"Woman-identifying person"...are these clowns fucking serious?
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (68)
sorted by:
But just "man" and not "man-identifying person."
Ha ha ha, who would want to be treated like a man if they could be treated like a woman?
Worry not, woman-identifying person ; that other person in the woods is also woman-identifying.
And remember, misgendering that woman-identifying person is an act of violence which can be met with "self-defense" to the most brutal extent.
Also, if that other woman-identifying person wants to have sex with your woman-identifying self, you cannot say no because that would be a hateful queerphobic bigoted assault.
Don't worry, they unironically AGREE with you. It'd probably be a badge of honor for the bitches who write articles like this to get shafted by a tranny
Samantha defending herself https://youtu.be/Q4Ui8BdIYRk
What an odd situation to pretend only affects women. What, you think men wouldn't be at least wary about running into a stranger in the middle of the night when you're not expecting it?
It’s more absurd than you may realize. I had to look up the article to confirm, because OP is a filthy jpg poster, but this isn’t just a redux of “men can walk anywhere at night, right?” No, this about the new twitter/tik tok trend of women saying that if they had to choose between encountering a random man and encountering a bear, they’d pick bear.
Presumably, this is because of a combination of feminist ideology, terrible risk assessment, and/or an inability to understand numbers contextually—a common argument is “but there are so many more rapes than bear attacks,” which is obviously facile.
There are more rapes than bear attacks because we don't tend to go where the bears are, what a bunch of morons.
Not to mention rape is still exceedingly rare. Just think of how many women walk around the typical city compared to how few rapes there are. Its complete and utter BS fearmongering to try to claim women do or should constantly live in fear of it.
Most people are raped by someone they know. Same goes for children.
Means, Motive, Opportunity.
Only the people who have many opportunities to rape you ultimately will. Unless they're just really lucky or their motivation is very strong, which is rare.
Anyways.. anecdotally.. I've never run into a stranger in the woods and not had it turn into a good time.
Ahh, but was it a good time for them? ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
This may sound a little off topic but it's germane. There is a media trope called rape is worse than murder. That's what these people actually think. That rape is the single biggest evil.
There was a showed called Joan of Arcadia in the early 2000s about a teenage girl who God spoke to. God would inhabit a person and talk to Joan. In one episode God is talking about Joan's mother being raped as a teenager. And he says, "I don't like to use the word evil, but what happened to your mom was truly evil."
Now I think we can all agree raping is an evil act. But can you imagine God who saw all of human history, calling rape especially evil?
is that why jews spend so much time fantasizing about it happening to them or to their enemies?
If they really believed that, they would advocate for euthanizing rape victims, because death seems to be preferable.
I will never understand how rape can be anywhere close to the top of most heinousness things to do to a human. Given the choice, I'd much rather take it up the ass than get my fingernails ripped out, my balls stomped to mush or outright killed. People saying otherwise are either lying or insane.
If you told me Canada had implemented this, I would believe you.
God is too powerful, too Great, to be a reasonable measure of morality to humans. Just as we cannot prescribe morality to ants: "Oh, the ant queen breeds all day, what a successful ant queen." Meanwhile, the ant queen: "AHHH! Childbirth is painful! AHH! I'm raped 20-30 times per day! AHHH!".
Of course rape is worse than death in His worldview. Death is meaningless to God. God cannot die, and humans that "die" ascend to a stronger, more powerful form. Death is a moral neutral to good for God. He likely views humans crying at Death the same as a parent views a child crying at getting their MMR vaccine. "Yes, yes, I know, I know, but it's better later!"
Its the same "vending machines kill more than sharks" argument.
Because most people will walk by a vending machine daily, and a good chunk of them even interact with it. Whereas the vast majority of people will never be in the ocean, and an even smaller amount out far enough to be near sharks whatsoever.
We should encourage this line of thought. Convincing retarded women to take their chances with the bear can only improve the quality of the gene pool.
It's also a bunch of women who don't hike, because two solo hikers meeting each other in the woods is very common. I imagine 1,000 women have ran into me in the woods and mountains and lived trama-free.
I remember reading a book where the author recounted two women climbing the Appalachian trail and in the designated campground was attacked, raped and murdered.
The thing is they didn't run into a man, they ran into a rapist-identifying person.
I love womens rights
This meme has an odd air about it though. It feels as though the dam is starting to break for many ordinary feminists regarding how insane the extremists are.
I hope so!
I hate to be that commenter, but...
They don't care. They don't give a fuck about men.
Unfortunately that's what it comes down to.
We literally matter less than dirt to the kind of "author" who writes articles like this...
They don't give a fuck about anybody but themselves, honestly...
I was chased by a homeless man in the park. You bet I started running.
I've also had a female meth head take a swing at me with a stick while I was minding my own business.
Men can be scared and women can be scary. It all depends on the circumstances
Well there is the little inconvenience that feminists often overlook that men are the vast majority of victims in all violent crimes. The only subcategory that women are the majority of victims in is in sexual crimes, and those studies can wildly vary in statistics from study to study based on biases.
But yeah, out on the street, men are more likely to be a victim than a woman. But that fact isn't fearmongering, so it doesn't get shared around.
"It's literally the plot of every other thriller novel..." But surely that's not the agenda-pushing, propaganda-laced problem; brainwashing women to think 50% of the human population is more dangerous than a wild apex predator in its home territory. No, it must be men.
