America, Europe, Australia, and Canada have been transformed into South Africa. The White children are victimized everyday by invaders who want them brutally tortured and dead. This didn't have to happen. The first world could have remained first world countries, and yet the Greatest Generation, the Silent generation, Boomers, and Gen X decided that their children didn't deserve peace and happiness. They decided that their descendants deserved to experience hell on Earth. The Boomers are Apostles of Satan, and nobody can convince me otherwise. This seems to be a universal constant across all first world nations, even non-white countries like Japan. They worship the demons of the third world, sacrificing their children and grandchildren to appease these creatures and protect their own virtuousness.
Unlike the hellspawn that are the Boomers, I can't close my heart to the suffering of the innocent. The lack of empathy displayed by many Elder Whites and White women (in general) literally makes me sick to my stomach. It gets harder and harder to wake up everyday knowing this.
I actually got down a train of thought this last weekend about my grandfather, on the dads side, who I don’t think would be a boomer as if he was still around he’d be over 100 now.
He worked a decent white collar life and had a pension that didn’t grant him lavishness but he was a very prudent person with finances so he certainly wasn’t poor. He retired when I was super young so I don’t really remember him working a job per se. Yet I also have zero memory of an expectation of retirement being this lazy couch sitting or lavish travel or anything. He liked gardening, so he got up every day at the buttcrack of dawn pretty much the entire season to go out and water everything and whatever else the plants required. Then he’d go to his church where he (for free) kept a small modest church with a beautiful garden. Then he had all sorts of volunteer work he did. They gave a lot of time to their grandkids but it was never in the super spoiling kind of way. So he was retired in that a job wasn’t paying him, but I don’t remember him ever not laboring at something until he was totally physically unable and even then he’d hobble around on a cane to try to help others.
That all just had me thinking, what the hell happened. I don’t know anyone that age who would do that anymore. My dad is probably the closest in that he’s not demanding at all for a boomer or lazy, but damn if it doesn’t seem like most of them totally “deserve” so many things and you should give it to them. That’s not even just observation but from those I’ve been close enough to. I honestly can’t think of one who would give back and be so humble about it all. I’m sure it exists, but where are they?
My grandpa was the blue collar working class version of this. Here were my Boomer parents’ reaction:
“Why does he do this? He’s just being taken advantage of!”
“He does everything for everyone else. And they do nothing for him.”
“Why doesn’t he do that for us instead of strangers [his neighbors].”
“Why is he taking his grandson [me] as a source of free labor?”
This is you answer. My boomer parents don’t leave the house, don’t care about their kids and grandkids, don’t know their neighbors, think doing anything for anyone else beyond their own family is socialist, and don’t do anything for their family either. This was my first inkling growing up that we might’ve lost WWII in the long run.
Something I've noticed with boomers and their grandkids is often they expected grandkids to be brought to them and "presented" in the form that they want, in order to choreograph something the boomer grandparent is interested in. If you don't they bitch and moan that everyone just abandons old people it's terrible blah blah. I mean my grandfather they used to drive to get me an hour away just to hang out for the day or to stay with them for the week and bring me back. Because they had the time and ability and my parents didn't. It's trivial for a retired person to come up with a few extra hours.
Funny enough I got dragged around to all sorts of things. May have looked like free labor on the outside, but the reality was I was never doing any real work or at least I didn't feel like I was working. What I was doing was being exposed to all sorts of actual good male role models that were his acquaintances and friends that totally didn't mind talking to me like a person and in a way an equal and therefore rubbed off all sorts of good things a young boy should learn about being a man.
Boomers wanted everything choreographed to match their fantasies. In college, I renovated a historic house in return for living there for free. My Boomer mother set foot in the house precisely 0 times, because I wouldn't enable her fantasy choreographing.
Bad political values have bad consequences. When you've spent centuries figuring out how to do such things as maximize personal freedom (ergo, the necessary erosion of intermediate social structures like the clan, family, and guild) and level all hierarchies, especially all those that are non-economic, it turns out that globalization and the like become practically inevitable. Nothing really matters in late-modernity beyond these stupid values (anti-discrimination, human rights, social justice, etc.) and the economy.
