"I have instructed the IDF to prepare a plan that will allow any resident of Gaza who wishes to leave to do so, to any country willing to receive them."
And what if they don't want to leave? Last I checked, "leave or die" wasn't an "offer," it's an ultimatum. Zionists are good at dressing up their threats like kind favors. Also, "legally obligated" under what authority? These are the same serpents that claim they're not subject to The International Court of Justice (ICJ) for their Human Rights abuses against Palestinians, but somehow other nations are "legally obligated" to take their refugees?
Wow, you're so right. I can't imagine why you're getting downvoted.
Tell us, given that we're talking about an illegal occupation gov't that has repeatedly bombed civilian targets like schools and hospitals and ambulances and shelters with illegal weapons like flechette bombs and white phosphorus ... what do you think the Israeli's would do to Palestinians who refuse to leave?
The parallels between what Israel is offering the Palestinians and what the Jews of Europe were offered 1937-1940 can't be ignored, with the exception of course that Jews weren't being bombed up until the offer to be deported to Palestine and Madagaskar.
Yeah, weird how terrorists use those as headquarters.
I know you'll ignore this, and continue seething about your goat rapist friends getting murdered, but the rest of us prefer dead terrorist shit bags to living ones. Maybe you should sack up and go over there with your buddies, since you hate the jews so much.
Sure you don't. And I don't care for your whatabout-isms and warped lies. Let's get that clear: you're always here responding to me, never the other way, so I'm clearly striking a nerve when I post the truth.
No, it's not. It's one of them but let's face it, low IQ cousin marriages and a degenerate child rape culture of Muslim and Jewish semites is the main one.
No, Israel is the main reason. The wars and destabilization of Iraq, Syria, Libya and Afghanistan are all directly connected to Israel. Maybe even Yemen.
Middle eastern instability goes waaay further back than the creation of Israel.
The Crusades were only successful because of the collapse of the Abbassid Caliphate into infighting. It's a trend amongst Islamic countries throughout history that they expand very rapidly and then fall apart to petty infighting and civil wars. It happened to the Umayyad Caliphate (which is what led to the survival of the Spanish Kingdoms and subsequent reqonquista), The Fatamids, even the Ottomans.
The game EUIV even had a mechanic to model this behaviour called the Decadance mechanic where political infighting, zealot uprisings and military coups become inevitable. It's just a staple of Islamic societies that they fall apart.
There's lots of reasons for it and some of it cultural, but Polygamy creates a large underclass of disenfranchised fighting aged men who turn to various forms of extremism, literally incels. Inbreeding lowers the IQ drastically. And the religion itself is intolerant and in perpetual schism with itself. Sunnies and Shia's hate eachother with a passion. And in turn they hate any other religion, and Islam is an invading force in every country it resides except for those in the Arabian peninsula, so there's a vast ethnic and cultural difference in those countries that further intensifies the problem.
Islamic countries have always been and will always be a shitshow basically.
I'm going to remind you that European countries were busy fighting eachother for centuries which is why the Ottoman Empire was able to conquer the Balkans in the first place. So infighting and instability before modern times wasn't exactly unique to the Arab world.
But we're talking about modern times and the instability since the fall of the Ottoman Empire has been directly caused by Israel as Israel does not want a stable Arab world that would be able to stand united against it. This is why Israel has waged war on all of its neighbors since the very beginning.
What you're saying about the Arab world is generally true but those are not the main reasons for the regions instability since the fall of the Ottoman Empire. Most of the wars in the region in modern times involved significant outside meddling. The Arab Revolt that led to the fall of the Ottoman Empire happend because of British involvement. Israels creation happened because of the British selling Palestine to the Zionists. Every single war and victory of Israel was only possible because massive western support. The only reason why Israel can act the way it does is because of their stranglehold on the US government. Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Libya, the Arab spring in general was all to the benefit of Israel.
