They're hyping up Vance for '28 right now. Vance is trying to position himself as being against the war in Iran, yet in his very first interview with Shawn Hannity at the RNC (where Trump announced him as the VP nominee), Vance said that he fully supported attacking Iran. Hannity didn't even ask him that, he just volunteered it as one of his priorities. Now Vance wants Trump to take all the heat so he can play the "moderate" in two years. All these two-faced fucks need to be held accountable. People need to be reminded they all wanted this invasion from the start.
Vance was created for this. He is meant to be their star actor. The CEO of their country. How many lower middle class guys join the service and get out and go directly to Yale? He was put in the pipeline back then.
It's apparently already been corrected to 'No transgender surgery for kids' an hour after the post was published.
That could mean backlash made him changed it, maybe this updated post was his original intent. I just think there are still some old types that don't FULLY understand the MALICE of the other side, kinda like us old GG'ers in 2014..
The same man that said the Epstein files didn't exist? And that they were a Democrat hoax? The same man that defends Epstein and Maxwell?
Yes. Yes, we do. And the interview with the that former police chief doesn't change anything about it. Show me actual police and court documents from when Epstein was investigated and imprisoned that Trump actually narked on Epstein.
And why Trump banned him from Mar-a-lago we don't know. Perhaps he was poaching Trumps employees.
Bullshit!!! The narrative falls apart when you know who Rump's queer Zionist CiA/Mossad mentor was while growing up. Roy ran the pedo extortion racket until AIDS killed him, then Epstein took over the CIA/Mossad pedo extortion racket. Both super close Rump friends! He knew about this Zionist criminality all along. Your narrative, fake and gay coverup used to distance himself from criminality!
Yes, the man who has never said anything other than what jews have told him to say. The one reading from a literal script given to him by his owners, just like every politician.
You do not get to be “elected” unless you obey the narrative.
How am I still having to say this to people 25 years after 9/11…
That could mean backlash made him changed it, maybe this updated post was his original intent.
If he actually wrote the posts himself I'd say there's no way you "accidentally" add entire qualifiers on the end, but with the introduction of social media managers I guess there's room for injecting their agenda.
But Occam's razor would still say it's obviously the backlash, not some elaborate sabotage.
Hey goyim, just because the voting system is totally rigged already and somehow most of you dipshits don’t know that yet, we are gonna make it look like we care enough about voting to stop the impact demographic shift would have on voting if voting even mattered, demographic shift that happens NO MATTER which party has the power.
Oh and we will remove those two absolutely demonic tranny policies we knew everyone would hate so you can feel like you got a big win, when in reality it has no impact on how fucked this country already is.
You can't even do that anymore. If you build a cabin, you will get taxed on that. If you try to live in an RV, you can only park it at campsites, where you will get charged money. If you try to live in the woods on federal land like a national park, you will get kicked out. Your best bet is literally moving to Alaska because the democrats forget it exists half the time. I hope you like the bitter cold winters and the mosquito filled summers.
Our system is literally designed to enslave you, and make it so that you are forced to work for the system for the rest of your life.
It's only okay to permanently mutilate and sterilize your kids for life while forcing them into a lifestyle that changes their suicide chances from 2% to 50% so long as a their parents say it's okay.
What the actual fuck. Nothing changes at all with it. Democrats continue destroying their children, conservatives don't. No different than current.
There are a couple of wings to the fight against trans bullshit. One is going after the medical people, from counselors to clinicians to surgeons. This is the clear and morally superior tactic, as these people are monsters and what they do should be illegal at the Federal level.
The other wing is "parental rights." This is far murkier, and therefore a riskier and more morally gray (to lawyers, and deviants) tactic, but it is emotionally effective, therefore far easier to gather popular support for. This is the one that good-hearted, simple folks will show up for. This tactic has been very successful at the State level.
"Without the express consent of the parents" is boilerplate language tacked onto anything and everything tailored to appeal to the parental rights crowd.
It's very disingenuous to paint this nod as some kind of blanket support for what's on the table; in this case, trans mutilation of minors. This is punching right for stupid semantic reasons divorced from the political reality.
