Women are emotional, not logical. It makes them better mothers, caretakers, and homemakers, but when modern women try to enter areas and fields meant for men they mostly fuck up. This is also the reason why women are more easily manipulated and controlled, because they can be swayed by logically fallacious arguments, like appeals to emotion and authority, and why women are more likely to vote for bigger government, the nanny state, and infringements of liberty under the name of "safety". Men are logical, because it makes us better protectors and providers.
feminists are loudest in places where they actually have the most rights. And quietest in places where women dont have rights. If you confront them about any country that actually doesnt have female rights or actually abusing females and that is a dictatorship that is difficult to deal with they will make all sorts of excuses to not care about it. Same thing if a country is poor they dont bother. i think someone said this. They go after weak and rich countries that are easy to shake benefits from
When society collapses, feminism disappears overnight. It's a self destructive philosophy and practice for individuals, families, communities, and society. It's not organic, it flies in the face of genetics and sexual dimorphism, and can't exist in harsh environments. It can only exist currently because of modern convenience and relative abundance and safety hard won mostly by men, which is quickly disappearing.
Kinda, all 9 judges agreed that congress should weight in first about changing the bill, as judicial branch is there to confirm laws existing, not change or set laws like congress (aka, reason why idea of draft was rejected is because existing bill says women are exempt +congress was already exploring about changing that bill)
thats american system (ones where Kavanaugh is)
president holds executive power
congress holds legislative power
supreme court holds judicial power
got it maybe poorly worded, but supreme court is not there to change or create laws, simply pass judgement based on laws
Also, at no point while being berated did she just leave the area. Apparently it was better to just stand there, because that's what a normal person would do.
Or even to take the initiative herself and speak to the barmen or even better, call the police?
Oh that's right ACAB/DEFUND.
Conveniently so they don't have to do the responsible thing either. Yes those blokes were being shitty not getting other bloke underwraps, she was just as shitty for allowing it to happen too. In fact I'd say even more so, assuming she was being 100% truthful (I know, and I don't think so)
I'm not entirely sure how that works, it seems to be some kind of biblical parable, one where the facts don't matter, or only matter as far as the illustrate the object lesson.
Don't worry about him. You don't know your Sowell. As he pointed out about racists, racists prefer their own race to other races, but they prefer themselves to members of their own race. Similarly, feminists may prefer their own gender to the opposite sex, but they sure as hell prefer their own family to other people.
Hmm, I'm not too sure that holds. Racists usually base their opinion on some kind of logic, whether it's the whole 13/50 thing or stormfagging.
Feminists meanwhile...their ideology seems based solely on hatred of the other, over anything else. I don't think they're capable of caring about the "other".
This was speculated in an academic paper about infanticide, where a female academic (imagine being so obvious that even your own people call you out) stated that the reason for the differing rates of infanticide based on the baby's gender was that boys were more "other" to these women.
Am I being optimistic by adding western women in general? I used to be mildly misogynistic but I met genuinely nice and kind ones but great looking to boot but don't flaunt their appearances to change my mind. The unicorns do exist but they are really rare as internet says. And no nobody offered me pity sex to change my mind.
Really the biggest problem with western women is really the western media encouraging them to become thots and being feminine is bad. Much of the anglosphere is controlled by feminism without any strong opposition. So-called conservatives don't really conserve anything and most of them are as threatening as wet noodles. They expect the simps to marry the thots and think things will go back to normal. I was just going to say one sentence and ended up ranting about politics
Liberty is inversely proportional to security. The most secure you will ever be is when you are restrained in a locked room under 24 hour surveillance. The moment you introduce any amount of freedom into a situation, you are empowering people to make bad decisions.
If your "hardship" is a consequence of other people's freedom, we need to think very carefully about whether or not your "problem" can be "solved" without drastically expanding the scope of government beyond what it is meant to do.
So how do we stop men, who have free will, from behaving inappropriately towards women? Consequences? We already have those. People "misbehave" anyways. Hell, leftists will talk your ear off about how deterrent punishments don't work (which is another lie, but whatever).
