I flatly refuse to be more 'racist' than 'homophobic'. For instance, I wouldn't vote for a homosexual, transsexual, etc. just because he is anti-immigration (like the late Pim Fortuyn or the current Alice Weidel). Plenty of other people would, but I dismiss them as fundamentally misguided: unable to see that this is fundamentally a moral struggle, i.e. most people are fine with mass immigration because any moral person would see it as a backstab, an invasion, etc., whereas immoral people have no in-group preference and will throw each other under the bus when expedient. There is practically zero chance that this idiot will do anything that ON voters want him to do, and a strong chance that he'll simply defect to another party or go independent soon, which will simply prove yet again the backstabbing, treacherous nature of such people.

Indonesian boyfriend

I agree that he'd be just nominally Muslim, not religiously Muslim. You're also correct in that Indonesians are noticeably more 'homophobic' than 'Australian' Muslims. You wouldn't get someone like Fatima Payman spewing her nonsense in Indonesia outside of the far fringes (of course, Indonesia is also quite liberal on abortion, so it isn't really 'based'), whereas 'Australian' Muslims are fine with voting for her and her non-Islamic, Leftist political party, 'Australia's Voice'.

yellow tide

I don't think ON cares about anything other than Muslim immigration and illegal immigration. The attitude is like this: 'As long as they're not Muslim and come legally, I don't care how many there are as long as they don't all show up overnight.' In the 1990s they did seem to be more ethnoracial, however.

Please Explain

Indeed. Hanson and colleagues have plenty to explain, like why they remain attached to Trump and Israel when polls show that these attachments have now become the leading deterrents to Australian voters casting votes for ON, probably because of the whole 'fuel crisis' thing. Of course, the utterly shithouse candidates open, as you suggest, a whole slew of Please Explains.

My suspicion is that this dirty Pozztralian sodomutt hid his deviant, delinquent sexuality from the party. That is the whole point of him coming out and announcing it after he was secure in his election: he may have felt that doing so earlier could jeopardize his electoral chances, e.g. that he would be dumped as the candidate. Either way, 'I love migrants and gayness up the anus from my migrant boyfriend, I love elections and erections' is about what I expect from many elected figures in today's world. Basically a male Alice Weidel, the lesbian Fuhrer of the Furred Reich.

A great deal of the party hierarchy are female, they recently ran an Italian stripper as a candidate, etc. Even a lot of the defectors to that party from the 'uniparty' are female, like the two older women who defected last week. Similar to Reform UK, to which plenty of 'uniparty' candidates (many high-profile Tories including former deputy leader Robert Jenrick and at least two Labour candidates) have defected: it's becoming like a reconstituted wing of the 'uniparty'.

What exactly do people expect from something that is effectively a reconstituted wing of the 'uniparty' and as - if not more - female-dominated than the rest of it?

This Pozzstralian sodomutt is par for the course. I don't know what faggotry has to do with religion and the political Right, but he's somehow managed to make it all cohere in his stupid mind.

For quite a while I've been saying that Trump is the best Democratic president that the Democrats never had, the best American president that the yids ever had, and the best Israeli prime minister that Israel never had.

Then he comes out and proves, lo and behold, that truth really is stranger than fiction.

I doubt that he's polling at 99% in Israel, but given the way that he has been portrayed alongside Netanyahu in Likud electoral propaganda, perhaps it isn't unbelievable that many Likudniks and orthodox yids would actually be willing to cast a vote for him if he was actually running for public office in Israel.

It also shows how utterly out of touch he is, identifying with this parasitic pariah state at the worst possible point since its establishment as though it is no less his homeland than America.

I saw through that woman immediately.

As soon as I heard that her main role model was Margaret Thatcher and that she is called the Japanese 'Iron Lady', I knew that she was trouble. At best, she'd simply be Japan's Thatcher.

Any actual Far-Rightist despises Thatcher. Voted in favour of abortion bills, brought about mass privatization, began the move towards mass consultation (i.e. giving NGOs more of a say in government, something greatly exacerbated in post-Thatcher Britain), had a 25% Jewish cabinet at its peak (also appointed homosexuals to high government positions), did not decrease immigration, etc.

Sadly, Japanese people have fallen for it. Just as Thatcher stopped the rise of the National Front, Takaichi seems to be the biggest obstacle at this point to the rise of Sanseito, since she is breathing new life into an LDP that needs to die off.

