1
SamuelColt 1 point ago +1 / -0

No it isn't. Over $10,000 the bank generates a CTR (currency transaction report) and sends it to FinCEN. You don't have to explain anything to any teller or anyone else. Their computer system does this automatically without the customer's involvement.

3
SamuelColt 3 points ago +3 / -0

So let the bank generate a SAR and waste some FinCen analyst's time. It's still none of their business why I want cash and I've never heard of any US bank requiring explanations for withdrawals. This isn't comparable.

4
SamuelColt 4 points ago +4 / -0

He doesn't care about the Russian people and certainly doesn't care what happens to that country after he is gone.

How do you know what he does and doesn't care about?

2
SamuelColt 2 points ago +2 / -0

The part where he is saying that the main goal for this war now is "Denazification"?

For the sake of historical accuracy, he isn't just saying this now, it was a big part of his speech back when he announced the commencement of the invasion (or "special operation" as the Russians like to call it).

3
SamuelColt 3 points ago +3 / -0

Putin also had an older brother who died in the siege of Leningrad before Putin was born.

1
SamuelColt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Prosecutorial discretion was never meant for a DA to issue office-wide, blanket policies on non-prosecution of entire penal law sections.

6
SamuelColt 6 points ago +6 / -0

we managed to fit 11 people including myself into a Lada that was only held together by the antirust paint sloppily applied over the absolutely rotten body

Hahaha excellent. Ladas, despite being such pieces of shit, were absolute tanks. You'd have to literally drop a bomb on a Lada to kill it.

1
SamuelColt 1 point ago +1 / -0

How do you deal with someone who is already locked up for life and then kills or seriously injures fellow inmates and/or guards?

17
SamuelColt 17 points ago +18 / -1

It's hardly "equal opportunity to all who are citizens of it" if some people are getting preferential treatment based on skin color.

14
SamuelColt 14 points ago +15 / -1

I'm sure the uptick in violent crime in Dublin only neatly tracks Ireland's immigration policies by utter coincidence.

3
SamuelColt 3 points ago +3 / -0

So STFU and move the company out of Canada. It's not like any of their "talent" works on site anyway.

1
SamuelColt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Composer safety league? Composing studios? Has professional music composition descended into such depths of mediocrity that it is no longer a mostly solitary pursuit? Have I been tricked and Mozart, Beethoven, Wagner etc all actually sat around in cubicles a la Office Space, belonging to "studios" so full of composers everyone needs a safety league?

What am I missing here?

22
SamuelColt 22 points ago +22 / -0

Why do people keep supporting and playing these shit-tier games?

5
SamuelColt 5 points ago +5 / -0

ala suburbia hates Trump

What makes you think that?

4
SamuelColt 4 points ago +5 / -1

So all of your argumentation hinges on the silly notion of a de Santis victory. Again, good luck.

You want to complain about Dominion machines instead of trying to take actions to win elections and then have the power to ban these machines you hate.

Fuck off with that. Stop putting words in my mouth. I don't "hate" anything. I know that those machines are in-auditable, thusly suspect by definition, and shouldn't be trusted to run your local HOA election, let alone elections of real consequence. "Hate" doesn't factor into it.

If you think Ron de Santis is the winning path forward to eliminating corruptible voting machines, you don't understand why Trump won in the first place.

4
SamuelColt 4 points ago +5 / -1

Ron de Santis isn't going to "improve" anything. If he's your savior, I wish you the best of luck.

And keep your stupid accusations about "not accepting reality" and "magically" doing anything to yourself. That's a shitty strawman you're erecting of shit I never said or claimed.

5
SamuelColt 5 points ago +5 / -0

The only way to have faith in the system and create actual election integrity for the future is to win elections by winning by a margin larger than any potential margin of fraud.

Why would you cede actual election integrity for this sham? Why do we have to live with and accept in-auditable electronic machines as some kind of foregone conclusion? Why are we accepting mail in ballots? Why would Ron De Santis winning by some hypothetical "no fraud" margin change any of this?

Sorry, but I wholeheartedly reject this concession. Absolutely unacceptable.

view more: Next ›