In that sense, I don't think it could have 'remained'. Past generations screwed up long ago by listening to the wrong people and believing in the wrong ideas, and people today are simply living with and processing the consequences of actions that were carried out long before their own time.
Where our time differs from theirs is that the consequences are becoming increasingly perceptible and unignorable. It is increasingly harder for people to turn a blind eye, yes, even with all the entertainment and distractions about. Who really thinks that the world is not regressing? Almost nobody. They merely disagree - vehemently - on how to get things back on the right track, with our shared enemies doubling down on the causes and thus in no way able to provide solutions.
The past ten or so years have proved that Japanese intelligence isn't all that it has been drummed up to be. Imagine having the whole Western world as a big warning of what not to do and then choosing to follow it anyway.
Japan and China, in particular, were so impressed by the Western world that much of the past 200 years has been spent trying to 'out-West' the West. Both countries threw away their own heritage to translate and read Western works of such thinkers as Mill, Marx, and Dewey. Hu Shih was a perfect example of this: an American-style progressive in 'yellow' skin whose view of China's heritage was dismissive and that China must become as Westernized as possible.
In China, the path to Westernization ultimately came through the Marxist route. In Japan, it came through the liberal route instead.
The way that Japan fell so easily for Sanae Takaechi - under whom LGBT-whatever education is entering Japanese schools, under whom immigration is rapidly increasing - led me to conclude that Asians are not at all immune to the stupidity of the Whites. Of course, the signs were already mounting up for decades, e.g. the first tranny was elected to public office in 2003.
Over the coming years, alot of that 'based Japan' nonsense will slowly evaporate. They weren't 'based' at all: they were simply behind the West.
The children are always what we feel the most empathy for. Mencius' famous thought experiment of the child about to fall into the well, and all that. That is normal and very human. It might be fair to say that they are some of the only beings that I feel compassion towards, other than animals.
It would be wrong of me to feel anything but amusement about Leftists and other idiots getting harmed or killed. The good should be pleased by the suffering of the wicked. The world is better off without such people, the causers of suffering, without whom neither you would make this post nor I this comment.
This stuff actually bothers me less than it used to. You develop more of a hard 'shell' over time. I am less 'blackpilled' than a few years ago, because while things haven't improved, there is growing discontent and tension, and that is the environment that is ripe for transformative sociopolitical change that could ultimately somehow see ideas more acceptable to us victorious.
Notice now that we are growingly voting against rather than for parties and politicians? That winning an election by 1% is somehow considered a 'landslide'? That so few politicians have approval ratings above 50% even at their zenith and can only dream about the approval ratings of a Duterte or a Bukele, whose approval ratings were never below 50% even at their nadir? That the Left seems to stand for less and less and against more and more, are becoming purely reactive, e.g. embracing big pharma during Covid, embracing free trade during Trump's tariffs, indeed, even embracing closed borders when Trump wanted to bring a very small number of White South Africans in?
Imagine if such discontent could not exist? People would simply be watching the bakkaball going back and forth on that retard box they call a television and doing every other monotonous activity of all sorts even when their world comes crashing down around them. Be glad that the discontent is growing in the masses, because only that will build up willpower and bring about true change, and, paradoxically, lead to all this discontent and suffering becoming a distant memory sooner.
In regards to japs, i think this just proves we're both in the same boat, just different ends of it. I don't think our societies are at their cores inherently compatible but i think we have much more in common with them than we realized now that we know our enemies.
Keep in mind japan is in immense debt to the global powers. If the powers that be that are ruling our country want japan to do something, then japan has little choice but to do so or they will just destroy their economy. Again.
The japs didn't "choose" shit. It was forced on them by jew bankers.
All Boomers, every single one, were exposed to toxic levels of atmospheric lead in the 70s/80s, immediately after locking in their successful lives at 25-30. After that they coasted, and nobody noticed because everybody also suffered the same brain damage.
they were exposed to toxic levels of jewish television, you mean
Do palestinian children count as white?
Because getting killed by drones and bombs sounds pretty shitty.
No. Muslims don't even count as people, much less White people.