I'm reading some insane numbers, like 300,000 from Bangladesh alone. I know of a White man in Japan who says that an area he visits rapidly became flooded with Indians and the area is no longer even recognizably Japanese, all in the span of a couple of years.

This Spanish Fluentes character is very politically schizophrenic.

First, he says that he is planning to leave America because the Left will come after him when they win in 2028. A reasonable belief.

Second, he says that people should vote Democrat to punish the Republicans. Simply a repetition of Richard Spencer's twaddle from 2020.

Third, he's with Keith Woods in Europe and says, again, that the Republicans must win in 2028 or else the state will come after him.

Now he says, vote for a Democrat in Ohio.

Which is it, Fluentes? Why tell people to vote for those who you have good reason to believe will inflict serious harm on you if they are returned to government?

Obviously, I'm not someone who takes Spanish Fluentes seriously. I've probably seen less than an hour of him talking overall and have long been sick of hearing about him, and this only reinforces my view about him.

If worse actually led to better, the South African ANC would have been overthrown by groups like the AWB a long time ago. It wasn't. Blacks (ANC, EFF, MK, etc.), Jews (e.g. Slovo, Zille, Leon, Kasrils, Suzman), Indians (e.g. Kathrada, Maharaj, as well as all the ones who only switched to voting for the National Party when it was already far too late, i.e. when it was decimated by the ANC in the 1994 elections), and dumb White liberals and Leftists (e.g. much of the DA's voter base) simply made worse lead to yet worse.

Doesn't he understand that there is no limit to the level of degeneracy that people can adapt to, can consider normal, given that it happens slowly enough and is supported by the people who they listen to? So long as their celebrity idols and influencers largely support it and it occurs in a sufficiently gradual way, there is no limit to what the masses can accept insofar as sociocultural factors are concerned. The masses are almost infinitely malleable in this regard.

Perhaps he thinks that economic collapse, where the case for accelerationism can be greater made, will lead to the desired U-Turn. But does it? Something like a million White South Africans are impoverished by things like BEE. Did it turn this million unfortunate Whites into some combination of anti-Ramaphosa, anti-ANC, anti-black rule, anti-Leftist, etc. soldiers? No, they have simply adapted to the life of homelessness and poverty. Furthermore, it is not as though the Democrats will collapse the economy to Weimar levels of bad in any sure way.

Ramaswamy isn't much good. By contrast, that woman would probably be very glad if Fluentes wound up dead tomorrow.

Given that a robot can't be stuck in the cycle of birth, suffering, and death (samsara) and therefore cannot get out of said cycle (nirvana), there is really not much point, egoistically, to its being Buddhist.

I suppose a robot could rationalize it altruistically by claiming that it is working to help other living things escape samsara.

It would make much more sense for it to become a Confucian, since the attainment of moral improvement and eventual sagehood seem more attainable and relevant to the existence of a robot: a robot could feasibly possess morality and wisdom, but never life.

The Korean Buddhist cat who supposedly never harmed mice nor eats fish, spending most of his day prostrating before a Buddha statue, is also relevant to anyone interested in the religious lives of non-humans.

An obese Hispanic lesbian.

That's exactly who you would trust to protect the president of your country.

Surely I jest, I hear you say? Nay, look at the sheer size of her. A walking human shield complete with durable fat rolls.

We also know from our very intelligent brothers who fought in the Liberian Civil War that bullets will try to veer away from women, because bullets do not like to hit women.

Thus, it is very logical to replace all Secret Service agents with obese lesbians.

That's just the explosive-hot curry that Sudip has been cooking. He's been so successful that the curry is wafting all across India.

Let's just say that India won't be having winter any time soon.

Notice that yids are so obsessed with what others think of them? Even blacks do not maintain anti-black hate crime maps or anti-black reports complete with seemingly meticulous numbers.

As for the list, disappointing that it's so 'diverse'. Yids hate and fear White men more than anyone else - yids fear the rise of a new Hitler more than they fear God Himself - and yet White men aren't being reciprocal by leading the way in giving the yids sufficient reason to consider them their greatest fear, instead being supplanted by Leftists, women, and non-whites. Even 'anti-semitism' has fallen victim to 'The Great Replacement'.