The minute they take the House, this Zionist puppet regime is dead in the water and Zognald, Bimbo Bondi and Pajeet Patel are impeached for obstructing the Epstein investigation and destroying federal records/ evidence. The new Democratic constituency of brown, non-native, anti-zionists have transformed the DNC entirely. I honestly feel safer voting for these new Democrats than AIPAC Republicans.
Taking the House away from Republicans means we can "stalemate" the next two years.
Cool. Then keep being a loyal bitch to AIPAC Republicans. Keep going back to the casino to feed the slot machines. Protect the status quo and STFU. Keep doing the same thing over and over and over again and expecting a different result. What's that the definition of again?
If the GOP/ AIPAC lose the House, Trump is neutralized and we can have an uneventful two year "reprieve".
That's the best deal we're going to get from voting.
I get that, but I don't see "The Squad" and other similar newly-elected, anti-zionist Dems going along THIS hard.
I voted for Trump three times. Now I want him Impeached to throw a wrench in his admin and "neutralize" the damage. Trump forfeited his mandate by not even trying with the deportations and then letting Israhell drag us into this war, aside from the fact that we're still quietly sending money to Ukraine, etc., etc., etc.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with parents transitioning their kids. The problem is when they do it on other people's dime. All transgendered healthcare must be 100% private with $0 in public funds going to subsidize any of it.
I would never put my child in a propaganda dissemination facility. My child would be home schooled, as all kids should be. Putting your kid in a school is literally child abuse. Not that I care what you do with yours but I'd never do that to mine.
Why would I care what another parent and their child get up to? If a parent wants to transition their child, then these parents shouldn't even have kids. By fucking up their child's ability to have children, they're doing the rest of society a favor by ensuring those genetics aren't passed down to the next generation. Why stop your enemies from taking out the trash for you?
I just can't justify the government controlling families like this. That's pure communism. It's not the government's job to interfere with parents raising their kids.
If it's the express written permission of both parents, I'm not inclined to intervene if they want to sterilize their dysgenic spawn, that's just fewer retards for my grandkids to deal with.
No way in hell should it be allowed with the go ahead by some batshit single mom though. Don't even know the father to contact him? Tough shit, no transed kids to brag about for you.
It’s the sexual abuse and coercion of a child. I don’t care if it’s the child of my nemesis- that child still deserves bodily integrity and to not be mutilated. Evil is evil and must be stopped.
People aren't nits. People aren't lice. People are people. Scientifically, spiritually, even genetically, there's no reason to think what makes a human being bad is a result of parental determinism.
Blank slate theory is judeo commie subversion. It isn't a coincidence that niggers are impulsive, violent apes, or that jews are greedy, manipulative, subversive scum. It's written into their fucking DNA.
Then what kind of subversion is unadulterated determinism? It's just as fucking stupid. Genetic heritage gives living things predilections and potential and tendencies. It does not determine behavior, nor does it come anywhere even close to the neighborhood of predicting "good" vs. "bad."
I'm honestly boggled that you and the other guy have managed to wedge yourselves into a head-space where literally all cultivation, all rearing, all education, all training, is worth zero, while chromosomes somehow call all of the shots. It sounds so frankly and obviously stupid. I expect this from subcontinent Indian Brahmins, not white Westerners.
There are a thousand instances of wisdom from our elders of the type: "The apple doesn't fall far from the tree." Even the ancients knew that the son will be like the father.
We also have thousands of instances from our elders about overcoming the patterns and hardships of rotten circumstances or an ill-favored birth. "The ancients," whoever they are, covered both ends of this in depth and breadth.
I'm not sure what kind of bonkers I'm dealing with here. Genetic/biological determinism, obviously. Failure to recognize genotype vs. phenotype? Yeah that too. Biological mechanism?
Just a generally fucked-up, uncharitable attitude, is what I say. It's an insult to anyone who ever achieved despite being given shitty odds. This sort of "You'll never rise above" attitude is how we get to Canada's demonic MAID system.
And two black people can have white kids thanks to albinism. Doesn't make it the norm.
The silly part is pretending all statistical distributions have the same mean, or pretending we live in some post-scarcity utopia where dedicating resources to people most likely to be disgusting reprobates isn't reducing the resources available for raising more people far more likely to be good and decent individuals.
