You get one vote for being a man who owns property. You get one vote for being a combat veteran. And if you are in either of those categories you get another vote for each of your sons.
vote for us if you keep wanting to have unprotected sex without consequences. never mind our rampant corruption, money laundering schemes, and nearly indiscriminate bombing of foreigners, or even the fact that the inflation that we caused means you can't buy a house anymore
all Republicans have to do is renege on their position on abortion and assure people that they will not lose their (actual) rights, and the Democrats have no platform.
all Republicans have to do is renege on their position on abortion
I still say this is a shortsighted idea. Drugs, trans nonsense and abortion aren't just carrots the left waves over the heads of their followers, they are tools to radicalise them. Train a leftist to kill their own child, and they will gladly kill yours.
The corporate evangelicals have been trying to throw every election with their abortion rhetoric. They failed so bad Ohio & Montana have enshrined abortion in the constitution.
People don't realize Ohio is an abortion on demand state now, because abortions are guaranteed if a Planned Parenthood doctor claims you need one to prevent "harm".
The real reason why pro-life is such an unpopular position is because, firstly, most people are absolutely terrified of not having the option to abort a cripple or retard baby. And secondly, if abortion was banned, the nigger population would explode.
As a Catholic, accepting a national platform of child sacrifice is hard. As a man of reason, I want to live in a country where praying in front of certain buildings isn't a hate crime. Relent on the "80% of women single issue against you" issue and get smaller and more important wins.
You need to win the culture war first before you can end abortion.
You need to win the argument that "you should not kill your children" long before you can argue to end it at a federal level.
You might not like it, but your position has been outside of the Overton Window for 30 years, and you need to accept that, and work with what's in front of you.
If I were you, I'd start improving men, and advocating for more marriages. You can win that demographic war easily.
Nonetheless, lib propaganda is getting through to these low-info voters. The right is way too focused on winning debates with other political nerds, while the left bypasses that shit to radicalize retards.
These people have never been able to articulate what rights trans rights fights for besides being praised for using the toilet and having unsupervised access to minors.
Not just a minor but young enough that carrying a child was dangerous, she got raped, and her abortion destroyed evidence. That's the kind of abortion they don't want you thinking too hard about.
Seriously, shame the sluts. I’m sure sluts and whores have been around since the beginning of time, but it never ever should have been something to be proud of.
And yet it got positive reception, and open discussion. Why are we taking a broad approach to restricting speech here again?
And don't get me wrong, fuck that pedo freak right off, but why extend that to proper discussions? You just make it harder for anyone else coming in to follow along with what was being talked about.
And how do we know that now? You've censored it, and it's down to your diminishingly trustworthy word.
Since when did we shift from free speech, even unlikable speech, to censoring that which is uncomfortable? I know I'm not the first to make this point, but come on, this is hard to defend as anything less than censorship because it makes you uncomfortable.
And I have no problem with it making you uncomfortable or angry or whatever. But this place was always meant to get away from that Reddit mentality of constant censorship on the emotional reactions of controlling mods. You were legitimately better than this. And I get that modding leaves anyone jaded, but it's such a shame that you don't want to even consider that maybe you're not doing the right thing by the rest of the sub.
There are several ways to find out exactly what was said if you really want to.
Let me be clear about something for a moment when it comes to "free speech" regarding KIA. I am more open and lackadaisical on viewpoint discrimination than anyone, in either KIA's history of moderation.
Prior to coming here, you have never been able to advocate for children getting raped. No in in KIA1 ever allowed it. No one ever allowed in KIA2 ever allowed it before I got added. I carry on that tradition.
There are several ways to find out exactly what was said if you really want to.
"Please sir, you're free to speak in this specially designated free-speech zone"
What a fucking joke.
you have never been able to advocate for children getting raped. No in in KIA1 ever allowed it. No one ever allowed in KIA2 ever allowed it before I got added. I carry on that tradition.
Cool, great, but frankly, I doubt you in that this comment included what you say it included. It might be interpreted that way. But I doubt it's as cut and dry as you are making it seem to be. Your word does not have the trust-worthiness that you seem to think it does. And going "well, if you just jump through these hoops that make your experience objectively more frustrating, you can still totally follow along" is utterly stupid.
So sure. Carry on and continue to pretend like nothing is a problem. Like you're not jaded and beginning to ignore long-time users here simply because YOU don't want to acknowledge there's a problem. Hide behind that which is easy to defend while you ignore your other shit solely because other places are less open and "lackadaisical". Because again, fuck that pedo shit, but I still doubt you.
Edit: After looking it up, yeah, I don't think this should have been removed. Is it an asshole comment? You bet. Is it encouraging rape? No, and only someone demented would think so. Especially considering you don't know the circumstances. What if the man who got her pregnant was also legally underage? I'm not a fan of it, but I'm not retarded enough to not know that these days, sadly, kids are getting sexual far younger than they should. And they shouldn't. That isn't encouraging rape, and you damn well know it.