Now what you're saying is still true. The Arabs are in general an inbred and culturally messed up people BUT Saddams Iraq was stable. Assads Syria was stable. Gadaffis Libya was stable and prospered. Afghanistan under the Taliban was stable even if you and I would've called it a religious shithole. Mubaraks Egypt was stable and fortunately is stable again after the military wiped out the Muslim brotherhood. Tunisia was also stable.
It doesn't matter if the Arab world is a shitshow. It only matters if it's a stable shitshow or not. Europe is a shitshow nowadays. The US is also a shitshow. But both still enjoy relative stability. Once that stability is gone you won't have a shitshow anymore but chaos.
Go and ask the Iraqis which they preferred. A violent but stable dictatorship under Saddam or the complete chaos that followed after the US carpet bombing of Iraq.
There's a difference in fighting eachother and repeatedly fighting civil wars and military coups. Medieval European societies were generally pretty stable, there are exceptions of course.
Arab societies can be stable but only under strongman governments like the ones you've mentioned and only for a generation at most, or until that strongman is gone.
If you assassinated a European leader the country wouldn't fracture into civil war and regional militias, but this does happen every single time in Islamic countries because of how the religion and cultures shape the society.
I'm not denying that the west has meddled in the middle east on behalf of Israel or other nefarious reasons and caused a shit show, but they merely sped up the inevitable shit show by a decade or so.
The Ottoman empire was being propped up by the European powers before the first world war to limit the expansion of Russia. Had it not been for Britain and France then the Ottomans would have blown up a hundred years earlier, it was suffering from rebellions in Egypt, Libya, the Balkans, it's own unpopular and unstable monarchy. Turkey only survives today as a unified state through the actions of ataturk, a weaker leader and Greece, Armenia, Georgia and Kurdistan would all be a lot larger and Turkey would likely not exist.
Again I'm not denying Israel is a destabilising influence on the region either, but without Israel the region would still be fighting itself, it's essentially the new Balkan powder keg.
You're talking to people who have a jew fetish, and blame them for everything no matter what. Don't bother explaining reality to them. They'll ignore you and keep seething about their inferiority complex.
All the jews in Israel would migrate to the West, and more jews is not good for the West. And they'd immediately be placed in positions of authority by the jews that are already here.
Well..for starters they wouldn't have control over the US..
Dual citizenship would be banned faster than you could say Oy Vey. Foreign aid would be cut off overnight and half of the user on this website would stop posting.
They are hamstrung by compromised leadership and international elite influence. They don’t have the American values of “go fuck yourself, I’ll fight everybody here”. It’s going to take the leadership here to show them that it’s ok to go back to the way things were.
This is what get my attention. No sovereign nation is legally obligated to take shit from Gaza. What legal grounds can they cite? “You hurt our feelings?”
But remember: it's only a right-wing conspiracy theory that Jews flood white countries with 3rd world migrants, even if they openly say so themselves and use their military to do it!
Can we talk about how this is a shameless theft of land?
The people of Gaza should have the right to freedom of movement and migration, as is customary everywhere in the world.
You don't have a right to enter other countries willy-nilly.
And if someone wants to go "muh refugee/assylum status", you're required to show up at the first accessible border, not show up and trek across countless miles.
I'm surprised they haven't suggested sending Gazans to Madagascar yet.
It makes no sense to send them to majority white countries. Lets face it people want to be next to people they relate with. For all I care they can stay where they are.
The Zionists pushed the idea of every Arab nation taking a little of them a few months ago. They all refused; not because they don't want the Palestinians, but because they don't want to see the Zionists steal any more lives and displace more people. Of course, the Western media tried to spin it the other way. "See? Even other Arab nations don't want these people. They're savages!" And there was that word again, "savages," which the Zionists got backlash for using in subway posters in NYC. Either way, they're intent as always on stealing more land with America's help.
They all refused; not because they don't want the Palestinians, but because they don't want to see the Zionists steal any more lives and displace more people.
BS. Maybe (probably) it wasn't the entire reason, but even a cursory look at the past 50-100 years shows quite clearly that any country (Western or Middle Eastern) which takes in large groups of Palestinians has issues with them. And with one exception, there's basically no one in the middle east able to take them safely.
