It's time to start taking the future seriously
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (68)
sorted by:
It's not just the political class. Nonwhites need to be expelled and women need to lose the right to vote.
One step at a time, dude.
Machiavelli says that if you're going to do unpopular and harsh things that it's better to do them all at once.
Women are going to kick and scream about what needs to be done the whole way through so we might as well use that as our starting point. Once they can't interfere and are happy being put back into their natural role the rest will be comparatively easier to accomplish.
Maybe it's the kind of women I've been listening to but there seems to be a growing amount that WANT to lose the right to vote and be able to be stay at home moms, just the economy forces them to work too.
I don't think its just the economy does it, many of them just don't want to settle for what they think is less than they deserve which is often a absurd degree higher than their actual worth (as a worker, spouse, etc) so they get stuck chasing their little dream instead of living in reality.
Where are those women hiding because I don't know any that would admit to that publicly or privately.
I don't see many women "kicking and screaming" in defense of ZOG. Even Ana Kasparian is saying shit like, "the goyim are waking up."
No, they fight for DEI, which is the wing of ZOG that targets them.
In the UK Women and Muslims are overwhelmingly supporting the Green Party. Both have the explicit agenda of erasing the white population of the UK and handing it over to immigrants ASAP.
I am not exaggerating.
They're already kicking and screaming about even the most perfunctory efforts to enforce our borders and expel invaders. They won't care if it's ZOG or the fourth reich, as soon as the cattle cars come out to start being serious about shipping foreigners out they're all going to go completely ape shit.
They say whatever is cool at the time.
At first and the start of getting bit interested in geo-politics, I was pretty optimistic or naive that people can't be so comically evil and scheming but no, from what I have observed, I found them to be lot worse, anyone trying to fight the hostile entities seriously need to emulate Machiavelli's method.
White People deserve a nation of their own
Every other race gets a nation of their own.
Why not Whites?
Good luck with dying for that to happen. Just because I'm right wing doesn't mean I'll cuck to being removed from my country and you'll find that you're a very unpopular opinion.
Now I will compromise and say we could expel everyone with a criminal record and children out of wedlock and it would remove virtually every undesirable from society
Preference cascades don't really work that way.
Once it descends into mob justice, your opinion really won't matter. Maybe you're one of the good ones but that only matters when times are good, and we're headed for very bad times.
I guarantee you'd probably die in the infighting so I hope it'd be worth it
Yeah, no. That's cutting off your nose to spite your face.
There are a number of specific ethnic groups that should be loaded into pods and shot into space, certainly, and certainly restrictions must be put in place on the franchise (because there are just as many weak, foolish men as there are flighty, capricious women, and they vote for the same fucking things), but a blanket "non-whites get out" and "no girls allowed" actually deprives us of good and useful human capital.
Put a strict meritocracy in place, and the problem will mostly resolve itself.
Non-Whites, talented or not, work against Whites. We invented the idea of "not being racist"; no other race even understands it, let along adhere's to it. Maybe if they're so dedicated to us that they're willing to be castrated and never pass on their genes, otherwise no.
Women need to be making babies, period. Every single woman needs to have at least two kids to maintain the population; there is nothing more important than that for them to do. They shouldn't even think about going to university before their kids are fully grown.
Lol yes all the times I've publicly addressed racism against whites was me working against them.
Your service is appreciated, but I've got some terrible news about regression to the mean and the consequences of systemic solutions.
For your first point, I refuse to cede the moral high ground to the scum. Yes, we invented "don't be racist", and I'll see that we beat the fuck out of the other ethnics until they adopt our system or exsanguinate under the lash.
We should not roll our society back into the shit just so we can wallow with the hogs.
For your second point, you do realize that, absent the modern brainwashing apparatus, most women do just want to become mothers, and will become such?
There is no reason to systematically hobble the small number of women who can, of their own volition and by their own guile and artifice, educate themselves and contribute to society. The breeders will spread their legs and pump out babies for you to obsess over regardless; there's no need to break the legs of the thinkers and doers. You dump entire percentage points of useful higher workers to pad the general pool by a few thousandths of s percent. That sort of waste is so obscene to behold it should be criminalized.
No, them entering the workforce reduces the productivity of the nearby men and there are so few of them as to not be worth considering. They can better contribute to society by birthing more men to cover the loss in productivity.
Crazy that you'd try to claim to be in favor of eugenics in the same thread as you declare the least capable women should be breeders whilst the most capable women should put more efforts into mimicking a slightly above average man in the workplace.
You carve out exceptions after establishing the rules.
Are you even remotely aware of genetics?