This isn't a matter of norms or statistical means here. We started with, the context is, who gets protected from mutilation and/or death. The answer is people. My answer is, people, regardless whether they're black or poor or Chinese or whatever. In the United States, in the white Christian world, we protect the young, vulnerable, innocent--we protect children and babies from degradations and predations. We don't assign babies genetic probabilities of being undesirable, then say okay you're fair game for whatever from whomever. That's barbarous.
This isn't a matter of norms or statistical means here
Yes, it is, but you're obviously willing to put your head in the sand before engaging with that.
In the United States, in the white Christian world, we protect the young, vulnerable, innocent--we protect children and babies from degradations and predations.
That is objectively not true. We protect some of them, and leave millions more to suffer predation and degradation from all levels of society. Files documenting some of those most high profile failures to protect have been national news for months now so don't pretend not to know that, not to mention the long history of documented failures around the school system, foster care system, etc. Because the truth is the resources aren't there to protect everyone, and if we're not going to protect everyone then I'd chose not spend those efforts first on the genealogies most likely to grow up into future predators, but rather last.
Yes, it is, but you're obviously willing to put your head in the sand before engaging with that.
Whatever you like. I'm not allowing my part to drift into hard eugenicism. You can take that or leave it.
That is objectively not true. We protect some of them, and leave millions more to suffer predation and degradation from all levels of society. Files documenting some of those most high profile failures to protect have been national news for months now so don't pretend not to know that, not to mention the long history of documented failures around the school system, foster care system, etc. Because the truth is the resources aren't there to protect everyone, and if we're not going to protect everyone then I'd chose not spend those efforts first on the genealogies most likely to grow up into future predators, but rather last.
We protect all we know about and can reasonably do something about. "Leaving to suffer" is a matter of knowledge, never a cold calculation of resource allocation. Just because we can't win them all, just because there are failures, doesn't in any way mean our intent, as civilized folk, is to leave babies and children at the mercy of malicious adult behavior, because we've noted their genetic heritage and find it icky.
It really boggles the mind that Left-Wing nutters always say: 'America needs to catch up with the rest of the world', while insisting that America needs to remain a backwards outlier when it comes down to Voter ID requirements. America is one of the few countries remaining that doesn't have it, and that number is declining, with Britain on the way to introducing it.
Because Republicans are retarded, they never consider backflipping this Left-Wing progress narrative back on them: 'The Democrats tell you that they want America to catch up with the rest of the world, and we're doing that. The Democrats want America to remain a backwards outlier because of their corruption.'
Democrats can't really oppose Voter ID at that point because it's obviously true. They end up adopting a conservative-reactionary position, trying to resist change, antithetical to their stances on most else. The Republicans are the true 'progressive' party on Voter ID, having America catch up and join the rest of the world, joining progressive movements like UK Labour in implementing it.
That, of course, is the second line of argument. It's not just that the Democrats are against the world on voter ID. They're also against other progressive movements. 'Progressive movements like UK Labour support Voter ID. All around the world, progressive, centrists, and conservatives agree on little, but they agree on one thing: Voter ID. Why do the Democrats want to keep you in the dark?'
Instead of appealing to the rest of the world, to the Democrats' hypocrisy, etc. the Republicans are totally impotent on Voter ID, allowing the Democrats to put up a sturdy defence - being able to paint Voter ID as 'fascist' (easily countered by appealing to widespread Left-Wing support for it outside of America) and 'racist' (easily countered by appealing to the fact that the only countries that do not have it are mostly White, like Australia and New Zealand - that's right, almost no, or possibly no, non-white country rejects Voter ID requirements).
Late-modernity is so dumbed down that political factions don't even try to out-intellectualize their opponents anymore. We aren't like the ancients. For instance, in ancient China, philosophical debates like the caixing debate were essentially between political factions trying to prove that they were smarter and thus more qualified to govern. Today's politics is base people being duped by base politicians making false promises.
Trump 2.0 sucks.
