There are several ways to find out exactly what was said if you really want to.
"Please sir, you're free to speak in this specially designated free-speech zone"
What a fucking joke.
you have never been able to advocate for children getting raped. No in in KIA1 ever allowed it. No one ever allowed in KIA2 ever allowed it before I got added. I carry on that tradition.
Cool, great, but frankly, I doubt you in that this comment included what you say it included. It might be interpreted that way. But I doubt it's as cut and dry as you are making it seem to be. Your word does not have the trust-worthiness that you seem to think it does. And going "well, if you just jump through these hoops that make your experience objectively more frustrating, you can still totally follow along" is utterly stupid.
So sure. Carry on and continue to pretend like nothing is a problem. Like you're not jaded and beginning to ignore long-time users here simply because YOU don't want to acknowledge there's a problem. Hide behind that which is easy to defend while you ignore your other shit solely because other places are less open and "lackadaisical". Because again, fuck that pedo shit, but I still doubt you.
Edit: After looking it up, yeah, I don't think this should have been removed. Is it an asshole comment? You bet. Is it encouraging rape? No, and only someone demented would think so. Especially considering you don't know the circumstances. What if the man who got her pregnant was also legally underage? I'm not a fan of it, but I'm not retarded enough to not know that these days, sadly, kids are getting sexual far younger than they should. And they shouldn't. That isn't encouraging rape, and you damn well know it.
I don't care that you don't trust me. I don't trust your judgement because a) the comment is clearly victim-blaming a minor, which is glorification of violence; b) you assume that the only correct rule enforcement should occur without the ability for a moderator to use interpretation, c) in the reply you've justified the ending of all rule enforcement of all kinds.
No. Because in so doing you have entire removed the purposes of enforcement altogether. By your logic, there should be no removals, nor bans, for any reason, under any circumstance, because all removals can be re-displayed as "preservation" including illegal content.
By your logic, there should be no removals, nor bans, for any reason, under any circumstance, because all removals can be re-displayed as "preservation" including illegal content.
By your assertion of my logic, you mean. You seem to think disagreeing that YOUR interpretation of THIS instance (and/or any other) means that I disagree with ALL instances of moderation.
This is what I mean about you being jaded. You've lost all respect for any critique. Any nudge in the right direction. You just handwave it away as some crackpot that wants no rules at all, when that simply isn't the case.
And that's why now you're not even bothering with the content of the issue. Instead you're diverting into other attack to deflect away from the critique at hand: This comment should not have been removed, and was only removed solely on the basis that you found it icky. And while I agree that it can be interpreted that way and would therefore be disgusting, I also know the clear fucking intent here. That you want to assume the worst is a direct fault of your own, not a fault of the community at large.
"Please sir, you're free to speak in this specially designated free-speech zone"
What a fucking joke.
Cool, great, but frankly, I doubt you in that this comment included what you say it included. It might be interpreted that way. But I doubt it's as cut and dry as you are making it seem to be. Your word does not have the trust-worthiness that you seem to think it does. And going "well, if you just jump through these hoops that make your experience objectively more frustrating, you can still totally follow along" is utterly stupid.
So sure. Carry on and continue to pretend like nothing is a problem. Like you're not jaded and beginning to ignore long-time users here simply because YOU don't want to acknowledge there's a problem. Hide behind that which is easy to defend while you ignore your other shit solely because other places are less open and "lackadaisical". Because again, fuck that pedo shit, but I still doubt you.
Edit: After looking it up, yeah, I don't think this should have been removed. Is it an asshole comment? You bet. Is it encouraging rape? No, and only someone demented would think so. Especially considering you don't know the circumstances. What if the man who got her pregnant was also legally underage? I'm not a fan of it, but I'm not retarded enough to not know that these days, sadly, kids are getting sexual far younger than they should. And they shouldn't. That isn't encouraging rape, and you damn well know it.
I don't care that you don't trust me. I don't trust your judgement because a) the comment is clearly victim-blaming a minor, which is glorification of violence; b) you assume that the only correct rule enforcement should occur without the ability for a moderator to use interpretation, c) in the reply you've justified the ending of all rule enforcement of all kinds.
No. Because in so doing you have entire removed the purposes of enforcement altogether. By your logic, there should be no removals, nor bans, for any reason, under any circumstance, because all removals can be re-displayed as "preservation" including illegal content.
By your assertion of my logic, you mean. You seem to think disagreeing that YOUR interpretation of THIS instance (and/or any other) means that I disagree with ALL instances of moderation.
This is what I mean about you being jaded. You've lost all respect for any critique. Any nudge in the right direction. You just handwave it away as some crackpot that wants no rules at all, when that simply isn't the case.
And that's why now you're not even bothering with the content of the issue. Instead you're diverting into other attack to deflect away from the critique at hand: This comment should not have been removed, and was only removed solely on the basis that you found it icky. And while I agree that it can be interpreted that way and would therefore be disgusting, I also know the clear fucking intent here. That you want to assume the worst is a direct fault of your own, not a fault of the community at large.