Machiavelli says that if you're going to do unpopular and harsh things that it's better to do them all at once.
Women are going to kick and scream about what needs to be done the whole way through so we might as well use that as our starting point. Once they can't interfere and are happy being put back into their natural role the rest will be comparatively easier to accomplish.
Maybe it's the kind of women I've been listening to but there seems to be a growing amount that WANT to lose the right to vote and be able to be stay at home moms, just the economy forces them to work too.
I don't think its just the economy does it, many of them just don't want to settle for what they think is less than they deserve which is often a absurd degree higher than their actual worth (as a worker, spouse, etc) so they get stuck chasing their little dream instead of living in reality.
Ok, but let's not confuse the kind of person who would get into Vtubing for the wider populace. That's a subset of the population that would have that kind of persona to begin with and an even narrower subset that would then take up the mantle of streaming(to say nothing of the attention whoring aspect of it) and then to survive long enough to be saying it repeatedly? Yeah, that's a few dozen terminally online women, that is not at all indicative of the average woman.
I never said it was the AVERAGE amount, just I'm hearing that sentiment a GROWING amount in the circles I'm in, it's just these are the ones that are vocal about it.
It's like how a lot of women hate feminists but can't vocally say it, only in private. That one I've heard a lot from women privately myself.
Usually once a woman has one kid, the mothering instincts kick in and they begin to understand that they should stay home. Many can't, because of economic pressures (hyper inflation forcing everyone to work), but many would prefer to stay home with the kids.
I have female family members like that, that pursued their careers hard core, and then once they had their first kid, they wanted to quit and stay home. There's also lots of evidence of "career" women who want nothing to do with kids, but once they see or hold a baby, they immediately get the baby fever. I've also seen this first hand, with women that swore they never wanted kids.
The propaganda is a deluge 24/7, because it has to be. We're hard coded to our biological roles, and even in the face of that propaganda, it still expressed immediately when even a hint of the truth touches us.
The wing of ZOG that targets me is the fucking indian woman going 10 under the speed limit in a Honda Odyssey keeping me from getting to work on time. I respond by breaking the law.
In the UK Women and Muslims are overwhelmingly supporting the Green Party. Both have the explicit agenda of erasing the white population of the UK and handing it over to immigrants ASAP.
Both have the explicit agenda of erasing the white population of the UK and handing it over to immigrants ASAP.
Every part in the UK supports this. The UK has recently come out of a period of Tory dominance where they got Brexit done and governed for a while after that on a platform of reducing immigration. As is typical for the ZOG right, they rug pulled and flooded the country with jeets. The left has an edge because the right self-discredited.
That isn't the people of the UK, that is the treacherous ruling class.
Restore UK is rising at an unprecedented rate because they are standing on a platform of mass deportations followed by remigration of foreigners.
It is still possible to solve the UK situation by voting; but it won't be for much longer. Two elections and it will be too late for a democratic solution, after which the UK will look like Lebanon if they are lucky and Indonesia if they are not.
They're already kicking and screaming about even the most perfunctory efforts to enforce our borders and expel invaders. They won't care if it's ZOG or the fourth reich, as soon as the cattle cars come out to start being serious about shipping foreigners out they're all going to go completely ape shit.
Women could want to deport migroids at 10x the rate that men do, and nothing would change. The general public already wanted mass deportations and elected a President running on that platform. He rug pulled. It doesn't matter what the general public wants. Jews are the sovereign that we must replace if we are to achieve any real changes.
At first and the start of getting bit interested in geo-politics, I was pretty optimistic or naive that people can't be so comically evil and scheming but no, from what I have observed, I found them to be lot worse, anyone trying to fight the hostile entities seriously need to emulate Machiavelli's method.
Good luck with dying for that to happen. Just because I'm right wing doesn't mean I'll cuck to being removed from my country and you'll find that you're a very unpopular opinion.
Now I will compromise and say we could expel everyone with a criminal record and children out of wedlock and it would remove virtually every undesirable from society
Good luck with dying for that to happen. Just because I'm right wing doesn't mean I'll cuck to being removed from my country and you'll find that you're a very unpopular opinion.
Preference cascades don't really work that way.
Once it descends into mob justice, your opinion really won't matter. Maybe you're one of the good ones but that only matters when times are good, and we're headed for very bad times.