Of course, yids themselves have no idea who the greatest 'anti-semites' are, hence, for instance, the 'Stop Anti-semitism' Twitter/X account presenting a very different list from the Israeli government (e.g. communist Calla Walsh, communist Guy Christiansen, 'Miss Rachel', kudos to Fuentes for appearing on both lists).

As for the specific entries, it's doubtful to me that any of the listed people even are genuinely 'anti-semitic'.

'Evidence' in the report (they are ordered in it differently to in the picture, suggesting that the picture isn't ordered, or the intended order was messed up in one or the other):

1. Tucker Carlson: Tweet accusing Israel of 'mass murder in Gaza'.

My verdict: Anti-Netanyahu, anti-Zionist, not anti-Israel per se, certainly not anti-semitic.

2. Greta Thunberg: 'genocide', 'Free Palestine'.

My verdict: Anti-Netanyahu, anti-Zionist (Left-Wing), not anti-Israel per se, certainly not anti-semitic.

3. Candace Owens: Tweet (probably) falsely accusing Freudian psychoanalysis of being 'created as a tool against the Catholic Church', Tweet drawing attention to yiddish ownership of many 'American' slave ships.

My verdict: Possibly 'anti-semitic' by this point, but does such a bad job of it as to come off as cartoonish, possibly harming the cause of 'anti-semitism' (e.g. when she was fixated on 'Sabbeatean Frankism', as if every problematic yid has anything at all to do with Sabbatean Frankism) and thus being beneficial to the yids overall. Freud was a pseudo-scientist (and anti-White), but I'm highly sceptical of any claim that his pseudo-science was all just a strategy to damage Catholicism.

4. Dan Bilzerian: Tweets against Israel

My verdict: Anti-Netanyahu, anti-Zionist, anti-Israel, not anti-semitic.

5. Bassam whatever (the Arab 'comedian'): 'Israel's genocide in Gaza', 'criminal state of Israel'

My verdict: Anti-Netanyahu, anti-Zionist (Left-Wing and Muslim), anti-Israel, not anti-semitic.

6. Omar Suleiman (first name I've never heard of): Posts about death of Palestinian children

My verdict: Anti-Netanyahu, anti-Zionist (Muslim), probably anti-Israel, not anti-semitic.

7. Nick Fuentes: 'Organized Jewish influence', 'against AIPAC'

My verdict: Only contextually anti-semitic, still agrees to philo-semitic, vaguely Christian-sounding claims such as that 'a Jew created the Earth' or 'a Jew is God'.

8. Anastasia Maria Loupis (isn't this a troll account, i.e. not a real name, profile pic not of person behind the account?): Tweet reply to user BillAckman, 'Go fuck yourself jew!'

9. Ian Carroll: Reposted image edited to depict Netanyahu being arrested by the DEA, posted image that says Israel is 'targeting Christians'.

My verdict: Anti-Netanyahu, anti-Zionist, possibly anti-Israel, not anti-semitic.

10. Abdel Bari Atwan (second name I've never heard of): Tweet suggesting Bondi was a Mossad false flag, 'Netanyahu violating Syrian territory'

My verdict: Anti-Netanyahu, anti-Zionist (Muslim), probably anti-Israel, not anti-semitic.

Anyone want to elaborate on any of these figures such that we can better judge whether they are actual 'anti-semites'? As opposed to merely anti-Zionists, e.g. Leftist anti-Zionists and/or Muslim anti-Zionists?

Leftists are essentially incapable of being anti-semitic due to racial egalitarianism - genuine anti-semitism necessitates contradicting racial egalitarianism - additionally, their entire worldview is of yiddish origins, e.g. yids fold the myriad human diversity into two groups, Jews and goyim, racial egalitarians simply go one step further in folding it all into one, humanity, in a way that also conveniently (for yids) blinds them to the very real yid-goy distinction. Furthermore, trans-sexualism has Talmudic precedent, since it contains more than male and female, though the exact number posited is disputed.

Lay Islam is also essentially incapable of being anti-semitic, e.g. Jews are fellow 'People of the Book', Muhammed and his followers (Sahaba) only killed yids who plotted to kill them, who committed crimes, etc.

However, both can be anti-Zionist, since Zionism is itself racially inegalitarian in its arguing for the uniqueness of yids (its problem with Leftism) and not Abrahamic religious per se (not protected under 'People of the Book', plenty of Zionists are atheists).