40% of Palestine is Christian
People generally dont care about suferring outside of their tribe. The jews know this and have weaponized it which allows them to genocide tribes that resist them safely and without interruption. The same is happening in The Ukraine. Peviously they did this in Russia.
No, they do not.
No, they are same as the jews. Both are semites who despise Whites
Don't you see? The "suffering of the innocent" refers to white children being near black children. Being bombed in a petty war between oligarchs is not on OP's radar.
I know you’re trying to be sarcastic. But it’s true and you’re still a dipshit.
Then forgive me if I roll my eyes at the pearl clutching.
“Think of the children! Oh…no not those children. My children!”
You think it's strange someone would care more about their own kin than some random person's?
I think it’s strange someone would care about their own kin but actively support the death of someone else’s
When those people threaten my and my family's existence, it's not strange at all.
Well I would absolutely agree with that! If there were children, or people, threatening you and your family's existence I would be absolutely on your side.
What I'm having trouble believing though is that this is happening. Can you tell me about a time when children of Palestine were threatening your existence?
You antiWhite scum litterally celebrated paki scum raping and grooming young kids in rotherham and other areas of the uk and europe, and the establishment turning a blind eye because of muh racism. You celebrated young White boys like henry nowak being murdered by foriegners and young White girls beign raped by muslims and then locked up for complaining about being raped.
I never once celebrated, nor would I ever celebrate, rape, murder, and grooming. So if you're just going to pull random accusations out of your ass about my character then why would I bother trying to have a real conversation with you?
Rotherham is due to antiWhite scum like you
What have I done that you would consider anti white? Made comments you didn’t like?
Do something about it. Be the change you want to see in the world.
What exactly are you considering “Hell on earth”? What is it that you’re experiencing where you live?
Where and how is this happening? Is this in real life or on twitter?
Shalom
I love when it's just the buzzword response.
It's all you deserve, troll.
Uh huh and I’m a “troll” for not blindly following the narrative. I see.
Fucking jew
Never answers. Only rage
STFU Jew. You don't deserve an answer. We see through you. Go earn your sheckels elsewhere. Your time is up. Israel will be gone within 100 years. Fuck you.
More rage.
If Israel is gone in 100 years that’s probably for the best.
In public school and any public places. You’re just some shade of something so of course you don’t see it.
In public school and any public places, what? I was just out in public in Chicago. What should I be witnessing?
Niggers
And white children are victimized simply by their existence? Seems like some pretty wimpy kids.
Crt and affirmative action
Where is the victimization?
Being demonized and branded as evil for having White skin and skipped over for jobs they are qualified fkr due to having White skin while blacks get a golden spoon due to being black
It's happening in every Western country, though the USA made a correction since Trump. Western countries will bring in significant quantities of non-White immigrants. These immigrants depress the price of labor (wages) and especially in low paying jobs which are jobs teens and early adults are more likely to take thus it impacts the "kids" if you include teenagers in your definition. The non-White immigrants do have higher percentages of criminal activity than White people and often the non-Whites specifically target Whites because of racism. This puts children more in danger. Also, the social programs that children utilize such as the public education system has been deteriorating in quality because non-Whites contribute significantly less tax revenue to the government to pay for public services but then the non-Whites utilize the public services at a higher per capita usage than White people thus costing White people more money for worse quality services thanks to non-Whites which has a negative impact on the kids. Now that non-Whites are starting to outnunmber Whites the amount of racial bullying White kids are exposed to has increased significantly. Then, there's the cultural impact of being taught that White people are evil colonisers, while all non-Whites are victims of White people's ancestors and owe non-Whites reparations. In media children are exposed to, race mixing is constantly pushed with non-Whites often being depicted as the smarter, more competent person and White people, men especially, often depicted in a villainous manner.
Society is without a doubt harming White children. You may not realize it because the harmful state is "normal" to you and therefore you don't perceive it as being harmful. This is problem Huxley warned us about in Brave New World.
Trump still increased h1b and stopped mass deportations so the usa is still fucked. Only good thing is that scotus is starting to strike down afffirmative action
I will say, every data point I've seen about crime rates shows non-white immigrants as having a much lower crime rate than I initially thought. If you have stats that show otherwise, please share them so I can get the correct information!