I guess what I'm trying to say is this: if feminists want to convince me that their ideology isn't just an authoritarian grift for power and money, then I'd like to see some solutions other than "give us all the power and money".
So how do we stop men, who have free will, from behaving inappropriately towards women?
Apparently you getting off the computer, going over to the local frat house (probably the same one Kavanaugh was at), and yelling at all the bros inside to "respect all women" will make them reconsider their life. And naturally you'll leave that situation without a scratch because they're dangerous but only to women.
Things that probably didn’t happen for 200 Alex. It’s a shame she couldn’t capture it for her tik tok and instead we get this unbiased rundown of what occurred.
So should I suggest to my friends that one of them hold down and grope a woman so we can come in and rescue her? Because I've never been in such a situation as part of the group of "all men." Would I still be part of the evil all men then for promoting antiquated ideas of chivalry? Women don't need a man to rescue them, right?
I don't think she's a famous person. That blurry shitty nonperson pfp is her way of going anon because she's above having an anime pfp like all the chuds. She has been doxxed tho. She's some sort of new york wall street analyst big money person who professionally goes to bat bag for the richest, scummiest people
Modern women repulse me and it's genuinely an issue for future of our people. How can we make families when we can't even find decent women? I'm European, and European women have never been so insane and unattractive. When you're young all you care about is looks, once she's fuckable, you're happy. Once you get older, it all changes, personality starts to matter far more. I'm at the stage where I come across genuinely good looking women, who instantly become less attractive to me because of their worldviews. Of course it has it's benefits, I'm not likely to go chasing after average women, making a fool of myself, like many simps. At the same time, it's making finding someone an almost impossible task.
Congrats, you fell for the commie agitprop: woman edition. Talk to a real woman sometime, you'll see most arent like this. This goes for theimpossible1, too
It existed among a small minority of psychopaths. Globalist powers are amplifying it to demoralize men. If you think 80% of women are like this, it shows you spend way too much time on the internet
Then again, I don't know how much of the female population is over 65, where tradcon views are still very strongly held.
But if you're talking about women of "breeding age" as the white nationalist cuckolds put it, 80% is more optimistic than the England fans saying "It's coming home" after scoring in the second minute.
"women are as strong as men but also women are victim of men and also i need men to protect me"
i dont know how they get over this cognitive dissidence.
Women are emotional, not logical. It makes them better mothers, caretakers, and homemakers, but when modern women try to enter areas and fields meant for men they mostly fuck up. This is also the reason why women are more easily manipulated and controlled, because they can be swayed by logically fallacious arguments, like appeals to emotion and authority, and why women are more likely to vote for bigger government, the nanny state, and infringements of liberty under the name of "safety". Men are logical, because it makes us better protectors and providers.
She even does the fake vocal quiver at the end that's characteristic of female sociopaths feigning emotions.
I'm glad I wasn't the only one who noticed it.
feminists are loudest in places where they actually have the most rights. And quietest in places where women dont have rights. If you confront them about any country that actually doesnt have female rights or actually abusing females and that is a dictatorship that is difficult to deal with they will make all sorts of excuses to not care about it. Same thing if a country is poor they dont bother. i think someone said this. They go after weak and rich countries that are easy to shake benefits from
Insha'Allah brother, we will convert Impossibro
In that case... lead on.
When society collapses, feminism disappears overnight. It's a self destructive philosophy and practice for individuals, families, communities, and society. It's not organic, it flies in the face of genetics and sexual dimorphism, and can't exist in harsh environments. It can only exist currently because of modern convenience and relative abundance and safety hard won mostly by men, which is quickly disappearing.
Simply put: feminists are fucking stupid.
Doesn't even need to be a collapse. Just talk about drafting women then suddenly they're all disney princesses and learned to cook.
Judge Brett "You fought for me while I sharpened the knife for your back" Kavanaugh saved them from that.