In conclusion, the Israeli Government took a bunch of influencers, including, most laughably, Greta Thunberg, and accused them of being dangerous, extremist, harmful, hateful anti-semites. In reality, none of them actually claim that all yids are evil, that all yids should be eradicated, etc. They just dislike what they perceive as 'Nazi' behaviour. Not that Nazis would ever sodomize captive men like the IDF do: that's just homosexual behaviour. Painting the defective, silly Thunberg as someone who could bring about a Holocaust is particularly funny: even Redditards are incredulous about Thunberg's inclusion alongside Tucker and Fuentes (two about whom Redditards agree with the Israeli government).

'Justin Fairfax'. Sounds like it could be a White man. (Many Leftists who don't know of him would undoubtedly be getting their hopes up that this was the case so that they can use it to peddle their 'White man bad' narratives.)

Scrolls down. Ah... another black. And Democrat. (Leftists screech in disappointment.)

Now that wasn't very feminist and egalitarian of you, Mr. Fairfax.

Isn't it nice when a man who spends his whole adult life pushing for feminism and egalitarianism ends up on the losing side of it? Mr. Fairfax died doing what he would have thought that only 'incels' would do: murdering a woman and then killing himself out of frustration with women.

Did it occur to him that he was going out in true incel fashion, in the most truly incel way imaginable, a soy-fuelled fit of anti-woman rage? Going out in a way that actual incels like TheImpossible1 will truly admire for all time? That he would go from egalitarian hero to incel hero in the span of a few gunshots?

TheImpossible1 is obviously printing off photos of Mr. Fairfax to stick all over the walls of his home right this moment. 'My idol!'

They only believe in it for humans. It's too obvious that many animal species are highly precocial: unlike humans, they have no society, education system, etc., and, in many cases, even no family structure and parental care to speak of, and yet they are able to survive and thrive from the get-go. Trying to argue that animal minds are blank slates is completely untenable. I am not aware of anyone who has bothered to try to make this case: not Boas, Gould, Lewontin, or any of those others who have made the case that this is so for humans.

Humans are actually the odd ones out, being extremely altricial (i.e. non-precocial). Somehow humans have lost something that animals possess in abundance, e.g. instincts (the German philosophical anthropologist Arnold Gehlen called this 'instinct deprivation'), and possibly even Cartesian innate ideas. These are the things that enable animals to survive without education systems, etc. And it is their absence in us that requires us to make such structures: we have to learn how to survive because the necessary knowledge for survival is not innate to us.

That's where all the Leftist and liberal nonsense comes in: the human mind, and near only the human mind, could convincingly argued to be essentially a blank slate upon which only external factors write, and they simply argue for the equality of these blank slates. The ruinous fool Locke seems to be interpreted as following a view like this.

The mistake seems to be in thinking that empiricist blank slatism necessitates racial equality, not even merely as an ultimately unattainable ideal, but as an objective truth. Racial equality is 'just the truth'. Some mysterious cause has ensured a levelling, a uniformity.

Of course, nothing about empiricism necessitates racial equality: even if I was firmly an epistemological empiricist, I see no reason to believe that every blank slate is one of equal size, quality, etc. Human brains are not produced as though they are all products of one production line and thus essentially identical: racial egalitarians, for all their supposed commitment to diversity, are inconsistently denying diversity where it is most evident. Thus, even brains empty of mental contents, and thus in that sense all equal—equally empty of ideas, instincts, etc.—could still be unequal in their capacity to learn, utilize, etc. mental contents. This view seems closer to a greater thinker like Leibniz.

The first view is the one on which racial equality rests: the one that needs to be demolished because it is so thoroughly incompatible with genuine human progress. Leftist and liberal views of race that force the intelligent to shoulder the increasingly crushing burden of the stupid and impulsive—increasingly crushing because those are also the fastest growing in number—will only lead to the world being ceded in its entirety to them, and to the extinction of the intelligent. Without enough intelligent people, they also will die off by the multitude, and, thus though they are too short-sighted to see it, it is not even in their own self-interest for the status quo to continue.

Every time I see the name 'Markwayne Mullin', I picture some stereotypical black basketball player or rapper or someone like that.