The PLO tried to take over Jordan in the early 70s, but lost and got kicked out.
They went to Lebanon, and first created their own autonomous zone there and then kicked off a 15 year civil war which resulted in Israel occupying southern Lebanon up until 2000 and Syria occupying northern Lebanon up until 2005.
Syria has historically been supportive of Palestinian groups but they are in no place to take anyone in at the moment due to the whole country basically being destroyed at the moment.
Egypt literally built a wall to keep people from Gaza out, and is actively expanding a buffer zone between them and Gaza.
Iraq? Thanks to George W Bush, the place is a massively unstable political and economic wreck and is in no position to help anyone.
That basically just leaves Saudi Arabia. They are politically and economically stable enough to take in Palestinians, but what possible reason would they have to do so given that pretty much every other country in the area has issues with the Palestinians?
If Hitler was the man who actively rounded up peoples for the purpose of the deportation of Jews, killing them and generally removing them from the face of the Earth, or at the least those on German sanctioned soil.
Is doing the opposite of that, defending their lands and the surrounding areas and engaging in activities which could only benefit their safety and ensure their ability to grow (No doubt into the surrounding areas) the antithesis of what Hitler did?
Would it be fair to say that Trump is the 'Anti-Hitler'?
Just passing that one over to our Left loadbearing cousins who are happy to say that Trump is "Literally Hitler".
If, in the context of the Jewish people of Israel, Trump is actively working towards the preservation of the oldest established religion of the world - is he still literally Hitler?
Don't hate the player, hate the game that you set the rules for.
I really don't understand why Trump doesn't just close the fucking border!
You want to become an American citizen. Here's a program for you:
The EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program is a US program that allows foreign investors to become permanent residents through investment and job creation. The minimum investment amount for an EB-5 visa is $1,050,000 for investments outside of a Targeted Employment Area (TEA), and $800,000 if the investment is made within a TEA, which is typically a rural area or a region with high unemployment.
And what if they don't want to leave? Last I checked, "leave or die" wasn't an "offer," it's an ultimatum. Zionists are good at dressing up their threats like kind favors. Also, "legally obligated" under what authority? These are the same serpents that claim they're not subject to The International Court of Justice (ICJ) for their Human Rights abuses against Palestinians, but somehow other nations are "legally obligated" to take their refugees?
Link
The local JIDF tells me there are no people there just "Hamas".
Where would we be without the "cyber commandos" of the Jewish Internet Defense Force? 🤣
Genocidal apartheid israel is a terrorist state.
A genocidal apartheid terrorist occupation state.
They don't even have legitimate claim/ rights to the land they occupy.
Your continuous hyperbolic distortion of your own posts is weird. You can say they are being threated with execution, but it's not in your post.
Wow, you're so right. I can't imagine why you're getting downvoted.
Tell us, given that we're talking about an illegal occupation gov't that has repeatedly bombed civilian targets like schools and hospitals and ambulances and shelters with illegal weapons like flechette bombs and white phosphorus ... what do you think the Israeli's would do to Palestinians who refuse to leave?
The parallels between what Israel is offering the Palestinians and what the Jews of Europe were offered 1937-1940 can't be ignored, with the exception of course that Jews weren't being bombed up until the offer to be deported to Palestine and Madagaskar.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/08/world/middleeast/hamas-unrwa-schools.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/02/us/politics/gaza-hospital-hamas.html
Yeah, weird how terrorists use those as headquarters.
I know you'll ignore this, and continue seething about your goat rapist friends getting murdered, but the rest of us prefer dead terrorist shit bags to living ones. Maybe you should sack up and go over there with your buddies, since you hate the jews so much.
NYT acting as a mouth piece for the Israeli government and US glowies
Your goat molesting terrorist buddies got blown up, deal with it.
This is a thread about destroying White countries in service to Israel. Of course you're a big fan.