What you're largely also describing is an issue of government funding. The middle class has been fighting to pay less taxes for eons, and those tax funding cuts have, especially recently, most affected the public education sphere.
I understand the "here's what the chain of events could be" setup you have here, but is that happening? My own two eyes I walk out in my city, I see people living well together, I see children playing together, I talk to my nieces in their public schools not caring who looks like what when it comes to who they want to play with, is my city just above the terrorizing? Why am I not seeing it?
Most of the media the kids I know watch is cartoons, not really race based. Paw Patrol, Bluey, Gumball, Over the Garden Wall...none of it is really race focused at all.
White people were colonizers and did evil things. It doesn't make any difference about who I am or what I do.
You seem to make the case that it's harmful because it's happening, but there's not really a strong case as to how or why.
Who did rotherham? Who did the grenade attacks in sweden? Who did the colgne rape and truck of peace attacks?
Who did Columbine? Who did the Las Vegas shooting? Who was the Unabomber?
We can pull examples all we want, but it doesn't mean anything. Why punish an entire group for the actions of a few?
White men reacting to their oppression (the deterioration of their society) makes sense though. Columbine and the Unabomber were both White men reacting to their deteriorating society. If I assassinated Mark Carney tomorrow, it's not because I'm a bad White man, it's actually because I'm a good White man trying to improve his country. However, when non-Whites murder White people in White people's countries, there is no reaction to oppression, there is no legitimate reason for it, it's something that should never happen because the non-Whites should not be in our countries.
Hilarious conclusion.
It not a few examples when its foreigners/browns doing these crimes
But it is. We can go back and forth naming crimes that foreigners did and domestic citizens did. It’s not really valuable information.
Actual hard data over a population is what we’re looking for.
Have you considered that the data you're viewing is not accurate? Oftentimes, government agencies consider Hispanics to be "White" for the purposes of race despite Hispanics not being White which skews the data. Jews are often considered White as well. White seems to be the default a lot of the times if an agency doesn't feeling like putting any effort into determining race. In the USA most studies compare American citizens to Immigrants but this is not a proper comparison because of course black American citizens commit more crimes than anyone else and many immigrants aren't black so by including black Americans with White Americans and then comparing them to immigrants it might be a "wash" in terms of crime rates when in reality immigrants commit significantly more crimes than White Americans. In many European countries, the racial data isn't collected specifically so people aren't able to connect the racial differences in crime together. Many "studies" that include Europe don't account for the fact that a "German" isn't necessarily White and can be non-White and then these non-White Germans will be lumped together with White Germans skewing the data when compared to immigrants. The immigrants themselves also won't necessarily be distinguish between White or non-White which again makes any study difficult to truly come to any conclusion over crime and race. The governments have an interest in promoting immigration because immigrants rely on government programs which require expanding government which allows government officials to funnel money to pet projects/friends/family (corruption) easier and also the big corporations want the cheapest labor possible so they also have an interest in bringing in immigrants. Furthermore, there is a whole philosophy many people have developed that relies on promoting anti-racism. All these elements combined lead to situations where skewing the data to try and make immigration look favorable becomes the norm.
You need to probably reevaluate the studies you're reading regarding race and crime. There is without a doubt a correlation. Light-Skinned Asians commit the least crime followed by Whites so any immigrant who isn't this will be adding to the crime-rate. There's also further nuances. I've seen studies that show a "regression to racial mean" with regards to behaviors from immigrants. First-generation immigrants who are gunning for PR + Citizenship might actually commit less crime because they're being highly monitored by the system for good behavior but second-generation immigrants tend to revert to "the racial mean" with regards to behaviors, thus even if a study concluded immigrants don't commit more crime, their descendants will and studies often don't factor this into consideration at all.
The solution to the immigration problem is lower taxes and less government programs. This will reduce the number of low-quality immigrants that come to the country and increase the quality of the immigrants that do come without straining the resources of the domestic people.
