Let me translate from Jumanji speak because she's had this idea many times in other cases.
What she's trying to say is that any result different from what it "should" be is proof of systemic discrimination. Kagan (I think?) even asked her directly in one of Katanji's first cases what the system discrimination was and she said, 'you know like the results aren't equitable so that's systemic discrimination'. You could hear the other justices roll their eyes.
I call this effect and cause thinking because these retard liberals seem to actually start from the effect.
Since blacks aren't 12% of representatives because winner-take-all isn't "equitable" that's proof of systemic discrimination from the government that must be fixed by making the voting system unfair to everybody else. That's what she's saying.
The eye roll thing you mentioned is real. At a certain point people, even justices, probably consider who is on my side and who is opposed to my side?
"If this dumbass is on MY side that makes me look really stupid. Maybe I'll just cast my vote in the opposite direction of the dumbass to save face.". And people do that A LOT.
Jackson might actually push the liberal justices with a sense of legacy to protect to the right out of necessity.
Likewise, Newsome deciding to go to war with Joe Rogan might push our wavering friend back into the good graces of Trump.
If there is anything the left is very good at doing, it's alienating people.
Nice one! It does explain a lot of leftist "thinking".
"I want this, therefor you have to do that" sort of thing. Expecting results without actually doing anything. I used to call it "They want the trophy before the game starts" & then they boycott the game and keep the trophy :/
Let me translate from Jumanji speak because she's had this idea many times in other cases.
What she's trying to say is that any result different from what it "should" be is proof of systemic discrimination. Kagan (I think?) even asked her directly in one of Katanji's first cases what the system discrimination was and she said, 'you know like the results aren't equitable so that's systemic discrimination'. You could hear the other justices roll their eyes.
I call this effect and cause thinking because these retard liberals seem to actually start from the effect.
Since blacks aren't 12% of representatives because winner-take-all isn't "equitable" that's proof of systemic discrimination from the government that must be fixed by making the voting system unfair to everybody else. That's what she's saying.
Weirdly, I think this will help us.
The eye roll thing you mentioned is real. At a certain point people, even justices, probably consider who is on my side and who is opposed to my side?
"If this dumbass is on MY side that makes me look really stupid. Maybe I'll just cast my vote in the opposite direction of the dumbass to save face.". And people do that A LOT.
Jackson might actually push the liberal justices with a sense of legacy to protect to the right out of necessity.
Likewise, Newsome deciding to go to war with Joe Rogan might push our wavering friend back into the good graces of Trump.
If there is anything the left is very good at doing, it's alienating people.
Nice one! It does explain a lot of leftist "thinking".
"I want this, therefor you have to do that" sort of thing. Expecting results without actually doing anything. I used to call it "They want the trophy before the game starts" & then they boycott the game and keep the trophy :/