I have first/secondhand experience in India. Without getting into the naivete of the couple, this is my major takeaway from this story: IT HAS GOTTEN WORSE for Westerners and for women in general. Indians used to fear and respect European names, and if this couple had taken the same journey decades ago, this might not happened, but now the risk has substantially increased. Why? Because the deliberate and increasing degradation of white people's ability to stand up for themselves has left them open to pillage by the savages of the world on a scale not seen since the Muslim invasion of Europe.
Make no mistake, this is bigger than the safety of tourists in Jharkhand. The story of this couple is a metaphor for the growing Hindu domination of medicine and tech in America. The native population is being administrated by people who in many cases perceive them with so little respect that they essentially register only as sources of income.
In contrast, Mark Twain's account of the Thuggee murder cult defines what being a Westerner used to mean:
There is one very striking thing which I wish to call attention to. You have surmised from the listed callings followed by the victims of the Thugs that nobody could travel the Indian roads unprotected and live to get through; that the Thugs respected no quality, no vocation, no religion, nobody; that they killed every unarmed man that came in their way. That is wholly true—with one reservation. In all the long file of Thug confessions an English traveller is mentioned but once—and this is what the Thug says of the circumstance:
"He was on his way from Mhow to Bombay. We studiously avoided him. He proceeded next morning with a number of travellers who had sought his protection, and they took the road to Baroda."
We do not know who he was; he flits across the page of this rusty old book and disappears in the obscurity beyond; but he is an impressive figure, moving through that valley of death serene and unafraid, clothed in the might of the English name.
The Thuggees were obliterated to extinction under British rule.
The world is a lot more dangerous because white guilt pussified the Western whites. A few decades ago, this would've been unthinkable because they had it in their heads mess with those people and their villages burned the next day.
Fear is the best tool to civilise and 'empathy and understanding' ONLY works with those that have full integrated into your culture and would side with you no matter what. Everyone else should fear that they'll unleash a demon by messing with you.
The simplest travel advisory these days is just "don't travel to places where their skin color is darker than your own." With how hostile the non-Whites are in my own country, I cannot imagine what decades of CIA and their own government propaganda has done to turn the rest of the world against me. Everyone is encouraged to exercise that chip on their shoulder and it shows.
What you hear in 'Murica about "Paris" is very likely actually outside the city-proper, which has some dodgy areas but is relatively safe to extremely safe (the area around the Seine) even at night.
You have very little reason to travel to the suburbs, except for the great cathedral at Saint Denis (which is in one of the worst areas, if not the worst), but you just take the subway, get out very close to the cathedral, visit, and then go back.
(I'm not encouraging anyone to go to Paris, just pointing out.)
I have a friend at work, he is from France, he absolutely hates Paris, he now moved in some rural place a couple of hours drive from Carcassonne. Oddly enough he is not French but Moroccan, still hates it.
I also have 2 friends that moved for a while in Paris, only thing they talked about was literal shit, rats and how bad it was. I don't know where in Paris, all I know that they could see the Eiffel Tower from one of the windows if you stretch your neck.
Also the yellow vest protests did not look very French.
I have a friend at work, he is from France, he absolutely hates Paris
Generally, the attitude of Europeans towards capital cities is the same as those of Americans towards San Francisco. Crime is higher and it's inhabited by out of touch scumbags.
Oddly enough he is not French but Moroccan, still hates it.
Quality of life doesn't discriminate. Unless you need the stuff that's in a big city, stay away.
I'm not saying that Paris (or any other place) is 'great', and like almost everywhere in Europe it has declined a lot over the past 20 years, just that it's not the Boschian hellscape that Americans imagine it to be.
Paris syndrome is Japanese tourists having an extreme shock to the point of feeling physically ill when witnessing shit-and-piss covered non-White Paris when they expected a gorgeous French city.
Paris and France had a huge aura of prestige in Japan : the French had a repulation for their architecture, food, culture and fashion. The must-go place to visit if you are going to spend your money on traveling to a foreing country.
Now Japanese arrive in Paris and see the place overcroweded by blacks and brown muslims, the streets smell like piss ( non-Whites piss in the streets ), the ''urban youths'' try to scam or steal from them.
Their expensive dream trip is a fucking nightmare. Compared to Japan, they are in a relatively high danger in Paris. They hate it.
point of feeling physically ill when witnessing shit-and-piss covered non-White Paris
I can't find any reference to "shit" in talks about Paris syndrome. Have you ever actually been to Paris? It's got problems, like 'clochards' being drunk during the day even back when San Francisco was a livable city, but "shit on the streets" are not one of those problems.
