I remember those headlines, now that you mention it. This is why I didn't put a zero, because I figured that someone must have died because of video games.
Brazil's military did a decent job at dealing with the commie problem as well. It's why the country's legitimate president speaks fondly of those days.
I feel like communism in South America was like "whatever else I'm doing isn't great so let's go hide out in the jungle and live off of pillage and Soviet supplies"
Bolsonaro failed the good people of Brazil and just ran away to the U.S. He clearly didn't have the courage that other past right wing political figures in Latin America had
The list is likely in the thousands. One of the most popular indie games of the last decade was a farming sim. Plus entire genres like rhythm, visual novels, racing, simulators, puzzle etc.
Stellaris is far enough removed from leftist grievances for genocide to be viable option. Victoria 3, not so much. You would think that playing as an ethnostate would open up options to eliminate undesirables, but you need mods for that.
Factorio, where the most UPS efficient power plants, and thus the power plants of the largest bases, is solar. Of course anyone who criticizes video games will never get that far.
And of course, teaching people to kill is bad because then they might consider that an option when dealing with unredeemably evil people like, I don't know say, politicians.
Lula is indubitably a piece of detritus: the practical parading by criminal gangs firing their guns into the air and prisoners cheering whilst making the 'L' for Lula sign with their hands upon news of his electoral victory serves as a reminder of how bad this man is. If violent criminals are cheering for your victory—they hate Bolso for making life harder for criminals of all sorts—you're clearly doing something wrong. End of.
However, the people who frequent this sub are all avid consumers and will invariably and quite reflexively condemn anyone who condemns consuming, particularly of video games, for all but a select few reasons.
Now I'll be bucking the trend here by saying that Lula has a point about video games being garbage. Only a degenerate fool would deny that the video games of the 2020s are worth a grain of salt. Even Lula probably isn't stupid enough to think that whatever kids are playing on their stupid tablets is anything but non-productive or even counter-productive brain rot. But even during the glory days of video gaming they were always violence-focused. In fact, it is quite difficult to conceive of an interesting game of any kind that does not have as its goal the destruction of something unless one finds whatever the latest EA Sports release happens to be, or some driving game, interesting. And one must concede that even those seemingly innocuous games such as Jak and Daxter, Ratchet and Clank, Spyro and Crash Bandicoot are all rather destruction-focused to varying extents. Jak 2, in particular, was a child's Grand Theft Auto 3, right down to the amount of shooting and wanton destruction.
I do not sympathize with Lula's claim that video games must focus on 'love', which is typical Leftist drivel. I agree, however, that they should be vastly more educative, and seeing brainless, non-educative forms of entertainment entering the annals of history would indubitably be of net benefit to the species. The species is increasingly being composed of little more than abject dumbasses of the highest magnitude, and both 'entertainment' and the internet are doing plenty to aid and abet that.
The idea of Christian Socialism is particularly strange to Americans.
Only because of jews taking over the right and using them to push an Israel First agenda. Everywhere else in the world Christianity and Leftisim go hand in hand, as they should because they're the same ideology.
Sodomy can be right-wing, if it is culturally established and traditional. There is nothing inherent in the acts of oral sex or anal sex (sodomy) that is about eschewing the currently existing regime.
40 years from now, it will be conservative to be gay, and radically liberal to want two-parent-households who raise their own kids, because it will be preaching to overturn and change, to alter, the existing rulership and cultural structure.
Conservative: "It works, don't fuck with something that works just fine."
Liberal: "It works right now... but if we fucked with it, it might work better, who knows? Sure it might crash and burn, but it MIGHT improve!"
Thats not conservstism, thats liberalism you retard. 10 commandments are the opposite of liberals. Liberals wnat tog ay and trans kids, conservstives want to protect kids from the lgtb pedos
Communist would be experts on killing. It’s all their ideology has ever done.
Communism: 100,000,000 + deaths
Nintendo, X-Box, Sony, Sega, Atari: ? deaths
After factoring in all the Koreans who starved to death while playing Starcraft the two numbers might be closer than you think.
It happened once that I've seen, and the death was clearly due to methamphetamine abuse, not video games.
I remember those headlines, now that you mention it. This is why I didn't put a zero, because I figured that someone must have died because of video games.
That’s not the fault of video games though. StarCraft didn’t force them to starve to death, bad life choices did.
The "Brazilian President..." that wasn't legitimately elected?
At the beginning people were like oh look Brazil is going to do something about it. Evidently not.
Bring back Pinochet.
We should start a charity "One helicopter flight simulator per child".
No duh. Pinochet was Chile. The actions are what is necessary here.
Brazil's military did a decent job at dealing with the commie problem as well. It's why the country's legitimate president speaks fondly of those days.
I feel like communism in South America was like "whatever else I'm doing isn't great so let's go hide out in the jungle and live off of pillage and Soviet supplies"
This Lula clown will utterly destroy Brazil.
Bolsonaro failed the good people of Brazil and just ran away to the U.S. He clearly didn't have the courage that other past right wing political figures in Latin America had
A shameful display.
So Brazilian Trump.