No, I'm just not seething because I'm inferior. I also don't have goat raping commie terrorist friends I have to cover for, unlike you guys.
You can find hundred of sources for that. You just don't like it because you hate jews more than anything else.
I'd rather glass them than displace them. Because, if it's about civilians Israel should welcome in them, not doing it would be hypocrisy
I don't care about the downdoots.
I'm not interested in you crying about your foreign war that you are losing. You didn't show me evidence and you still don't have it.
Sure you don't. And I don't care for your whatabout-isms and warped lies. Let's get that clear: you're always here responding to me, never the other way, so I'm clearly striking a nerve when I post the truth.
I respond to OP pushing retarded jew-hate because you're shilling for upvotes.
See, I know you're not a real jew hater, you're weirdo obsessed with getting internet points. You're fishing.
"How dare you say we're ethnically cleansing Gaza?! Just for that, we're going to ship all the people we're displacing from Gaza to your countries!"
"You can't accuse us of genocide!"
"We kept a few alive to use as political pawns to punish your insolence".
More like "punish you for your existence."
"Our greatest ally" bragging about creating murderous extremists and then shipping them to our nations. Great.
But remember, you gotta side with them to stop the Muslims (that they are sending to your country).
Hey, how about fuck you, lets you and them fight to the death for our amusement.
If muslims took over Israel, could it ever be worse for the West than it is now? I might be starting to wish for that timeline...
Israel is literally the main reason for the instability of the Middle East.
No, it's not. It's one of them but let's face it, low IQ cousin marriages and a degenerate child rape culture of Muslim and Jewish semites is the main one.
No, Israel is the main reason. The wars and destabilization of Iraq, Syria, Libya and Afghanistan are all directly connected to Israel. Maybe even Yemen.
Middle eastern instability goes waaay further back than the creation of Israel. The Crusades were only successful because of the collapse of the Abbassid Caliphate into infighting. It's a trend amongst Islamic countries throughout history that they expand very rapidly and then fall apart to petty infighting and civil wars. It happened to the Umayyad Caliphate (which is what led to the survival of the Spanish Kingdoms and subsequent reqonquista), The Fatamids, even the Ottomans. The game EUIV even had a mechanic to model this behaviour called the Decadance mechanic where political infighting, zealot uprisings and military coups become inevitable. It's just a staple of Islamic societies that they fall apart. There's lots of reasons for it and some of it cultural, but Polygamy creates a large underclass of disenfranchised fighting aged men who turn to various forms of extremism, literally incels. Inbreeding lowers the IQ drastically. And the religion itself is intolerant and in perpetual schism with itself. Sunnies and Shia's hate eachother with a passion. And in turn they hate any other religion, and Islam is an invading force in every country it resides except for those in the Arabian peninsula, so there's a vast ethnic and cultural difference in those countries that further intensifies the problem. Islamic countries have always been and will always be a shitshow basically.
I'm going to remind you that European countries were busy fighting eachother for centuries which is why the Ottoman Empire was able to conquer the Balkans in the first place. So infighting and instability before modern times wasn't exactly unique to the Arab world.
But we're talking about modern times and the instability since the fall of the Ottoman Empire has been directly caused by Israel as Israel does not want a stable Arab world that would be able to stand united against it. This is why Israel has waged war on all of its neighbors since the very beginning.
What you're saying about the Arab world is generally true but those are not the main reasons for the regions instability since the fall of the Ottoman Empire. Most of the wars in the region in modern times involved significant outside meddling. The Arab Revolt that led to the fall of the Ottoman Empire happend because of British involvement. Israels creation happened because of the British selling Palestine to the Zionists. Every single war and victory of Israel was only possible because massive western support. The only reason why Israel can act the way it does is because of their stranglehold on the US government. Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Libya, the Arab spring in general was all to the benefit of Israel.
Now what you're saying is still true. The Arabs are in general an inbred and culturally messed up people BUT Saddams Iraq was stable. Assads Syria was stable. Gadaffis Libya was stable and prospered. Afghanistan under the Taliban was stable even if you and I would've called it a religious shithole. Mubaraks Egypt was stable and fortunately is stable again after the military wiped out the Muslim brotherhood. Tunisia was also stable.