Now Japanese arrive in Paris and see the place overcroweded by blacks and brown muslims
Except that the parts the Japanese visit don't have a lot of blacks and Muslims. Again, you can only make this claim when you've never been to Paris and your entire knowledge of the city comes from Fox News reports about Saint Denis labeled as 'Paris'.
Compared to Japan, they are in a relatively high danger in Paris
This is correct, and this will be true anywhere in Europe. Japan simply is a much better place.
I have considered Greece, but only ever for the ancient Roman stuff. I don't know what modern Greece has to offer that could inspire me to visit. For instance, I don't care for much Mediterranean food at all.
I consider Japan to be close enough to White to be safe. The country speaks for itself regardless of my rating. China maybe not so much. I may have uttered too many gong fei's into my phone for their liking.
I did mean Greek, I am retarded. My excuse is that I was very tired. My brain tends to ram them together due to my school education about them being in the same unit.
Regarding the Japanese, in terms of color. One of my "favorite" complaints from Leftists is that anime is filled with 'White people' when, from the Japanese perspective, they are all Asian, minus the ones that are explicitly not so based on their names or stated origins.
Not retarded at all, Greco-Roman is basically the way it's always said. I only asked because we're talking about color here, and there was the theoretical possibility that someone would say "the Greeks are too dark for me, but not the Romans".
Reminder: The world is not a safe place. It's not some theme park for you to just stroll through as a vacation destination. People seem to forget this as a consequence of living in a first world country and imbibing luxury ideologies that pretend otherwise. The third world is the third world because it is populated by people who do shit like this.
If I had to guess, they are typical "the world is a beautiful place!" liberal Europeans. Their travel blog probably goes something like this:
Myanmar is such an amazing place with kind, generous people. The culture is rich and diverse. The food is delicious.
Bangladesh is such an amazing place with kind, generous people. The culture is rich and diverse. The food is delicious.
India is...such an amazing place with kind, generous people. The culture is rich and diverse. The countryside has its share of underprivileged youths who haven't gotten the help they need, but every country has it's issues. That doesn't represent the best India has to offer. LOVE NOT HATE! The food is delicious.
Nepal, it's such an amazing place with kind, generous people. The culture is rich and diverse. The food is delicious.
It's always the fucking food with people like that. Ask them to name one thing about a foreign culture they claim to love - aside from its food - and they might, at best, be able to name a pop culture song.
This is the truth, and not just for different countries/cultures. It applies to the whole world.
The natural state of man is abject poverty, a few days if not hours away from dying of starvation, infection, broken limbs, excessive heat/cold/water/fire, hungry animals, and countless other miserable ways to die.
Every action of human advancement, from when Crog the caveman first figured out how to secure a pointy rock to a stick up until today has been Crog (and descendants) telling Mother Nature (who is an absolute, murderous monster) and that complete jerk Grog living in the next cave over "Screw you, I'm going to keep me and mine safe and try to get us lives which are as comfortable as possible!"
I don't know if it is ignorance, ridiculously easy lives where they're never had to do anything hard, a sense of entitlement/superiority, or a combination thereof, but the same people who ignore the dangers around them (and amplify minor o non-dangers) also seem determined to undo as much of what civilization as accomplished over history as possible.
This is important for people to understand. Absent external force, groups will always regress to the mean.
And the reality is that most other groups are no better than animals that walk upright.
It's why when cuckservatives whine about "welfare destroying black culture" that it falls so far off the mark. They only ever behaved because there was a boot on their proverbial necks. They only went to church because we'd hang them if they practiced their real religion. They only left our women alone because we'd burn their houses down if they didn't. They only worked hard because they'd starve if they didn't.
Same thing with the Indians, although perhaps to an even worse degree because they never stopped being pagans. Ritual human sacrifice was only ever outlawed in India in the 90s. The 1990s.
They can't be fixed. And it isn't worth the effort to try. The best we can hope for is containment, to pen them up in their feculent hell and make sure they leave us alone.
They only ever behaved because there was a boot on their proverbial necks.
Actually, this sounds like a pretty good universal rule. People only ever behave as long as they're forced to by either government repression or strong social mores.
One of the most important lines in modern Western writing came from fucking Office Space, and it describes every element of human behavior filtered through their job:
That's my only real motivation is not to be hassled, ...that will only make someone work just hard enough not to get fired.
