A fucking EPIDEMIC… wtf is this, Gen Z??? Our society is doomed
(media.communities.win)
Comments (75)
sorted by:
This is the result of allowing 100+ years of Marxism.
There's more to that than you likely think. What do you think more and more kids are identifying as SMGK9000 over the past few years? Because when you're taught that you are the conduit for all of society's ills because of your original sin, you can escape it all by simply becoming an 'oppressed group'. Since we can't exactly change skin color, the 'next best option' is to scream "I LOVE DICK!".
Yes, the Social Justice moment is a cult. Thank you for noticing.
Cult like recruitment tactics, cult like grooming tactics. Preying on those who are lonely or abused for that extra culty goodness. They've infiltrated the government more than Scientology ever did and given the 40% suicide rate, are even more abusive than that ridiculously abusive cult.
So not only are they faggots, they're not even competent at brain function.
Marxists seek division to get power. Notice all these intentional “crisis”
IMO --- it is a fashion, sold to kids
There is money to be made.
Cutting dicks off is the new $200 tennis shoes.
This is totally organic and natural and not at all related to relentless indoctrination from the media and social pressure to conform.
I wonder what the percentages are of those who are actually L, G, or B, versus those who are claiming a T or Q identity so they can be part of the in-crowd.
I also wonder what the societal hangover is going to be like when those who are high on the T identity come down and realize they've irreversibly fucked up their bodies.
I'm sure the mass indoctrination of kids has something to do with it.
Have you actually taken a minute to actually look at the average zoomer and how dysgenic they look? The last time we had Darwinian selection in European populations was the 17th century. The climate was harsh, food was scarce. Back then 1 in 3 children died in infancy and probably many more died before passing their genes on. Darwinian selection is critical in eradicating bad mutations, in keeping a population genetically similar enough to cooperate and promoting mutations that promote group centric values. The lack of this has produced the horde of spiteful mutants that make up modern society - and to be fair the modern left is an expression of this trend.
Zoomers are the end of the genetic rainbow.
You won't improve the situation unless you find a way to kill off all the weak children so only the strong reproduce. Civilisation is always dysgenic. The same thing happened with Rome. Skeleton sizes in Europe increased after the death of the empire and living standards for the peasants and barbarians actually increased.
If you're of Anglo or northern European ancestry then you're a barbarian by nature. We should probably take a leaf or two out of our ancestors way of doing things and put a stop to the soy faggotry.
Childhood diseases exist for a reason - in fact disease in general have a protective effect on ones homeland. If we still accepted a general rate of infectious disease like measles most 3rd worlders would not be able to colonise our lands as they have no resistance to it. Just like if we go to Africa we have no genetic resistance to Malaria or yellow fever.
That's a very deep crimson pill to swallow. Can't say you're wrong, though. If it was genetically difficult to be an invader, invasions wouldn't be as prevalent.
Generally you're invaded by people of like type.
England has only ever been invaded by other Europeans. Had the Aztecs or Bantu tried to invade Europe (assuming they had gained the technological advantage to do so) our diseases would have wiped them all out. Now we wiped out most infectious disease with vaccination and antibiotics it has made it possible for different civilisations to mix freely.
I was just thinking about something to this point last week--not necessarily in how they look albeit there's plenty of truth to that too, but more in the case of general life experience. I've got plenty of exposure to family and friends in the 8-20 range, many of which I've been around since they were quite young.
What I find mindblowing is when I think back to myself through the different ages and in comparison they just haven't learned to do anything. Examples, around age 10, I could build (crude) things out wood and nails with actual tools then, unsupervised no less, or do quite a bit of computer programming, do some really basic cooking (I don't mean microwaving), etc. I'd spent so much time with my Dad and my grandfathers in particular just being dragged around with them for whatever they had to do and it was just experience in doing things men do. It wasn't me-centric I was just along for the ride, but you learn from it.
I just find it really sad in that I really can't think of one kid I know personally in this group who's life experience outside of school is anything more than electronic consumption or extremely organized and very kid-centric activities. That's really where I think the Darwinian selection thing you talk about comes in, it's partially just from compounding of weak upbringing. In 30 years, I guess the foreign invaders will do everything, because I can't think of any of these weak youth having built up even simplistic things like motor skills to do any of it.