I'll agree with that statement if can see bolsanaro was backed by Zionist Jews
Thankfully, Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot showed us that communism teaches love and education.
Video games are definitely the problem.
LULU is a criminal piece of shit.
No, living in Brazilian lawless zones teaches how to kill WAY more effectively..
Shouldn't he be out killing loggers?
Meanwhile, Factorio, Oxygen Not Included, any Zachtronix game,... so on and so forth.
...flight simulators, Kerbal Space Program...
Stellaris, wait... 🤔
The list is likely in the thousands. One of the most popular indie games of the last decade was a farming sim. Plus entire genres like rhythm, visual novels, racing, simulators, puzzle etc.
Paradox games as well. They're pretty much history simulators. Of course the genocide mods in the Victoria series might ruffle some feathers..
Paradox games need mods for genocide? 🤔
I'm playing Stellaris wrong, or very right 🤖
Stellaris is far enough removed from leftist grievances for genocide to be viable option. Victoria 3, not so much. You would think that playing as an ethnostate would open up options to eliminate undesirables, but you need mods for that.
Factorio, where the most UPS efficient power plants, and thus the power plants of the largest bases, is solar. Of course anyone who criticizes video games will never get that far.
This just tells me that your factory must grow.
And of course, teaching people to kill is bad because then they might consider that an option when dealing with unredeemably evil people like, I don't know say, politicians.
Watch that supreme court judge who gave himself virtually unlimited power outlaw video games
Far more true of communist scum like him then any video game
This is the totally legitimately elected liberal Brazilian preseident right?
This dude never touched video games beyond mainstream media articles, and it shows.
Factorio, Kerbal, Banished, Portal...
And dont even start with Spec Ops: The Line.
No one should start with Spec Ops: The Line. One of the most overrated video games of all time.
Video games don't teach shit, nor they are meant to. They're entertainment.
Lula is indubitably a piece of detritus: the practical parading by criminal gangs firing their guns into the air and prisoners cheering whilst making the 'L' for Lula sign with their hands upon news of his electoral victory serves as a reminder of how bad this man is. If violent criminals are cheering for your victory—they hate Bolso for making life harder for criminals of all sorts—you're clearly doing something wrong. End of.
However, the people who frequent this sub are all avid consumers and will invariably and quite reflexively condemn anyone who condemns consuming, particularly of video games, for all but a select few reasons.
Now I'll be bucking the trend here by saying that Lula has a point about video games being garbage. Only a degenerate fool would deny that the video games of the 2020s are worth a grain of salt. Even Lula probably isn't stupid enough to think that whatever kids are playing on their stupid tablets is anything but non-productive or even counter-productive brain rot. But even during the glory days of video gaming they were always violence-focused. In fact, it is quite difficult to conceive of an interesting game of any kind that does not have as its goal the destruction of something unless one finds whatever the latest EA Sports release happens to be, or some driving game, interesting. And one must concede that even those seemingly innocuous games such as Jak and Daxter, Ratchet and Clank, Spyro and Crash Bandicoot are all rather destruction-focused to varying extents. Jak 2, in particular, was a child's Grand Theft Auto 3, right down to the amount of shooting and wanton destruction.
I do not sympathize with Lula's claim that video games must focus on 'love', which is typical Leftist drivel. I agree, however, that they should be vastly more educative, and seeing brainless, non-educative forms of entertainment entering the annals of history would indubitably be of net benefit to the species. The species is increasingly being composed of little more than abject dumbasses of the highest magnitude, and both 'entertainment' and the internet are doing plenty to aid and abet that.
Typical of both christians and socialists, sadly. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Brazilian_Christian_socialists?useskin=vector
He probably thinks metal is the devils music and DnD summons demons.
Looking at today's society I'm starting to come around on that theory.
He's an old man so he does probably still live in the 1980s yeah.
The idea of Christian Socialism is particularly strange to Americans.
Becaude socialisma nd christianity are the opposite. Every single communist and socialist shithole are state atheist.
The idea of Christian Socialism is particularly strange to Americans.
Only because of jews taking over the right and using them to push an Israel First agenda. Everywhere else in the world Christianity and Leftisim go hand in hand, as they should because they're the same ideology.
Chrisitianity is right wing. Atheism and sodomy is left wing you retard
Sodomy can be right-wing, if it is culturally established and traditional. There is nothing inherent in the acts of oral sex or anal sex (sodomy) that is about eschewing the currently existing regime.
40 years from now, it will be conservative to be gay, and radically liberal to want two-parent-households who raise their own kids, because it will be preaching to overturn and change, to alter, the existing rulership and cultural structure.
Conservative: "It works, don't fuck with something that works just fine."
Liberal: "It works right now... but if we fucked with it, it might work better, who knows? Sure it might crash and burn, but it MIGHT improve!"
Thats not conservstism, thats liberalism you retard. 10 commandments are the opposite of liberals. Liberals wnat tog ay and trans kids, conservstives want to protect kids from the lgtb pedos
Take a civics class.
They aren't defined as "good" and "bad".
Religion doesn't have a wing. It does have rules though so that puts it into authoritarian territory.
Yes it does. The 10 commandments are the opposite of liberals