Perhaps a black MAGA rapper. His stage name would be 'M-WM da Dawg', and his albums would have names like 'Mullin's Mash-Ups'. One of his greatest hits would be entitled 'Tha G's In Da DHS'.

The name definitely doesn't fit the man.

Pewdiepie

He just came across as silly when I'd observe other people watching him 14 or so years ago, but didn't strike me as a degenerate and harmful influence. The current crop of influencers are noticeably worse.

lolcows

I have trouble believing that that many people are operating according to that kind of KiwiFarms and/or 'hatewatching' logic. Sure, I'm sure that some portion of their viewer base are just malicious people out there that really do just follow these people because they like watching a trainwreck slowly unfold, but such people are of particularly low character.

Indeed, I don't think anyone even does this except a kind who may feel a certain psychological 'need' to routinely remind themselves that someone is worse off than them in some way so that they feel good by comparison. For it is simply easier to tear others down than to raise yourself up. While I'm not sold on the concrete existence of such a personality type - e.g. does it have biological underpinnings, is it a product of dysfunctional social structures, etc. - I find the possible existence of such a personality type and people unsettling.

Anyone who follows the likes of Clavicular just to egg them on in the hope that they'll be arrested, overdose, etc. is even scummier than they are, lower even than the lowest of animals.

I don't like or care about him on any personal level, but he personifies something endemic: young people wasting away on drugs. The only difference is that he's a high-profile case and thus a little bit more than just another number, another statistic, unlike the millions of nameless young people who are dying or have died from drugs over the past few decades, most of whom have amounted to nothing but yet another increment on burgeoning drug deaths statistics.

Today's good news!

Any foreigner who goes around saying to the locals, for instance, that he wants their country to be nuked, is someone who should never have been let in in the first place.

If I recall correctly, he had already been deported from Japan. Why South Korea thought it would be a good idea to let him in so that he could continue his nonsense there is anybody's guess.

Now, no sane American wants this utter buffoon to return to their country after finishing his three-year sentence.

So here's to hoping that some Korean with a bit of honour left in him will find this Sammy's monkeying around so offensive as to shank him in there. Koreans have already attacked this skinny in the past; thus, we have good reason to be hopeful.

(Some are claiming that he only received six months, in which case Korea is no less retarded than any Western country.)

There are five medications in the photos. The woman correctly identifies two:

'Xanax' (alprazolam): Used for: Epileptic seizures, anxiety disorder (as needed)

'Seroquel' (quetiapine): Used for: Psychosis, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder (could use low dose for maintenance and/or higher dose as needed)

The three in the photos:

Escitalopram: Used for: Depression, anxiety disorder (maintenance)

Hydroxyzine: Used for: Anti-histamine, anxiety disorder (as needed)

Eszopiclone: Used for: Insomnia

The commonality is anxiety disorder. Unless there are other medications, what he has probably wouldn't be effective for bipolar disorder since none of these medications are mood stabilizers. The article does suggest psychotic symptoms, which quetiapine would well fit with (strong choice for someone with both anxiety and psychosis, even better if bipolar disorder also present).

What he's got is an anxiolytic arsenal: what you might think of as a pharmaceutical way to mass obliterate anxiety.

We can rule out the remaining diagnoses I've identified. It is unlikely that he has a separate depressive disorder. Depression is often comorbid with anxiety disorder. Escitalopram is also FDA-approved for Generalized Anxiety Disorder.

It is unlikely that he has epilepsy, since there is no gabapentin, pregablin, etc. prescribed (and since pregablin is effective for both anxiety and epilepsy, it would be a strong choice for someone who has both mental problems).

Insomnia is a common anxiety disorder side effect.

In conclusion, he probably has anxiety disorder. The other two, bipolar disorder and psychosis, are only possibilities. 'Diagnosed manic' could simply be the side effect of a drug: he might not necessarily have bipolar disorder. Psychotic symptoms can also be side effects of a drug: he might not necessarily have psychosis, either. For all we know, he could have used drugs (e.g. marijuana) before acting in ways that suggest psychosis. Some of the evidence might be overblown: him suspecting that the FBI are trying to kill him doesn't seem particularly irrational given who he is. For all we know, he could have received credible death threats, etc.

This combination of medications comes at a cost: for instance, alprazolam dependence and tolerance is a thing, quetiapine sedation and weight gain is a thing.