Yeah, no. That's cutting off your nose to spite your face.
There are a number of specific ethnic groups that should be loaded into pods and shot into space, certainly, and certainly restrictions must be put in place on the franchise (because there are just as many weak, foolish men as there are flighty, capricious women, and they vote for the same fucking things), but a blanket "non-whites get out" and "no girls allowed" actually deprives us of good and useful human capital.
Put a strict meritocracy in place, and the problem will mostly resolve itself.
but a blanket "non-whites get out" and "no girls allowed" actually deprives us of good and useful human capital.
Non-Whites, talented or not, work against Whites. We invented the idea of "not being racist"; no other race even understands it, let along adhere's to it. Maybe if they're so dedicated to us that they're willing to be castrated and never pass on their genes, otherwise no.
Women need to be making babies, period. Every single woman needs to have at least two kids to maintain the population; there is nothing more important than that for them to do. They shouldn't even think about going to university before their kids are fully grown.
For your first point, I refuse to cede the moral high ground to the scum. Yes, we invented "don't be racist", and I'll see that we beat the fuck out of the other ethnics until they adopt our system or exsanguinate under the lash.
We should not roll our society back into the shit just so we can wallow with the hogs.
For your second point, you do realize that, absent the modern brainwashing apparatus, most women do just want to become mothers, and will become such?
There is no reason to systematically hobble the small number of women who can, of their own volition and by their own guile and artifice, educate themselves and contribute to society. The breeders will spread their legs and pump out babies for you to obsess over regardless; there's no need to break the legs of the thinkers and doers. You dump entire percentage points of useful higher workers to pad the general pool by a few thousandths of s percent. That sort of waste is so obscene to behold it should be criminalized.
No, them entering the workforce reduces the productivity of the nearby men and there are so few of them as to not be worth considering. They can better contribute to society by birthing more men to cover the loss in productivity.
No, that's bullshit. A woman who can perform as well as a man is useful. I'm not budging on this. You're fucking retarded, and your position is stupid.
You'd dumpster civilization to accommodate the warm and fuzzy feeling you get for white knighting the three dozen women on earth who belong in the workforce, and you've got the gall to call me the retarded one.
You're not a serious person and everything you have to say from this point forward should be met solely with scorn and derision.
You want more progress? Then you want more men. Make women birth more men. It's their literal best contribution to civilization no matter how clever you delude yourself into thinking they are.
Again, you must establish the rule prior to carving out any exceptions and we currently don't have the rule firmly established because of idiots like you who want to feel good about themselves and get head pats from m'lady.
Even the most exceptional women barely reach the levels of mediocre men. You'd think we'd learn that lesson by now with supposedly elite women constantly getting BTFO in women's sports, chess, and even fucking video games by high school boys and trannies.
Crazy that you'd try to claim to be in favor of eugenics in the same thread as you declare the least capable women should be breeders whilst the most capable women should put more efforts into mimicking a slightly above average man in the workplace.
No, you codify rules that allow for exceptions. There has never been a rule of law or societal norm that carved out exceptions after the fact without some form of coercion or violence.
Are you even remotely aware of genetics?
Are you? Because it sounds like you're trying to make a retarded argument made by people who've never actually studied population groups make.
Yes, the average somalian is retarded. If we eliminate the benefits for taking them in regardless and return everything to a "sink or swim" meritocracy, they'll either fuck off back to their mudhuts, starve in the streets, or die when cops or private citizens make good shoots of they try comitting crimes.
However, it's possible for there to be a statistical outlier born amongst them who isn't retarded, or is even intelligent. We don't need a system that throws them away for the crime of association with a poor performing group. If they have a brain and can learn to act like a human, they should be able to join human society. What you're proposing codifies the opposite, and you're pretending people who grow up under such a system would be willing and able to consider after the fact exceptions.
If you let in the exceptional Somalis they will breed and spawn more average Somalis in your country, thus turning your country into a shithole like Somalia.
You are either an idiot or malicious. I'm going with you being malicious until given a reason to believe otherwise.
Intelligence is pretty heritable so if they're exceptionally intelligent their first generation children are likely to be remain above average for a Somalian.