It doesn't matter if the Arab world is a shitshow. It only matters if it's a stable shitshow or not. Europe is a shitshow nowadays. The US is also a shitshow. But both still enjoy relative stability. Once that stability is gone you won't have a shitshow anymore but chaos.
Go and ask the Iraqis which they preferred. A violent but stable dictatorship under Saddam or the complete chaos that followed after the US carpet bombing of Iraq.
There's a difference in fighting eachother and repeatedly fighting civil wars and military coups. Medieval European societies were generally pretty stable, there are exceptions of course. Arab societies can be stable but only under strongman governments like the ones you've mentioned and only for a generation at most, or until that strongman is gone. If you assassinated a European leader the country wouldn't fracture into civil war and regional militias, but this does happen every single time in Islamic countries because of how the religion and cultures shape the society. I'm not denying that the west has meddled in the middle east on behalf of Israel or other nefarious reasons and caused a shit show, but they merely sped up the inevitable shit show by a decade or so. The Ottoman empire was being propped up by the European powers before the first world war to limit the expansion of Russia. Had it not been for Britain and France then the Ottomans would have blown up a hundred years earlier, it was suffering from rebellions in Egypt, Libya, the Balkans, it's own unpopular and unstable monarchy. Turkey only survives today as a unified state through the actions of ataturk, a weaker leader and Greece, Armenia, Georgia and Kurdistan would all be a lot larger and Turkey would likely not exist. Again I'm not denying Israel is a destabilising influence on the region either, but without Israel the region would still be fighting itself, it's essentially the new Balkan powder keg.
"Inbreeding lowers the IQ drastically."
Thanks. Most people don't know the Enlightenment is largely due to the Church banning cousin marriages.
Jewish semites have the same issues as their Muslim cousins. Only European Jews mixed enough to not suffer too much from inbreeding. Or am I wrong?
You're talking to people who have a jew fetish, and blame them for everything no matter what. Don't bother explaining reality to them. They'll ignore you and keep seething about their inferiority complex.
Good day ghostfox1_. Would you like to talk about the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society?
Yes, I’m pretty sure it’d be immeasurably better.
All the jews in Israel would migrate to the West, and more jews is not good for the West. And they'd immediately be placed in positions of authority by the jews that are already here.
I think it's genetically-determined behavior in both races.
But now they use Israel as a base of operations and the place to flee to when they get caught. I'm still very much in favor of the Madagaskar plan.
Welcome to the party!
Well..for starters they wouldn't have control over the US..
Dual citizenship would be banned faster than you could say Oy Vey. Foreign aid would be cut off overnight and half of the user on this website would stop posting.
Leave my Norway alone, you bloviated piece of shit small hat tribe rat. They belong with their kind, not with the people of Light.
Europe cannot begin to save themselves unless and until they shed the yoke of fear from being called "racist" or "antisemitic."
Once they liberate their minds from those meaningless, manipulative words, THEN they can begin to reclaim the land of their fathers!
They are hamstrung by compromised leadership and international elite influence. They don’t have the American values of “go fuck yourself, I’ll fight everybody here”. It’s going to take the leadership here to show them that it’s ok to go back to the way things were.
It takes an exceptional amount of chutzpah to tell other countries what they are legally allowed to do in their own territory.
This is what get my attention. No sovereign nation is legally obligated to take shit from Gaza. What legal grounds can they cite? “You hurt our feelings?”
How about you FUCK OFF OUT OF PALESTINIAN LAND instead, you Zionist pigs?
But remember: it's only a right-wing conspiracy theory that Jews flood white countries with 3rd world migrants, even if they openly say so themselves and use their military to do it!
The people of Gaza should have the right to the freedom of movement and migration, including migration into Israel?
See I heard Trunp or someone in his administration recommended Somalia to move them to...
So leftist run Western governments, you gonna take them in or side with Trump?
