I call this phenomenon "the filter". Women know men can physically defeat them. But they view fellow women as equal and more easily dominated violently. The violent women who wouldn't try with a man now goes after another woman. Men know they are physically matched and it is a higher risk to go at each other. The men also no longer have to deal with female gate keeping sexual instincts, so they all have the filter removed and fuck each other's brains out 24/7.
There may be something to that, but I think overall it's more simple: women don't face consequences for "small" displays of violence, and they're less in control when emotional. Culturally, how often do you see slapping represented as an acceptable response from a woman to something a man says or does? TV/movies are riddled with it.
When it comes to the unusually high rate of violence between lesbians, I think that's mostly just a product of there now being two women whose violent responses have been normalised. On top of that, throw lesbian bed death into the mix for some extra frustration and volatility.
It's actually even simpler than that: men are biologically designed to protect and procreate with women. Women are biologically designed to compete with each other to acquire the best male protector.
Left to their own devices, women have no filter to restrict themselves from violence toward one another the way men generally prevent themselves from doing harm to women.
Probably part of it, but I'd argue it's more important to note that in roughly 70% of all Domestic Violence, women are the initiators of DV. Including that in the equation, it quickly becomes apparent that the issue is in fact women often starting fights without realising that they have no real way to end said fights and then crying victim, which is what happens in most cases since most DV is reciprocal in nature, not one directional. Take women OUT of the situation entirely, like between gay men, and suddenly the DV drops through the floor.
The idea that men are aggressive towards their loved ones is disgustingly overblown and not at all based in reality, but the media has portrayed it like this for decades to the point that it's just accepted on a subconscious level that that's the way it actually is, and it simply isn't. I partially also blame the adoption of the Duluth Model for this in regards to arresting guidelines, which was adopted after mandatory arrests for DV calls (something advocated by Feminists at the time) resulted in a massive increase in women being arrested, so they needed a new model that would arrest men instead.
Nah, I doubt it. Probably has some level of that, but it'd probably be a mixed bag. Just because the cliche that most people think of regarding DV is overblown doesn't mean it doesn't happen at all.
they're promiscuous af, less attachment and so why get violent?
Men don't hold grudges like women do, on average
Men don't use weapons or poison, they might hit but not much more than that
Men seem to instinctually respect the ability of other men to kill them, there's more restraint compared to modern women who push buttons until something happens
For all of those reasons and more, it's not that surprising that the domestic violence rate of gay men is so low, except when you consider how dysfunctional they otherwise are.
That's putting it mildly. Women will go from being "best friends" with someone to not speaking with them for years because of a relatively minor argument.
I have multiple female family members who have gone years refusing to speak with one another. They'll finally reconcile, but then two years later they get in an argument and they'll go another three years without speaking.
Many years ago, I got into a heated argument with my Mom and at one point she said, "That's it, we're done! We are done!!" I asked what she meant and she meant we're done having a relationship of any kind. I told her she's fucking insane. The topic wasn't even important lol and in her mind it was totally reasonable to end our relationship over it.
She's a lot less crazy these days and we're close because she hates all the woke shit and sees the left for what they are.
They're really fucking two faced as well. They'll act like they're best friends to each other's faces then mercilessly talk shit behind each other's backs.
Women will go from being "best friends" with someone to not speaking with them for years because of a relatively minor argument.
Part of it is that they assume the absolute worst in each other, so a minor misunderstanding will escalate into a blood feud. It could all be avoided if they would communicate directly like men do, but of course they can't manage that. The notion that women are more emotionally intelligent is one of the most successful lies that feminists have ever spread.
Lesbians are definitely the most jealous and "protective" demographic of their significant others. I have a friend who owns a bar and has told his lesbian bartender that her girlfriend wasn't welcome anymore because she was causing too many issues by either arguing with customers for flirting with the bartender or dragging the bartender outside to argue with her about guys flirting with her.
Short answer: because lesbians don't exist.