Kinda, all 9 judges agreed that congress should weight in first about changing the bill, as judicial branch is there to confirm laws existing, not change or set laws like congress (aka, reason why idea of draft was rejected is because existing bill says women are exempt +congress was already exploring about changing that bill)
What country uses this system? It certainly isn't found in the Anglosphere.
thats american system (ones where Kavanaugh is)
president holds executive power
congress holds legislative power
supreme court holds judicial power
got it maybe poorly worded, but supreme court is not there to change or create laws, simply pass judgement based on laws
Congress passed a federal law forcing gay marriage on the states? Who wrote the law that mandated the legality of abortion?
Yes, I'm absolutely sure someone hit on you, and that he then threatened to kill you for 15 minutes.
You're angry because of some story you made up on the spot?
They don't believe it. At no point do they ever believe any of it.
I will die on this hill - they are 100% aware of everything they are doing. There is no subtle hand behind the curtain, there is no incompetence.
Schizophrenic?
Also, at no point while being berated did she just leave the area. Apparently it was better to just stand there, because that's what a normal person would do.
He then left her alone to go grope a random girl.
The way women describe men is like the Family Guy bit about white people in Spike Lee movies.
Also this classic from years before the numerous false accusations against men started getting talked about online.
Or even to take the initiative herself and speak to the barmen or even better, call the police?
Oh that's right ACAB/DEFUND.
Conveniently so they don't have to do the responsible thing either. Yes those blokes were being shitty not getting other bloke underwraps, she was just as shitty for allowing it to happen too. In fact I'd say even more so, assuming she was being 100% truthful (I know, and I don't think so)
I'm not entirely sure how that works, it seems to be some kind of biblical parable, one where the facts don't matter, or only matter as far as the illustrate the object lesson.
impossible is the man women deserve
We should clone him 3.5 billion times so we can get every woman on earth her own Impossible.
I feel sorry for the clones.
We're hooking you up with Jess Philips.
Maybe I can convince her to do a couple's suicide like Hitler and Eva Braun.
I'll just switch my cyanide pill with a sugar pill at the last minute.
You know she has a son? That fact screwed with my head for a few days.
Don't worry about him. You don't know your Sowell. As he pointed out about racists, racists prefer their own race to other races, but they prefer themselves to members of their own race. Similarly, feminists may prefer their own gender to the opposite sex, but they sure as hell prefer their own family to other people.
Hmm, I'm not too sure that holds. Racists usually base their opinion on some kind of logic, whether it's the whole 13/50 thing or stormfagging.
Feminists meanwhile...their ideology seems based solely on hatred of the other, over anything else. I don't think they're capable of caring about the "other".
This was speculated in an academic paper about infanticide, where a female academic (imagine being so obvious that even your own people call you out) stated that the reason for the differing rates of infanticide based on the baby's gender was that boys were more "other" to these women.
Am I being optimistic by adding western women in general? I used to be mildly misogynistic but I met genuinely nice and kind ones but great looking to boot but don't flaunt their appearances to change my mind. The unicorns do exist but they are really rare as internet says. And no nobody offered me pity sex to change my mind.
Really the biggest problem with western women is really the western media encouraging them to become thots and being feminine is bad. Much of the anglosphere is controlled by feminism without any strong opposition. So-called conservatives don't really conserve anything and most of them are as threatening as wet noodles. They expect the simps to marry the thots and think things will go back to normal. I was just going to say one sentence and ended up ranting about politics
I'm not sure if that's hard on me, or hard on them.
With a top down view and tummy tucked jeans. Her video is essentially 90% of women’s tinder profiles.
Trying to hide her gut.
Liberty is inversely proportional to security. The most secure you will ever be is when you are restrained in a locked room under 24 hour surveillance. The moment you introduce any amount of freedom into a situation, you are empowering people to make bad decisions.
If your "hardship" is a consequence of other people's freedom, we need to think very carefully about whether or not your "problem" can be "solved" without drastically expanding the scope of government beyond what it is meant to do.