I know this 16 year old boy who is really smart, does tons of computer stuff, does music recording and production, works on his own car (partially because he doesn't have the money to pay anyone), has a part time job, hustles side jobs, and gets good grades. Father isn't in his life, either, and he takes pretty good care of his single mom.
His friends are less talented than him, but they have jobs and cars that they put work into, one puts effort into writing and performing music (that the other guy produces) on top of working, though his grades are trash because he doesn't care about school.
This is in California, too; probably a higher density of boys like that in red states. Gen Z isn't a complete loss, despite what many might think. The best people like us can do for them is be good examples and get involved in some lives of younger guys.
That's good to hear. I'll just hope my sampling of young people is just a really bad group.
I've noticed that as well. I cannot think of a more disastrous combination than the dysgenic trends in genetics coupled with an entire generation who have no actual life experience or useful practical skills and literally all they know how to do is play on their phones or make Tik Tok videos. I know exactly what you mean.
Growing up my dad was an industrial electrician and makes a point of turning his hand to most trades. My house was a building site growing up and I would always watch my dad or other tradesmen and then I would normally get given jobs to do. You learn by watching someone do it and then doing it yourself. My one grandfather was an electrical engineer and was also a mad inventor type on the side. I used to make money on the side doing all sorts of things for people I knew. I used to fix bikes for people, make things for them. Do things of questionable legality but those skills I developed as a kid have helped me immensely as an adult.
I think a lot like language - that you really need to have picked it up and be talking by a certain age and then be reading and writing at a certain age. I think the fine motor skills needed to do practical work also need to be honed when you're young. I wonder how many of these kids would be able to actually pick them up if they had to? Most western countries are going to become a lot like the USSR in terms of labour availability. In the USSR there were no tradesmen. You worked where you were told and labour was so short. If you needed wiring doing, your roof reshingling or your floor replacing or your car repaired you had to do it yourself.
Your average zoomer looks Dysgenic not because of their genes, but because of the shit they're exposed to.
Do you really expect a man to develop properly when they're exposed to estrogenic compounds from within the womb until adulthood?
Maybe that's a factor as well.
the OKCupid data showed roughly 80% of people claiming "nonbinary" or bisexual are neither... the men are virtually all gay and in the closet, and the women are doing it for fashion.
tinder data is the same... women claiming to be bi overwhelmingly turn off seeing females, and men claiming to be bi turn off seeing women too.
both of them took the data down when the groomer crowd got uppity about being outed.
Yup. It's not just trans trenders. It's gay trenders too. It's all just a massive fraud.
Is it really a fraud? You can practically get away with anything by claiming to be a member of an oppressed group in many cities, states, and even countries.
If calling yourself a masculine-presenting trans-lesbian would open doors and provide immunity, who wouldn't?
Someone with a shred of dignity and self respect, but those are rare these days.
America is a nation of figurative and literal whores.
Someone who wouldn't want to deserve to be killed on sight.
No excuses. Fry them.
And almost all of them are white. First groomer "teachers" indoctrinate kids that there is nothing positive about being a normal white person inducing an irreconcilable anxiety. Then encouraging the non-white kids to attack and abuse the white kids with unequal enforcement of rules endorsing who how whites are the inferior race. "Celebrate" every identity except white and publicly shame any white kid who dares speak out.
Then offer the kids a way out. "Normal white kids are awful but if you declare your loyalty by identifying as a degenerate then you get to be part of the cool kids club. Oh and your parents will hate it so if you have even the slightest bit of resentment at their authority this is a great way to get back at them."
MKULTRA?
Media conditioning?
Because those are the most effective ways of tricking people into thinking they are gay.
Didn't I hear that they inject chickens with some sort of hormone, something or other, that causes this? Or am I making this up? Either way when my kids were little I only fed them organic chicken. Seems like it helped us out. 3 straight girls.
Hormones are expensive, as far as I know it is not actual hormons they are feading chickens. The food is designed to speed up their natural growth, you eat them younger then you normally would. So you get in fact a large dose of chicken hormons that the chicken will natural produce. You get extra homons from eating chicken but they are not feeding hormons to chickens.