Long answer: a lot of lesbians aren't really lesbians, they just hate men, had a bad experience with men or can't get the men they want so they become lesbians. But secretly still want a dude or want to be a dude. Look at how many lesbians dress like early 2000s thugs. This would also explain why lesbian bed death is so common.
Also, lesbians seem to have a higher rate of mental illness and aggressive tendencies (to the point where some lesbians are like "well lesbians are supposed to be aggressive"). Lesbians look to fight over anything at the drop of the hat.
You couple this all together and you have a recipe for domestic violence.
There is a selection bias because the more unhinged violent ones become ''transwomen''.
Also, men are raised with the expectation that if they start violence, they are responsible for it.
It's also possible minor and playful pushing or knock on the shoulder will, in the mind of a woman, get re-interpreted moments, days, months or years later as ''domestic violence'' like consensual sex gets ''re-interpreted'' as rape.
Men are held accountable from an early age and women aren't. It's that simple. Double the female bullshit and take 2 creatures that have never experienced accountability in their pampered little lives and it's surprising they don't kill each other more.
It's because there's no man to deflect blame onto so we get to see a more accurate rate of how frequently women are the root cause of domestic violence.
That's not the "if a man gets trapped in a fire he was in the wrong place" Goomba, right? Is the whole leadership over there butch overweight lesbians?
Too bad. If it was, I'd say we should give the wife the benefit of the doubt. After how much that piece of shit screwed up, everyone in LA should be considered a suspect for its death. Or for that matter, a hero.
Going by the liberal definition of abuse every man has been abused. I don't know one guy who hasn't been hit, pinched, bit, and had shit thrown at him.
In 2015, a federal statistics agency in Canada (StatCan) released a report based on census data that included self-reported rates of spousal violence victimisation. My recall of the numbers isn't perfect, but I believe 342,000 women reported being the victims of spousal violence... as did 420,000 men. To me, this suggested a massive underrporting in official violent offenses against men. StatCan has since changed how these numbers are reported and women are overrepresented by a huge margin now.
If you look at police statistics in Canadian provinces, they characterise their numbers as "police-reported" so those numbers can't be trusted at all.
Or are the male victims of violent women too afraid to report it?
They literally can't in a lot of areas. Legally, the Duluth Model is the most commonly accepted form of domestic violence enforcement and within it the man cannot be the aggressor short of a set of super specific scenarios no one will ever meet.
By a man being larger than her, he must be the aggressor by that model and even if they catch her mid stab on him unarmed he is still not by default a victim. Because its a feminist theory that says that domestic violence is a "society level taught patriarchal threat."
That's without getting into them pulling a reversal and starting to cry and acting like you hit them when the cops show up, because they are legally required to arrest someone if they are and you are the easy option.
So if you report it, you will likely end up getting arrested yourself for domestic violence and get branded by it, and you will have to go through a lengthy legal case to reverse that. At that point why would you ever want to risk reporting it? That's not fear, its purely rational caution.
Or are the male victims of violent women too afraid to report it?
More like they get arrested and charged for their trouble. Our civilization refuses to acknowledge evil when it is perpetrated by a woman and there's a man within a ten mile radius that could be blamed instead.
Between losing funds for lgbbq propagation and trans losing outlets to injure women, I think we're going to see a marked increase in domestic violence among alphabet peoples.
I'm shocked. Shocked I say.
Not. Lesbians have the highest rate of domestic violence, even with the left covering it up
I'm stunned the domestic violence rate of gay men is so LOW.
Seriously, how?
I call this phenomenon "the filter". Women know men can physically defeat them. But they view fellow women as equal and more easily dominated violently. The violent women who wouldn't try with a man now goes after another woman. Men know they are physically matched and it is a higher risk to go at each other. The men also no longer have to deal with female gate keeping sexual instincts, so they all have the filter removed and fuck each other's brains out 24/7.
