You don't even have to dig that deep, social sciences are fucking useless and the heckin' diversity experiments they perform are either useless or counter-productive, but you can't point this out because it's problematic
GRS is modern lobotomy and social sciences are modern Lysenkoism
There was a study from Brown University a few years back that showed if one elementary school child "transitions" then many others follow, much higher than the standard rate. Basically showing it was a social contagion. It was actually released but the alphabet mafia screeched until they retracted it and issued an apology.
I have a book from the 1970s that discusses how this was going on back then and how scientists were scared of losing their jobs if they didn't report the right results so a lot of stuff never got published.
People are just waking up to it because of covid but it has been going on since the beginning. Most of the "science" out there is gamed. Reproducibility is a huge problem in most fields except hard sciences and in hard sciences the problem is often that many people lack the expensive equipment to reproduce even if they wanted to so the data is usually just checked to make sure it makes sense given current theoretical beliefs which means a lot of hard science could be fake too if the theoretical stuff is wrong.
So much of science is a scam. Everything is fake and gay.
Yup. I've only known 2 actual real "scientists" in my life who I would say were exceptionally smart and competent at science. One of them worked in weapons research for South Korea and one of them worked in weapons research for the USA. Of course, what they worked in was never expressively said but that's what anyone would assume given the details.
I have a book from the 1970s that discusses how this was going on back then and how scientists were scared of losing their jobs if they didn't report the right results so a lot of stuff never got published.
Probably became commonplace somewhere post-WWII, as quackery started to finally disappear but other bullshit had to replace it, where pharmaceuticals were becoming the Big Money and nepotism began to take serious hold.
Any soft science, especially ones that require speculation and biases, can probably be thrown in the trash easily.
Believing science that works with the actual, rigorous method depends on how much you're willing to deny observational reality. Some throw quantum physics in the trash, others throw cosmology in the trash. Even then the sci-method path can require decades to get just a "theory" down, and even then it doesn't go beyond "theory", sort of an extension of the Incompleteness Theorems applied to this field.
Look up Domestic Violence Studies. Over the past 50 odd years, there have been hundreds that were suppressed because they didn't perpetuate the desired Narrative.
There is zero reason to wonder how many times it's happened, because it's happened a lot. Which is why I always laugh at people who say that conspiracies can't be true because there would be whistleblowers. The reality is that anything evil enough is too hard for most people to cope with so they instinctively go into denial to avoid coming to terms with it, or there actively are whistleblowers that are then immediately either ignored, called loony, or just taken for granted. Just take a look at Snowden and Assange. We've known of wide-spread corruption for decades, and nobody does anything. Because it's too difficult to accept that they've supported evil people all their lives.
the drugs did not improve mental health in children with gender distress and that the finding might be weaponized by opponents of the care.
That's why you fudge the results, honey. That way you and your peers can weaponize "the finding" for your desired political effects.
Time for your covid booster, by the way.
Weird, it's as if doing permanent chemical damage to children that castrates them might not help a mental disorder.
Crazy.
Wait about a decade, see how high the suicide rate gets from fucking savages like these. We are honestly living through our version of lobotomies and thalidomide.
Protip: the vast majority of cases aren't even about "gender disphoria". It's at best about social alienation, neglect, anxiety and/or autism and at worst is about the natural mild discomfort that comes with puberty
Correct. Years ago the Trans activists tried claiming that you don't need gender dysphoria to be trans, showing that they were pushing nothing legitimate. Now we are managing castrate children because they are depressed or alienated, as if that would help them.
Whether it's castrating girls with body issues, or young gay men, the solution isn't mutilation.
Deleted comment because I looked more into it. Apparently they still use the term "chemical castration" for females even though "castration" itself is only male by definition.
If that's just term creep or woke stuff, can't tell anymore.
I prefer 6 and 2, above the others... and 1 & 3 get special considerations from me such that even if they are not great, I like them anyway. 4 and 5 have good moments but I don't typically need to watch them.
4 will always have some of the funniest moments, and "Transparent Aluminum" which is still being worked on. "Hello Computer" still gets me.
5 will always have "Excuse me... What does God need with a starship?"
In the nine years since the study was funded by the National Institutes of Health, and as medical care for this small group of adolescents became a searing issue in American politics, Dr. Olson-Kennedy’s team has not published the data. Asked why, she said the findings might fuel the kind of political attacks that have led to bans of the youth gender treatments in more than 20 states, one of which will soon be considered by the Supreme Court.
“I do not want our work to be weaponized,” she said. “It has to be exactly on point, clear and concise. And that takes time.”
The fact that they're comfortable admitting to something so egregious shows how far we've fallen.
