Justice Sotomayor Compares Risks of Child Sex Changes to "Taking an Aspirin"
(www.informationliberation.com)
Comments (50)
sorted by:
Everyone knows that chopping off your dick is the same as taking an aspirin. That's just wise-latina common sense!
Aspirin is also not for children or adolescents. She's a perfect retard.
Diversity hire in a nutshell.
Anyone thinking this is stupidity and not evil is in severe need of a
vibereality check.That's you thinking as a normal person. The conniving rules lawyer is thinking "there, now I'm technically correct by listing two dangerous things, whilst still giving those rubes the exact opposite impression"
The way she talks about stuff, you can tell that she doesn't think about the law at all. She just latches onto a civil rights or some other kind of democrat issue like the environment and picks a side then works backwards to the case.
Bonus irony : children and adolescents should not take Aspirin or products that contain chemicals close to it ( like Pepto-Bismol ) because there are increased health risks ( up to death ) for them.
Reye Syndrome
Gotta love the medical industrial complex not wanting to jeopardize financial partners: "The cause in unknown" "Stopping aspirin use reduces risk by 90%".
Shit man, tobacco and cancer have weaker correlations than that!
If November went differently we would have wound up with a SCOTUS with five retarded brown women.
It’s so infuriating that the left is continuously allowed to seat these SC justices that are clearly making highly political activist type rulings.
There needs to be a more simple process to get people removed when it is obvious they have zero intention of doing their actual job, being only looking at the consistency of something with regards to the fucking Constitution. They are basically just admitting they lied about their oath, and that should be grounds for removal.
The only problem I have with this idea is that no matter how it gets setup, the Left will use it to remove our guys citing the same reasons and with three times the support from the Government/Legal system. You can make it as ironclad, pro-constitution as you want and they will give a flimsy justification and push it through with full approval.
Its one of those situations where the rot needs to be stymied first before we start cleaning the mess its made.
They need to start Scalia'ing more of the shitlib judges and the traitors like Kavanaugh
Aspirin?
That thing children shouldn't be taking? 🤔
That thing adults take to try and OD and kill themselves? 🤔
That thing when taken as an OD is "reversed" with a stomach pump but likely still results in a permanently fucked liver that will lead to a drastically shortened and painful remaining life? 🤔
That thing which by modern drug testing standards wouldn't actually pass for widescale and public distribution due to the complications that can arise, but because it's been used for so long "it's too late now"? 🤔
That aspirin? 🤔
isn't that more paracetamol that you are describing?
Yes, aspirin messes with your kidneys but if you stay hydrated it's mostly fine.
Paracetamol, or Tylenol, really fucks with your liver.
Liver failure is one of the worst ways to go. It's extremely painful. I've said this before but I know no kidding alcoholics who toast something like "May our kidneys kill us before our livers"
This explains a lot.
People have been focusing on the "risk" part of it, when what she said was actually even dumber.
You take Aspirin to reduce pain, and shit like kidney failure is a side-effect which is a rare and unintentional reaction. When you block puberty...blocking puberty is the entire point. Weak bones, micropenis, impotence, and emotional incontinence aren't a "risk," it's something you did intentionally, and happens literally every single time, because puberty is the growth beyond those problems.
Only to liberals could you have to explain that if you break your legs, your legs are broken.
If Aspirin worked the way sex changes and hormone blockers did, if they were actually comparable the way she understands it, it would be by rotting your organs until the nerves died and you couldn't feel the pain anymore.
What a mid-wit.
There really needs to be some kind of IQ and sanity test for something as important as being a supreme court justice.
That died in 1965 with our immigration policy.
I like how you think this is incompetence and not malice.
That would get screwed up by the bureaucrats anyway.
In terms of age, who can we replace first in supreme Court after Trump gets in?
I think Thomas is oldest and we need to let him be able to retire in honour after helping hold the line during Biden administration but I'm hoping this bitch is a close second.
Sad thing is that Trump is probably going to lean way left in his picks now that he doesn't have to run again. And his picks (Barrett and Kavanaugh) have sided with the liberal Justices way too many times. Gorsuch has been OK. But 1 out of 3 isn't a good record on something this important.
Most of Trump's picks were Federalist society promotions. Trump will probably end up picking people much further to the right than before, because he kept getting screwed by FedSoc members at basically every turn last term.
Turtleneck was DEFINITELY behind Barrett being picked as his allies warned him about her, Kavanaugh was the same even after the shit he went through.
With turtleneck going and a more loyalist group surrounding him, he should get A LOT better picks for justices.
I enjoy shitting on McConnell as much as the next person, but without him we would have had Justice Garland.
Who is Turtleneck?
Jared Kushner? Bill Barr?
Mitch the Bitch.
If you look at pictures of the guy, you'd understand instantly.
Mitch McConnell
Gorsuch was the deciding vote on tranny workplace discrimination. They are all moderates at best compared to Thomas and alito
In terms of who's likely to drop dead first, it's her. She has such bad diabetes it's rumored she has already lost a few toes.
Time to have a daily cheesecake sent to her house.
Better start finding a good conservative judge to replace her with.
We just have to make sure that we don't make the same mistake the dems did after Obama and leave any possibility of them getting a court majority, especially if we can give some of our good judges a deserved retirement than working them to death like dems love doing.
That wasn't Obama's mistake. Ginsberg wanted to be decommissioned and have a medal pinned on her in some big ceremony led by the first woman POTUS. Her state of mind on Trump's victory must have been as incredible as Hillary's.
It had to be so so much worse. Hillary lost to Trump, but it was an election and she could always cope with the popular vote. Ginsberg had no one to blame but herself and her own ego. And the repercussions will last several decades instead of just a term or two. And she would have been completely aware of that.
It makes me smile.
Me too honestly. Ginsberg lighting her legacy on fire like that is more impressive and spectacular than Hillary's loss after a lifetime of political maneuvering. All over some Tarantino-style revenge fantasy. Amazingly she gets very little hate when people reflect on it. It's the same media smokescreen that had Biden sharp as a tack going into his last debate.
Maybe this type of aspirin: https://www.chicagohistory.org/tylenol-murders/
(Yeah tylenol isnt aspirin just like boys cant be girls)
Crazy that went unsolved. The shit people got away with before the proliferation of cameras.
I’m surprised stuff like that didn’t happen sooner.
Ask the justice if she'd be willing to take those drugs since they are as safe as asprin.
Proving beyond doubt that she is unqualified for her position.
It's oral arguments. Even a Supreme can start off some Tim Pool-esque analogy and realize by the time they're finished they're the beanie-head.
But what kills me is their written positions aren't any better.
Their dissenting opinion in Trump v. United States immunity case was literally hysterical - and I mean that in the most offensive 17th century definition of the word (I guess the DEI judges must hire DEI legal aids too). According to them the country is literally a dictatorship now, impeachment & removal doesn't exist, and the Supremes can't just meet up at any time they want to and reverse immunity.
This is one of those things where I can’t necessarily blame an elderly woman for having such a stupid take when I’m sure she has an army of MDs in her ear assuring her that this is literally the case. Term limits are a must in all things
One of the biggest mistakes of the founding fathers imo.
"Compares"
Is there an actual in context quote of what she said available?
Because I can say they are wildly different in terms of risks and technically I'm still comparing the two.
So wise!
The only good thing she's done, that most people here would know of was make the injunction that actually stopped the 1994 MLBPA strike.
Outside of that, I'm not sure how she was ever appointed, but that singular ruling shouldn't have carried her to where she is.