But intelligence heritability is also genetically very complex so their children are very likely to regress towards the mean from random variation, and when the mean is 60 IQ retards it really doesn't take much regression to make that a shit deal for the country.
Nobody is falling for your magic dirt lie anymore Shlomo. Your attempts at words as magic spells by calling your trojan horse "human capital" just makes me laugh. Someday soon, all of you will hang.
Fuck, it doesn't take long to hit the "everyone who disagrees with me is jews" with you faggots, does it?
No, you fuck. Some of us are just high functioning sociopaths who want to metagame society until space travel is cheap and I can fuck off from this gay earth. Fuck off with the jews who live rent free in your head.
If you don't want to be outed as a jew, then stop running their playbook. If you are with them flooding our country with cheap foreign labor, then you will hang with them too.
You're an absolute example of how eugenics are good, moral, and necessary, given how without them we've produced such staggering intellects as yourself.
No nonwhite has ever created anything. Ever. Anywhere on Earth. No value added to civilization since its dawn. This has been anthropologically proven. You have no fucking idea what the words you’re using even mean.
There are a number of specific ethnic groups that should be loaded into pods and shot into space
Whites. The Universe is our birthright. Everyone else must be destroyed.
good and useful human capital.
No women are net economic positives. No nonwhites are net economic positives. You have absolutely no idea what you are saying. Eat shit and die with your communist “human capital” dialectic. We’re not commodities to be traded.
(because there are just as many weak, foolish men as there are flighty, capricious women, and they vote for the same fucking things)
Big fucking doubt. Weak foolish men exist, but the claim that there are exactly just as many men like that as there are flighty, capricious women voting for the societal suicide is absurd. By every metric I've seen that attempts to measure that, it appears politically retarded women vastly outnumber politically retarded men. On average they're comically more easy to manipulate with contradictory emotional bullshit or an illusory consensus, and the polls show it every time. Even the sane or based ones aren't typically that way inherently, just by means of having an especially grounded close social circle to outweigh the wider media influences
You can't have a "strict" meritocracy because weighting merit comparisons between disparate fields is subjective, nevermind somehow measuring the wider merit to society from your non-working behavior. Strict and subjective do not belong together, nor do strict and incomplete data. How do you objectively quantify the merit of an electrician's work versus a salesman's, for example?
You can try a strict adherence to specific merit proxies perhaps. Like income. But in a job market that is anything but meritocratic and a financial system that is both cooked and cucked, that's a shitty proxy that hands political power even more into the hands of rich liberal women in adult daycares or the Rothschilds and bankers, depending on how high you set the bar. You could try IQ tests, or some other general intelligence proxy, but even those have some subjective wiggle room in their weighting of the various cognitive tests that combine to approximate g or IQ, for example you could disproportionately favor people who have high verbal reasoning or facial emotion identification over people with good pattern recognition or abstract reasoning. Plus there's the problem that IQ is not quickly and easily verified at the polls, it relies on a prior institutional stamp of approval from a bunch of bureaucrats that are ripe for political infiltration and subversion. Also general intelligence is, well, general, whilst the political acumen to vote effectively in favor of either your own interests or the interests of your nation as a whole is a specific skillset. There are plenty of generally intelligent academics who have by some combination of necessity and cowardice have politically lobotomized themselves to survive in their fields, rather than live politically "undercover" as it were.
Simply put you can't just magically implement "meritocratic" voting because it's too ambiguous and easily manipulated by an already existing ideology to simply disenfranchise the opposition. The only method of limiting the franchise that is completely safe from incumbent manipulation is by overt, immutable characteristics that any member of the public can independently verify. The next most safe category is by permanent, objective rules rather than personal measurement (e.g. citizenship, or a set number of years of logged national service), which can still technically be falsified by a hostile bureaucracy, but the ease of catching fraud is still high enough to deter blatant mass manipulation.
Ironically if the presence of a handful of good eggs prevents you from seeing the value of removing a group that is measurably more of a net negative overall than the rest of the population, in a zero sum game where the candidate with the highest relative vote proportion takes all the power. Then that would make you one of the uncommonly politically retarded men you're so quick to denounce. Rather than the results focused, competent sociopath you supposedly desire to be.
