Japan's natural xenophobia unlike other Western island nations is STILL intact so they globalist are having a harder time covering for their third world pets compared to, for instance, Rotherham in the UK.
I hate how people always attach "phobia" to behaviors deemed bad. A phobia is an irrational fear of something. There is nothing irrational about not wanting outsiders raping your children.
It's because stupid western education has associated phobias as being bad when it's perfectly reasonable to have them in context.
Like being an arachnophobic can be silly depending on location but I fully understood why Australia banned that one episode of a children's cartoon saying spiders are friendly.
Xenophobia is perfectly reasonable for rural and island nations when outsider's visiting never brought good intentions. It's the actions from the mistrust that matters like extremely strict visas and easy deporting makes sense, glassing an entire country to stop said immigrants might be taking it too far..
Which works with basically every social type phobia as a definition. Might even be underselling it as by the time you reach xeno/homo/whatever-phobic you are well beyond just being adverse to.
And this is with the extremely limited numbers they actually let in, let's face reality. Only certain people from certain areas are civilised enough to be accepted as immigrants let alone refugees to the west.
Our cats and ducks would appreciate us making this distinction..
Edit: This is just a shitpost, based only on Japan actually having that. I doubt this actually happened, but it would be alarming (and funny) if that actually happened.
I one time walked into a female only train with another male friend of mine when I was in Japan. We both just looked around at all the women staring at us and were just like uhh bro I think we're on the wrong train. Was pretty funny.
Ideally, we should allow discrimination. Female only trains shouldn't exist if they are government funded but neither should any government funded train.
I’m 99% certain you’re wasting your time trying to argue in good faith with a spammer troll who’s made a series of accounts to argue for the legalization of child marriage.
I mean, even spammer trolls are people. I doubt it's a sophisticated bot. I have had discussion with him before when he uses to troll ConPro that were actually productive. He always gets banned before the discussion goes anywhere. It's weird being this dedicated to spamming early teen marriages. Like, is it a fed, a guy with literally no life that has that much of an axe to grind with women and/or the win community? Who knows but it's definitely different.
Why would a fed do it? It's your approach. The way you go about trying to convince people by spamming and being as offensive as possible actually closes people's minds off to the very idea you supposedly support so you are creating an outcome that actually encourages women to get an education, etc... just like a fed would. Any person who might be convinced by another man that women shouldn't be educated is going to see your posts and be like nah, the men who think women shouldn't be educated are retarded immature spammers, I would wrong for even considering such an idea. So in the end you encourage people against the very cause you supposedly support which is exactly how a fed would operate.
There was a movement by men who didn't want to be falsely accused (during a spate of this being very common, accusing then demanding cash to make the accusation go away before the train hits the next stop), to make male-only trains. The proposition was shot down hard.
You should learn to phrase your message better. You're actually just going to drive people away from coming to the correct conclusion about the role of women in society. Though, I suspect that's actually your purpose.
World was better place when we chopped off hands of thieves and can challenge people to a duel if there is a problem. Japanese wouldve beheaded this dude already.
Japan at least shows his face - UK would ban information about him and then arrest anyone who speculates without a speculation license.
Japan's natural xenophobia unlike other Western island nations is STILL intact so they globalist are having a harder time covering for their third world pets compared to, for instance, Rotherham in the UK.
I hate how people always attach "phobia" to behaviors deemed bad. A phobia is an irrational fear of something. There is nothing irrational about not wanting outsiders raping your children.
It's because stupid western education has associated phobias as being bad when it's perfectly reasonable to have them in context.
Like being an arachnophobic can be silly depending on location but I fully understood why Australia banned that one episode of a children's cartoon saying spiders are friendly.
Xenophobia is perfectly reasonable for rural and island nations when outsider's visiting never brought good intentions. It's the actions from the mistrust that matters like extremely strict visas and easy deporting makes sense, glassing an entire country to stop said immigrants might be taking it too far..
Depends, what is the strategic value? We haven't been hiding Titans or a manufactorum there have we?
Inquisitor, I doubt the Pakis have been manufacturing Titans. Or, at least, Titans that would be functional in the God Emperor's service.
These questions need to asked first guardsman, as we cannot afford mistakes in the Emperor's name
But since we gave found no value in this lump of dirt......SMASH IT!
That's actually dangerous in context lol.
Bonus points if there are friendly Australian spiders under the kitchen sink.