Wait until you see Trump 3.0 ultra ZOG megajew
Mandatory death to all goyim who bad-mouth the chosen
And no, i'm 1488% he will sign it into law
They're hyping up Vance for '28 right now. Vance is trying to position himself as being against the war in Iran, yet in his very first interview with Shawn Hannity at the RNC (where Trump announced him as the VP nominee), Vance said that he fully supported attacking Iran. Hannity didn't even ask him that, he just volunteered it as one of his priorities. Now Vance wants Trump to take all the heat so he can play the "moderate" in two years. All these two-faced fucks need to be held accountable. People need to be reminded they all wanted this invasion from the start.
Vance was created for this. He is meant to be their star actor. The CEO of their country. How many lower middle class guys join the service and get out and go directly to Yale? He was put in the pipeline back then.
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2010/09/wayne-madsen/the-story-of-obama-allinthecompany/
Obama was born into it. Vance has an off the charts IQ that brought him under scrutiny when he joined up. Nothing is organic.
It's not as rare as you think
Trump 1.0 sucked too.
1.0 was closeted ZOG
2.0 the mask came off when he put the tiny hat on and started licking the wall
Trump Jew.0
First Season: "Hey this show's kinda based, likeable male protagonist pushing traditional values"
Second Season: race-swapped trannies in piss pool orgy
Have you figured out how Hollywood works yet?
Netflix ass President
It's apparently already been corrected to 'No transgender surgery for kids' an hour after the post was published.
That could mean backlash made him changed it, maybe this updated post was his original intent. I just think there are still some old types that don't FULLY understand the MALICE of the other side, kinda like us old GG'ers in 2014..
No, it wasn't. It wasn't the first time he said it.
https://x.com/robbi_fahey/status/2029787014770414046
Then back to my statement of him not fully grasping there ARE a significant group of parents that not only harm their kids but advertise it.
We're talking about the man who started a war with Iran on the behalf of Israel and is willing to sacrifice as many American lives as it takes.
Do we really still pretend he's just a bumbling old fool who can't call left from right?
I'm not entirely sure what he is at this point, but I'm not actually ruling out him being drugged up and manipulated by the CIA.
He doesn't sound or even look like same man that was on the campaign trail a little over a year ago.
And I'm rooting for impeachments and jail time at this point. For a lot of them.
Why should anyone care what you have to say on the topic, then?
Doesn’t need to be. Jews are on video admitting they were going to kill him over his real estate debts in the 1990s unless he took their deal.
Suddenly he didn’t have any debt. Suddenly he became a successful TV personality. Suddenly he became the president of the United States.
Suddenly all of his children married jews.
YEAH, MORE TALKING AND VOTING!
You first.
No? Go to hell.
Thanks for proving me right every waking moment of your life.
He's a crypto Jew. Wise men learn from their mistakes, fools pretend they never made one in the first place to save face.
Are we saying the same man that banned and narked on Epstein early is OK with kids being mutilated?
The same man that said the Epstein files didn't exist? And that they were a Democrat hoax? The same man that defends Epstein and Maxwell?
Yes. Yes, we do. And the interview with the that former police chief doesn't change anything about it. Show me actual police and court documents from when Epstein was investigated and imprisoned that Trump actually narked on Epstein.
And why Trump banned him from Mar-a-lago we don't know. Perhaps he was poaching Trumps employees.
Bullshit!!! The narrative falls apart when you know who Rump's queer Zionist CiA/Mossad mentor was while growing up. Roy ran the pedo extortion racket until AIDS killed him, then Epstein took over the CIA/Mossad pedo extortion racket. Both super close Rump friends! He knew about this Zionist criminality all along. Your narrative, fake and gay coverup used to distance himself from criminality!
At this point, I'm just waiting for him to make the meme reality and call dems "the real transphobes".
Yes, the man who has never said anything other than what jews have told him to say. The one reading from a literal script given to him by his owners, just like every politician.
You do not get to be “elected” unless you obey the narrative.
How am I still having to say this to people 25 years after 9/11…
The guy that habitually busted in to the dressing rooms at the child pageants he ran?
Naw, he's squeaky clean...
He is, at the end of the day, still a boomer.
If he actually wrote the posts himself I'd say there's no way you "accidentally" add entire qualifiers on the end, but with the introduction of social media managers I guess there's room for injecting their agenda.
But Occam's razor would still say it's obviously the backlash, not some elaborate sabotage.