There may be something to that, but I think overall it's more simple: women don't face consequences for "small" displays of violence, and they're less in control when emotional. Culturally, how often do you see slapping represented as an acceptable response from a woman to something a man says or does? TV/movies are riddled with it.
When it comes to the unusually high rate of violence between lesbians, I think that's mostly just a product of there now being two women whose violent responses have been normalised. On top of that, throw lesbian bed death into the mix for some extra frustration and volatility.
It's actually even simpler than that: men are biologically designed to protect and procreate with women. Women are biologically designed to compete with each other to acquire the best male protector.
Left to their own devices, women have no filter to restrict themselves from violence toward one another the way men generally prevent themselves from doing harm to women.
Probably part of it, but I'd argue it's more important to note that in roughly 70% of all Domestic Violence, women are the initiators of DV. Including that in the equation, it quickly becomes apparent that the issue is in fact women often starting fights without realising that they have no real way to end said fights and then crying victim, which is what happens in most cases since most DV is reciprocal in nature, not one directional. Take women OUT of the situation entirely, like between gay men, and suddenly the DV drops through the floor.
The idea that men are aggressive towards their loved ones is disgustingly overblown and not at all based in reality, but the media has portrayed it like this for decades to the point that it's just accepted on a subconscious level that that's the way it actually is, and it simply isn't. I partially also blame the adoption of the Duluth Model for this in regards to arresting guidelines, which was adopted after mandatory arrests for DV calls (something advocated by Feminists at the time) resulted in a massive increase in women being arrested, so they needed a new model that would arrest men instead.
Yeah, and I suspect that the 30% where they don't initiate the violence, the man's been nagged at for an hour straight and loses his temper.
Nah, I doubt it. Probably has some level of that, but it'd probably be a mixed bag. Just because the cliche that most people think of regarding DV is overblown doesn't mean it doesn't happen at all.
they're promiscuous af, less attachment and so why get violent?
Men don't hold grudges like women do, on average
Men don't use weapons or poison, they might hit but not much more than that
Men seem to instinctually respect the ability of other men to kill them, there's more restraint compared to modern women who push buttons until something happens
For all of those reasons and more, it's not that surprising that the domestic violence rate of gay men is so low, except when you consider how dysfunctional they otherwise are.
That's putting it mildly. Women will go from being "best friends" with someone to not speaking with them for years because of a relatively minor argument.
I have multiple female family members who have gone years refusing to speak with one another. They'll finally reconcile, but then two years later they get in an argument and they'll go another three years without speaking.
Many years ago, I got into a heated argument with my Mom and at one point she said, "That's it, we're done! We are done!!" I asked what she meant and she meant we're done having a relationship of any kind. I told her she's fucking insane. The topic wasn't even important lol and in her mind it was totally reasonable to end our relationship over it.
She's a lot less crazy these days and we're close because she hates all the woke shit and sees the left for what they are.
They're really fucking two faced as well. They'll act like they're best friends to each other's faces then mercilessly talk shit behind each other's backs.
Part of it is that they assume the absolute worst in each other, so a minor misunderstanding will escalate into a blood feud. It could all be avoided if they would communicate directly like men do, but of course they can't manage that. The notion that women are more emotionally intelligent is one of the most successful lies that feminists have ever spread.
None of my female friends are on the same set of "best friends" that I've met them with.
Lesbians are definitely the most jealous and "protective" demographic of their significant others. I have a friend who owns a bar and has told his lesbian bartender that her girlfriend wasn't welcome anymore because she was causing too many issues by either arguing with customers for flirting with the bartender or dragging the bartender outside to argue with her about guys flirting with her.
Short answer: because lesbians don't exist. Long answer: a lot of lesbians aren't really lesbians, they just hate men, had a bad experience with men or can't get the men they want so they become lesbians. But secretly still want a dude or want to be a dude. Look at how many lesbians dress like early 2000s thugs. This would also explain why lesbian bed death is so common. Also, lesbians seem to have a higher rate of mental illness and aggressive tendencies (to the point where some lesbians are like "well lesbians are supposed to be aggressive"). Lesbians look to fight over anything at the drop of the hat. You couple this all together and you have a recipe for domestic violence.
