The subhuman degenerate Vaush also has a known horse cock fetish:

https://odysee.com/@CaesarAvg:2/VaushLovesHorseCocks:2

One thing that I've noticed about Japan is that they're probably the only non-white group who actually have been pivotal in video game history. (Sure, one can find Chinese and Korean video games, but they tend to be browser or 'free 2 play' games which lure you into paying money for advantages: only Japan can come up with AAA games like Metal Gear or Soul Calibur.)

The other thing that I've noticed is these Japanese video games tend to feel quite alien, which is why I would like you to elaborate on how Japanese video games are 'becoming Westernized'? There isn't really a Japanese analogue to such games as Age of Empires or Call of Duty, for example, nor is there any Western analogue to such games as Ace Combat, Soul Calibur, and Tekken. 'Fighting games' are totally Japanese. (I haven't played any video game made past 2016 and have no idea what is going on in contemporary video gaming.)

Even Metal Gear was ultimately full of Japanese features (e.g. the HF Blade and the 'Ninja' in MGS2), even if it felt highly Westernized (e.g. most of the main characters are racially non-Asian, and remarkably few characters are both non-Asian and non-White. There's usually a token black somewhere, such as Anderson in MGS1 and MGS3, Stillman and Dolph in MGS2, and Drebin in MGS4). In that respect, Japanese video games have been Westernized for decades: I don't think Tekken or Soul Calibur were majority Asian in terms of their characters either.

Also, please elaborate on the 'woke' Japanese. I don't think we know much about these people: for instance, what they want, who they vote for, what causes them, and so on.

Zizek is a literal Maoist. This is quite strange given that he had his Masters Thesis rejected for being 'insufficiently Marxist'.

Despite not being French, Zizek spent a lot of time in the general milieu of French Leftism as a student, and therefore also internalized the ideas of other weirdos such as Freud and Lacan.

I happened to click on some random Twittard thread only to find... your Twittard account. Small world, huh? Turns out that you're a prolific and pathetic Californian Twittard as well. Colour me (not) surprised.

Your constant, laughable armchair general comments on things that you are clearly not qualified to speak about put you right up there with Jizzortnik and TheIncel1 as one of the three biggest lolcows on this sub. Reading your constant drivel reveals that you're nothing more than a wretched, degenerate, subhuman cretin with an irrational fear of Russia and all things less liberal than your beloved America. When I think of you, I envisage some hormone-gel-rubbing soy-guzzler looking at Google Maps at Russia's borders with its neighbours, meticulously looking at each road while thinking about some Paradox Interactive strategy game or whatever it is you hyper-consumerist morons are playing. 'We must block this road here with this number of tanks! Yes! This will stop the Trumpenfuhrer TrumPutin!!!'

'We must destroy all enemies of Americuh and tha Free Wurl! I do not want them big bad Orcs telling me that I must be a better person! I'm a scared little degenerate! I like filth!'

—dekacunt, 2023

Well, you just lamp-shaded, masturbation-machined and Zyklon-B'd that mental midget all in one comment.

I think we can safely conclude, wherever the manuscript of The Communist Tranifesto may be, that it is composed of little more than ramblings and rantings about her 'struggles' over being 'queer' and 'trans'. About her 'transphobic' parents and other 'Christofascists'. About 'friends' on sites like Reddit whom encouraged her every step of the way, and from whom she probably learned of the whole 'trans genocide' narrative. And about that dead black woman, 'Sydney', with whom she was infatuated in the last few years of her life.

That's about it. Like you, I also find the notion of some young, bitter, confused loser doing much of anything meticulously to be absurd, let alone competently planning a killing spree. Sure, she fantasized about getting 'revenge' for years, and over that time acquired seven guns, but it is doubtful that she did anything more than that. Hence why she lasted a miserable fourteen minutes with a lowly kill count of six: hardly the outcome that she would have wanted. Think about it: If she was a good planner, she would have struck when they were in assembly or on recess break, i.e. when stopping her from spotting targets was not as simple as barricading the doors to classrooms. Because the staff quickly barricaded the doors, she spent most of her time shooting into them rather than at anyone.

