That's about it. Sadly, only 30% of women aren't fat. Most women seem to think men liking sex is an insult to the woman or something. And don't be annoying is probably the hardest thing for a woman to do. All she has to do is literally shut up but they just can't help themselves and when they learn the man finds them annoying they get insulted at that knowledge that they could possibly be annoying which makes them become even more annoying.
They don't even have to shut up all the time. They just have to stop trying to fill every moment of silence with noise, and they can't even do that. It's ten times worse when they have a shrill voice or an obnoxious accent.
It's ridiculously simple to make men content with things, and yet they can't do it, yet men will work two jobs and do house chores on top of buying a bunch of stupid bullshit, only for a woman to complain that he's not around enough.
If I didn't have a mating drive I wouldn't have a single reason to want to interact with women.
yet men will work two jobs and do house chores on top of buying a bunch of stupid bullshit, only for a woman to complain that he's not around enough
Men's willingness to put up with this shit is a major part of the problem. Women put out without strings attached if they actually value a guy, but men will attempt to please an unpleasable whore who's already told him he's subhuman by imposing conditions. As bad as women are simps are worse, at least in some ways.
If I didn't have a mating drive I wouldn't have a single reason to want to interact with women.
Not even my sex drive is enough to get me to deal with those creatures outside of an honest transaction. It's just not worth it.
I understand the issue of simps enabling women by their simping; however, there's more to it than that. Even if men were entirely not willing to put up with a woman's shit, we'd still have many of the same problems though the overall situation might be slightly different. Simps are a problem but they're also a symptoms of the overall system. The system itself needs to change.
Women don't struggle to make men content. As you say, it's easy to do. If all a woman wanted to do was make a man content, she could easily do it. Women struggle to make themselves content and that's no easy task.
Most women seem to think men liking sex is an insult to the woman or something.
Unless he's Chad. The reason they find non-Chads wanting sex so insulting is because it implies that some subhuman beta is worthy of her magic vagjayjay and she's therefore not at the top of SMV/RMV pecking order.
This is definitely one angle. Another angle though is that women chase "Chad" when they are young but Chad only wanted her around for sex. At first she maybe didn't realize that but eventually it became obvious when she was only getting calls for sex, when the second she stopped wanting to have sex she stopped getting calls and whatever other signals made it apparent. The women though, wanted Chad to love her for her and to be valued for something more than sex. The women though were going for the wrong men. It would be like if men who wanted housewives kept going for prostitutes and then wondering why it wasn't working out. These women who went for Chad and only got used for sex then starts to see all men who want sex as being the same as Chad who pump-and-dumped her so she starts looking for men who don't like her for sex. Of course, the problem though is that all men like women for sex and ironically, the non-Chads are the guys getting sex the least so sex is more on their mind than Chad because they're desperate from not getting sex since young girls chase Chad not non-Chad (just like her when she was younger). So now, these men who might actually be good boyfriends who would love and care for the woman forever unlike Chad are getting passed over by women simply because these men really value sex since they aren't getting sex since these women never slept with these non-Chads and these women are mistakenly attributing the fact these men want sex to mean these men are just like Chad who only ever valued her for sex.
The system is broken. Women are the cause of it and they could be the solution but they choose not to be.
It's almost always mid women who are the most paranoid about (usually imaginary) "sexual harassment." Mids can make themselves fairly attractive with enough makeup, and especially on camera, but topple their jenga tower of cope and remind them that they're mid and they'll hunt you down like Stalin hunted Trotsky.
These are the same women who as kids would be the most vicious bullies to nerds and ugly girls, they never changed they just figured out a more sophisticated way to be the same horrible person.
I agree, but I think it's more that mid/ugly women want to be hot; and so they lash out at any perceived sexual harassment since, in their mind, the hot girls can reject and degrade men for hitting on them... so if a mid chick can freak out and bitch at a guy for hitting on her, then she is also a hot chick.
Actual hot chicks (in my experience) tend to handle dudes hitting on them and flirting with them pretty well since it happens all the time. They usually just ignore it or brush the guy off. It is always mid/ugly women that flip out and throw a shitfit; because they finally "get to" do so (since it almost never happens).
