Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

56
It's time to start taking the future seriously (media.kotakuinaction2.win)
posted 103 days ago by SparkMandrill83 103 days ago by SparkMandrill83 +56 / -0
68 comments download share
68 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (68)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– logintoblockcommunit 1 point 103 days ago +1 / -0

Yeah, no. That's cutting off your nose to spite your face.

There are a number of specific ethnic groups that should be loaded into pods and shot into space, certainly, and certainly restrictions must be put in place on the franchise (because there are just as many weak, foolish men as there are flighty, capricious women, and they vote for the same fucking things), but a blanket "non-whites get out" and "no girls allowed" actually deprives us of good and useful human capital.

Put a strict meritocracy in place, and the problem will mostly resolve itself.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 21 ▼
– WeedleTLiar 21 points 103 days ago +21 / -0

but a blanket "non-whites get out" and "no girls allowed" actually deprives us of good and useful human capital.

Non-Whites, talented or not, work against Whites. We invented the idea of "not being racist"; no other race even understands it, let along adhere's to it. Maybe if they're so dedicated to us that they're willing to be castrated and never pass on their genes, otherwise no.

Women need to be making babies, period. Every single woman needs to have at least two kids to maintain the population; there is nothing more important than that for them to do. They shouldn't even think about going to university before their kids are fully grown.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– MattTheBlack 6 points 103 days ago +6 / -0

Lol yes all the times I've publicly addressed racism against whites was me working against them.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Sneak_King 9 points 103 days ago +9 / -0

Your service is appreciated, but I've got some terrible news about regression to the mean and the consequences of systemic solutions.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– logintoblockcommunit 2 points 103 days ago +2 / -0

For your first point, I refuse to cede the moral high ground to the scum. Yes, we invented "don't be racist", and I'll see that we beat the fuck out of the other ethnics until they adopt our system or exsanguinate under the lash.

We should not roll our society back into the shit just so we can wallow with the hogs.

For your second point, you do realize that, absent the modern brainwashing apparatus, most women do just want to become mothers, and will become such?

There is no reason to systematically hobble the small number of women who can, of their own volition and by their own guile and artifice, educate themselves and contribute to society. The breeders will spread their legs and pump out babies for you to obsess over regardless; there's no need to break the legs of the thinkers and doers. You dump entire percentage points of useful higher workers to pad the general pool by a few thousandths of s percent. That sort of waste is so obscene to behold it should be criminalized.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– MargarineMongoose 8 points 103 days ago +8 / -0

No, them entering the workforce reduces the productivity of the nearby men and there are so few of them as to not be worth considering. They can better contribute to society by birthing more men to cover the loss in productivity.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– logintoblockcommunit 1 point 102 days ago +1 / -0

No, that's bullshit. A woman who can perform as well as a man is useful. I'm not budging on this. You're fucking retarded, and your position is stupid.

I will not condone such absolute nonsense.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 4 ▼
– BandageBandolier 4 points 102 days ago +4 / -0

Crazy that you'd try to claim to be in favor of eugenics in the same thread as you declare the least capable women should be breeders whilst the most capable women should put more efforts into mimicking a slightly above average man in the workplace.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– MargarineMongoose 10 points 103 days ago +10 / -0

You carve out exceptions after establishing the rules.

Put a strict meritocracy in place, and the problem will mostly resolve itself.

Are you even remotely aware of genetics?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– logintoblockcommunit 1 point 102 days ago +1 / -0

No, you codify rules that allow for exceptions. There has never been a rule of law or societal norm that carved out exceptions after the fact without some form of coercion or violence.

Are you even remotely aware of genetics?

Are you? Because it sounds like you're trying to make a retarded argument made by people who've never actually studied population groups make.

Yes, the average somalian is retarded. If we eliminate the benefits for taking them in regardless and return everything to a "sink or swim" meritocracy, they'll either fuck off back to their mudhuts, starve in the streets, or die when cops or private citizens make good shoots of they try comitting crimes.

However, it's possible for there to be a statistical outlier born amongst them who isn't retarded, or is even intelligent. We don't need a system that throws them away for the crime of association with a poor performing group. If they have a brain and can learn to act like a human, they should be able to join human society. What you're proposing codifies the opposite, and you're pretending people who grow up under such a system would be willing and able to consider after the fact exceptions.

Which is retarded as shit.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– MargarineMongoose 7 points 102 days ago +7 / -0

If you let in the exceptional Somalis they will breed and spawn more average Somalis in your country, thus turning your country into a shithole like Somalia.

You are either an idiot or malicious. I'm going with you being malicious until given a reason to believe otherwise.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– BandageBandolier 3 points 102 days ago +3 / -0

Intelligence is pretty heritable so if they're exceptionally intelligent their first generation children are likely to be remain above average for a Somalian.