"As you can see, the numbers don't add up to 100%. That's because the math was done by a woman."
Women can’t write jokes
We don't hire women.
Based pre-1946 codgers being only 0.8% Alphabet
There are two answers to explain what is happening:
First being the Gen Z one is easily explained by the fact that it's always been trendy to identify with something that isn't what you are for virtue signalling points, this time it's 'Queer'. 140 years ago, it was having TB.
Millennials is about right for the average.
As for the second answer, I wonder what started happening around 45 years ago that would make the gay population dwindle...
grooming
It compounds over the generations.
Faggotry is doubling every 15 years.
Those born from 2004-2019 should be 41% faggot.
Yep.
Gen Z is no worse than any of the others, they are each twice as queer as their parents.
Hopefully they will be mad at the people who wronged them instead of "muh straight white men".
Hopefully they won't be alive to be mad.
Alex Jones didn't go far enough... they're not just making the frogs gay.
Its a fad. A very dangerous fad.
Were all social media and television to disappear, the number would drop back to 0.8% because the propaganda creating false peer pressure would be gone.
I have to believe as these Gen x ppl grow up that number would drop. I’ve heard of plenty of women who claimed to be lgbt when they were young but married guys and had kids. This is disturbing though because this shows the consequences of over representation as well as glamorizing it.
Young people are the first to adopt fads. Being a faggot victim has been the new fad since Gen Z were born.
Propaganda works. And nowadays with Netflix, Google, Twitter, it is pretty much unstoppable.
... your carrot is backwards.
Gen Z,
Please kill yourself and any of your friends if they consider themselves LGBT faggots.
Thank you and have a pleasant tomorrow.
Sincerely,
Based Handshake Vet
Notice the number of homos grows in the generations of people who grow up with Internet. GenZ is the first generation to have social media from the cradle to the grave.
Social media spreads social contagion fast. Between this and public school grooming, I look for a serious population crash of native Americans (not Indians, Karen) within the next 20 years.
The Great Replacement was tagged as a conspiracy theory by corporate media en masse, which seems to happen any time a leftist totalitarian plot becomes evident.
Yet here I am on social media writing about it. Maybe the corrective to social media hysteria is social media sanity and reason, in so far as it can evade silencing.
To quote Mrs. Robinson, "Benjamin, I just don't know."
Why not push this kinda crap in middle east or especially africa?? Lgbt people have it good in the west. I think we should start a campaign to export wokeism to africa lol.
Lgbt is similar to sterilized mosquitoes being released to control pop.
Proof that lesbianism is a choice - now I need to convince my girlfriend
Doubling every generation.
At what point does this clearly unsustainable trend collapse?
soon
If the stats were actually accurate and not people claiming to be bisexual for the pity points, society would have already collapsed because birth-rates would be further in the negatives than they already are.
I'm pretty sure if you went by dating preferences/outcomes, and corrected for how the definition of LGBT has broadened over the years, the needle would have barely ticked up from nominal values. 90% of the culture war is redefinition of terms and dishonestly re-framing arguments so that they 'win' the 'debate' by default.
No, this isn't an epidemic. Biological sexual attraction isn't something you can just cultivate away from, even with grooming.
Vast and sweeping majority of all of those are """"Bisexuals"""" who will never have sex with the same sex, or will have a romantic encounter with a member of the same sex, and immediately go back to being heterosexual.
A normal straight person who wants to have sex with someone they are romantically inclined to is called: "Demiromantic Demisexual"
It's literally just a fraud, trying to get people to attach themselves to any Queer Revolutionary label in order to push Leftism.
You can fuck it all up with puberty blockers, hormone replacement, and bottom surgery. People on that stuff probably have scrambled sex drives and are definitely unattractive to everyone else.
They can fuck it up, but they can't really change it. You can do damage, but that's why people keep resorting to killing themselves.
Your underlying biological imperatives can't co-exist with grooming, conditioning, and medication; thus creating a literally lethal amount of cognitive dissonance.
Hey dude, it's less population and so fewer people suffer.
Kinsey was another pedo-freak.