They don't give a fuck about harming children and young adults. They only care about furthering their agenda and they aren't even trying to hide it. (not that this is anything new, they've been admitting to covering up race related data for decades)
"Because people who don't want to see kids getting fucked over by absolutely vile human beings can say I told you so, I'm not going to show the findings of this study."
''We can't release the study because it would be used by people who warned chemical castration and entertaining the child's delusions would cause catastrophic consequences.''
Mmmmm.
Oh look, they keep lying about it too :
[chemical castration drugs] which stave off the permanent physical changes
Actual consequence of chemical castration drugs they gave children : Permanently derail puberty with life-long consequences, such has damaged bone density, lowered IQ, stunt growth, life-long dependance on exogenous hormones, persistence of gender dysphoria ( yes, that is a documented side-effect of chemical castration of gender-confused kids ).
It's not a ''pause'' switch. It's a ''derail this developmental phase'' switch. The kids will depend on drugs for the rest of their lives.
puberty blockers did not lead to mental health improvements, she said, most likely because the children were already doing well when the study began.
No child that is doing well will be asking you to chemically-castrate them. Stop lying.
In the nine years since the study was funded by the National Institutes of Health, and as medical care for this small group of adolescents became a searing issue in American politics, Dr. Olson-Kennedy’s team has not published the data. Asked why, she said the findings might fuel the kind of political attacks that have led to bans of the youth gender treatments in more than 20 states, one of which will soon be considered by the Supreme Court.
“I do not want our work to be weaponized,” she said.
Heh, prophetic given that Feb '23 post by u/TheKidsAreAltRight I quoted yesterday,
The trans narrative is a house of cards built within an echo chamber.
The second it faces outside reality rather than the desperate "Yes men" propping it up with self delusion it collapses, because no matter how much lipstick you put on a pig, it's still a pig.
Those findings being the 'outside reality' that would collapse the 'house of cards' the MSM and so many "oppressed" groups have been grifting for years now at the expense of so many lives.
Thousands. Just think of how long margarine has been around. They knew from the start that it was dramatically worse for humans than real butter.
Think how long they've been pouring toxic flouride in the water.
You don't even have to dig that deep, social sciences are fucking useless and the heckin' diversity experiments they perform are either useless or counter-productive, but you can't point this out because it's problematic
GRS is modern lobotomy and social sciences are modern Lysenkoism
There was a study from Brown University a few years back that showed if one elementary school child "transitions" then many others follow, much higher than the standard rate. Basically showing it was a social contagion. It was actually released but the alphabet mafia screeched until they retracted it and issued an apology.
I have a book from the 1970s that discusses how this was going on back then and how scientists were scared of losing their jobs if they didn't report the right results so a lot of stuff never got published.
People are just waking up to it because of covid but it has been going on since the beginning. Most of the "science" out there is gamed. Reproducibility is a huge problem in most fields except hard sciences and in hard sciences the problem is often that many people lack the expensive equipment to reproduce even if they wanted to so the data is usually just checked to make sure it makes sense given current theoretical beliefs which means a lot of hard science could be fake too if the theoretical stuff is wrong.
So much of science is a scam. Everything is fake and gay.
That's why people of real talent work on black programs. When you can't publish the only thing anybody cares about is results.
Yup. I've only known 2 actual real "scientists" in my life who I would say were exceptionally smart and competent at science. One of them worked in weapons research for South Korea and one of them worked in weapons research for the USA. Of course, what they worked in was never expressively said but that's what anyone would assume given the details.
What's the book?
10 days late, thank you for your response.
Probably became commonplace somewhere post-WWII, as quackery started to finally disappear but other bullshit had to replace it, where pharmaceuticals were becoming the Big Money and nepotism began to take serious hold.
Any soft science, especially ones that require speculation and biases, can probably be thrown in the trash easily.
Believing science that works with the actual, rigorous method depends on how much you're willing to deny observational reality. Some throw quantum physics in the trash, others throw cosmology in the trash. Even then the sci-method path can require decades to get just a "theory" down, and even then it doesn't go beyond "theory", sort of an extension of the Incompleteness Theorems applied to this field.
Look up Domestic Violence Studies. Over the past 50 odd years, there have been hundreds that were suppressed because they didn't perpetuate the desired Narrative.
There is zero reason to wonder how many times it's happened, because it's happened a lot. Which is why I always laugh at people who say that conspiracies can't be true because there would be whistleblowers. The reality is that anything evil enough is too hard for most people to cope with so they instinctively go into denial to avoid coming to terms with it, or there actively are whistleblowers that are then immediately either ignored, called loony, or just taken for granted. Just take a look at Snowden and Assange. We've known of wide-spread corruption for decades, and nobody does anything. Because it's too difficult to accept that they've supported evil people all their lives.
That and all the studies they agree with have trouble being reproduced.
It's all just a fucking priest class dictating whatever benefits themselves as dogma for the masses to adhere to.