But intelligence heritability is also genetically very complex so their children are very likely to regress towards the mean from random variation, and when the mean is 60 IQ retards it really doesn't take much regression to make that a shit deal for the country.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 9 ▼
– ModsAreAIDS 9 points 103 days ago +9 / -0

Not only will all non-whites have to go, but so will all cocksucking traitors like you.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– logintoblockcommunit 2 points 103 days ago +2 / -0

Retarded nigger shit like this is the best evidence of horseshoe theory.

You dumb fucks are in the middle of a purity spiral and can't see it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– ModsAreAIDS 8 points 103 days ago +8 / -0

Nobody is falling for your magic dirt lie anymore Shlomo. Your attempts at words as magic spells by calling your trojan horse "human capital" just makes me laugh. Someday soon, all of you will hang.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– logintoblockcommunit 2 points 103 days ago +2 / -0

Fuck, it doesn't take long to hit the "everyone who disagrees with me is jews" with you faggots, does it?

No, you fuck. Some of us are just high functioning sociopaths who want to metagame society until space travel is cheap and I can fuck off from this gay earth. Fuck off with the jews who live rent free in your head.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 7 ▼
– TallestSkil 7 points 102 days ago +7 / -0

Yeah, no.

Nonwhite detected.

That's cutting off your nose to spite your face.

No nonwhite has ever created anything. Ever. Anywhere on Earth. No value added to civilization since its dawn. This has been anthropologically proven. You have no fucking idea what the words you’re using even mean.

There are a number of specific ethnic groups that should be loaded into pods and shot into space

Whites. The Universe is our birthright. Everyone else must be destroyed.

good and useful human capital.

No women are net economic positives. No nonwhites are net economic positives. You have absolutely no idea what you are saying. Eat shit and die with your communist “human capital” dialectic. We’re not commodities to be traded.

Put a strict meritocracy in place

WHITES ONLY, GOT IT. THANKS FOR BOWING OUT.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– BandageBandolier 5 points 102 days ago +5 / -0

(because there are just as many weak, foolish men as there are flighty, capricious women, and they vote for the same fucking things)

Big fucking doubt. Weak foolish men exist, but the claim that there are exactly just as many men like that as there are flighty, capricious women voting for the societal suicide is absurd. By every metric I've seen that attempts to measure that, it appears politically retarded women vastly outnumber politically retarded men. On average they're comically more easy to manipulate with contradictory emotional bullshit or an illusory consensus, and the polls show it every time. Even the sane or based ones aren't typically that way inherently, just by means of having an especially grounded close social circle to outweigh the wider media influences

You can't have a "strict" meritocracy because weighting merit comparisons between disparate fields is subjective, nevermind somehow measuring the wider merit to society from your non-working behavior. Strict and subjective do not belong together, nor do strict and incomplete data. How do you objectively quantify the merit of an electrician's work versus a salesman's, for example?

You can try a strict adherence to specific merit proxies perhaps. Like income. But in a job market that is anything but meritocratic and a financial system that is both cooked and cucked, that's a shitty proxy that hands political power even more into the hands of rich liberal women in adult daycares or the Rothschilds and bankers, depending on how high you set the bar. You could try IQ tests, or some other general intelligence proxy, but even those have some subjective wiggle room in their weighting of the various cognitive tests that combine to approximate g or IQ, for example you could disproportionately favor people who have high verbal reasoning or facial emotion identification over people with good pattern recognition or abstract reasoning. Plus there's the problem that IQ is not quickly and easily verified at the polls, it relies on a prior institutional stamp of approval from a bunch of bureaucrats that are ripe for political infiltration and subversion. Also general intelligence is, well, general, whilst the political acumen to vote effectively in favor of either your own interests or the interests of your nation as a whole is a specific skillset. There are plenty of generally intelligent academics who have by some combination of necessity and cowardice have politically lobotomized themselves to survive in their fields, rather than live politically "undercover" as it were.

Simply put you can't just magically implement "meritocratic" voting because it's too ambiguous and easily manipulated by an already existing ideology to simply disenfranchise the opposition. The only method of limiting the franchise that is completely safe from incumbent manipulation is by overt, immutable characteristics that any member of the public can independently verify. The next most safe category is by permanent, objective rules rather than personal measurement (e.g. citizenship, or a set number of years of logged national service), which can still technically be falsified by a hostile bureaucracy, but the ease of catching fraud is still high enough to deter blatant mass manipulation.

Ironically if the presence of a handful of good eggs prevents you from seeing the value of removing a group that is measurably more of a net negative overall than the rest of the population, in a zero sum game where the candidate with the highest relative vote proportion takes all the power. Then that would make you one of the uncommonly politically retarded men you're so quick to denounce. Rather than the results focused, competent sociopath you supposedly desire to be.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy