Exactly this. She believes that being a nigger is the most important and sacred thing in the universe and every word and thought and deed of hers is filtered through that lens.
Nothing is about the country or the people - just niggers.
And most importantly, note how in the absence of having anything of substance to contribute, they instead just default to advocating for whatever is most beneficial to their own in-group.
Let me translate from Jumanji speak because she's had this idea many times in other cases.
What she's trying to say is that any result different from what it "should" be is proof of systemic discrimination. Kagan (I think?) even asked her directly in one of Katanji's first cases what the system discrimination was and she said, 'you know like the results aren't equitable so that's systemic discrimination'. You could hear the other justices roll their eyes.
I call this effect and cause thinking because these retard liberals seem to actually start from the effect.
Since blacks aren't 12% of representatives because winner-take-all isn't "equitable" that's proof of systemic discrimination from the government that must be fixed by making the voting system unfair to everybody else. That's what she's saying.
The eye roll thing you mentioned is real. At a certain point people, even justices, probably consider who is on my side and who is opposed to my side?
"If this dumbass is on MY side that makes me look really stupid. Maybe I'll just cast my vote in the opposite direction of the dumbass to save face.". And people do that A LOT.
Jackson might actually push the liberal justices with a sense of legacy to protect to the right out of necessity.
Likewise, Newsome deciding to go to war with Joe Rogan might push our wavering friend back into the good graces of Trump.
If there is anything the left is very good at doing, it's alienating people.
Nice one! It does explain a lot of leftist "thinking".
"I want this, therefor you have to do that" sort of thing. Expecting results without actually doing anything. I used to call it "They want the trophy before the game starts" & then they boycott the game and keep the trophy :/
Yes. I agree. Ditch the Americans with Disabilities Act. It's too much effort for too little benefit.
Every new building has to accommodate the 0.1% or fewer people who will use it because they're wheelchair-bound or whatever. Ramps that stick out really far because the grade of the slope has to be really low due to this law, that sort of thing.
Besides, you know, blacks, it's one of the largest contributors to building decay in the nation. If you can't build without jumping through hoops, people won't build.
Okay, help me out people cause I'm kinda dumb. But if I'm following her logic districts have to be drawn to give all groups equal access to voting power. How do you achieve that outside of segregation? Is she making an argument for segregation?
It's about not being able to afford an ID. This argument should have been in your history book, or Govt 101 class. And, yet it's still not free IDs for everyone.
That's the basis of this argument. Go look. IDs have a cost, people can't afford this cost, therefore these people can't vote. Now add illegals voting, and you can see that the entire argent breaks down if IDs have no cost.
The thing lefties (and righties too) forget about Gerrymandering is: sure you can rig it for a few extra seats, but you create "fortresses" for the other side too. So stacked with their voters they will never flip. Meanwhile the "rigged" areas will remain purple at best & could flip in just a decade, requiring regular "jigging" :/ It gets really flagrant after a while, like a lot of Blue cities & states. Some Red ones too.
Enforced segregation is one way to keep districts "stable".
The fact that people still take supreme court decisions as valid ethical or moral ground to base themselves off is a joke. But muh supreme court says... This is the supreme court: a bunch of activist retards/dei hires/cucks/Jews etc.
That's only because insurance started refusing to pay unless patients had SSNs. Which made hospitals create an entire position to get babies SSN's so they could get paid.
It may sound stupid but she does not care. She is black first, anything that favors her group is the most important.
Exactly this. She believes that being a nigger is the most important and sacred thing in the universe and every word and thought and deed of hers is filtered through that lens.
Nothing is about the country or the people - just niggers.
Observe the diversity hire in the wild. Note their 95 IQ, and their abject stupidity on any issue you care to name.
95 is... extremely generous.
Average across the African continent is 70, some places as low as 60.
80 was considered the threshold for mental retardation in Canada before political correctness swept it under the rug.
And most importantly, note how in the absence of having anything of substance to contribute, they instead just default to advocating for whatever is most beneficial to their own in-group.
95 IQ is being generous.
Wait, she's saying blacks need gerrymandering or else they're like disabled people without wheelchair ramps? WTF
Let me translate from Jumanji speak because she's had this idea many times in other cases.
What she's trying to say is that any result different from what it "should" be is proof of systemic discrimination. Kagan (I think?) even asked her directly in one of Katanji's first cases what the system discrimination was and she said, 'you know like the results aren't equitable so that's systemic discrimination'. You could hear the other justices roll their eyes.