Yes but it's not just about her perception of her appearance but the main point is actually her perception of where she stands on the overall social hierarchy. u/marsupialLarge kind of alludes to it but seems to think it's about the mid chick finally getting the opportunity to cutdown some guy. No, the women cutdown the guy hard because she's scared of others perceiving her social status as being equivalent to the man who she perceives as not having high enough social status to want to be seen as being equal to. Hot women don't have as much fear of their social status being ruined by ugly men hitting on them because the hot women understand they're so hot no one would think the lower social status man has a chance with her and even if she gave him that chance, her social status wouldn't be impacted. The mid women fear that the lower status men will drag their social status down and overreact in cutting these men down as a defense mechanism and in an attempt to signal their status superiority to high status people.
That has been my observation anyhow. I think it has less to do with appearance/looks and more to do with perceived "social status" more than anything. Mid women are insecure about their status and want to be perceived as being high status. Looks obviously correlates with social status and especially for women. The men women can attract also correlates to status. But it's not really about appearance so much as it is about status.
Fair but also, there's tons of women out there who are into that. I've slept with dozens of women and outside of Asia, I've never seen a woman with a bush. Most girls tell me to fuck their ass and I'm the one who has to tell them no. And every threesome I've been in has been initiated by the woman who wanted one so.... yeah. I agree those are unrealistic expectations but they're so prevalent among women, if a guy wants the above he might as well look for it because he'll find it.
Yes and many women do in fact seek this out and find it but many also fail and in the process they permanently damage themselves. There's way more women without bushes that will try anal than there are dudes with 8" dicks that can get hard on command and fuck at full speed for 20 minutes straight any time the woman wants.
You may care about equality between men and women but I don't. We need to curb women's behavior in society to promote better quality women. Men are fine enough.
Friendly reminder to all readers that these charts are a simple example that women can't into math. They cannot understand basic distributions on an intuitive level in the way that men can (notice that men naturally create a Bell curve without being pushed towards doing so). So they come up with this weird "90% of men are ugly" distribution that makes no sense.
As the other comment brings up porn can lead to unrealistic expectations, maybe not the specific examples given there but just a general trend and frequency that doesn't match real life.
Porn intentionally finds and markets both physical and mental traits that will be outliers on the edge of distribution curves, and it's not just something applicable to women. Male height, body proportions, body hair quality and quantity, performance times, and basically everything else to do with sex/porn will be significantly amplified and tailored to maximise their marketing revenue and the more it gets done the more the exposure cultivates a false perception about how sex will be. Not every guy willtbe able to last 20+ minutes. Conversely not every woman will want that because after long enough you get chafing, other irritation, and feel it more and for longer afterwards. But the consistent runtimes of such material takes root in the minds of some that this must be how all sex is.
And that's before even getting onto kinks and fetishes.
This is true. Still, most men are way less picky than women suggest. The amount of men ruined by porn is very small. It's women who tend to have unrealistic expectations warped by porn.
Women complain about men's "unrealistic" standards due to porn because women get with a guy who already finds them attractive then the guy wants her to try things he's seen on porn. The woman doesn't want to do those things and that creates conflict. The woman then gets made that porn has warped the guys mind because she imagined if he never saw porn he wouldn't want her to do those things.
Women on the other hand will not find a man attractive because he doesn't live up to standards she thinks she can expect because of porn. You'd be shocked at how many young women don't understand men can't instantly get hard and they get mad if he doesn't or can't last or fuck them at super speed nonstop super rough etc... and lots of young men knowing women have these expectations are dropping Cialis and Viagra when they sleep with women because they feel pressured into it. The problem with this though is that women won't give men chances to develop the relationship. If the man doesn't perform as king pornstar from the first time they have sex, she's already done with him (bad sexual compatibility) and she's out hunting for the next pornstar. Young women into porn don't realize the time and effort it truly can take to develop emotional connections and then work on developing some comfortability with the other person such that they can mutually woke on improving the sex. They expect it all from the start. This prevents relationships from developing.