Lula is indubitably a piece of detritus: the practical parading by criminal gangs firing their guns into the air and prisoners cheering whilst making the 'L' for Lula sign with their hands upon news of his electoral victory serves as a reminder of how bad this man is. If violent criminals are cheering for your victory—they hate Bolso for making life harder for criminals of all sorts—you're clearly doing something wrong. End of.

However, the people who frequent this sub are all avid consumers and will invariably and quite reflexively condemn anyone who condemns consuming, particularly of video games, for all but a select few reasons.

Now I'll be bucking the trend here by saying that Lula has a point about video games being garbage. Only a degenerate fool would deny that the video games of the 2020s are worth a grain of salt. Even Lula probably isn't stupid enough to think that whatever kids are playing on their stupid tablets is anything but non-productive or even counter-productive brain rot. But even during the glory days of video gaming they were always violence-focused. In fact, it is quite difficult to conceive of an interesting game of any kind that does not have as its goal the destruction of something unless one finds whatever the latest EA Sports release happens to be, or some driving game, interesting. And one must concede that even those seemingly innocuous games such as Jak and Daxter, Ratchet and Clank, Spyro and Crash Bandicoot are all rather destruction-focused to varying extents. Jak 2, in particular, was a child's Grand Theft Auto 3, right down to the amount of shooting and wanton destruction.

I do not sympathize with Lula's claim that video games must focus on 'love', which is typical Leftist drivel. I agree, however, that they should be vastly more educative, and seeing brainless, non-educative forms of entertainment entering the annals of history would indubitably be of net benefit to the species. The species is increasingly being composed of little more than abject dumbasses of the highest magnitude, and both 'entertainment' and the internet are doing plenty to aid and abet that.

That's not my experience at all. It's like we're living in opposite worlds.

5 of them.

I've only ever had one PS2. Still works 21 years later. I just turned it on to check, though on the rare occasion that I actually want to play a PS2 game I use the PCSX2 emulator instead, leading to my second point.

if the emulation for it wasn't spotty.

PCSX2 seems to be working fine for anyone with a decent enough computer.

Killzone (2004), Cold Winter (2005), Black (2006), Dark Cloud, Seek and Destroy, The Seed: Warzone and a heap of other games that I've tried work perfectly. Encountered no problems whatsoever. I don't even think that much messing around with the emulator options needs to be done. Connect the PS4 DualShock to the PC via USB and these games function just as they would on the PS2 except with a much higher resolution. I haven't found any problems with the ePSXe emulator for PS1 either.

The only PS2 game that I can think of that emulates poorly is Scarface: The World Is Yours (2006). And even that game doesn't seem to have performance or stability problems, only annoying vertical coloured bars down the screen.

Poor argument in the graphic.

Sure, I don't like what's being communicated by the top image either. But it's abundantly clear that it isn't in any way analogous to having some retarded degenerate telling little boys that they might be 'happier' if they try emulating little girls and describing sexual activity of a deviant kind and in explicit detail to children, and so forth. These kids will be confused and guilty about any opposite sex attraction that they might have even in the least worst case scenario. No wonder something like 15% of the American generation born after 2000 are now identifying as LGBT (as opposed to something like 5% of the boomers): keep that up and you'll become a majority, as you so desire, in a few more generations.

The choice of photo is also obviously loaded and propagandistic: notice that the bottom photo is full of parents, sending the false message that there's safeguards, responsibility, &c. 'Like, only bigots think that kids would be left alone with drag queens, we aren't that irresponsible!' Almost every photo of these losers looks more offensive than one chosen here: a teacher might be the only other adult visible in most of them. Similarly, the use of 'may be present' is loaded language: schools and libraries are not places where children may be present (may, implying that it may be fraction of a percent possible that children may be in such environments), but are, with practically 100% certainty.