I don't know or pay any attention to Elijah Schaffer. It's just a name that I hear. Consequently, I didn't realize that he was only 32. I think it is sad that late-modernity is leading people to be already on five medications by the age of 32.

Get your stress levels under control: L-Theanine is practically side effect-free (also helps with insomnia, ineffective for serious anxiety disorders but useful for mild anxiety), long-term camomile usage helps with insomnia, passionflower is also effective for anxiety (to a lesser extent also with insomnia) with long-term usage. Don't let yourselves get stressed out by the late-modern world to the extent that you develop anxiety disorders and end up needing to take multiple medications.

They'll obviously go after Turkey so long as Erdogan remains charge, possibly even just if the AKP remains in charge. As for Greater Israel, I suspect that even more Leftist and Centrist groups like the CHP will fight any foreign group who tries to seize a part of Turkey, for the simple reason that nationalism is more powerful in Turkey than in most countries (due to Kemalism, etc.), even if it is often just rhetorical (e.g. Kilicdaroglu suddenly calling himself a 'nationalist' in his efforts to defeat Erdogan during the last presidential run-off).

Let's rewind to 2016 or so. Turkey seriously looked as though it was going to enter the EU.

It would have. For the 'Far-Right', that looked like an impending disaster at the time. Turks - all 85-90 million or so of them - would be able to move around much of Europe with little to no restriction.

But then there was a failed coup against the AKP. Then the AKP-led government won a 2017 referendum that switched Turkey's political system in a way that would prolong Erdogan's rule and give him more power.

The sense that Erdogan was some sort of 'Turkish Fuhrer' grew among the EU-types. Relations between Turkey and the European Union soured. Consequently, we were all spared from the Turks becoming part of the European Union. A case of being 'accidentally based'. All because 'muh fascism'.

But that is contingent on Erdogan and the AKP remaining in power. The EU loves the Kurds and most of their political movements (e.g. the Left-Wing HDP), the Left-liberal CHP, indeed, basically anyone and everyone that is non-aligned with Erdogan. If the 'conservative' AKP and its allies (e.g. the 'nationalist' MHP) leave power, you can rest assured that Turkey will enter the European Union very quickly.

This is why I have always been an Erdogan 'supporter' (yes, even if he does stupid things like calling Netanyahu 'Hitler'). I know what will happen if he leaves power. I want Erdogan and the AKP to rule Turkey for the indefinite future, because that is the only realistic way the EU won't admit Turkey.

Other than Slovakia's Smer-SD, and with PiS and Fidesz out of power, there is probably no ruling party anywhere that the EU hates more than the AKP. However, I think it is practically inevitable that Erdogan and the AKP will leave power and the pro-EU CHP are returned to power, with Turkey entering the EU shortly after.

That raises an interesting scenario: Israel aggressing against Turkey, by that point, an EU member state. In that sense, it might actually be in Israel's greatest interest to ensure that Turkey never joins the EU. Then again, Israel seems to be able to do whatever it wants even when the masses all across the political spectrum are growingly distasteful of it. Thus I suppose it is not impossible, the following scenario: Israel (with or without American help) invades this Turkey, the EU condemns it but does not actually do anything, Israel seizes chunks of Turkey and millions of Turks flee to Europe with Israel's encouragement (because, after all, they're essentially 'European' now, and no longer Turkish), and the rest of Turkey, knowing that it cannot defeat some sort of Israeli-American military force, renounces its ownership of the occupied areas to Israel.

Of course, this scenario relies on all sorts of factors, e.g. America continuing to be pro-Israel (insofar as the political classes are concerned, this seems highly likely); the EU actually doing nothing to help Turkey (some possibility); and Israel deciding that it can take on a country substantially more powerful than Lebanon or even Syria (with America on side, Turkey would clearly lose, but Turkey would be quite resilient against a lone Israeli invasion).

Hasn't the Russian government been reliant on open source software for something like a decade or more at this point? In their case, I think it was more related to saving money rather than dependence or security concerns, however.

Degenerates like Aubrey 'Kirtaner' Cottle, of Anonymous fame, were still hacking into Russian systems, regardless. (Thankfully, this complete and utter scumbag is now in jail after a chain of stupid actions, including defacing the Texas Republican Party's website and breaching bail conditions.)