It is exceptionally rare for men to decide not to be with a woman because she didn't perform like a pornstar on day 1. Guys just want to see women who are eager to please men so if he says he wants her to suck his dick and she says sorry, I'm not into that because my pastor said blowjobs are unholy and my feminist friend said blowjobs are demeaning to women, he's going to walk. However porn might lead the guy to developing some odd fetishes but if they aren't crazy, it really shouldn't be outside the realm of something a woman should consider doing for her BF. The fact women get mad at porn because their BF doesn't just want vanilla sex is kind of selfish. At least these men still find the women attractive even if she's not a pornstar unlike the women who have too high of expectations in men now. There's are some outliers where the guys like you have to shit on my face while I wear a diaper or we can't be together which is just fucked but that's a really fucking small minority and guys with those types of niche fetishes can sometimes find women into them too.
I'm not gonna say anything new on gender in this forum, but I think the least desirable probably 30% or more of women just don't date. Something like that has to be the case to create the unbalance you see. There's nothing inherently wrong (in the sense of incorrect -- not a moral sense) with women who are spoiled for choice being picky.
The cause of the imbalance is women's Chad chasing. It is becoming more and more common for them to opt out of dating if they can't get the hawt guy they feel entitled to, but that's not limited to the bottom rungs. Even a 7/10 is going to have difficulty locking down the kind of gigachad they all want, and feminism has taught them that comprising even a tiny bit is a fate worse than death. They deal with it in different ways. Some opt out, some share gigachads in "situationships", and others financially exploit betas while fucking the guys they actually want on the side.
The issue is that women's demands for standards in men are too high such that this leads to a reduction in demand by women for men which is causing the imbalance. The statistics on online dating show this. Men rate women /10 in a perfect normal bell curve as it should be. Women on the other hand rate men basically such that like 10% of men are 9-10/10 and 80% of men are <5 and 10% are inbetween 5-9. It's a fucked up exponential-like curve. And that's 5/10 women rating men like this. That's what's causing the imbalance. Women's perception of men is unrealistic.
I've been working on "Dad bod." It's the only thing that keeps me sane. I'm in better shape now than I was at 30 (40 now). Of course, one is in better shape after ceasing to drink a fifth of liquor a day. Go figure.
A lot of men throw other men under the bus to look good to women. Not just soy boys, macho types do it too, especially older men towards younger men who need guidance. Hell, pretty much all western culture does this. Bro code is dead and gone, and the West hasn't been patriarchal since at least Wyoming caved in and brought about the 19th Amendment (and arguably, earlier than that as well).
The bro code was enforced by the implied threat of violence, and until recently it was understood by cops that when men have a dispute, unless it escalates to murder they should just stay out of it. Even physically superior men tended to restrain themselves from being dishonorable douchebags since a weaker man can still make things not worth it, and if anything a man willing to take a beating for his own honor was considered admirable.
But the era of zero tolerance policies in schools, police being incentivised to make arrests with quota systems where they could have simply de-escalated a violent situation, and criminal records that follow you literally everywhere, has turned men into a bunch of pussified metrosexuals who only lift for looks, rather than to fight.
As a result you have men resorting to the weapons of women; passive-aggression, sarcasm, twisting your words, emotional blackmail, etc. In a previous era boys learned quickly that acting like a weaselly little bitch was an invitation to getting jumped, coming back to school the next day with black eyes, and everyone knowing that you got what you fucking deserved instead of getting pity and parents and teachers getting the cops involved.
Give the measurement sizes you cowardly faggot instead of hiding behind vague statements, I already have Christina Hendricks lined up to counter your bullshit and look at who she ended up marrying for 10 years!
That's a valid preference, not a requirement or demand.
has these exact three-measurement sizes
Never, ever heard a man say that.
a body weight that would be impossible at those sizes
Hit the gym, you lazy tub of lard. "Impossible" weight is asked for so little, for the sake of simplicity, it doesn't exist. We can talk about "realistic" (which I still think is usually bullshit excuses), but "impossible" is pathetic cope. It's possible, it's very possible.
heterochromia
Combine "preference" and "never asked for."
a latex fetish
Not even touching that. It's a fetish, that's a little different, and if you have one, you want someone who is compatible, of course. This is again a preference, and rarely asked for.