Hey goyim, just because the voting system is totally rigged already and somehow most of you dipshits don’t know that yet, we are gonna make it look like we care enough about voting to stop the impact demographic shift would have on voting if voting even mattered, demographic shift that happens NO MATTER which party has the power.
Oh and we will remove those two absolutely demonic tranny policies we knew everyone would hate so you can feel like you got a big win, when in reality it has no impact on how fucked this country already is.
There ya go, AMERICA SAVED!
He can only eat Jew cum
I understood that reference
It doesn't matter. This admin is toast, country collapses, blue hairs take over, mandatory anal sex lessons will be in kindergarten
I'll crash out completely at that point or go live in the woods
You can't even do that anymore. If you build a cabin, you will get taxed on that. If you try to live in an RV, you can only park it at campsites, where you will get charged money. If you try to live in the woods on federal land like a national park, you will get kicked out. Your best bet is literally moving to Alaska because the democrats forget it exists half the time. I hope you like the bitter cold winters and the mosquito filled summers.
Our system is literally designed to enslave you, and make it so that you are forced to work for the system for the rest of your life.
Alaska is on my list. I have a few friends there
It worked for Uncle Ted.
Just in time for the midterms.
Almost like it's a plan to never wield a majority in this country.
To always let fractious dipshit politics control the spotlight.
It's only okay to permanently mutilate and sterilize your kids for life while forcing them into a lifestyle that changes their suicide chances from 2% to 50% so long as a their parents say it's okay.
What the actual fuck. Nothing changes at all with it. Democrats continue destroying their children, conservatives don't. No different than current.
Wtf Trump
he already reneged
YEAH, MORE VOTING! THAT’LL WORK!
"Muh Dems will stop the war in Iran and release the Epstein Files"
There are a couple of wings to the fight against trans bullshit. One is going after the medical people, from counselors to clinicians to surgeons. This is the clear and morally superior tactic, as these people are monsters and what they do should be illegal at the Federal level.
The other wing is "parental rights." This is far murkier, and therefore a riskier and more morally gray (to lawyers, and deviants) tactic, but it is emotionally effective, therefore far easier to gather popular support for. This is the one that good-hearted, simple folks will show up for. This tactic has been very successful at the State level.
"Without the express consent of the parents" is boilerplate language tacked onto anything and everything tailored to appeal to the parental rights crowd.
It's very disingenuous to paint this nod as some kind of blanket support for what's on the table; in this case, trans mutilation of minors. This is punching right for stupid semantic reasons divorced from the political reality.
VOTE DEMOCRAT IN THE MIDTERMS!
The minute they take the House, this Zionist puppet regime is dead in the water and Zognald, Bimbo Bondi and Pajeet Patel are impeached for obstructing the Epstein investigation and destroying federal records/ evidence. The new Democratic constituency of brown, non-native, anti-zionists have transformed the DNC entirely. I honestly feel safer voting for these new Democrats than AIPAC Republicans.
Taking the House away from Republicans means we can "stalemate" the next two years.
VoTe BlUe No MaTtEr WhO
Cool. Then keep being a loyal bitch to AIPAC Republicans. Keep going back to the casino to feed the slot machines. Protect the status quo and STFU. Keep doing the same thing over and over and over again and expecting a different result. What's that the definition of again?
If the GOP/ AIPAC lose the House, Trump is neutralized and we can have an uneventful two year "reprieve".
That's the best deal we're going to get from voting.
lol, you deserve this.
Where did I say ANY of that, dumbass?
Chill, voter. All you have to do is vote harder and everything magically becomes better.
Where did I say ANY of that, you lying snake?
No one said you did, voter. Relax and just vote.
AIPAC FUNDS BOTH PARTIES!
Sometimes both candidates in the same race, or even every candidate running in a primary, so that an AIPAC candidate always wins...
It's rigged. Two-party, democratically-elected governments are an illusion. Political theatre.
ZOG.
Exactly.
Are you ready for the reality that voting is pointless and it's time to stop thinking inside the system?
That's why I said that. I've known and said it for a long time, but most folks aren't ready for the alternative, so ...
You do realize AIPAC owns both parties, right? The solution to this problem won't be found in a compromised political process.
I get that, but I don't see "The Squad" and other similar newly-elected, anti-zionist Dems going along THIS hard.