This. A lot of "former" party thots, druggie gals and other assorted hoes turn "lesbian.". If they have children God help them.
There is a selection bias because the more unhinged violent ones become ''transwomen''.
Also, men are raised with the expectation that if they start violence, they are responsible for it.
It's also possible minor and playful pushing or knock on the shoulder will, in the mind of a woman, get re-interpreted moments, days, months or years later as ''domestic violence'' like consensual sex gets ''re-interpreted'' as rape.
They're limpwristed fags who can't hurt each other if they wanted to, since the soy has sapped all their strength.
Men are held accountable from an early age and women aren't. It's that simple. Double the female bullshit and take 2 creatures that have never experienced accountability in their pampered little lives and it's surprising they don't kill each other more.
It's because there's no man to deflect blame onto so we get to see a more accurate rate of how frequently women are the root cause of domestic violence.
I’m shocked, shocked, to find violence going on in lesbian relationships!
Woman suspected of killing fire captain wife fatally stabbed her husband in 2000, records show
11 years for stabbing her husband to death.
That's not the "if a man gets trapped in a fire he was in the wrong place" Goomba, right? Is the whole leadership over there butch overweight lesbians?
No, that was Los Angeles, not San Diego.
Too bad. If it was, I'd say we should give the wife the benefit of the doubt. After how much that piece of shit screwed up, everyone in LA should be considered a suspect for its death. Or for that matter, a hero.
Are lesbians really more violent than straight women?
Or are the male victims of violent women too afraid to report it?
Going by the liberal definition of abuse every man has been abused. I don't know one guy who hasn't been hit, pinched, bit, and had shit thrown at him.
Impossible to say, however...
In 2015, a federal statistics agency in Canada (StatCan) released a report based on census data that included self-reported rates of spousal violence victimisation. My recall of the numbers isn't perfect, but I believe 342,000 women reported being the victims of spousal violence... as did 420,000 men. To me, this suggested a massive underrporting in official violent offenses against men. StatCan has since changed how these numbers are reported and women are overrepresented by a huge margin now.
If you look at police statistics in Canadian provinces, they characterise their numbers as "police-reported" so those numbers can't be trusted at all.
They literally can't in a lot of areas. Legally, the Duluth Model is the most commonly accepted form of domestic violence enforcement and within it the man cannot be the aggressor short of a set of super specific scenarios no one will ever meet.
By a man being larger than her, he must be the aggressor by that model and even if they catch her mid stab on him unarmed he is still not by default a victim. Because its a feminist theory that says that domestic violence is a "society level taught patriarchal threat."
That's without getting into them pulling a reversal and starting to cry and acting like you hit them when the cops show up, because they are legally required to arrest someone if they are and you are the easy option.
So if you report it, you will likely end up getting arrested yourself for domestic violence and get branded by it, and you will have to go through a lengthy legal case to reverse that. At that point why would you ever want to risk reporting it? That's not fear, its purely rational caution.
More like they get arrested and charged for their trouble. Our civilization refuses to acknowledge evil when it is perpetrated by a woman and there's a man within a ten mile radius that could be blamed instead.
If a lesbian needed my help during an attempted murder my response is she got herself in the wrong place if I have to save her from a dyke GF.
Many such cases
Between losing funds for lgbbq propagation and trans losing outlets to injure women, I think we're going to see a marked increase in domestic violence among alphabet peoples.
Lesbo on lesbo violence is a real thing.
That lesbian's name? Keith Olbermann
The internalized misogyny caused by MAGA and the fear of being othered is becoming epidemic and fatal.....the new headline
Lol. Just fucking lol. Happy Saturday to all.
Lesbian domestic violence, they still blame a man. Feminism is cancer
Anyone got a pic of her? I have a theory....