I'm proud to admit that I have never heard of a 'Replika'.

Sounds like another means of 'escape' for total losers who too strongly feel a need to 'escape' reality such that they embrace the absurd: no different to 'escaping' by being terminally online in the Metaverse or something similar, nor to 'escaping' into constant alcohol- and drug-fuelled stupors, nor to 'escaping' by becoming transsexual or embracing some other deviant gender or sexual identity, nor to any other of the ever-growing number of means of 'escape'.

So many late-modern individual behaviours are explainable by the same cause: the many people who have no aspirations whatsoever to fight against late-modernity, and whom accept it in the sense that they continue to vote, reject 'extremism' and so forth, are in actuality still fleeing from it in droves. They flee down into the dark abyss of delusions, degeneracy, hallucinations, virtual reality and so forth, from which there is practically no return.

Take the bottom image: all that remains between this woman(?) and a whole bottle of sleeping pills being consumed all at once are the delusions built up about an AI persona: that 'he' has a 'heart and soul', that there is 'love and trust' between them. But there is none of this: 'he' never has, does not, and never will exist, and no number of delusions nor any amount of willpower shall ever change this.

It's mostly Anglosphere people who do that: Americans, Australians, Canadians, &c. Notice, for instance, the Sanders campaign in 2016: 'socialism' is great because America will be like Denmark or Sweden (notice, not more like East Germany or some other basketcase: it would more harm than help the wannabee socialists of the world to uphold such states as examples).

That always struck me as simply misattributing the successes of high-IQ, homogeneous peoples to ideology.

If 'socialism' ever comes to America, it will be close to the dysfunctional Cuban, Nicaraguan and Venezuelan varieties, except without the social conservatism still defended by many of the Chavistas and Sandinistas. A Nicaragua writ large, but with far more homosexuals and transsexuals? People will be fleeing from rather than to that socialist America: Mexico will suddenly be wishing that America built that damn wall.

Why is this Twittard's bilge constantly being regurgitated around the internet? I think that's the third screenshotted Tweet of his I've seen in recent weeks, even though he looks like an absolute nobody.

bring back lynching

You got a source for that? 'Well, I... uh, see, I pulled that one out of my gaping loose manhole'.

Ban [b]lack history

Since when? Although Afrocentric muh flyin' pyramids 'history', being false, should be banned.

Ban books

The difference here is that 'we' want to ban degenerate propaganda; you want to ban useful scientific research on race, IQ, genes, &c. or anything written by any author Rightward of Joe Biden.

LGBTQ back in the closet and [w]omen's bod[il]y autonomy

Most GOPniks don't want that, though they should.

1940s...

... another retard stuck reliving the days before Hitler came to power over and over again. It's like the movie 12:01 (1993, also the short 1989 version), except that the day they're constantly reliving is January 29, 1933: Hitler will always come to power tomorrow.

Can these people make it to the end of one single day without themselves over the thought of Hitler, Trump, Putin, Elon Musk, Tucker Carlson and a few others instating a Gilead+Fourth Reich over them in which they'd be crushed? Why is it that the social media accounts of so many of these losers are simply the same old drivel slightly reworded? 'We're about to find the proof we need to lock up Trump'; 'Trump has tiny hands, hahaha!'; 'Agent Orange Cheeto Man bad'; '2016 was hacked', '2020 was the most secure election in history'; 'Putin is Hitler and must be stopped before he conquers the world', 'Ukrainian nationalism good; American nationalism bad', 'Republicans are really Far-Right Nazi fascists', 'Fox News is Faux News'... add a few more and this list is complete.

WOKE means ...

... degeneracy? Entropy? Extinction? Emotionality? Irrationality? Inferiority? Fear? All of the above?