Of what relevance is Russia to a Hungarian election? Russia and Putin are absolutely living in your head rent free, to the extent that you can't even see anything but Russia and Putin anymore.

Most people experience floaters from time to time. You experience the outline of Russia floating around in your vision, all of the time! Sucks to be you, so completely and utterly fucktarded to the extent that it isn't even funny.

Can the 'Nazis' actually just be the Nazis that they are always accused of being? The 'big bad Far-Right' (of which Fidesz is labelled as being part) never actually does 'big bad Far-Right' things, just utterly lame things like making their country a safe haven for fleeing Israelis.

I saw a YouTube video of a yid who fled from the Ukraine to Israel and from post-October 7 Israel to Hungary. Why would anyone think that someone who has fled two countries in the span of a couple of years would somehow be loyal to a third? Such a 'Nazi' thing to do, to let guys like this into your country.

Mass media: 'Conceded defeat?' Yeah, that's exactly how Orban and everyone of importance in Fidesz end up in jail where all the shitheads of the world want them, the new 'leadership' promptly make everything ten times worse, and, unlike with Fidesz, you won't be able to vote out these Tisza fuckwits, either.

No coup? No big bad Russian interference? No going down in a blaze of glory? No 'Nazi' stuff? Yes to Israel? Yes to continued EU membership? Orban, you had one job - just be the 'Nazi' they accuse you of being - and you screwed it up.

With Poland also retaken by non-Rightists, Hungary is practically the only European country that is even vaguely on 'our' (Orban's intransigent support for Israel aside) side (depending on how one sees Belarus, that might be the sole exception remaining, or there simply will be none remaining).

The pro-EU, non-Rightist forces (i.e. almost everyone non-Fidesz) came very close to defeating Fidesz last election. However, Marki-Zay ultimately wasn't their man of the hour.

Now Orban is up against the very suspicious Peter Magyar, who defects from Fidesz, joins an inactive party called TISZA, and is now somehow slated to win the election. Seems totally artificial.

I have noticed that some people who call themselves 'nationalists' are still anti-Orban. There were always some of these people, who accused him of being part-gypsy, corrupt, etc., but it seems clear to me that even Hungarian nationalists are being duped into believing that anti-Orban forces will somehow be better for Hungary.

These are the same kind of people whose Ukrainian analogues are intransigently anti-Russian, who mindlessly charged into the meat grinder as part of Azov Battalion on day one. Consequently, Ukrainian nationalism is practically wiped out, when they should have used the war as an opportunity to rid themselves of Zelensky and his kind and then conscripted all of the dumb degenerates in the country so that they could be thrown into the meat grinder instead. Now they're all dead while all the faggots and other weirdos are still alive - since they are able to avoid conscription - while every remaining normal man and his dog is being press-ganged into the Cuckrainian military. Such people represent a stupid side of nationalism.

How TISZA will be better for Hungary than some combination of Fidesz, KDNP (Fidesz ally), and Our Homeland (what's left of Jobbik's Right, with mainline Jobbik moving so far towards liberalism that the Rightist faction split off, possibly has also since gravitated towards a pro-Fidesz view) is anybody's guess. When these fools start trying to ban Fidesz, KDNP, and Our Homeland so that Rightist forces are effectively eliminated from politics, some of them will finally realize their folly too late.

I have wondered for years why it is that Orban is so intransigently pro-Israel? Does he think that the yids will somehow save him? Doesn't he know that the natural place of the yids is on the Left, and that they are only ever non-Left when the Left gets out of their control? Hence Greenblatt and others wanting to shift everything towards the Centre all of a sudden post-October 7 (the same Greenblatt who always bemoans the supposed rise of the 'Far-Right' while hypocritically making the extremely 'racist' claim that intermarriage between his kind and the goyim threatens the survival of his kind!). This is essentially a repetition of the yiddish Trotskyites (Bell, Glazer, etc.) becoming the neoconservatives when Stalin took the Left from their kind, with what was left of them returning to the Left when Trump began his meteoric rise to the presidency. If they can get the Left back under their control, you can rest assured such yids as Greenblatt complaining about the 'woke Left' will become 'woke Left' again. It will seem a big mystery to all those whom have not been observant of the past actions of such 'people'.