Can we talk about how this is a shameless theft of land?
You don't have a right to enter other countries willy-nilly.
And if someone wants to go "muh refugee/assylum status", you're required to show up at the first accessible border, not show up and trek across countless miles.
I'm surprised they haven't suggested sending Gazans to Madagascar yet.
As I've been saying
https://scored.co/c/KotakuInAction2/p/17rmJXusOW/the-west-should-welcome-gaza-ref/c
The safest nearby country is Isreal. They should be relocated there.
The Israelis are literally saying, "If you said they were good, and you wanted them so much, you are going to get them".
He's replicating the strategy that Greg Abbot and Ron DeSantis used.
Gizortnik wants to destroy White countries for Israel's sake.
Like always, you just make up horse shit you know isn't true, and I've proved to you a dozen times. You explicitly refuse to engage in good faith.
We don't need these retards going down from Canada to America
Every single time, you never miss.
instead of deporting them to arab countries (or just... not genociding them) they want to use them as bio-weapons against US
the only question is... are they willing to be an instrument of the jews?
It makes no sense to send them to majority white countries. Lets face it people want to be next to people they relate with. For all I care they can stay where they are.
The Zionists pushed the idea of every Arab nation taking a little of them a few months ago. They all refused; not because they don't want the Palestinians, but because they don't want to see the Zionists steal any more lives and displace more people. Of course, the Western media tried to spin it the other way. "See? Even other Arab nations don't want these people. They're savages!" And there was that word again, "savages," which the Zionists got backlash for using in subway posters in NYC. Either way, they're intent as always on stealing more land with America's help.
BS. Maybe (probably) it wasn't the entire reason, but even a cursory look at the past 50-100 years shows quite clearly that any country (Western or Middle Eastern) which takes in large groups of Palestinians has issues with them. And with one exception, there's basically no one in the middle east able to take them safely.
The PLO tried to take over Jordan in the early 70s, but lost and got kicked out.
They went to Lebanon, and first created their own autonomous zone there and then kicked off a 15 year civil war which resulted in Israel occupying southern Lebanon up until 2000 and Syria occupying northern Lebanon up until 2005.
Syria has historically been supportive of Palestinian groups but they are in no place to take anyone in at the moment due to the whole country basically being destroyed at the moment.
Egypt literally built a wall to keep people from Gaza out, and is actively expanding a buffer zone between them and Gaza.
Iraq? Thanks to George W Bush, the place is a massively unstable political and economic wreck and is in no position to help anyone.
That basically just leaves Saudi Arabia. They are politically and economically stable enough to take in Palestinians, but what possible reason would they have to do so given that pretty much every other country in the area has issues with the Palestinians?
The entire middle East can go to hell, and take all its people with them.
I looooooooove jeeeeeeewwwwssss!!!!
https://youtu.be/eS797lGsa2M
A classic.
Genocidal apartheid israel is a terrorist state.
Those countries can still refuse, and should.
Weird how that works.
If Hitler was the man who actively rounded up peoples for the purpose of the deportation of Jews, killing them and generally removing them from the face of the Earth, or at the least those on German sanctioned soil.
Is doing the opposite of that, defending their lands and the surrounding areas and engaging in activities which could only benefit their safety and ensure their ability to grow (No doubt into the surrounding areas) the antithesis of what Hitler did?
Would it be fair to say that Trump is the 'Anti-Hitler'?
Just passing that one over to our Left loadbearing cousins who are happy to say that Trump is "Literally Hitler".
If, in the context of the Jewish people of Israel, Trump is actively working towards the preservation of the oldest established religion of the world - is he still literally Hitler?
Don't hate the player, hate the game that you set the rules for.
Deport these degenerates back from the shitholes they came from.
I really don't understand why Trump doesn't just close the fucking border!
You want to become an American citizen. Here's a program for you:
Well then.. when the palestinians chimp out in the west and starts doing bad stuff to the goblins. Ill look the other way.
Time to censored
OP also included a link to an article.