That's why you fudge the results, honey. That way you and your peers can weaponize "the finding" for your desired political effects.
Time for your covid booster, by the way.
Fudging requires understanding the underlying statistics in the first place.
''These children that totally spontaneously asked us to chemically-castrate them were doing well.''
Said no sane person ever.
'yeah, those chuds were right all along but with this study they could say I told you so and we can't allow that'
-that doctor, probably
Alternatively: truth comes in three stages; first, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
Thankfully for the sane segments of society, they’re too fucking retarded to have done that
Weird, it's as if doing permanent chemical damage to children that castrates them might not help a mental disorder.
Crazy.
Wait about a decade, see how high the suicide rate gets from fucking savages like these. We are honestly living through our version of lobotomies and thalidomide.
Where's Dr. McCoy when you need him.
Protip: the vast majority of cases aren't even about "gender disphoria". It's at best about social alienation, neglect, anxiety and/or autism and at worst is about the natural mild discomfort that comes with puberty
The autism-to-troon pipeline is real.
There is a doctor in Canada that basically bragged about tronning almost every child in his autistic special ED class.
Ooo, I have a Sinfest comic for this!
https://sinfest.xyz/view.php?date=2023-03-30
https://sinfest.xyz/view.php?date=2023-03-31
Correct. Years ago the Trans activists tried claiming that you don't need gender dysphoria to be trans, showing that they were pushing nothing legitimate. Now we are managing castrate children because they are depressed or alienated, as if that would help them.
Whether it's castrating girls with body issues, or young gay men, the solution isn't mutilation.
True.
And I think you mean "I" instead of "II"
Deleted comment because I looked more into it. Apparently they still use the term "chemical castration" for females even though "castration" itself is only male by definition.
If that's just term creep or woke stuff, can't tell anymore.
I guess that would make sense.
I'm glad I'm not the only one that immediately thinks of that scene with respect to transgender 'care'
I'm glad we're on the same page.
I love that movie. The hospital scene feels so surreal
Eh, Star Trek 4 is alright, but there are better ones in the TOS movie series.
Star Trek IV is my favorite. Nuclear Wessels makes me laugh every time.
I prefer 6 and 2, above the others... and 1 & 3 get special considerations from me such that even if they are not great, I like them anyway. 4 and 5 have good moments but I don't typically need to watch them.
4 will always have some of the funniest moments, and "Transparent Aluminum" which is still being worked on. "Hello Computer" still gets me.
5 will always have "Excuse me... What does God need with a starship?"
"Kirk has been banned from the chat."
Suicide rate is one thing, but can we wait a decade after the increase in trans school shooters?
No. Those will be at the same time, in the same event.
The fact that they're comfortable admitting to something so egregious shows how far we've fallen.
They don't give a fuck about harming children and young adults. They only care about furthering their agenda and they aren't even trying to hide it. (not that this is anything new, they've been admitting to covering up race related data for decades)
You just fucking did you vile human being.
''We can't release the study because it would be used by people who warned chemical castration and entertaining the child's delusions would cause catastrophic consequences.''
Mmmmm.
Oh look, they keep lying about it too :
Actual consequence of chemical castration drugs they gave children : Permanently derail puberty with life-long consequences, such has damaged bone density, lowered IQ, stunt growth, life-long dependance on exogenous hormones, persistence of gender dysphoria ( yes, that is a documented side-effect of chemical castration of gender-confused kids ).
It's not a ''pause'' switch. It's a ''derail this developmental phase'' switch. The kids will depend on drugs for the rest of their lives.
No child that is doing well will be asking you to chemically-castrate them. Stop lying.
"the finding might be weaponized by opponents of the care"
Facts are weapons
But if it went the other way it would have been plastered all over the media for weeks to own the chuds.
The govt should say fine don't release it, just pay the people back all the taxpayer funding that went into it and we'll call it even.
If she's willing to censor it, why wasn't she willing to fake it?
Incompetence or lukewarm commitment?
There are True Believers.
They tend to get brought against a wall and shot during the Revolution.
Or sent to the Gulag and spend their days enthousiastically saying there was a simple mistake made and it will be fixed any moment now.
Heh, prophetic given that Feb '23 post by u/TheKidsAreAltRight I quoted yesterday,
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/16aT3D8t7q/x/c/4TrH8FejwZS
Those findings being the 'outside reality' that would collapse the 'house of cards' the MSM and so many "oppressed" groups have been grifting for years now at the expense of so many lives.
this is standard operating procedure in academia. when the results don't match your genius, the study must be bunk!
I do not want to provide facts that can be used to force us to admit our politics were wrong.
It needs to exactly support our pre ordained politics, clearly, point by point. It takes time to either bury or adulterate these results.