I've yet to meet a woman who won't wear latex if asked to and gifted the latex. I mean, once she finds out how much the latex costs she'll be right into it as long as she's being gifted the outfits.
This was written by an average looking brunette who is likely post wall or soon to be, then parroted by a dude to try and sell the point better, which is hilariously ironic with regards to things women claim to not need.
Your daily Too Much Info: Take it from someone with a latex fetish- there is no reasonable person that would demand that from a partner. Amazing as it looks on women with healthy bodies, it's uncomfortable as hell, expensive, difficult to wear (depending on the attire) and fragile; too many cons for a simple pro of "looks sexy on sexy women."
Who the hell looks for Heterochromia? This isn't anime.
Sounds like a possible VTuber.
I think someone might be conflating an imagined ideal for literal requirements. Or perhaps he(?) hangs out with a few fellow autists who will never accept the current selection of 3D women.
Standards can be a bitch. There's nothing wrong with having ridiculously high standards, but you have to accept the possibility that nobody will meet them. I, for one, think it's better to be alone than stuck in an awkward relationship where nobody is happy.
Men's actual standards in women:
That's about it. Sadly, only 30% of women aren't fat. Most women seem to think men liking sex is an insult to the woman or something. And don't be annoying is probably the hardest thing for a woman to do. All she has to do is literally shut up but they just can't help themselves and when they learn the man finds them annoying they get insulted at that knowledge that they could possibly be annoying which makes them become even more annoying.
They don't even have to shut up all the time. They just have to stop trying to fill every moment of silence with noise, and they can't even do that. It's ten times worse when they have a shrill voice or an obnoxious accent.
It's ridiculously simple to make men content with things, and yet they can't do it, yet men will work two jobs and do house chores on top of buying a bunch of stupid bullshit, only for a woman to complain that he's not around enough.
If I didn't have a mating drive I wouldn't have a single reason to want to interact with women.
Men's willingness to put up with this shit is a major part of the problem. Women put out without strings attached if they actually value a guy, but men will attempt to please an unpleasable whore who's already told him he's subhuman by imposing conditions. As bad as women are simps are worse, at least in some ways.
Not even my sex drive is enough to get me to deal with those creatures outside of an honest transaction. It's just not worth it.
I understand the issue of simps enabling women by their simping; however, there's more to it than that. Even if men were entirely not willing to put up with a woman's shit, we'd still have many of the same problems though the overall situation might be slightly different. Simps are a problem but they're also a symptoms of the overall system. The system itself needs to change.
Women don't struggle to make men content. As you say, it's easy to do. If all a woman wanted to do was make a man content, she could easily do it. Women struggle to make themselves content and that's no easy task.
Unless he's Chad. The reason they find non-Chads wanting sex so insulting is because it implies that some subhuman beta is worthy of her magic vagjayjay and she's therefore not at the top of SMV/RMV pecking order.
What's even more insulting to them is when a man they consider below them declines their offer to have sex.
This is definitely one angle. Another angle though is that women chase "Chad" when they are young but Chad only wanted her around for sex. At first she maybe didn't realize that but eventually it became obvious when she was only getting calls for sex, when the second she stopped wanting to have sex she stopped getting calls and whatever other signals made it apparent. The women though, wanted Chad to love her for her and to be valued for something more than sex. The women though were going for the wrong men. It would be like if men who wanted housewives kept going for prostitutes and then wondering why it wasn't working out. These women who went for Chad and only got used for sex then starts to see all men who want sex as being the same as Chad who pump-and-dumped her so she starts looking for men who don't like her for sex. Of course, the problem though is that all men like women for sex and ironically, the non-Chads are the guys getting sex the least so sex is more on their mind than Chad because they're desperate from not getting sex since young girls chase Chad not non-Chad (just like her when she was younger). So now, these men who might actually be good boyfriends who would love and care for the woman forever unlike Chad are getting passed over by women simply because these men really value sex since they aren't getting sex since these women never slept with these non-Chads and these women are mistakenly attributing the fact these men want sex to mean these men are just like Chad who only ever valued her for sex.
