be the day hell freezes over.
Just like Susan Rosenberg, including the left-wing extremism and explosives.
People say social media isn’t biased against conservatives but that conservatives call for violence and get censored. Yet there are nearly no examples of that, but unlimited examples of this shit.