I don't care that you don't trust me. I don't trust your judgement because a) the comment is clearly victim-blaming a minor, which is glorification of violence; b) you assume that the only correct rule enforcement should occur without the ability for a moderator to use interpretation, c) in the reply you've justified the ending of all rule enforcement of all kinds.
There's been talk (and attempts) at this stuff for years (For example, Here's KiA5). The problem is that the more this stuff happens, the more splintered it all gets and each tiny little offshoot is more personalised and niche and as a result, more insular.
Unless you get a near 100% adoption rate via exodus, it's just going to cause less cohesion. And what sucks is that people like Dom know this. So either people jump ship and the community gets divided up into more factions, or we stick around and bear his bullshit. It's a lose lose for everyone but people like Dom, which is why for months now people have been pleading with him to either change his ways or let someone else in to help out, all to no avail.
I know this isn't wrestling related, but how is this "Violent Speech?" He said not to do something -getting pregnant - then called her a name -slut. It's crude and maybe rude (dude), but what part of that is violent? Was it spam?
Okay but I'm not following. What does that have to do with the removed comment? He didn't encourage a minor getting pregnant and thus rape. He literally did the opposite, while in a pretty crass and vulgar way. How is that a violation of Rule 2?
He didn't do the opposite. He supported a minor getting raped as the just consequence of the minor's behavior. I'm not going to tolerate that. The minor, doesn't have agency in this case, as they are a minor. It is the glorification of violence.
If voting was restricted only to married men with kids, Democrats have nothing to offer them.
The current democratic party in America is literally built on a platform of degeneracy and solipsism.
Bio-leninism. An alliance of outcasts to overthrow civilization.
Why would spiteful mutants wanna overthrow civilization when civilization is the reason they even survived childhood?
You overestimate their capacity for gratitude.
The fact that they're too dumb to live is what makes them ideal shock troops.
You get one vote for being a man who owns property. You get one vote for being a combat veteran. And if you are in either of those categories you get another vote for each of your sons.
this is what Democrats do nowadays.
all Republicans have to do is renege on their position on abortion and assure people that they will not lose their (actual) rights, and the Democrats have no platform.
I still say this is a shortsighted idea. Drugs, trans nonsense and abortion aren't just carrots the left waves over the heads of their followers, they are tools to radicalise them. Train a leftist to kill their own child, and they will gladly kill yours.
Republicans removed any mention of abortion on the federal level
The issue isn't republican stances, it's the bought-and-paid-for shill media who actively propagandizes against them.
The corporate evangelicals have been trying to throw every election with their abortion rhetoric. They failed so bad Ohio & Montana have enshrined abortion in the constitution.
People don't realize Ohio is an abortion on demand state now, because abortions are guaranteed if a Planned Parenthood doctor claims you need one to prevent "harm".
The real reason why pro-life is such an unpopular position is because, firstly, most people are absolutely terrified of not having the option to abort a cripple or retard baby. And secondly, if abortion was banned, the nigger population would explode.
It's weak women propagandized into anti natalism and misanthropy and the weak men that follow them begging for a scrap of pussy.
You're an idiot, and most people do not think like that.
As a Catholic, accepting a national platform of child sacrifice is hard. As a man of reason, I want to live in a country where praying in front of certain buildings isn't a hate crime. Relent on the "80% of women single issue against you" issue and get smaller and more important wins.
You need to win the culture war first before you can end abortion.
You need to win the argument that "you should not kill your children" long before you can argue to end it at a federal level.
You might not like it, but your position has been outside of the Overton Window for 30 years, and you need to accept that, and work with what's in front of you.
If I were you, I'd start improving men, and advocating for more marriages. You can win that demographic war easily.
Too bad you worried more about "losing your rights" more than you were worried about losing your baby.
There's so many things wrong about this.
Nonetheless, lib propaganda is getting through to these low-info voters. The right is way too focused on winning debates with other political nerds, while the left bypasses that shit to radicalize retards.
“I’m a straight woman that murdered my unborn child”
They've got the .01% demo locked in
This woman is voting Kamala
https://x.com/jmlara02/status/1823768190402617795
What isn’t her choice is finding anyone to impregnate her.
These people have never been able to articulate what rights trans rights fights for besides being praised for using the toilet and having unsupervised access to minors.
it belongs in a padded room wearing a straight jacket.
I would totally volunteer for the Trump squad that patrols local malls, snatching women's piercings out and lasering their tattoos off.
We could call it the THOT patrol.
I think somebody already had that idea!
https://thotpatrol.org
vote to make our uniform include Pepé Le Pew masks
"I'm starving and dying from radiation tumors, but it's ok, I can force an illegal alien spa worker to wax my bussy."
Maybe they deserve to... jesus.
man made horrors beyond our comprehension
What a fucking waste of breathable air.
...I don't even know how to unpack and unravel that much retardation.
Not just a minor but young enough that carrying a child was dangerous, she got raped, and her abortion destroyed evidence. That's the kind of abortion they don't want you thinking too hard about.