This is the entire point of the bear/man question. Obviously, in 99.99% of circumstances you would pick man - the only case in which you wouldn't is if you knew the man was going to eat you while you were still alive, y'know, like bears do. But their brains are so rotted out with trash media that they seriously think that "bear" would ever be preferable.
We did too good a job protecting them boys, now they don't even understand reality.
As an aside, what exactly is the horror of rape these days? Abortions are easily accessible and STDs are either curable or treatable, so what's the big downside? How is it worse that a comparable assault? Considering the total lack of long term consequences, I would argue getting a tooth punched out is worse than rape, assuming access to Western healthcare.
I'm willing to say that rape is a much more intimate violation than assault. I don't agree with the corollary that usually goes with that that it's guaranteed to "traumatize" you forever—I think you can and should mentally recover from such a thing in most cases—but I have no issue with the idea that it would be more frightening or mentally painful than getting punched in the face, or even, maybe, than getting held down and repeatedly punched for an equivalent amount of time that a rape would take. (Although at that point the analogy falls apart a little because we wander back into the realm of "repeated bludgeoning is more likely to cause long-lasting physical damage.")
That was my argument also, but my comment didn’t post…
Rape is objectively not as bad as being eaten alive/dismembered/disemboweled, which should be obvious, but somehow isn’t, to these idiots…
At least with rape you’re likely to still be fucking alive, at the end of it. At least relative to the bear situation…
Being alive is always the superior option, because while alive, you always have the option to be dead, but once dead, you do not have the option of being alive. If being dead is superior, then everyone who is alive with that decision can choose to be dead.
The funnier part is that the other 50% of those books that aren't thrillers that these girls are reading are smut heavy "romance" novels.
You know, the ones where a guy showing up mysteriously in the woods does have actual intentions to rape and kidnap you. Because its written by women for women to all collectively masturbate to.
But as soon as they climax enough for the horny to let go, they are stuck with the consequences of thinking about that guy outside of pure sex. And that's what scares them.
That's why you always murder them after.
(kidding)
I find it hilarious how much fear these people have been indoctrinated into having for people that can barely hurt them while at the same time feeling incredibly safe around very dangerous threats.
And I'm not just talking about literal bears here but all manner of different threats.
But the men that have protected them from the dangers, those are what they are afraid of.
It's a trillion dollar a year industry to make people afraid.
But what if the woman-identifying person also identifies as a girlboss?
Walking along a quiet stretch of woodland or a trail. You come across a woman, what do you do?
In the journos mind - immediately and brutally rape her.
In reality - Make eye contact, smile, say good morning / afternoon and keep walking.
You're alone in the woods at night, it's quiet, and your phone is dead. Suddenly you see him: Shia LaBeouf.
I saw a video where a woman-identifying person walked into a 7-11 and hit a guy in the face with an axe.
To clarify: a security video, not a fictional account.
The interesting thing to me is not just the pronoun and "identifying" horror, but think about someone saying this exact same thing about black people.
A strange black person is undeniably a threat. I don't think there is a white-identifying person alive who wouldn't be gripped with fear to see a black person on the sidewalk in front of them. ... The truth is that blacks do whites harm, every day."
That would RIGHTFULLY be called out. But because it's women...
Statistically it would be more accurate.
I can't imagine a lot of "woman identifying" things actually being in the woods, let alone by themselves.
The lost part, oh I can believe that.
The "woman identifying" thing is more likely to be the rapist than some random man. Nothing says great risk assessment capabilities like letting them invade women's spaces.
I finally understand. These assholes are paid per typed character.
Who are all these PhD biologists walking in the woods alone?!
Then they should stop identifying as women. Problem solved.
No, they aren't serious. They're leftists, which means there is no lie they will not tell if they think it will provide a momentary advantage.
These are people who will scream for a man's help if they see a rat, and they expect us to believe they'd rather face a bear? Bullshit.
What's the racial background of these men? We should narrow things down for women's safety.
Replace men with black men and this is rabid hate speech.
Yes, they're absolutely serious and joking about them only emboldens them + spreads the virus to more people who would have never been exposed otherwise.
I feel like the chances of survival of a woman in the woods go drastically up when they are accompanied by a white man
Then buy a gun. Learn to use it. Learn to defend yourself with a real equaliser.
Or better yet, take responsibility for your own safety. We don't make endless campaigns about how most non-natural, non-disease deaths are men, because most of those are caused by some dumbfuck being a dumbfuck. So don't be a dumbfuck and let yourself be victimised.
Frankly, this is just further sanitisation of reality. The harsh reality of the world is violence. The safety we face is nothing more than a tiny, insignificant blip in the history of humanity. And for some reason, we focus on this little blip to try and justify people being wilfully defenceless. Fuck that. And this isn't saying you should hope to shoot someone who would assault you. You shouldn't want to do that. But you need to be prepared for it. Because at the end of the day, your life is worth more than some scumbag that would attack you unprovoked.
This woman-identifying person of gender would be absolutely gripped with fear. Look how delicate shem/zer is!!!!!
Aside from the elitist newspeak, they're using televised fiction to feed the feminist fever dream that 'every man is a rapist'.
friendly PSA to never be caught standing in the middle of the woods menacingly, my fellow man identifying chuds!
/s
I know a lot of women would feel saved if they came across a man in the woods when they're alone (and most of the time they'd be right).
...depends on which definition of serious you're using...