I call this effect and cause thinking because these retard liberals seem to actually start from the effect.
Since blacks aren't 12% of representatives because winner-take-all isn't "equitable" that's proof of systemic discrimination from the government that must be fixed by making the voting system unfair to everybody else. That's what she's saying.
Weirdly, I think this will help us.
The eye roll thing you mentioned is real. At a certain point people, even justices, probably consider who is on my side and who is opposed to my side?
"If this dumbass is on MY side that makes me look really stupid. Maybe I'll just cast my vote in the opposite direction of the dumbass to save face.". And people do that A LOT.
Jackson might actually push the liberal justices with a sense of legacy to protect to the right out of necessity.
Likewise, Newsome deciding to go to war with Joe Rogan might push our wavering friend back into the good graces of Trump.
If there is anything the left is very good at doing, it's alienating people.
Nice one! It does explain a lot of leftist "thinking".
"I want this, therefor you have to do that" sort of thing. Expecting results without actually doing anything. I used to call it "They want the trophy before the game starts" & then they boycott the game and keep the trophy :/
Yes, that's what identity politics are about
Supreme Court Justice confirms that niggers are not our equals, and literally too retarded to vote.
Well, I'm a racist, and even I'm slightly offended at that...
I mean Justice Thomas is literally right there, jeez.
"He's White." - leftists 😄
While we're on the subject let's get rid of the ADA too.
Disabled man here.
Yes. I agree. Ditch the Americans with Disabilities Act. It's too much effort for too little benefit.
Every new building has to accommodate the 0.1% or fewer people who will use it because they're wheelchair-bound or whatever. Ramps that stick out really far because the grade of the slope has to be really low due to this law, that sort of thing.
Besides, you know, blacks, it's one of the largest contributors to building decay in the nation. If you can't build without jumping through hoops, people won't build.
I recently learned about this great scene from the Rodney Dangerfield movie Back To School.
Note the students taking notes as Rod's character shows you how the business world really works...
Under appreciated movie, there were a lot of funny scenes like that one.
History class was funny too": "GOOOKS!"
If you want to know why Clarence Thomas despises affirmative action this is a good example.
I want to see Thomas lose his cool and drop the N bomb on Jumanji.
We’re all waiting for this to happen before he dies.
I completely disavow claiming racial superiority.
If you want to claim I'm superior to another race, that's on you, and I won't argue against you.
It is less supremacy for one side and more consistently displayed (and for some reason valorized) mediocrity for the other.
Yeah, I was starting to think I phrased it wrong. Should've been "if you want to claim your own inferiority."
Okay, help me out people cause I'm kinda dumb. But if I'm following her logic districts have to be drawn to give all groups equal access to voting power. How do you achieve that outside of segregation? Is she making an argument for segregation?
Yes, segregation is ok to her but only when it’s beneficial to black people. Everyone else can’t have it because they’re not “disabled”.
Logic?
I'm generous
It's about not being able to afford an ID. This argument should have been in your history book, or Govt 101 class. And, yet it's still not free IDs for everyone.
Who said anything about having an ID?
That's the basis of this argument. Go look. IDs have a cost, people can't afford this cost, therefore these people can't vote. Now add illegals voting, and you can see that the entire argent breaks down if IDs have no cost.
Oh I thought it was about gerrymandering.
That's just a bonus.
It's about your "average" nog IQ technically qualifying as mental retardation, one way or the other.
The thing lefties (and righties too) forget about Gerrymandering is: sure you can rig it for a few extra seats, but you create "fortresses" for the other side too. So stacked with their voters they will never flip. Meanwhile the "rigged" areas will remain purple at best & could flip in just a decade, requiring regular "jigging" :/ It gets really flagrant after a while, like a lot of Blue cities & states. Some Red ones too.
Enforced segregation is one way to keep districts "stable".
Translation:
If it's proven that an autopen signature got it appointed to the SC can it be removed?
Let's find out
In our dreams :/
Can’t even say I’m surprised
The fact that people still take supreme court decisions as valid ethical or moral ground to base themselves off is a joke. But muh supreme court says... This is the supreme court: a bunch of activist retards/dei hires/cucks/Jews etc.
If states made IDs free this argument would instantly go away.
Maybe. Everyone gets a Social Security Number at birth and that doesn't prevent fraud or misuse.
That's only because insurance started refusing to pay unless patients had SSNs. Which made hospitals create an entire position to get babies SSN's so they could get paid.