People will always work the barest minimum to not get in trouble. Once you take away that threat, they will regress and regress until they hit little more than an animal.
Yes as a safety measure, but his point is some will always need it more than others. Historically we've seen where many places in the west had draconian rules that went away over time because some peoples don't need it - but then we forgot why we ever had those rules in the first place, and act like everyone else on the planet is the same. The west in its own cultural success failed to recognize its superiority.
It's the "strong men create good times" cycle. Strong norms create times in which people start to believe that those strong norms aren't actually necessary.
This article mentions that it's quite the political controversy and is being used by one of the opposition parties to target the reigning one. It also mentions the implications for tourism, which is why the police took it so seriously.
It also mentions that 'tribal sisters' in Jharkhand's Dumka were also the victims of rapes. A quick search turned up an incident with a 14-year old girl in 2023.
In ancient Rome, just three words were enough to protect any citizen: 'Civis Romanus sum': I
am a Roman Citizen. So great was the power of Rome that an attack on a citizen of Rome
was considered an attack on Rome itself.
[...]
Because of their Korean
heritage we have seen their property destroyed and their persons assaulted, and in some
cases they have been murdered. Simply because they are Korean. My message to them is
simple: we will protect you. If we cannot protect you, we will avenge you.
Indian men are some of the rapiest on the planet and there's a good reason why not even Indian women want to be involved with an Indian man if they're not being forced into marriage by their parents. If all tourist dried up in India due to the animals unable to control themselves, the Indian government would be forced to do something but since tourism won't stop there is no incentive to care.
Even in the comments, some people are shitting on white people saying rape is higher in usa and europe so she was more likely to be raped there instead.
I kind of had the same thought but, they stormed the tent in the middle of the night, probably stomped the couple out, then held a knife to the husband's neck. Tough situation.
I have first/secondhand experience in India. Without getting into the naivete of the couple, this is my major takeaway from this story: IT HAS GOTTEN WORSE for Westerners and for women in general. Indians used to fear and respect European names, and if this couple had taken the same journey decades ago, this might not happened, but now the risk has substantially increased. Why? Because the deliberate and increasing degradation of white people's ability to stand up for themselves has left them open to pillage by the savages of the world on a scale not seen since the Muslim invasion of Europe.
Background details.
Make no mistake, this is bigger than the safety of tourists in Jharkhand. The story of this couple is a metaphor for the growing Hindu domination of medicine and tech in America. The native population is being administrated by people who in many cases perceive them with so little respect that they essentially register only as sources of income.
In contrast, Mark Twain's account of the Thuggee murder cult defines what being a Westerner used to mean:
The Thuggees were obliterated to extinction under British rule.
The unspoken civis Romanus sum of the ascendant European. I pray I live to see it happen again.
Perhaps if we just concede to their every demand? We already gave them London, how about we give them Liverpool too?
We must just open our heart in compassion for their situation and give them just a little more.
/s
The world is a lot more dangerous because white guilt pussified the Western whites. A few decades ago, this would've been unthinkable because they had it in their heads mess with those people and their villages burned the next day.
Fear is the best tool to civilise and 'empathy and understanding' ONLY works with those that have full integrated into your culture and would side with you no matter what. Everyone else should fear that they'll unleash a demon by messing with you.
The thing the Left understands and the Right does not: There is no truth but power.
I vaguely remember a news story about India where a girl was gang raped. She went to the police station and was gang raped at the police station.
Not long ago one was posted here where a rape victim was sent to the hospital and she was raped at the hospital.
I found the story.
https://edition.cnn.com/2022/05/05/india/india-rape-teenager-police-arrested-intl-hnk/index.html
Insane
The simplest travel advisory these days is just "don't travel to places where their skin color is darker than your own." With how hostile the non-Whites are in my own country, I cannot imagine what decades of CIA and their own government propaganda has done to turn the rest of the world against me. Everyone is encouraged to exercise that chip on their shoulder and it shows.
Unfortunately that now excludes Paris and London
Did he stutter?
What you hear in 'Murica about "Paris" is very likely actually outside the city-proper, which has some dodgy areas but is relatively safe to extremely safe (the area around the Seine) even at night.
You have very little reason to travel to the suburbs, except for the great cathedral at Saint Denis (which is in one of the worst areas, if not the worst), but you just take the subway, get out very close to the cathedral, visit, and then go back.
(I'm not encouraging anyone to go to Paris, just pointing out.)