Bukele is somewhat an example of this, electing effectively a (currently benevolent/beneficial) dictator, because the problems got so bad that traditional politics no longer worked.
Elect one dictator for life with a reversion to the former system on their death.
They need to be sterile with no children; everything goes into their personal legacy.
In return, they are essentially the king and can create, erase, modify, or ignore laws at their convenience, other than the aforesaid deal. The House and Senate become simply administrative arms to impose their will. Members are appointed for life but can be executed at the pleasure of the dictator.
After they die, we bury them in a giant pyramid in Washington along with all members of the House and Senate, then elect new ones from scratch.
It’s illegal to take the future seriously. You’re not even allowed to talk about it. Now mass downvote me like you always do to 1. prove me right and 2. signal your own acquiescence to this truth.
Who, they? Anonymous people whose names aren’t tied to their real lives, because they will have their bank accounts stolen, be evicted from their homes, arrested, and killed for it?
hey man, if you do enough digging on this account and beyond and a few sites like breach.vip you can find my real name easy, then eventually address too because i own a company here in Romania and they keep that stuff public.
if you could do it, the CIA definitely could've at this point. but im still here relatively alive and well.
It's not just the political class. Nonwhites need to be expelled and women need to lose the right to vote.
One step at a time, dude.
Machiavelli says that if you're going to do unpopular and harsh things that it's better to do them all at once.
Women are going to kick and scream about what needs to be done the whole way through so we might as well use that as our starting point. Once they can't interfere and are happy being put back into their natural role the rest will be comparatively easier to accomplish.
Maybe it's the kind of women I've been listening to but there seems to be a growing amount that WANT to lose the right to vote and be able to be stay at home moms, just the economy forces them to work too.
I don't think its just the economy does it, many of them just don't want to settle for what they think is less than they deserve which is often a absurd degree higher than their actual worth (as a worker, spouse, etc) so they get stuck chasing their little dream instead of living in reality.
Well decades of feminist propaganda especially thanks to state schools does fill them with false delusions of worth. Why We need to homeschool more.
Where are those women hiding because I don't know any that would admit to that publicly or privately.
I hear it a lot among female Vtubers, I think having the model as an intermediary helps to say it publicly.
If you want more direct examples look up the ones Arch hangs out with Lumi (Lumlum) and Amalgamyte
Ok, but let's not confuse the kind of person who would get into Vtubing for the wider populace. That's a subset of the population that would have that kind of persona to begin with and an even narrower subset that would then take up the mantle of streaming(to say nothing of the attention whoring aspect of it) and then to survive long enough to be saying it repeatedly? Yeah, that's a few dozen terminally online women, that is not at all indicative of the average woman.
I never said it was the AVERAGE amount, just I'm hearing that sentiment a GROWING amount in the circles I'm in, it's just these are the ones that are vocal about it.
It's like how a lot of women hate feminists but can't vocally say it, only in private. That one I've heard a lot from women privately myself.
Usually once a woman has one kid, the mothering instincts kick in and they begin to understand that they should stay home. Many can't, because of economic pressures (hyper inflation forcing everyone to work), but many would prefer to stay home with the kids.
I have female family members like that, that pursued their careers hard core, and then once they had their first kid, they wanted to quit and stay home. There's also lots of evidence of "career" women who want nothing to do with kids, but once they see or hold a baby, they immediately get the baby fever. I've also seen this first hand, with women that swore they never wanted kids.
The propaganda is a deluge 24/7, because it has to be. We're hard coded to our biological roles, and even in the face of that propaganda, it still expressed immediately when even a hint of the truth touches us.
I don't see many women "kicking and screaming" in defense of ZOG. Even Ana Kasparian is saying shit like, "the goyim are waking up."
No, they fight for DEI, which is the wing of ZOG that targets them.
Are you aware of which wings of ZOG target you? How are you responding?
The wing of ZOG that targets me is the fucking indian woman going 10 under the speed limit in a Honda Odyssey keeping me from getting to work on time. I respond by breaking the law.
In the UK Women and Muslims are overwhelmingly supporting the Green Party. Both have the explicit agenda of erasing the white population of the UK and handing it over to immigrants ASAP.
I am not exaggerating.