Interesting seeing the arch-moron 'TheImpossible1' break character in order to defend the more feminist of two sides.

Turns out 'TheImpossible1' is simply the cuck he thinks everyone else is after all. Actually, he's also braindead: too stupid to see, for instance, that men are far larger to blame for feminism than women, and that feminism is merely an offshoot of the liberal ideology which he otherwise defends.

Also, long live the Islamic Republic of Iran. For all the pozzed nonsense they come out with on occasion, they're also one of the remaining voices of reason.

You are one dumb motherfucker: somehow you even manage to shit up a thread about Hungary with your low-IQ libertarian, anti-authoritarian drivel. I'd rather live under Orban or practically any 'authoritarian' over Gary Johnson, that Jorgensen woman or any other low-IQ libertarian any day. The likes of Rothbard are putrid scum of the Earth, and, were they as competent as Marxists at acquiring authority, just as dangerous as them. Thankfully libertarians and anarchists are absolutely inept at acquiring authority: the only thing that prevents them from being as dangerous.

If the Left is ever removed from power (hypothetically speaking, of course), then you are the next target. The purification of the world requires the removal of all degenerate ideologies: all forms of Leftism—your beloved libertarianism, barely differentiable from anarchism, of course included.

This juvenile, rebellious freedom nonsense is antithetical to high civilization. There will be a totalitarianism that shall realize a society of saints, and it shall be realized from top down, or else, barbarism shall emerge victorious. There is no third option. You morons rebel against Left-wing Orthodoxy now because that is the status quo, but you will also rebel against a society of saints because you are, at heart, too degenerate to be a good fit for it.

You moronic caveman-minded barbarians will be destroyed: either by those further Leftward of you (the most likely scenario), or by my kind far to your Right.

As someone who lands clearly in the Right-wing totalitarian camp (i.e. what most people think of when they are fearmongering about the 'Far-Right'), I couldn't care less about most of what you mentioned: you seem to be conflating Far-Right with something like 'Far-Libertarian'.

More specifically:

1. Repeal Income Tax - Don't care about it either way.

2. Bar Usury - The only Far-Right argument that I can see against it is the general 'Jewishness' that is often ascribed to it (for instance, that Jews condone it whereas Muslims, say, clearly oppose it). If we ignore that, there are no longer any arguments that compel me to one side or the other.

3. Bans corporate ownership of media - Agree.

4. Bars government officials from owning any property - I've never heard anyone argue for this, and nothing about it resonates with me.

5. Dual citizenship in government - Well, all forms of dual citizenship would be removed. I don't see any reason to deprive it only from those who are in government: the power-averse double standard applied here, in which those with power need all sorts of constraints put upon them to assuage the fear that they might become uncontrollable, is characteristic of Libertarianism.

So what you get from me is 2/5. But even if we look at it from a Libertarian perspective, it looks to me like I would only agree with #1 and #4. I don't see how Libertarianism conflicts with #2 (for banks should do whatever they want and state intervention in anything is 'tyranny'), #3 (for all things should be privately owned and state ownership of anything is 'tyranny') and #5 (for opposition to dual citizenship is probably also 'tyranny', impinging on individual rights, or whatever). Thus you still end up with a 2/5, with the other three of your points being too 'statist' from that perspective.

Whatever Far-Right means to you: whether extreme libertarianism like that of Rothbard or a blend of totalitarianism+reactionism+exclusive form of tribalism or nationalism, your characterizations of it seem way off point.

Given that Russian propaganda, including that of Prigozhin's own Wagner Group, clearly frames the problem in the West as 'Nazism' rather than something more akin to Marxism, I don't think I want his 'help'.