No, you codify rules that allow for exceptions. There has never been a rule of law or societal norm that carved out exceptions after the fact without some form of coercion or violence.
Are you? Because it sounds like you're trying to make a retarded argument made by people who've never actually studied population groups make.
Yes, the average somalian is retarded. If we eliminate the benefits for taking them in regardless and return everything to a "sink or swim" meritocracy, they'll either fuck off back to their mudhuts, starve in the streets, or die when cops or private citizens make good shoots of they try comitting crimes.
However, it's possible for there to be a statistical outlier born amongst them who isn't retarded, or is even intelligent. We don't need a system that throws them away for the crime of association with a poor performing group. If they have a brain and can learn to act like a human, they should be able to join human society. What you're proposing codifies the opposite, and you're pretending people who grow up under such a system would be willing and able to consider after the fact exceptions.
Which is retarded as shit.
If you let in the exceptional Somalis they will breed and spawn more average Somalis in your country, thus turning your country into a shithole like Somalia.
You are either an idiot or malicious. I'm going with you being malicious until given a reason to believe otherwise.
Not only will all non-whites have to go, but so will all cocksucking traitors like you.
Retarded nigger shit like this is the best evidence of horseshoe theory.
You dumb fucks are in the middle of a purity spiral and can't see it.
Nobody is falling for your magic dirt lie anymore Shlomo. Your attempts at words as magic spells by calling your trojan horse "human capital" just makes me laugh. Someday soon, all of you will hang.
Nonwhite detected.
No nonwhite has ever created anything. Ever. Anywhere on Earth. No value added to civilization since its dawn. This has been anthropologically proven. You have no fucking idea what the words you’re using even mean.
Whites. The Universe is our birthright. Everyone else must be destroyed.
No women are net economic positives. No nonwhites are net economic positives. You have absolutely no idea what you are saying. Eat shit and die with your communist “human capital” dialectic. We’re not commodities to be traded.
WHITES ONLY, GOT IT. THANKS FOR BOWING OUT.
Big fucking doubt. Weak foolish men exist, but the claim that there are exactly just as many men like that as there are flighty, capricious women voting for the societal suicide is absurd. By every metric I've seen that attempts to measure that, it appears politically retarded women vastly outnumber politically retarded men. On average they're comically more easy to manipulate with contradictory emotional bullshit or an illusory consensus, and the polls show it every time. Even the sane or based ones aren't typically that way inherently, just by means of having an especially grounded close social circle to outweigh the wider media influences
You can't have a "strict" meritocracy because weighting merit comparisons between disparate fields is subjective, nevermind somehow measuring the wider merit to society from your non-working behavior. Strict and subjective do not belong together, nor do strict and incomplete data. How do you objectively quantify the merit of an electrician's work versus a salesman's, for example?
You can try a strict adherence to specific merit proxies perhaps. Like income. But in a job market that is anything but meritocratic and a financial system that is both cooked and cucked, that's a shitty proxy that hands political power even more into the hands of rich liberal women in adult daycares or the Rothschilds and bankers, depending on how high you set the bar. You could try IQ tests, or some other general intelligence proxy, but even those have some subjective wiggle room in their weighting of the various cognitive tests that combine to approximate g or IQ, for example you could disproportionately favor people who have high verbal reasoning or facial emotion identification over people with good pattern recognition or abstract reasoning. Plus there's the problem that IQ is not quickly and easily verified at the polls, it relies on a prior institutional stamp of approval from a bunch of bureaucrats that are ripe for political infiltration and subversion. Also general intelligence is, well, general, whilst the political acumen to vote effectively in favor of either your own interests or the interests of your nation as a whole is a specific skillset. There are plenty of generally intelligent academics who have by some combination of necessity and cowardice have politically lobotomized themselves to survive in their fields, rather than live politically "undercover" as it were.
Simply put you can't just magically implement "meritocratic" voting because it's too ambiguous and easily manipulated by an already existing ideology to simply disenfranchise the opposition. The only method of limiting the franchise that is completely safe from incumbent manipulation is by overt, immutable characteristics that any member of the public can independently verify. The next most safe category is by permanent, objective rules rather than personal measurement (e.g. citizenship, or a set number of years of logged national service), which can still technically be falsified by a hostile bureaucracy, but the ease of catching fraud is still high enough to deter blatant mass manipulation.
Ironically if the presence of a handful of good eggs prevents you from seeing the value of removing a group that is measurably more of a net negative overall than the rest of the population, in a zero sum game where the candidate with the highest relative vote proportion takes all the power. Then that would make you one of the uncommonly politically retarded men you're so quick to denounce. Rather than the results focused, competent sociopath you supposedly desire to be.