Every part in the UK supports this. The UK has recently come out of a period of Tory dominance where they got Brexit done and governed for a while after that on a platform of reducing immigration. As is typical for the ZOG right, they rug pulled and flooded the country with jeets. The left has an edge because the right self-discredited.
That isn't the people of the UK, that is the treacherous ruling class.
Restore UK is rising at an unprecedented rate because they are standing on a platform of mass deportations followed by remigration of foreigners.
It is still possible to solve the UK situation by voting; but it won't be for much longer. Two elections and it will be too late for a democratic solution, after which the UK will look like Lebanon if they are lucky and Indonesia if they are not.
Restore is going to betray everyone as well.
They're already kicking and screaming about even the most perfunctory efforts to enforce our borders and expel invaders. They won't care if it's ZOG or the fourth reich, as soon as the cattle cars come out to start being serious about shipping foreigners out they're all going to go completely ape shit.
Women could want to deport migroids at 10x the rate that men do, and nothing would change. The general public already wanted mass deportations and elected a President running on that platform. He rug pulled. It doesn't matter what the general public wants. Jews are the sovereign that we must replace if we are to achieve any real changes.
They say whatever is cool at the time.
At first and the start of getting bit interested in geo-politics, I was pretty optimistic or naive that people can't be so comically evil and scheming but no, from what I have observed, I found them to be lot worse, anyone trying to fight the hostile entities seriously need to emulate Machiavelli's method.
White People deserve a nation of their own
Every other race gets a nation of their own.
Why not Whites?
Good luck with dying for that to happen. Just because I'm right wing doesn't mean I'll cuck to being removed from my country and you'll find that you're a very unpopular opinion.
Now I will compromise and say we could expel everyone with a criminal record and children out of wedlock and it would remove virtually every undesirable from society
Preference cascades don't really work that way.
Once it descends into mob justice, your opinion really won't matter. Maybe you're one of the good ones but that only matters when times are good, and we're headed for very bad times.
I guarantee you'd probably die in the infighting so I hope it'd be worth it
Yeah, no. That's cutting off your nose to spite your face.
There are a number of specific ethnic groups that should be loaded into pods and shot into space, certainly, and certainly restrictions must be put in place on the franchise (because there are just as many weak, foolish men as there are flighty, capricious women, and they vote for the same fucking things), but a blanket "non-whites get out" and "no girls allowed" actually deprives us of good and useful human capital.
Put a strict meritocracy in place, and the problem will mostly resolve itself.
Non-Whites, talented or not, work against Whites. We invented the idea of "not being racist"; no other race even understands it, let along adhere's to it. Maybe if they're so dedicated to us that they're willing to be castrated and never pass on their genes, otherwise no.
Women need to be making babies, period. Every single woman needs to have at least two kids to maintain the population; there is nothing more important than that for them to do. They shouldn't even think about going to university before their kids are fully grown.
Lol yes all the times I've publicly addressed racism against whites was me working against them.
Your service is appreciated, but I've got some terrible news about regression to the mean and the consequences of systemic solutions.
For your first point, I refuse to cede the moral high ground to the scum. Yes, we invented "don't be racist", and I'll see that we beat the fuck out of the other ethnics until they adopt our system or exsanguinate under the lash.
We should not roll our society back into the shit just so we can wallow with the hogs.
For your second point, you do realize that, absent the modern brainwashing apparatus, most women do just want to become mothers, and will become such?
There is no reason to systematically hobble the small number of women who can, of their own volition and by their own guile and artifice, educate themselves and contribute to society. The breeders will spread their legs and pump out babies for you to obsess over regardless; there's no need to break the legs of the thinkers and doers. You dump entire percentage points of useful higher workers to pad the general pool by a few thousandths of s percent. That sort of waste is so obscene to behold it should be criminalized.
No, them entering the workforce reduces the productivity of the nearby men and there are so few of them as to not be worth considering. They can better contribute to society by birthing more men to cover the loss in productivity.
No, that's bullshit. A woman who can perform as well as a man is useful. I'm not budging on this. You're fucking retarded, and your position is stupid.
I will not condone such absolute nonsense.
You'd dumpster civilization to accommodate the warm and fuzzy feeling you get for white knighting the three dozen women on earth who belong in the workforce, and you've got the gall to call me the retarded one.
You're not a serious person and everything you have to say from this point forward should be met solely with scorn and derision.
You want more progress? Then you want more men. Make women birth more men. It's their literal best contribution to civilization no matter how clever you delude yourself into thinking they are.
Again, you must establish the rule prior to carving out any exceptions and we currently don't have the rule firmly established because of idiots like you who want to feel good about themselves and get head pats from m'lady.
Even the most exceptional women barely reach the levels of mediocre men. You'd think we'd learn that lesson by now with supposedly elite women constantly getting BTFO in women's sports, chess, and even fucking video games by high school boys and trannies.
Crazy that you'd try to claim to be in favor of eugenics in the same thread as you declare the least capable women should be breeders whilst the most capable women should put more efforts into mimicking a slightly above average man in the workplace.
You carve out exceptions after establishing the rules.
Are you even remotely aware of genetics?
No, you codify rules that allow for exceptions. There has never been a rule of law or societal norm that carved out exceptions after the fact without some form of coercion or violence.
Are you? Because it sounds like you're trying to make a retarded argument made by people who've never actually studied population groups make.
Yes, the average somalian is retarded. If we eliminate the benefits for taking them in regardless and return everything to a "sink or swim" meritocracy, they'll either fuck off back to their mudhuts, starve in the streets, or die when cops or private citizens make good shoots of they try comitting crimes.
However, it's possible for there to be a statistical outlier born amongst them who isn't retarded, or is even intelligent. We don't need a system that throws them away for the crime of association with a poor performing group. If they have a brain and can learn to act like a human, they should be able to join human society. What you're proposing codifies the opposite, and you're pretending people who grow up under such a system would be willing and able to consider after the fact exceptions.
Which is retarded as shit.
If you let in the exceptional Somalis they will breed and spawn more average Somalis in your country, thus turning your country into a shithole like Somalia.
You are either an idiot or malicious. I'm going with you being malicious until given a reason to believe otherwise.
Intelligence is pretty heritable so if they're exceptionally intelligent their first generation children are likely to be remain above average for a Somalian.
But intelligence heritability is also genetically very complex so their children are very likely to regress towards the mean from random variation, and when the mean is 60 IQ retards it really doesn't take much regression to make that a shit deal for the country.
That's where eugenic practices come in. Not that Somalians would be likely to practice them
Not only will all non-whites have to go, but so will all cocksucking traitors like you.
Retarded nigger shit like this is the best evidence of horseshoe theory.
You dumb fucks are in the middle of a purity spiral and can't see it.
Nobody is falling for your magic dirt lie anymore Shlomo. Your attempts at words as magic spells by calling your trojan horse "human capital" just makes me laugh. Someday soon, all of you will hang.
Fuck, it doesn't take long to hit the "everyone who disagrees with me is jews" with you faggots, does it?
No, you fuck. Some of us are just high functioning sociopaths who want to metagame society until space travel is cheap and I can fuck off from this gay earth. Fuck off with the jews who live rent free in your head.
If you don't want to be outed as a jew, then stop running their playbook. If you are with them flooding our country with cheap foreign labor, then you will hang with them too.
Rent fucking free.
You're an absolute example of how eugenics are good, moral, and necessary, given how without them we've produced such staggering intellects as yourself.
Nonwhite detected.
No nonwhite has ever created anything. Ever. Anywhere on Earth. No value added to civilization since its dawn. This has been anthropologically proven. You have no fucking idea what the words you’re using even mean.
Whites. The Universe is our birthright. Everyone else must be destroyed.
No women are net economic positives. No nonwhites are net economic positives. You have absolutely no idea what you are saying. Eat shit and die with your communist “human capital” dialectic. We’re not commodities to be traded.
WHITES ONLY, GOT IT. THANKS FOR BOWING OUT.
Big fucking doubt. Weak foolish men exist, but the claim that there are exactly just as many men like that as there are flighty, capricious women voting for the societal suicide is absurd. By every metric I've seen that attempts to measure that, it appears politically retarded women vastly outnumber politically retarded men. On average they're comically more easy to manipulate with contradictory emotional bullshit or an illusory consensus, and the polls show it every time. Even the sane or based ones aren't typically that way inherently, just by means of having an especially grounded close social circle to outweigh the wider media influences
You can't have a "strict" meritocracy because weighting merit comparisons between disparate fields is subjective, nevermind somehow measuring the wider merit to society from your non-working behavior. Strict and subjective do not belong together, nor do strict and incomplete data. How do you objectively quantify the merit of an electrician's work versus a salesman's, for example?
You can try a strict adherence to specific merit proxies perhaps. Like income. But in a job market that is anything but meritocratic and a financial system that is both cooked and cucked, that's a shitty proxy that hands political power even more into the hands of rich liberal women in adult daycares or the Rothschilds and bankers, depending on how high you set the bar. You could try IQ tests, or some other general intelligence proxy, but even those have some subjective wiggle room in their weighting of the various cognitive tests that combine to approximate g or IQ, for example you could disproportionately favor people who have high verbal reasoning or facial emotion identification over people with good pattern recognition or abstract reasoning. Plus there's the problem that IQ is not quickly and easily verified at the polls, it relies on a prior institutional stamp of approval from a bunch of bureaucrats that are ripe for political infiltration and subversion. Also general intelligence is, well, general, whilst the political acumen to vote effectively in favor of either your own interests or the interests of your nation as a whole is a specific skillset. There are plenty of generally intelligent academics who have by some combination of necessity and cowardice have politically lobotomized themselves to survive in their fields, rather than live politically "undercover" as it were.
Simply put you can't just magically implement "meritocratic" voting because it's too ambiguous and easily manipulated by an already existing ideology to simply disenfranchise the opposition. The only method of limiting the franchise that is completely safe from incumbent manipulation is by overt, immutable characteristics that any member of the public can independently verify. The next most safe category is by permanent, objective rules rather than personal measurement (e.g. citizenship, or a set number of years of logged national service), which can still technically be falsified by a hostile bureaucracy, but the ease of catching fraud is still high enough to deter blatant mass manipulation.
Ironically if the presence of a handful of good eggs prevents you from seeing the value of removing a group that is measurably more of a net negative overall than the rest of the population, in a zero sum game where the candidate with the highest relative vote proportion takes all the power. Then that would make you one of the uncommonly politically retarded men you're so quick to denounce. Rather than the results focused, competent sociopath you supposedly desire to be.
I'm not coming together with uncontrollable pedophiles and child killers
Bukele is somewhat an example of this, electing effectively a (currently benevolent/beneficial) dictator, because the problems got so bad that traditional politics no longer worked.
Elect one dictator for life with a reversion to the former system on their death.
They need to be sterile with no children; everything goes into their personal legacy.
In return, they are essentially the king and can create, erase, modify, or ignore laws at their convenience, other than the aforesaid deal. The House and Senate become simply administrative arms to impose their will. Members are appointed for life but can be executed at the pleasure of the dictator.
After they die, we bury them in a giant pyramid in Washington along with all members of the House and Senate, then elect new ones from scratch.
Do this every 500 years or so.
It’s illegal to take the future seriously. You’re not even allowed to talk about it. Now mass downvote me like you always do to 1. prove me right and 2. signal your own acquiescence to this truth.
They're talking about it tho.
Who, they? Anonymous people whose names aren’t tied to their real lives, because they will have their bank accounts stolen, be evicted from their homes, arrested, and killed for it?
hey man, if you do enough digging on this account and beyond and a few sites like breach.vip you can find my real name easy, then eventually address too because i own a company here in Romania and they keep that stuff public.
if you could do it, the CIA definitely could've at this point. but im still here relatively alive and well.
Blue check marks aren't anonymous.
And he’s about to find that out.
You are such a ConFagPro
Cool. I don’t even need to go to the thread to see what I said. Thanks for admitting everything I said is true.
You think you’re some internet wizard with hot takes? You fags are a dime a dozen online, on every forum. You’re not special.
Don't waste your time with this tool. He just repeats the same goddamn things in every thread. Like a worse version of Imp.
Hey there, coward. Too afraid of me to reply directly, huh. Yeah, I get that a lot. Mind proving me wrong? Or am I right again?
No. Stop talking about me, coward. Reply to the topic of discussion with citations and sources or don’t reply at all.
Sulla did nothing wrong.
OK, how are people going to live on this earth in two thousand years when all the resources have been used up for trinkets and baubles?