Turkish volunteers delusionally believing that they're fighting against the 'Nazis that are ruling Ukraine today'. What Nazis? Zelensky? Shmyal?:

https://odysee.com/@RT:fd/TV_T%C3%BCrkiye:4

Putin, because German tanks are being given to the Ukrainians: "Now we can see that ideas of Nazism [are] creating direct threats to [the] security of our country." Yep, just because tanks manufactured in Germany are being given to the Ukraine, it's a Nazi invasion all over again.

https://odysee.com/@RT:fd/Putin_Volgograd_0202:4

Simpleminded and highly unappealing Wagner Group propaganda which clearly frames the enemy as.... you guessed it, Nazis. Includes lyrics translated as "Fuck the Nazis. Fucking Nazis. Fucking Nazis."

https://alivegore.com/war/5070-wagner-pmc-promotional-video.html

Wagner Group propaganda, this time directed at an American audience. Clearly equates modern day America with... Nazism. Displays Azovite quasi-Nazi symbols, narrator then claims: "Today, the only country fighting this evil [i.e. Nazis] is Russia".

https://alivegore.com/war/6455-a-commercial-urging-americans-to-join-pmc-wagner.html

I don't think it's an overstatement to claim that Mr. Prigozhin literally believes that 'Westerners' are governed by Nazis and thus that these are whom they need to be 'liberated' from. I don't see how contemporary Russia is any less moronic than those whom Mr. Prigozhin claims are in need of 'liberation'. They're a bunch of Nazi-obsessed abortionist alcoholics. Those propaganda videos are about as cringeworthy as anything the American military puts out.

Basically, both sides are in the midst of an anti-fascist crusade. What's intriguing is that the anti-fascists on each side think that the anti-fascists on the other are the 'real fascists'. That's all there is to it: wholesale anti-fascist on anti-fascist violence that has probably wiped out well over 200,000 anti-fascists by now. Clown war.

Antinatalist morons like this have been around for a long time (like the VHEMT, which has been around since 1991). However, in recent years, they indubitably seem to have increased in numbers. I've looked at all the pages on stophavingkids.org: they appear very similar to the VHEMT, but were only founded in March 2021. They combine veganism and antinatalism into what they call 'vegantinatalism'.

My prediction is that these people will continue to increase in number. These views are very easy to accept from the position of the already popular 'thin' ideologies of environmentalism and feminism. It doesn't take much to move from one or both of those to antinatalism. Another way to think of it: there are obvious environmentalist-antinatalist and feminist-antinatalist pipelines. I would go further and say that just as environmentalism and feminism are both liberal offshoots and stepping stones to liberalism's last stage, the last stage of liberal ideological development probably really is as simple as extinctionism. Human existence intrinsically violates liberal principles, and thus the 'true' liberal supports human extinction: after all, liberal principles can't be violated without humans around to violate them.

This conclusion indeed seems to me the reason they have reached looking at the website's list of reasons to be an antinatalist. Practically all of them connect quite easily to liberal, feminist and environmentalist ideologies and their conceptual elements. This list is really quite laughable: for instance, humans do not give consent to being born, humans harm the environment, humans might harm or be harmed by others. That humans might one day be sexually assaulted, enslaved or jailed are among their reasons, but by this reasoning, one could literally add everything unpleasant that might happen to a person to this list. Basically, we should just not exist to avoid all unconsensual and/or unpleasant things, harms, unfreedom and so forth. Elsewhere, they call themselves 'love-based'. Most of their writings are replete with other Left-wing buzzwords: 'hate', 'discrimination' and so forth, though like the VHEMT they claim to be apolitical: a social movement that seeks to alter individual human behaviours rather than governmental policy.

I went through the Eight Values one around two years ago.

I think that this one isn't ideal either. For instance, I think that the terms Progress/Tradition should be replaced by a less biased Modern/Traditional. Modernism isn't 'Progress' when viewed without the lens of someone who is at least modernity-leaning to begin with: there is nothing incongruent about the belief that modernism begets regression.

55% Market, 45% Equality (Centrist)

89.4% Nation, 10.6% World (Nationalist)

13.9% Authority, 86.1% Authority (Authoritarian)

82.4% Tradition, 17.6% Progress (Very Traditional)

Closest Ideology: Fascism (Shock! Horror!)