I have a friend at work, he is from France, he absolutely hates Paris, he now moved in some rural place a couple of hours drive from Carcassonne. Oddly enough he is not French but Moroccan, still hates it.
I also have 2 friends that moved for a while in Paris, only thing they talked about was literal shit, rats and how bad it was. I don't know where in Paris, all I know that they could see the Eiffel Tower from one of the windows if you stretch your neck.
Also the yellow vest protests did not look very French.
Generally, the attitude of Europeans towards capital cities is the same as those of Americans towards San Francisco. Crime is higher and it's inhabited by out of touch scumbags.
Quality of life doesn't discriminate. Unless you need the stuff that's in a big city, stay away.
I'm not saying that Paris (or any other place) is 'great', and like almost everywhere in Europe it has declined a lot over the past 20 years, just that it's not the Boschian hellscape that Americans imagine it to be.
Look up "Paris syndrome." It's not just 'Murica that thinks Paris is a shithole.
I assume you mean the "reality vs imagined" videos? It's just like any other large European city.
Paris syndrome is Japanese tourists having an extreme shock to the point of feeling physically ill when witnessing shit-and-piss covered non-White Paris when they expected a gorgeous French city.
Paris and France had a huge aura of prestige in Japan : the French had a repulation for their architecture, food, culture and fashion. The must-go place to visit if you are going to spend your money on traveling to a foreing country.
Now Japanese arrive in Paris and see the place overcroweded by blacks and brown muslims, the streets smell like piss ( non-Whites piss in the streets ), the ''urban youths'' try to scam or steal from them.
Their expensive dream trip is a fucking nightmare. Compared to Japan, they are in a relatively high danger in Paris. They hate it.
I can't find any reference to "shit" in talks about Paris syndrome. Have you ever actually been to Paris? It's got problems, like 'clochards' being drunk during the day even back when San Francisco was a livable city, but "shit on the streets" are not one of those problems.
Except that the parts the Japanese visit don't have a lot of blacks and Muslims. Again, you can only make this claim when you've never been to Paris and your entire knowledge of the city comes from Fox News reports about Saint Denis labeled as 'Paris'.
This is correct, and this will be true anywhere in Europe. Japan simply is a much better place.
Paris is notorious for having a shit on the streets problem.
https://globometer.com/animaux-crottes-chiens-paris.php
Inb4 ''you never went to Paris, the tourists don't see the shit''.
It may be a good rule of thumb in practice, but does this mean you're not visiting Greece?
Also, how does the color of the Japanese figure?
I have considered Greece, but only ever for the ancient Roman stuff. I don't know what modern Greece has to offer that could inspire me to visit. For instance, I don't care for much Mediterranean food at all.
I consider Japan to be close enough to White to be safe. The country speaks for itself regardless of my rating. China maybe not so much. I may have uttered too many gong fei's into my phone for their liking.
Eh, I think you mean ancient Greek stuff. There is some Roman stuff as well, but the Parthenon wasn't Roman.
He who hasn't eaten a gyros in Greece has not lived.
In terms of color or behavior?
I did mean Greek, I am retarded. My excuse is that I was very tired. My brain tends to ram them together due to my school education about them being in the same unit.
Regarding the Japanese, in terms of color. One of my "favorite" complaints from Leftists is that anime is filled with 'White people' when, from the Japanese perspective, they are all Asian, minus the ones that are explicitly not so based on their names or stated origins.
Not retarded at all, Greco-Roman is basically the way it's always said. I only asked because we're talking about color here, and there was the theoretical possibility that someone would say "the Greeks are too dark for me, but not the Romans".
Reminder: The world is not a safe place. It's not some theme park for you to just stroll through as a vacation destination. People seem to forget this as a consequence of living in a first world country and imbibing luxury ideologies that pretend otherwise. The third world is the third world because it is populated by people who do shit like this.
If I had to guess, they are typical "the world is a beautiful place!" liberal Europeans. Their travel blog probably goes something like this:
Myanmar is such an amazing place with kind, generous people. The culture is rich and diverse. The food is delicious.
Bangladesh is such an amazing place with kind, generous people. The culture is rich and diverse. The food is delicious.
India is...such an amazing place with kind, generous people. The culture is rich and diverse. The countryside has its share of underprivileged youths who haven't gotten the help they need, but every country has it's issues. That doesn't represent the best India has to offer. LOVE NOT HATE! The food is delicious.
Nepal, it's such an amazing place with kind, generous people. The culture is rich and diverse. The food is delicious.
Live, laugh, love.