Cool it with the anti-Semitic remarks, bro.
'Phobia' should mean 'an aversion to'. A hydrophobic material isn't afraid of water, it repels it.
Which works with basically every social type phobia as a definition. Might even be underselling it as by the time you reach xeno/homo/whatever-phobic you are well beyond just being adverse to.
Probably in 3 years. Japan always plays follow up and follow in the footsteps of the usa.
Unless they can stop the rise of feminism, this is sadly true. All bad policies start with giving women the right to vote and power.
And this is with the extremely limited numbers they actually let in, let's face reality. Only certain people from certain areas are civilised enough to be accepted as immigrants let alone refugees to the west.
Our cats and ducks would appreciate us making this distinction..
If that number is > 0, they done fuck up. For some reason it angers me more than it should and I am not even Japanese or a weebz.
Fact Check False: Americans have never been civilized. 😎🇺🇸 We just fake it until we're given a reason to be ourselves.
You're 50 war tribes underneath a big coat you call the United States
And you're STILL more civilised than at least 40% of the world..
lol. all in good fun. Self-deprecation keeps me honest.
On the women-only train?
Edit: This is just a shitpost, based only on Japan actually having that. I doubt this actually happened, but it would be alarming (and funny) if that actually happened.
She identifies as a female non-rapist.
He must not have read the sign(s). Or perhaps, that's how he identified.
I hate you for making me play devil's advocate for the piece of shit, but there is a high possibility he can not read Japanese.
It's hardly devil's advocate to say he functionally didn't belong there.
It's spelled out in English as well, though point taken, perhaps he cannot read English either. Such is the nature of cultural enrichment.
being able to read basic signs in the local language should be a requirement for visiting, let alone "immigrating"
He probably can't read, period, nevermind fucking Japanese.
If true, the supreme irony being that those train cars exist to "protect women from being sexually assaulted".
I one time walked into a female only train with another male friend of mine when I was in Japan. We both just looked around at all the women staring at us and were just like uhh bro I think we're on the wrong train. Was pretty funny.
I did that but it was a bathroom. God I was embarrassed.
Ideally, we should allow discrimination. Female only trains shouldn't exist if they are government funded but neither should any government funded train.
I’m 99% certain you’re wasting your time trying to argue in good faith with a spammer troll who’s made a series of accounts to argue for the legalization of child marriage.
I mean, even spammer trolls are people. I doubt it's a sophisticated bot. I have had discussion with him before when he uses to troll ConPro that were actually productive. He always gets banned before the discussion goes anywhere. It's weird being this dedicated to spamming early teen marriages. Like, is it a fed, a guy with literally no life that has that much of an axe to grind with women and/or the win community? Who knows but it's definitely different.
Why would a fed do it? It's your approach. The way you go about trying to convince people by spamming and being as offensive as possible actually closes people's minds off to the very idea you supposedly support so you are creating an outcome that actually encourages women to get an education, etc... just like a fed would. Any person who might be convinced by another man that women shouldn't be educated is going to see your posts and be like nah, the men who think women shouldn't be educated are retarded immature spammers, I would wrong for even considering such an idea. So in the end you encourage people against the very cause you supposedly support which is exactly how a fed would operate.
There was a movement by men who didn't want to be falsely accused (during a spate of this being very common, accusing then demanding cash to make the accusation go away before the train hits the next stop), to make male-only trains. The proposition was shot down hard.
For work, which they also shouldn't be doing.
You should learn to phrase your message better. You're actually just going to drive people away from coming to the correct conclusion about the role of women in society. Though, I suspect that's actually your purpose.
Giving women additional, exclusive resources is not "based."
If they had a women-only train and a men-only train, then perhaps it could be.
hang him, deport all his fellow countrymen, charge pakistan for the trouble.
That guy is not going to enjoy Japanese prison.
Deport all Gaijin.
All of them.
Immigrant? What the fuck Japan? Japanese citizens need to turn up the racism to 11.
At least the japanese dont fuck arround when it comes to punishing criminals. But stupid enough to even let them in.
World was better place when we chopped off hands of thieves and can challenge people to a duel if there is a problem. Japanese wouldve beheaded this dude already.
Run him through with a samurai sword
Too honorable of a death.
Impale him on a rebar fencepost?
The series Shogun had a very good way to kill foreigners.
It involved fire, a big pot and water.