It’s the sexual abuse and coercion of a child. I don’t care if it’s the child of my nemesis- that child still deserves bodily integrity and to not be mutilated. Evil is evil and must be stopped.
People aren't nits. People aren't lice. People are people. Scientifically, spiritually, even genetically, there's no reason to think what makes a human being bad is a result of parental determinism.
And two black people can have white kids thanks to albinism. Doesn't make it the norm.
The silly part is pretending all statistical distributions have the same mean, or pretending we live in some post-scarcity utopia where dedicating resources to people most likely to be disgusting reprobates isn't reducing the resources available for raising more people far more likely to be good and decent individuals.
This isn't a matter of norms or statistical means here. We started with, the context is, who gets protected from mutilation and/or death. The answer is people. My answer is, people, regardless whether they're black or poor or Chinese or whatever. In the United States, in the white Christian world, we protect the young, vulnerable, innocent--we protect children and babies from degradations and predations. We don't assign babies genetic probabilities of being undesirable, then say okay you're fair game for whatever from whomever. That's barbarous.
It’s the sexual abuse and coercion of a child. I don’t care if it’s the child of my nemesis- that child still deserves bodily integrity and to not be mutilated. Evil is evil and must be stopped.
Yes, but...what if it's a jewish child?
I'm open to any jews that renounce Judaism and embrace Christ so yes there is value in jewish life
I still see value in the life of all people, even if they are jews.
Then why aren't you letting Evil sterlize itself?
Kids of bad people can grow up to be good people.
C'mon, you know this. Don't be silly.
Nits become lice.
People aren't nits. People aren't lice. People are people. Scientifically, spiritually, even genetically, there's no reason to think what makes a human being bad is a result of parental determinism.
And two black people can have white kids thanks to albinism. Doesn't make it the norm.
The silly part is pretending all statistical distributions have the same mean, or pretending we live in some post-scarcity utopia where dedicating resources to people most likely to be disgusting reprobates isn't reducing the resources available for raising more people far more likely to be good and decent individuals.
This isn't a matter of norms or statistical means here. We started with, the context is, who gets protected from mutilation and/or death. The answer is people. My answer is, people, regardless whether they're black or poor or Chinese or whatever. In the United States, in the white Christian world, we protect the young, vulnerable, innocent--we protect children and babies from degradations and predations. We don't assign babies genetic probabilities of being undesirable, then say okay you're fair game for whatever from whomever. That's barbarous.
Hmm.