Only someone with a great deal of practice would be able to get that right without any mistakes. That just shows how ridiculous these people are, having MMIWG2SLGBTQQIA+ on their minds all the time such that they don't get the order mixed up, miss out letters, etc.

I suspect that she's very proud of being able to get that right, as well.

Finally, she needs to stop making Carney look better than the Tories. I wish that this 'Gazan' was blown up in the Gazan genocide.

People always go on about Darwin - even on the 'Far-Right' - but he wasn't just wrong, he had the truth standing on its head.

Cockroaches, rats, and low-IQ people have a far greater chance of surviving over the long term than Whites and East Asians. It doesn't even come close. Rats are even surviving in Pripyat/Chernobyl, having evolved far quicker than humans can.

Darwin thought that it was the nons who would go extinct. That's really quite laughable in hindsight. If Whites manage even to survive the coming crap-show, let alone thrive, it's going to be by a hair's breadth. It will be thought of by future Whites as some kind of miracle from God that they scraped through at all.

By contrast, no one really thinks that the existence of Africans is in question. For even if hundreds of millions were to die in a Malthusian collapse-style scenario - and I even think that likely - it wouldn't actually reduce the numbers to zero, but to a level that can be sustained by a hunter-gatherer way of life, that is, to pre-colonial numbers.

On the other hand, when you have a birth rate like 0.8 (South Korea's latest figure, up from 0.72 as a result of former President Yoon's natalist policies), literal extinction seems not only not remote, but almost certain. A news article claimed that if, at such a low rate, you take 100 average South Koreans, they'll have only eleven grandchildren.

A future with zero Koreans is far more likely than one with zero Kenyans.

Only in the past few years has it even seemed like Whites may be beginning to wake up at all to their predicament, and we have no guarantee that enough of them will wake up fast enough.

A very MALEvolent, MANiacal, MENdacious, MENtal woMAN right there.

Everyone thinks that they've wizened up to the whole WMDs in Iraq narrative, and yet they're falling for it again, hook, line, and sinker. The only difference is that you change one letter in the word 'Iraq' and start talking about the country next door.

cut babies' heads off

Where have we all heard that before? Ah, yes... The 'fifty beheaded babies' nonsense from October 7.

You wonder: Why is it that they recycle, regurgitate these false narratives with no originality, almost verbatim?

Then you realize: they know that it actually still works on, that it is still convincing to, the average person. So why should they go through the extra work involved in trying to make something more convincing or more original?

It really boggles the mind that Left-Wing nutters always say: 'America needs to catch up with the rest of the world', while insisting that America needs to remain a backwards outlier when it comes down to Voter ID requirements. America is one of the few countries remaining that doesn't have it, and that number is declining, with Britain on the way to introducing it.

Because Republicans are retarded, they never consider backflipping this Left-Wing progress narrative back on them: 'The Democrats tell you that they want America to catch up with the rest of the world, and we're doing that. The Democrats want America to remain a backwards outlier because of their corruption.'

Democrats can't really oppose Voter ID at that point because it's obviously true. They end up adopting a conservative-reactionary position, trying to resist change, antithetical to their stances on most else. The Republicans are the true 'progressive' party on Voter ID, having America catch up and join the rest of the world, joining progressive movements like UK Labour in implementing it.

That, of course, is the second line of argument. It's not just that the Democrats are against the world on voter ID. They're also against other progressive movements. 'Progressive movements like UK Labour support Voter ID. All around the world, progressive, centrists, and conservatives agree on little, but they agree on one thing: Voter ID. Why do the Democrats want to keep you in the dark?'

Instead of appealing to the rest of the world, to the Democrats' hypocrisy, etc. the Republicans are totally impotent on Voter ID, allowing the Democrats to put up a sturdy defence - being able to paint Voter ID as 'fascist' (easily countered by appealing to widespread Left-Wing support for it outside of America) and 'racist' (easily countered by appealing to the fact that the only countries that do not have it are mostly White, like Australia and New Zealand - that's right, almost no, or possibly no, non-white country rejects Voter ID requirements).

Late-modernity is so dumbed down that political factions don't even try to out-intellectualize their opponents anymore. We aren't like the ancients. For instance, in ancient China, philosophical debates like the caixing debate were essentially between political factions trying to prove that they were smarter and thus more qualified to govern. Today's politics is base people being duped by base politicians making false promises.