You of course realize you're only exposed to a fraction of what goes on. My mom watches CNN all day every day and she too thinks she knows exactly what's going on. I have a friend in Alaska who thought she knew what was going on then she moved to another State and she has been stalked by black men twice while she was out with her 3 young daughters. They never did anything but they obviously were creepily staring at her and her daughters and followed her and her daughters well beyond that was his normal route while still staring as if he was waiting for an opportunity to kidnap one of the kids. Her neighborhood is 50% black and she's scared to go out with her daughters now.
Incorrect. White people have done the most good things for humanity of all the races and White people have always been the least evil of all the races.
If you are White, why do you always advocate for political positions that are not in the interests of your people?
If I watched any of these cartoons I could probably point out all the propaganda embedded in the "messages" these cartoons portray to children but it's not the children where the worst of it is. It's the teenagers watching TV Shows and Movies. It undoubtedly has an impact on their perception of reality because teens lack experience so where they lack experience they fill it in with the media they consume and that media rarely portrays anything "real", it's all fiction and highly ideological and political. I see adults get consumed by the same garbage. They watch Ozark and then think this is EXACTLY how people doing crime act irl. They watch crime dramas and think criminals are exactly as portrayed, police are exactly as portrayed, etc... And this portrayal is often highly political rather than real. You don't ever watch a movie and go hmmm, the jewish guy is the sex guru who knows everything and bangs all the hot women while the White man is a bumbling idiot who treats people badly and the Woman is a Mary-Sue with no faults and can do anything? That's done on purpose. It's programming your mind to believe this is reality. Even if you think you understand it's fiction, you watch it enough and you mind starts to believe it's real. It's being done on purpose. Much of our media we consume is political as much as it is entertainment.
Just because it isn't in your neighborhood yet, affecting anyone you know yet, doesn't mean it might not start becoming a problem for you soon if corrections are not taken.
Yes, which is why I openly mentioned that when I wrote the comment. If you have more accurate data, I’d be happy to see it.
I’ve taken the time to look over the data I have, but if you have data that shows a different story then by all means, show me what I’m missing.
Yes. As do you. Which fraction represents the overall better? I’ve lived in a number of cities and traveled plenty and come to much of the same conclusions wherever I go. Yes, obviously, there are rougher areas anywhere but what I don’t see is a race correlation. I certainly see a poverty correlation, but you wouldn’t like my solution to that.
It’s objectively true. I’m not making comparisons on who did the most bad stuff, but there were objectively evil white colonizers. That cannot be denied.
I do, thank you. I also advocate for political positions that are in the interest of others. This is not mutually exclusive.
lol no. What kind of movies are you watching bud? Maybe in hallmark romantic straight tv movies.
I also find it concerning how many people who know who think tv represents reality. Most everybody I socialize with sees television as fiction. Nobody thinks Ozark is real lol.
I feel like my neighborhood is too…aware of reality to be so easily swayed by a Netflix crime drama
A scorpion wants to cross a river but cannot swim. He spots a frog sitting near the water's edge and asks for a ride on the frog’s back.
The frog hesitates, immediately suspicious. "Absolutely not," the frog says. "If I let you on my back, you will sting me, and I will die."
The scorpion replies smoothly with an argument of pure logic: "Why would I do that? If I sting you while we are in the middle of the river, you will sink and drown, and since I cannot swim, I will drown right along with you. It would be suicide."
The frog thinks this over. The logic seems airtight. Realizing it is in the scorpion's best interest to keep him alive, the frog agrees to help. The scorpion climbs onto his back, and the frog leaps into the water.
They make it halfway across the fast-moving river when suddenly, the frog feels a sharp, searing pain in his back. The scorpion has stung him.
As paralysis sets in and the frog begins to sink beneath the surface, taking them both down, he cries out in disbelief and agony: "Why did you do that?! Now we are both going to die!"
The scorpion just shrugs sadly and replies: "I couldn't help it. It's in my nature."
Just don't be the frog. Letting in a bunch of scorpions to your society of frogs is probably not a good idea. The nature of all humans are not equal.
Cute story. Heard it before.
You’re implying that violence is in the nature of non-whites. If that were the case, then I witness it regularly. Everybody we know would witness it regularly. You wouldn’t be able to leave your house without hearing about it happening.