She (or whatever it is) didn’t say anything about being raped.
If she was that young, it would at least be statuatory.
ETA: could have even been "mutually statuatory."
They can collect a DNA sample from the fetus, not to mention imagine being a kid and finding out you exist to put your bio dad in prison.
Yeah, but do the clinics do that?
You can make them do that.
Seriously, shame the sluts. I’m sure sluts and whores have been around since the beginning of time, but it never ever should have been something to be proud of.
Comment Removed for: Rule 2 - Violent Speech
This is a "Pedo Pajeet" level comment.
And yet it got positive reception, and open discussion. Why are we taking a broad approach to restricting speech here again?
And don't get me wrong, fuck that pedo freak right off, but why extend that to proper discussions? You just make it harder for anyone else coming in to follow along with what was being talked about.
Because it was of the same level. It was victim-blaming the rape of a minor. That isn't a proper discussion.
If it gets a positive reception, then fuck everyone who upvoted it.
And how do we know that now? You've censored it, and it's down to your diminishingly trustworthy word.
Since when did we shift from free speech, even unlikable speech, to censoring that which is uncomfortable? I know I'm not the first to make this point, but come on, this is hard to defend as anything less than censorship because it makes you uncomfortable.
And I have no problem with it making you uncomfortable or angry or whatever. But this place was always meant to get away from that Reddit mentality of constant censorship on the emotional reactions of controlling mods. You were legitimately better than this. And I get that modding leaves anyone jaded, but it's such a shame that you don't want to even consider that maybe you're not doing the right thing by the rest of the sub.
There are several ways to find out exactly what was said if you really want to.
Let me be clear about something for a moment when it comes to "free speech" regarding KIA. I am more open and lackadaisical on viewpoint discrimination than anyone, in either KIA's history of moderation.
Prior to coming here, you have never been able to advocate for children getting raped. No in in KIA1 ever allowed it. No one ever allowed in KIA2 ever allowed it before I got added. I carry on that tradition.
"Please sir, you're free to speak in this specially designated free-speech zone"
What a fucking joke.
Cool, great, but frankly, I doubt you in that this comment included what you say it included. It might be interpreted that way. But I doubt it's as cut and dry as you are making it seem to be. Your word does not have the trust-worthiness that you seem to think it does. And going "well, if you just jump through these hoops that make your experience objectively more frustrating, you can still totally follow along" is utterly stupid.
So sure. Carry on and continue to pretend like nothing is a problem. Like you're not jaded and beginning to ignore long-time users here simply because YOU don't want to acknowledge there's a problem. Hide behind that which is easy to defend while you ignore your other shit solely because other places are less open and "lackadaisical". Because again, fuck that pedo shit, but I still doubt you.
Edit: After looking it up, yeah, I don't think this should have been removed. Is it an asshole comment? You bet. Is it encouraging rape? No, and only someone demented would think so. Especially considering you don't know the circumstances. What if the man who got her pregnant was also legally underage? I'm not a fan of it, but I'm not retarded enough to not know that these days, sadly, kids are getting sexual far younger than they should. And they shouldn't. That isn't encouraging rape, and you damn well know it.
I don't care that you don't trust me. I don't trust your judgement because a) the comment is clearly victim-blaming a minor, which is glorification of violence; b) you assume that the only correct rule enforcement should occur without the ability for a moderator to use interpretation, c) in the reply you've justified the ending of all rule enforcement of all kinds.
Whatever happens I don't envy you having to litigate this shit.
Is it time for kia3?
There's been talk (and attempts) at this stuff for years (For example, Here's KiA5). The problem is that the more this stuff happens, the more splintered it all gets and each tiny little offshoot is more personalised and niche and as a result, more insular.
Unless you get a near 100% adoption rate via exodus, it's just going to cause less cohesion. And what sucks is that people like Dom know this. So either people jump ship and the community gets divided up into more factions, or we stick around and bear his bullshit. It's a lose lose for everyone but people like Dom, which is why for months now people have been pleading with him to either change his ways or let someone else in to help out, all to no avail.
I know this isn't wrestling related, but how is this "Violent Speech?" He said not to do something -getting pregnant - then called her a name -slut. It's crude and maybe rude (dude), but what part of that is violent? Was it spam?
Rape is an act of violence.
Agreed! But what does that have go do with the sanctioned comment? It doesn't even mention rape.
Getting pregnant as a minor is, by definition, the non-consensual sex with a minor, because minors can't consent. Hence, it is rape.
Okay but I'm not following. What does that have to do with the removed comment? He didn't encourage a minor getting pregnant and thus rape. He literally did the opposite, while in a pretty crass and vulgar way. How is that a violation of Rule 2?
He didn't do the opposite. He supported a minor getting raped as the just consequence of the minor's behavior. I'm not going to tolerate that. The minor, doesn't have agency in this case, as they are a minor. It is the glorification of violence.