Kinda, all 9 judges agreed that congress should weight in first about changing the bill, as judicial branch is there to confirm laws existing, not change or set laws like congress (aka, reason why idea of draft was rejected is because existing bill says women are exempt +congress was already exploring about changing that bill)
thats american system (ones where Kavanaugh is)
president holds executive power
congress holds legislative power
supreme court holds judicial power
got it maybe poorly worded, but supreme court is not there to change or create laws, simply pass judgement based on laws
Kinda, all 9 judges agreed that congress should weight in first about changing the bill, as judicial branch is there to confirm laws existing, not change or set laws like congress (aka, reason why idea of draft was rejected is because existing bill says women are exempt +congress was already exploring about changing that bill)
What country uses this system? It certainly isn't found in the Anglosphere.
thats american system (ones where Kavanaugh is)
president holds executive power
congress holds legislative power
supreme court holds judicial power
got it maybe poorly worded, but supreme court is not there to change or create laws, simply pass judgement based on laws
Congress passed a federal law forcing gay marriage on the states? Who wrote the law that mandated the legality of abortion?
democrats likely; generally house writes laws and senate passes/rejects the law; executive can veto the law at this point too