Ideally, we should allow discrimination. Female only trains shouldn't exist if they are government funded but neither should any government funded train.
I’m 99% certain you’re wasting your time trying to argue in good faith with a spammer troll who’s made a series of accounts to argue for the legalization of child marriage.
I mean, even spammer trolls are people. I doubt it's a sophisticated bot. I have had discussion with him before when he uses to troll ConPro that were actually productive. He always gets banned before the discussion goes anywhere. It's weird being this dedicated to spamming early teen marriages. Like, is it a fed, a guy with literally no life that has that much of an axe to grind with women and/or the win community? Who knows but it's definitely different.
Why would a fed do it? It's your approach. The way you go about trying to convince people by spamming and being as offensive as possible actually closes people's minds off to the very idea you supposedly support so you are creating an outcome that actually encourages women to get an education, etc... just like a fed would. Any person who might be convinced by another man that women shouldn't be educated is going to see your posts and be like nah, the men who think women shouldn't be educated are retarded immature spammers, I would wrong for even considering such an idea. So in the end you encourage people against the very cause you supposedly support which is exactly how a fed would operate.
There was a movement by men who didn't want to be falsely accused (during a spate of this being very common, accusing then demanding cash to make the accusation go away before the train hits the next stop), to make male-only trains. The proposition was shot down hard.
You should learn to phrase your message better. You're actually just going to drive people away from coming to the correct conclusion about the role of women in society. Though, I suspect that's actually your purpose.
Ideally, we should allow discrimination. Female only trains shouldn't exist if they are government funded but neither should any government funded train.
I’m 99% certain you’re wasting your time trying to argue in good faith with a spammer troll who’s made a series of accounts to argue for the legalization of child marriage.
I mean, even spammer trolls are people. I doubt it's a sophisticated bot. I have had discussion with him before when he uses to troll ConPro that were actually productive. He always gets banned before the discussion goes anywhere. It's weird being this dedicated to spamming early teen marriages. Like, is it a fed, a guy with literally no life that has that much of an axe to grind with women and/or the win community? Who knows but it's definitely different.
Why would a fed do it? It's your approach. The way you go about trying to convince people by spamming and being as offensive as possible actually closes people's minds off to the very idea you supposedly support so you are creating an outcome that actually encourages women to get an education, etc... just like a fed would. Any person who might be convinced by another man that women shouldn't be educated is going to see your posts and be like nah, the men who think women shouldn't be educated are retarded immature spammers, I would wrong for even considering such an idea. So in the end you encourage people against the very cause you supposedly support which is exactly how a fed would operate.
There was a movement by men who didn't want to be falsely accused (during a spate of this being very common, accusing then demanding cash to make the accusation go away before the train hits the next stop), to make male-only trains. The proposition was shot down hard.
For work, which they also shouldn't be doing.
You should learn to phrase your message better. You're actually just going to drive people away from coming to the correct conclusion about the role of women in society. Though, I suspect that's actually your purpose.