I voted for Trump three times. Now I want him Impeached to throw a wrench in his admin and "neutralize" the damage. Trump forfeited his mandate by not even trying with the deportations and then letting Israhell drag us into this war, aside from the fact that we're still quietly sending money to Ukraine, etc., etc., etc.
Bleach_America, is that you?
No you faggot
Sure. Keep voting Red, then. Keep upholding the status quo. Nothing changes. So smart!
Yes because that's what I said
There is absolutely nothing wrong with parents transitioning their kids. The problem is when they do it on other people's dime. All transgendered healthcare must be 100% private with $0 in public funds going to subsidize any of it.
Right, parents can do what they please with their kids. If some nutcase mom decides to castrate her son, who are we to intervene?
Frankly, I don't care about interfering with other people's children. I couldn't care less about the boy.
You'll care when sHe will shoot your children at school.
I would never put my child in a propaganda dissemination facility. My child would be home schooled, as all kids should be. Putting your kid in a school is literally child abuse. Not that I care what you do with yours but I'd never do that to mine.
Hard disagree. Transitioning your child is devil's work, and anyone who would violate the Hippocratic Oath to perform that work should be in a gibbet.
You're a porn sick freak show who defends Epstein so this take doesn't surprise me.
Why would I care what another parent and their child get up to? If a parent wants to transition their child, then these parents shouldn't even have kids. By fucking up their child's ability to have children, they're doing the rest of society a favor by ensuring those genetics aren't passed down to the next generation. Why stop your enemies from taking out the trash for you?
I don't want trannies of any kind running around. The NSDAP had a better approach to dealing with this than your nonsense.
I just can't justify the government controlling families like this. That's pure communism. It's not the government's job to interfere with parents raising their kids.
Defeating trannies is communism now. OK, shill.
If it's the express written permission of both parents, I'm not inclined to intervene if they want to sterilize their dysgenic spawn, that's just fewer retards for my grandkids to deal with.
No way in hell should it be allowed with the go ahead by some batshit single mom though. Don't even know the father to contact him? Tough shit, no transed kids to brag about for you.
It’s the sexual abuse and coercion of a child. I don’t care if it’s the child of my nemesis- that child still deserves bodily integrity and to not be mutilated. Evil is evil and must be stopped.
Yes, but...what if it's a jewish child?
I'm open to any jews that renounce Judaism and embrace Christ so yes there is value in jewish life
I still see value in the life of all people, even if they are jews.
Then why aren't you letting Evil sterlize itself?
Kids of bad people can grow up to be good people.
C'mon, you know this. Don't be silly.
Nits become lice.
People aren't nits. People aren't lice. People are people. Scientifically, spiritually, even genetically, there's no reason to think what makes a human being bad is a result of parental determinism.
Blank slate theory is judeo commie subversion. It isn't a coincidence that niggers are impulsive, violent apes, or that jews are greedy, manipulative, subversive scum. It's written into their fucking DNA.
Then what kind of subversion is unadulterated determinism? It's just as fucking stupid. Genetic heritage gives living things predilections and potential and tendencies. It does not determine behavior, nor does it come anywhere even close to the neighborhood of predicting "good" vs. "bad."
I'm honestly boggled that you and the other guy have managed to wedge yourselves into a head-space where literally all cultivation, all rearing, all education, all training, is worth zero, while chromosomes somehow call all of the shots. It sounds so frankly and obviously stupid. I expect this from subcontinent Indian Brahmins, not white Westerners.
Bullshit.
There are a thousand instances of wisdom from our elders of the type: "The apple doesn't fall far from the tree." Even the ancients knew that the son will be like the father.
We also have thousands of instances from our elders about overcoming the patterns and hardships of rotten circumstances or an ill-favored birth. "The ancients," whoever they are, covered both ends of this in depth and breadth.
I'm not sure what kind of bonkers I'm dealing with here. Genetic/biological determinism, obviously. Failure to recognize genotype vs. phenotype? Yeah that too. Biological mechanism?
Just a generally fucked-up, uncharitable attitude, is what I say. It's an insult to anyone who ever achieved despite being given shitty odds. This sort of "You'll never rise above" attitude is how we get to Canada's demonic MAID system.