So how do we stop men, who have free will, from behaving inappropriately towards women? Consequences? We already have those. People "misbehave" anyways. Hell, leftists will talk your ear off about how deterrent punishments don't work (which is another lie, but whatever).
I guess what I'm trying to say is this: if feminists want to convince me that their ideology isn't just an authoritarian grift for power and money, then I'd like to see some solutions other than "give us all the power and money".
Apparently you getting off the computer, going over to the local frat house (probably the same one Kavanaugh was at), and yelling at all the bros inside to "respect all women" will make them reconsider their life. And naturally you'll leave that situation without a scratch because they're dangerous but only to women.
Things that probably didn’t happen for 200 Alex. It’s a shame she couldn’t capture it for her tik tok and instead we get this unbiased rundown of what occurred.
She had probably drunk 2 bottles of wine and was screaming at a guy just casually kissing his girlfriend.
There is a reason Islam requires 4 male witnesses before a woman is allowed to make allegations of assault.
Come on now, don't make stuff up like that.
We all know it was in boxes, not bottles. 🍷
Boxwine is only for cooking with. CMV
CMV?
Change my view, I guess?
Change My View.
Strong and independent...but still wants you to fight her battles for you.
Try giving out a white feather next time too while your at it.
Apply race to it and yeah you see. How insane it is.
"HEY could you X person tell that other X person to stop committing murders?"
Cool story, lying whore.
You wonder who is stupid enough to believe her bullshit, but then you see, oh, feminists, that's who.
White knights and simps will believe her as well.
Believe her, willing to do anything for the potential to get their tips wet. 6 one day, half dozen the other.
Change the demographic that she is attacking from “men” to (for example) - “blacks” and see if it would be acceptable or not.
The Sexual Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
Also..... "EIGHT friends"
Right.
So should I suggest to my friends that one of them hold down and grope a woman so we can come in and rescue her? Because I've never been in such a situation as part of the group of "all men." Would I still be part of the evil all men then for promoting antiquated ideas of chivalry? Women don't need a man to rescue them, right?
I still simp for women, but only fictional.
I can't even watch or read any of this shit anymore.
Prepare your family for chaos.
Women are sponges. Fix the sewer leak, and they won't be nearly so foul.
This is a great way of putting it
Also, capable men that stand up for themselves are violent bigots that were asking for it. Their masculine fragility is showing.
edit: I don't think that emrazz person is real. Look at that pfp. Getting thispersondoesnotexist vibes from it.
Is this not her?
I don't think she's a famous person. That blurry shitty nonperson pfp is her way of going anon because she's above having an anime pfp like all the chuds. She has been doxxed tho. She's some sort of new york wall street analyst big money person who professionally goes to bat bag for the richest, scummiest people
I often find myself thinking the same thing.
not a word of that story is true.
Modern women repulse me and it's genuinely an issue for future of our people. How can we make families when we can't even find decent women? I'm European, and European women have never been so insane and unattractive. When you're young all you care about is looks, once she's fuckable, you're happy. Once you get older, it all changes, personality starts to matter far more. I'm at the stage where I come across genuinely good looking women, who instantly become less attractive to me because of their worldviews. Of course it has it's benefits, I'm not likely to go chasing after average women, making a fool of myself, like many simps. At the same time, it's making finding someone an almost impossible task.
She seems nice.
ok...
I'm guessing everyone clapped. Allegedly.
Congrats, you fell for the commie agitprop: woman edition. Talk to a real woman sometime, you'll see most arent like this. This goes for theimpossible1, too
Yes, the CCP is totally creating this narrative.
This shit existed when China was still fucking Taiwan.
It existed among a small minority of psychopaths. Globalist powers are amplifying it to demoralize men. If you think 80% of women are like this, it shows you spend way too much time on the internet
80% is optimistic on your part.
Then again, I don't know how much of the female population is over 65, where tradcon views are still very strongly held.
But if you're talking about women of "breeding age" as the white nationalist cuckolds put it, 80% is more optimistic than the England fans saying "It's coming home" after scoring in the second minute.