The system is broken. Women are the cause of it and they could be the solution but they choose not to be.
Women are way more solipsistic than this.
It's almost always mid women who are the most paranoid about (usually imaginary) "sexual harassment." Mids can make themselves fairly attractive with enough makeup, and especially on camera, but topple their jenga tower of cope and remind them that they're mid and they'll hunt you down like Stalin hunted Trotsky.
These are the same women who as kids would be the most vicious bullies to nerds and ugly girls, they never changed they just figured out a more sophisticated way to be the same horrible person.
I agree, but I think it's more that mid/ugly women want to be hot; and so they lash out at any perceived sexual harassment since, in their mind, the hot girls can reject and degrade men for hitting on them... so if a mid chick can freak out and bitch at a guy for hitting on her, then she is also a hot chick.
Actual hot chicks (in my experience) tend to handle dudes hitting on them and flirting with them pretty well since it happens all the time. They usually just ignore it or brush the guy off. It is always mid/ugly women that flip out and throw a shitfit; because they finally "get to" do so (since it almost never happens).
Good point.
Yes but it's not just about her perception of her appearance but the main point is actually her perception of where she stands on the overall social hierarchy. u/marsupialLarge kind of alludes to it but seems to think it's about the mid chick finally getting the opportunity to cutdown some guy. No, the women cutdown the guy hard because she's scared of others perceiving her social status as being equivalent to the man who she perceives as not having high enough social status to want to be seen as being equal to. Hot women don't have as much fear of their social status being ruined by ugly men hitting on them because the hot women understand they're so hot no one would think the lower social status man has a chance with her and even if she gave him that chance, her social status wouldn't be impacted. The mid women fear that the lower status men will drag their social status down and overreact in cutting these men down as a defense mechanism and in an attempt to signal their status superiority to high status people.
That has been my observation anyhow. I think it has less to do with appearance/looks and more to do with perceived "social status" more than anything. Mid women are insecure about their status and want to be perceived as being high status. Looks obviously correlates with social status and especially for women. The men women can attract also correlates to status. But it's not really about appearance so much as it is about status.
TBF you can point to porn for some level of unfair expectations from men, like women having no bush, interest in anal and threesomes, etc.
Fair but also, there's tons of women out there who are into that. I've slept with dozens of women and outside of Asia, I've never seen a woman with a bush. Most girls tell me to fuck their ass and I'm the one who has to tell them no. And every threesome I've been in has been initiated by the woman who wanted one so.... yeah. I agree those are unrealistic expectations but they're so prevalent among women, if a guy wants the above he might as well look for it because he'll find it.
Tbf then, there are plenty of men who do fuck like porn stars, so if that's what a woman wants she might as well look for it because she'll find it
Yes and many women do in fact seek this out and find it but many also fail and in the process they permanently damage themselves. There's way more women without bushes that will try anal than there are dudes with 8" dicks that can get hard on command and fuck at full speed for 20 minutes straight any time the woman wants.
You may care about equality between men and women but I don't. We need to curb women's behavior in society to promote better quality women. Men are fine enough.
Lol I mean you can take away the gender in what you wrote and you just describe people.
Tons of people, either in a phase or for most of their lives, fantasize about and look for that porn star lay. Some succeed, many fail.
Yes but it ruins women worse than it ruins men.
Depends on the person
Here is how men and women rate and percieve eachothers.
Men rate women on a bell curve for attraction.
Women rate 80% of men as ''below average''.
But sure, it's men who have retarded standarts and skewed perceptions.
Friendly reminder to all readers that these charts are a simple example that women can't into math. They cannot understand basic distributions on an intuitive level in the way that men can (notice that men naturally create a Bell curve without being pushed towards doing so). So they come up with this weird "90% of men are ugly" distribution that makes no sense.
Many do, but for completely different reasons.
Elaborate?
As the other comment brings up porn can lead to unrealistic expectations, maybe not the specific examples given there but just a general trend and frequency that doesn't match real life.