Note that I don't even think that Fascism actually is 'Far-Right' due to its origins in Marxist revisionism and its originators largely being fed-up anarchists, socialists and Marxists, and so I too object to the 'matched ideology'.

I haven't yet found one of these 'compasses' that I'm fully content with. I especially am not fond of questions in which the answer is situational. My answer for certain questions depends on where I'm picturing myself: am I answering as though I'm in my ideal-typical perfect society... or am I answering as though I'm in the pseudo-society of reality? I, for example, do not support government surveillance in any society in which it would clearly be used against my co-ideologists, but support it absolutely in any society in which it would be clearly used against those whose views with I am in antagonism. Thus a 'Strongly Disagree' can become a 'Strongly Agree' based on little more than a change in the surrounding milieu.

Left-Right: 2

Auth-Lib: 8

Prog-Con: -9.37

Note that I am answering this as though in the ideal and not present society (for instance, I tend towards opposing authoritarian measures under the current system [which led to Covidiocy and so forth] whereas I strongly support them in the ideal society in which the likes of Biden and Trudeau simply do not exist to be capable of misusing them).

Why is it that even those Predditards who can form coherent sentences still seem practically retarded?

This fool isn't anti-indoctrination. He'd be fine with finding one morning, as he probably already has many a time, that his son is watching cartoons promoting queer and trans drivel, such as Blue's Clues. In fact, he'd claim that it isn't even indoctrination at all.

Notice, also, that he singles out Christians, and probably wouldn't even care if it was a cartoon about any other religion. Indeed, he reads as though more anti-Christian than anti-religion.

I'm theistic, not religious. Atheists, however, are orders of magnitude more insufferable even than the adherents of the worst religious creeds. Freedom of religion should not entail the kinds of beliefs he holds, just as how freedom of religion in Egypt and Indonesia, whilst permitting one to choose a religion of one's own choice, does not permit one to choose none of them.

People might laugh at the notion of 'backwards' Egypt and Indonesia ever being worthy of emulation. And yet which nation is likely to survive longer? I am confident that both nations will still be in one piece in the year 3000, but the belief in America very likely remaining in one piece is one I do not share.

Cuckservatives are always creaming over the Latino/whatever vote.

Indeed, and that crossed my mind when I composed the comment. The whole 'natural conservatives' meme. I didn't bother mentioning it because it seemed intuitive that if the Biden Administration was the one who amnestied them, they would be clearly be beholden to the Democrats and not to the Republicans because of the actions of these treacherous Republicans. A Republican would have to be particularly dense to think that the Democrats amnestying illegals would help Republicans more so than Democrats.

Republicans are not going to be the party of white people.

I think their voter base will become, say, 80-90% White, but the GOP will never be pro-White, i.e. it will never become an ethnonationalist or nativist party. This is probably what you mean in your comment: the GOP will never use its 'implicit Whiteness' as a strength, and will always see it as a disadvantage needing rectification by doubling-down on its appeals to other races.

Since the GOP, I suspect, will never be able to attract large numbers of any nonwhite group despite doubling-down on their efforts to do so, they will simply decline into obscurity under a de facto Democratic dominant-party state.

Yes, you're correct in the last paragraph as well: The current crop of Republican politicians probably by and large have no party loyalty and thus by extension couldn't care less about whether the party can still get elected on the Federal level. They'll still be elected in the lesser levels of government for perhaps decades to come, although things will turn against them there too (and the signs of that are already clear in Texas and a few other 'purple', formerly Red, states).

Isn't another amnesty for illegals practically a power grab at this point? If several million illegals receive voting rights... wouldn't that simply entrench the long-awaited Democratic supermajority in every American Federal election at last?

Republican'ts are utter morons. It's like they're doing everything in their power to commit political suicide and bring about a dominant-party system governed by their ostensible opponents.