The world isn’t responding in the way that you seem to be giving warnings on. Why should I believe what you’re saying when the daily excursions outside are so unlike the picture you paint?
No one is saying all non-Whites are criminally violent just that they're more criminally violent than Whites. If 1/100 Whites are criminally violent and 2/100 non-Whites are that's significant and by increasing the amount of non-Whites, we're going to close to double the amount of criminally violent people but 2/100 criminally violent people isn't going to lead to some situation where as soon as you walk out of your house, you're attacked by a non-White person. Yet, we're making society worse for the White people by bringing in non-Whites from the perspective of criminally violent people in this example. This example is reasonably reflective of reality though.
The world is undeniably responding exactly how I say it is. Quality of life of White people relative to what it could be were we not bringing in non-Whites is going down. If it weren't for technological progress, it would be extremely easy to see that life has got worse over the last century for White people, not better but the technological progress muddies the water and makes this harder to observe.
Uk where young White girls are being raped and groomed by paki filth, Uk where young White boys like Henry novak are being murdered by foreigner filth who smeared them as racist. Both the eu and us establishment nornalized antiWhitism like critical race theory to demonize young White kids and ounish them while worshipping black supremacist terrorists from blm. Look at gernany, france, uk where they arresr actual White europeans for callign out the crimes the browns are doing to kids
I can look at news headlines, sure. Have you been to these places?
Why am I wasting my time explaining self-evident reality to a disingenuous lying j-boy again, but here goes...
It's almost like if you didn't have these people in your country, you wouldn't have an over abundance of the problems they bring with them?! Wow! That's a pretty easy solution and very logical! See how quickly & easily your moronic contentions are proven to be retarded?
If none of them were here, you wouldn't have one crime from a non-White invader. Because even one is too many when there's absolutely zero reason for there to be any. Get it?! That's it. That is the only reason we as White people need to express for not wanting them here.
Oh, and we have expressed that desire multiple times. All across Western Civilization everytime there's been a vote, poll or referendum on immigration for the past 50 years or more the native populations are always against! Yet, the mudflood still keeps happening...
Now, add on top of that the irrefutable reality that disproportionately most groups of non-Whites globally (no matter where they are and their circumstances) are well documented to commit more crimes per capita... It then becomes a question of why is this person making an argument against White people wanting their homelands to be more safe and homogenous? But in your case... I'd hope most here already know why... Judenschwein.
I know you won't listen... But dont waste time responding. Everything I said is 100% factual self-apparent reality and nothing that comes from the sewer mouth of a lying scumbag shlomo changes any of it.
Fully retard logic.
Let’s say you and 100 of your neighbors move to another country. You find yourself a nice home, get ingrained in the community, find a good job, meet your neighbors. Hey, maybe you even get on the city council. All feels well with the world.
But uh oh, one of the other neighbors went nuts. He got a butchers knife and went into town, slaujtering 5 people before he was apprehended. You never knew that guy, but he came over there with you.
So should that mean that you, and upstanding citizen, should be removed from the community just because some other guy when on a killing spree?
I know you won’t respond in earnest. It’s fine. I enjoy making my point clear.
I told you not to bother. I'm not reading one word of your pilpul response, rabbi. Fuck off!
I know.
I don't really care what you tell me to do. I wanted to post it to make my point clear. This isn't about you. I know you read it so that's all the better for me.
Wasting your time. Nothing you say here is being taken seriously by anyone. Because it is obvious to all that you are sewer rat jewboy liar. When I said, "Fuck off." I didn't mean from this post. This sub. Or this site. Or the internet. I meant find yourself a large building and fuck off the top of it. The moment you hit the ground the world will instantly become a better place. One less inbred sheeny shlomo contaminating the Earth with their poison.
The Greatest Generation would be 100% against all this. They would despise the modern world. They are nothing like their children, the Boomers.
They're the ones who invaded Europe to kill their White Christian kin for the jew bankers. They supported the end of the Jim Crow era when boomers were still just kids. Even the CRA and Hart-Celler happened mostly on their watch.
Its self loathing and kalergi indoctrination.
Not Gen X you cunt. We tried to stop that shit.