Porn intentionally finds and markets both physical and mental traits that will be outliers on the edge of distribution curves, and it's not just something applicable to women. Male height, body proportions, body hair quality and quantity, performance times, and basically everything else to do with sex/porn will be significantly amplified and tailored to maximise their marketing revenue and the more it gets done the more the exposure cultivates a false perception about how sex will be. Not every guy willtbe able to last 20+ minutes. Conversely not every woman will want that because after long enough you get chafing, other irritation, and feel it more and for longer afterwards. But the consistent runtimes of such material takes root in the minds of some that this must be how all sex is.
And that's before even getting onto kinks and fetishes.
This is true. Still, most men are way less picky than women suggest. The amount of men ruined by porn is very small. It's women who tend to have unrealistic expectations warped by porn.
Women complain about men's "unrealistic" standards due to porn because women get with a guy who already finds them attractive then the guy wants her to try things he's seen on porn. The woman doesn't want to do those things and that creates conflict. The woman then gets made that porn has warped the guys mind because she imagined if he never saw porn he wouldn't want her to do those things.
Women on the other hand will not find a man attractive because he doesn't live up to standards she thinks she can expect because of porn. You'd be shocked at how many young women don't understand men can't instantly get hard and they get mad if he doesn't or can't last or fuck them at super speed nonstop super rough etc... and lots of young men knowing women have these expectations are dropping Cialis and Viagra when they sleep with women because they feel pressured into it. The problem with this though is that women won't give men chances to develop the relationship. If the man doesn't perform as king pornstar from the first time they have sex, she's already done with him (bad sexual compatibility) and she's out hunting for the next pornstar. Young women into porn don't realize the time and effort it truly can take to develop emotional connections and then work on developing some comfortability with the other person such that they can mutually woke on improving the sex. They expect it all from the start. This prevents relationships from developing.
It is exceptionally rare for men to decide not to be with a woman because she didn't perform like a pornstar on day 1. Guys just want to see women who are eager to please men so if he says he wants her to suck his dick and she says sorry, I'm not into that because my pastor said blowjobs are unholy and my feminist friend said blowjobs are demeaning to women, he's going to walk. However porn might lead the guy to developing some odd fetishes but if they aren't crazy, it really shouldn't be outside the realm of something a woman should consider doing for her BF. The fact women get mad at porn because their BF doesn't just want vanilla sex is kind of selfish. At least these men still find the women attractive even if she's not a pornstar unlike the women who have too high of expectations in men now. There's are some outliers where the guys like you have to shit on my face while I wear a diaper or we can't be together which is just fucked but that's a really fucking small minority and guys with those types of niche fetishes can sometimes find women into them too.
Women: says guys want a bunch of things and basically want servants
Actual men: just someone who ain't a bitch and not self destructive enough to hurt them and those around them.
It's female projection as usual. They treat dating like shopping and their "standards" reflect that.
I'm not gonna say anything new on gender in this forum, but I think the least desirable probably 30% or more of women just don't date. Something like that has to be the case to create the unbalance you see. There's nothing inherently wrong (in the sense of incorrect -- not a moral sense) with women who are spoiled for choice being picky.
The cause of the imbalance is women's Chad chasing. It is becoming more and more common for them to opt out of dating if they can't get the hawt guy they feel entitled to, but that's not limited to the bottom rungs. Even a 7/10 is going to have difficulty locking down the kind of gigachad they all want, and feminism has taught them that comprising even a tiny bit is a fate worse than death. They deal with it in different ways. Some opt out, some share gigachads in "situationships", and others financially exploit betas while fucking the guys they actually want on the side.
The issue is that women's demands for standards in men are too high such that this leads to a reduction in demand by women for men which is causing the imbalance. The statistics on online dating show this. Men rate women /10 in a perfect normal bell curve as it should be. Women on the other hand rate men basically such that like 10% of men are 9-10/10 and 80% of men are <5 and 10% are inbetween 5-9. It's a fucked up exponential-like curve. And that's 5/10 women rating men like this. That's what's causing the imbalance. Women's perception of men is unrealistic.
ok but why now?