And two black people can have white kids thanks to albinism. Doesn't make it the norm.
The silly part is pretending all statistical distributions have the same mean, or pretending we live in some post-scarcity utopia where dedicating resources to people most likely to be disgusting reprobates isn't reducing the resources available for raising more people far more likely to be good and decent individuals.
This isn't a matter of norms or statistical means here. We started with, the context is, who gets protected from mutilation and/or death. The answer is people. My answer is, people, regardless whether they're black or poor or Chinese or whatever. In the United States, in the white Christian world, we protect the young, vulnerable, innocent--we protect children and babies from degradations and predations. We don't assign babies genetic probabilities of being undesirable, then say okay you're fair game for whatever from whomever. That's barbarous.
Yes, it is, but you're obviously willing to put your head in the sand before engaging with that.
That is objectively not true. We protect some of them, and leave millions more to suffer predation and degradation from all levels of society. Files documenting some of those most high profile failures to protect have been national news for months now so don't pretend not to know that, not to mention the long history of documented failures around the school system, foster care system, etc. Because the truth is the resources aren't there to protect everyone, and if we're not going to protect everyone then I'd chose not spend those efforts first on the genealogies most likely to grow up into future predators, but rather last.
Whatever you like. I'm not allowing my part to drift into hard eugenicism. You can take that or leave it.
We protect all we know about and can reasonably do something about. "Leaving to suffer" is a matter of knowledge, never a cold calculation of resource allocation. Just because we can't win them all, just because there are failures, doesn't in any way mean our intent, as civilized folk, is to leave babies and children at the mercy of malicious adult behavior, because we've noted their genetic heritage and find it icky.
This is nasty stuff.
Hmm.
It really boggles the mind that Left-Wing nutters always say: 'America needs to catch up with the rest of the world', while insisting that America needs to remain a backwards outlier when it comes down to Voter ID requirements. America is one of the few countries remaining that doesn't have it, and that number is declining, with Britain on the way to introducing it.
Because Republicans are retarded, they never consider backflipping this Left-Wing progress narrative back on them: 'The Democrats tell you that they want America to catch up with the rest of the world, and we're doing that. The Democrats want America to remain a backwards outlier because of their corruption.'
Democrats can't really oppose Voter ID at that point because it's obviously true. They end up adopting a conservative-reactionary position, trying to resist change, antithetical to their stances on most else. The Republicans are the true 'progressive' party on Voter ID, having America catch up and join the rest of the world, joining progressive movements like UK Labour in implementing it.
That, of course, is the second line of argument. It's not just that the Democrats are against the world on voter ID. They're also against other progressive movements. 'Progressive movements like UK Labour support Voter ID. All around the world, progressive, centrists, and conservatives agree on little, but they agree on one thing: Voter ID. Why do the Democrats want to keep you in the dark?'
Instead of appealing to the rest of the world, to the Democrats' hypocrisy, etc. the Republicans are totally impotent on Voter ID, allowing the Democrats to put up a sturdy defence - being able to paint Voter ID as 'fascist' (easily countered by appealing to widespread Left-Wing support for it outside of America) and 'racist' (easily countered by appealing to the fact that the only countries that do not have it are mostly White, like Australia and New Zealand - that's right, almost no, or possibly no, non-white country rejects Voter ID requirements).
Late-modernity is so dumbed down that political factions don't even try to out-intellectualize their opponents anymore. We aren't like the ancients. For instance, in ancient China, philosophical debates like the caixing debate were essentially between political factions trying to prove that they were smarter and thus more qualified to govern. Today's politics is base people being duped by base politicians making false promises.
it's fake
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116178624373752275
nevertheless he still sucks
It’s not fake lol. That is what he originally wrote before it was edited
that website he uses should specify if its edited or "corrected". maybe he deleted the post and posted the one i linked? thanks for the reply.
It seems like it was deleted and posted the one you linked since the timestamps don't match.
on PDW there was a thread about it and people were livid about point #5 just as MTG is here.
Fake and ghey.
Her only policies were being a whore and cheating on her husband with gym bros.
Trump supports Trump, that's it.
Any civilization that permits to happen to its children deserves to be destroyed.