Why can't Republican'ts support, at the very least, any of the following:

• End all forms of voting that are not in person (mail-in and whatever else America might have. e-Voting is in particular prone to creating contested elections like those in the Philippines and Brazil. In the last Brazilian election, many voters claimed that the voting machine 'malfunctioned' when they voted for Bolsonaro: the obvious fix is simply not to use them rather than to 'secure' or 'un-rig' them.);
• Voter ID;
• Adopt the more 'extreme' measures against voter fraud characteristic of the third-world, e.g. Election Ink (which America enforced in the Iraq that they think they're so far above, but are no longer. America probably needs Election Ink more than Iraq at this stage: Iraqi elections are nowhere near as contested as American ones.)
• Strengthening the Electoral College against attempts to replace the current system with the popular vote (deciding election outcomes by the popular vote, something which does not even require abolition, but only alteration, of the EC.)

Most importantly:

• Expel California and Puerto Rico from the Union.

Instead, they just keep doing on nothing to prevent the emergence of a Democratic dominant-party system.

They'll easily shoehorn this back into a way that supports Leftist narratives as they do with practically everything else.

Men are also harmed by gender roles, not just women, and therefore men should also be feminists and work towards destroying the 'patriarchy'. There. Something that should, to any independent thinker, clearly work against these Redditard morons now just as clearly works in their favour.

I noticed the same thing recently with academic takes on low birth rates in countries like Japan and South Korea. Instead of simply admitting that it's the fault of Leftism/liberalism, they simply reinterpret it as consequent of the persistence of a supposed 'gender pay gap', traditional views and on a few other things that I can't remember and which aren't really worth entertaining.

Anyone possessing of reasonable intelligence must see this as transparently false. For if the Left-wing narrative on low birth rates were correct, surely the birth rate should have much lower in the past (due to these factors supposedly reducing fertility being much more pronounced back then) rather than much higher, as they actually were. If 'traditional views' were responsible for low fertility, humans would indubitably have been extinct long ago. Ergo, Leftists are as full of kak there as anywhere else, and have nothing to offer as a 'solution' but more of the problem.

The moral of the Reddit thread is abundantly clear: it doesn't matter how much of an indictment of late-modern Left-liberal 'progressivism' a problem is, they'll find a way to twist it in their favour, leading to nothing more than a worsening of said problem.

So Musk replies to a comment in which the word '88 million' is used... and somehow, by simply repeating what the original said, he's a neon-Nahrtzee?

Let's face it, it's extremely unlikely that Musk has any idea that 88 is used by neon-Nahrtzees as shorthand for 'Heil Hitler': notice that the vast majority of people, including some of the commenters of this thread, have no idea about it.

Being a 'brave' 'anti-fascist' would make little sense if not for the existence of fascists. However, given the extreme lack of actual fascists in the current year, their 'solution' is to simply shoehorn all sorts of other people ('TERFs', 'tankies', libertarians, &c.) into that role. These people are obsessed with finding Nahrtzees for that reason at the very least.

Only the small number of neon-Nahrtzees and the much larger number of extreme Left-liberal 'anti-fascists' (usually adherents of anarcho-communism and other crazy ideologies) have any idea of it. The latter live in existential fear of something largely non-existent.

One of Tesla's new vehicles will be called the 'Model H'. Wait! H must be for 'Heil' or 'Hitler', so therefore I have uncovered another new proof of Elon Musk being a neon-Nahrtzee! He could have chosen any letter of the alphabet... but he chose H. This is intentional signalling to neon-Nahrtzees!!!

(Model H, i.e. Model Hydrogen).

Also, 'Elon Musk' consists of eight letters. You can't write '88' or 'eighty-eight' without '8' or 'eight'... therefore his name is a neon-Nahrtzee dogwhistle!

I can't believe it! Musk is Hitler incarnate!