Social media and hollywood propaganda.
When people call Jason Mamoa not constantly cutting to get an 8-pack showing a 'Dad bod', you know shit's fucked.
I've been working on "Dad bod." It's the only thing that keeps me sane. I'm in better shape now than I was at 30 (40 now). Of course, one is in better shape after ceasing to drink a fifth of liquor a day. Go figure.
I would argue social media and online dating are driving this.
pronouns in bio
People will keep parroting this "muh supermodel" narrative to avoid talking about the real issue: most women have shit personalities
They do that on purpose so you’ll stop talking to them.
Women who like you will never have this problem.
Short, tits, freckles, ready to go
A lot of men throw other men under the bus to look good to women. Not just soy boys, macho types do it too, especially older men towards younger men who need guidance. Hell, pretty much all western culture does this. Bro code is dead and gone, and the West hasn't been patriarchal since at least Wyoming caved in and brought about the 19th Amendment (and arguably, earlier than that as well).
The bro code was enforced by the implied threat of violence, and until recently it was understood by cops that when men have a dispute, unless it escalates to murder they should just stay out of it. Even physically superior men tended to restrain themselves from being dishonorable douchebags since a weaker man can still make things not worth it, and if anything a man willing to take a beating for his own honor was considered admirable.
But the era of zero tolerance policies in schools, police being incentivised to make arrests with quota systems where they could have simply de-escalated a violent situation, and criminal records that follow you literally everywhere, has turned men into a bunch of pussified metrosexuals who only lift for looks, rather than to fight.
As a result you have men resorting to the weapons of women; passive-aggression, sarcasm, twisting your words, emotional blackmail, etc. In a previous era boys learned quickly that acting like a weaselly little bitch was an invitation to getting jumped, coming back to school the next day with black eyes, and everyone knowing that you got what you fucking deserved instead of getting pity and parents and teachers getting the cops involved.
Give the measurement sizes you cowardly faggot instead of hiding behind vague statements, I already have Christina Hendricks lined up to counter your bullshit and look at who she ended up marrying for 10 years!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geoffrey_Arend
What a bunch of nonsense.
Seems a reasonable request for a relationship.
That's a valid preference, not a requirement or demand.
Never, ever heard a man say that.
Hit the gym, you lazy tub of lard. "Impossible" weight is asked for so little, for the sake of simplicity, it doesn't exist. We can talk about "realistic" (which I still think is usually bullshit excuses), but "impossible" is pathetic cope. It's possible, it's very possible.
Combine "preference" and "never asked for."
Not even touching that. It's a fetish, that's a little different, and if you have one, you want someone who is compatible, of course. This is again a preference, and rarely asked for.
I've yet to meet a woman who won't wear latex if asked to and gifted the latex. I mean, once she finds out how much the latex costs she'll be right into it as long as she's being gifted the outfits.
There's a difference between a latex outfit and those gimp suits I'm guessing the ogre in the tweet is referring to
This was written by an average looking brunette who is likely post wall or soon to be, then parroted by a dude to try and sell the point better, which is hilariously ironic with regards to things women claim to not need.
I'll set the timer for this guy being a rapist now.
Reasonably fit, agreeable, enjoys sex with me. That’s the entire list. No one wants obese, withholding, and argumentative.
I was on board with the first sentence.
Your daily Too Much Info: Take it from someone with a latex fetish- there is no reasonable person that would demand that from a partner. Amazing as it looks on women with healthy bodies, it's uncomfortable as hell, expensive, difficult to wear (depending on the attire) and fragile; too many cons for a simple pro of "looks sexy on sexy women."
Who the hell looks for Heterochromia? This isn't anime.
Sounds like a possible VTuber.
I think someone might be conflating an imagined ideal for literal requirements. Or perhaps he(?) hangs out with a few fellow autists who will never accept the current selection of 3D women.
Standards can be a bitch. There's nothing wrong with having ridiculously high standards, but you have to accept the possibility that nobody will meet them. I, for one, think it's better to be alone than stuck in an awkward relationship where nobody is happy.