Going by the liberal definition of abuse every man has been abused. I don't know one guy who hasn't been hit, pinched, bit, and had shit thrown at him.
In 2015, a federal statistics agency in Canada (StatCan) released a report based on census data that included self-reported rates of spousal violence victimisation. My recall of the numbers isn't perfect, but I believe 342,000 women reported being the victims of spousal violence... as did 420,000 men. To me, this suggested a massive underrporting in official violent offenses against men. StatCan has since changed how these numbers are reported and women are overrepresented by a huge margin now.
If you look at police statistics in Canadian provinces, they characterise their numbers as "police-reported" so those numbers can't be trusted at all.
Or are the male victims of violent women too afraid to report it?
They literally can't in a lot of areas. Legally, the Duluth Model is the most commonly accepted form of domestic violence enforcement and within it the man cannot be the aggressor short of a set of super specific scenarios no one will ever meet.
By a man being larger than her, he must be the aggressor by that model and even if they catch her mid stab on him unarmed he is still not by default a victim. Because its a feminist theory that says that domestic violence is a "society level taught patriarchal threat."
That's without getting into them pulling a reversal and starting to cry and acting like you hit them when the cops show up, because they are legally required to arrest someone if they are and you are the easy option.
So if you report it, you will likely end up getting arrested yourself for domestic violence and get branded by it, and you will have to go through a lengthy legal case to reverse that. At that point why would you ever want to risk reporting it? That's not fear, its purely rational caution.
Or are the male victims of violent women too afraid to report it?
More like they get arrested and charged for their trouble. Our civilization refuses to acknowledge evil when it is perpetrated by a woman and there's a man within a ten mile radius that could be blamed instead.
Are lesbians really more violent than straight women?
Or are the male victims of violent women too afraid to report it?
Going by the liberal definition of abuse every man has been abused. I don't know one guy who hasn't been hit, pinched, bit, and had shit thrown at him.
Impossible to say, however...
In 2015, a federal statistics agency in Canada (StatCan) released a report based on census data that included self-reported rates of spousal violence victimisation. My recall of the numbers isn't perfect, but I believe 342,000 women reported being the victims of spousal violence... as did 420,000 men. To me, this suggested a massive underrporting in official violent offenses against men. StatCan has since changed how these numbers are reported and women are overrepresented by a huge margin now.
If you look at police statistics in Canadian provinces, they characterise their numbers as "police-reported" so those numbers can't be trusted at all.
They literally can't in a lot of areas. Legally, the Duluth Model is the most commonly accepted form of domestic violence enforcement and within it the man cannot be the aggressor short of a set of super specific scenarios no one will ever meet.
By a man being larger than her, he must be the aggressor by that model and even if they catch her mid stab on him unarmed he is still not by default a victim. Because its a feminist theory that says that domestic violence is a "society level taught patriarchal threat."
That's without getting into them pulling a reversal and starting to cry and acting like you hit them when the cops show up, because they are legally required to arrest someone if they are and you are the easy option.
So if you report it, you will likely end up getting arrested yourself for domestic violence and get branded by it, and you will have to go through a lengthy legal case to reverse that. At that point why would you ever want to risk reporting it? That's not fear, its purely rational caution.
More like they get arrested and charged for their trouble. Our civilization refuses to acknowledge evil when it is perpetrated by a woman and there's a man within a ten mile radius that could be blamed instead.