It's always the fucking food with people like that. Ask them to name one thing about a foreign culture they claim to love - aside from its food - and they might, at best, be able to name a pop culture song.
This is the truth, and not just for different countries/cultures. It applies to the whole world.
The natural state of man is abject poverty, a few days if not hours away from dying of starvation, infection, broken limbs, excessive heat/cold/water/fire, hungry animals, and countless other miserable ways to die.
Every action of human advancement, from when Crog the caveman first figured out how to secure a pointy rock to a stick up until today has been Crog (and descendants) telling Mother Nature (who is an absolute, murderous monster) and that complete jerk Grog living in the next cave over "Screw you, I'm going to keep me and mine safe and try to get us lives which are as comfortable as possible!"
I don't know if it is ignorance, ridiculously easy lives where they're never had to do anything hard, a sense of entitlement/superiority, or a combination thereof, but the same people who ignore the dangers around them (and amplify minor o non-dangers) also seem determined to undo as much of what civilization as accomplished over history as possible.
This is important for people to understand. Absent external force, groups will always regress to the mean.
And the reality is that most other groups are no better than animals that walk upright.
It's why when cuckservatives whine about "welfare destroying black culture" that it falls so far off the mark. They only ever behaved because there was a boot on their proverbial necks. They only went to church because we'd hang them if they practiced their real religion. They only left our women alone because we'd burn their houses down if they didn't. They only worked hard because they'd starve if they didn't.
Same thing with the Indians, although perhaps to an even worse degree because they never stopped being pagans. Ritual human sacrifice was only ever outlawed in India in the 90s. The 1990s.
They can't be fixed. And it isn't worth the effort to try. The best we can hope for is containment, to pen them up in their feculent hell and make sure they leave us alone.
Actually, this sounds like a pretty good universal rule. People only ever behave as long as they're forced to by either government repression or strong social mores.
“ The human mind is never better disposed to gratitude and attachment than when softened by fear.” —Sir Charles James Napier
One of the most important lines in modern Western writing came from fucking Office Space, and it describes every element of human behavior filtered through their job:
People will always work the barest minimum to not get in trouble. Once you take away that threat, they will regress and regress until they hit little more than an animal.
Yes as a safety measure, but his point is some will always need it more than others. Historically we've seen where many places in the west had draconian rules that went away over time because some peoples don't need it - but then we forgot why we ever had those rules in the first place, and act like everyone else on the planet is the same. The west in its own cultural success failed to recognize its superiority.
Christianity changed the genetic destiny of Europeans, but our failure to recognize that is fatal to our efforts in other countries.
It's the "strong men create good times" cycle. Strong norms create times in which people start to believe that those strong norms aren't actually necessary.
You do realize that the Indian sub-continent is huge and has many different ethnic groups, from urban populations to neglected rural populations.
Let me give you a tip. The moment you say "you do realize", is the moment people stop listening.
That said, I know full well and I absolutely do not care. Stand under the same flag, die on the same hill.
The moment people say: "Let me give you a tip", is the moment ....
J/k. ;)
The moment you ask them to put on a condom?
Why do you think Sihks religiously carry knives?
This article mentions that it's quite the political controversy and is being used by one of the opposition parties to target the reigning one. It also mentions the implications for tourism, which is why the police took it so seriously.
It also mentions that 'tribal sisters' in Jharkhand's Dumka were also the victims of rapes. A quick search turned up an incident with a 14-year old girl in 2023.
hmmm.. all those indians in CEO and filling up a lot of positions at a lot of companies. hmmmmm hmmmm.
Say what you will about Homefront, but one of the newspaper collectibles had a quote that really stuck with me.
wouldn't even defend the game against Chyna
Indian men are some of the rapiest on the planet and there's a good reason why not even Indian women want to be involved with an Indian man if they're not being forced into marriage by their parents. If all tourist dried up in India due to the animals unable to control themselves, the Indian government would be forced to do something but since tourism won't stop there is no incentive to care.
"Yes, all males are rape monsters and need to be locked up." - Typical Spanish Feminist (aka woman)
Even in the comments, some people are shitting on white people saying rape is higher in usa and europe so she was more likely to be raped there instead.
A lot of bot farms are based in India.
So shouting "Yankee go home!" isn't enough anymore.
Safe bet that it will also be the last time anyone hears anything about them.
I kind of had the same thought but, they stormed the tent in the middle of the night, probably stomped the couple out, then held a knife to the husband's neck. Tough situation.