I’m pro abortion because of who’s getting abortions, but someone that’s pro choice tried arguing with me the other day when I said abortion wasn’t ever a right. They said it is because of the right to bodily autonomy. I said you have two bodies in this situation so it’s hard to draw the line as to when both have the right to bodily autonomy as it’s not like we let mothers kill their babies after they pop up and there’s at least a period of time before that when it’s not any different. There’s never any coherent response to that. You know your side is fucked when you can’t actually address or discuss an issue but have to rely on metaphors and slogans indefinitely.
At least with me I can say I think plenty of abortion might be murder but I’m okay with that because of who’s doing it. Then I just point to a photo of pretty much any women’s march attendee, or ghetto welfare folks. I’m okay if they kill their babies and don’t breed in the same way you’d be okay with a warring tribe of crazy people chopping off each other’s limbs. “Great, you do that and disappear from existence. Let me know if you need help.”
I’m pro abortion because of who’s getting abortions
I disagree with this sentiment as it enables the exact degeneracy that created the cultural problem to begin with. If the only answer is to let degenerates kill their children then who will they work on to continue their legacy? Foucault was a gay pedophile who died of aids, he is also the most cited social scientist in history, he has no children, yet plenty of others' children have taken his mantle. Abortion does not guarantee degenerate children just as poverty does not guarantee generational poverty. The more we enable and bastardize truth for convenience, the more those that promote convenience win.
I completely understand taking moral issue with me being okay with leftists murdering an innocent child of their own, but the Foucault argument doesn’t really work because him having had children isn’t why his ideas became influential to other people’s children. Speaking of Foucault: it is kind of weird than any time you look into a leftist ideal, they’re creepy deranged pedophiles that often lived a life of unemployment and child rape. We’re going around taking down statues of Jefferson but praising people like that?
More on the topic: I don’t believe children are blank slates and have over time taken to seeing people as family lines and units. I agree that killing an unborn or newly born baby is murdering an innocent child in most cases. In this context, however, I am okay with that because I see it as self castration if someone is willing to do that in many of the cases we find of someone using it as contraception in a way that’s now said with deranged pride. I think the most morally righteous and respectable person in most cases would be willing to upturn their entire life for their unborn child, provided it didn’t ruin the life of the child in the process and make the effort pointless. That person would not abort their babies. More people like that will have kids. Less people that are somewhat the opposite over time will have less kids. I see that as the long game and a viable way out of this mess we’re in with few great alternatives being put on the table.
In some ways it’s also self domestication. People I think shouldn’t breed are going to breed less than people I think should breed more. I look a crazy and deranged obese blue haired ham planet in the eye asking to kill her own child to end her family line, and I say “thank you for your service.”
I never understood the bodily autonomy argument and if you really question them on it you can tell they never believed in it either.
Eventually it boils down to them admitting they don't care and they think you should be able to murder children on a whim whenever you don't want them as a parent.
Eventually this will change to the "right" to murder anyone they disagree with.
Eventually this will change to the "right" to murder anyone they disagree with.
Hawaiian Judge: "Yes, it is clear from the facts of this case that this stunning and brave transgender woman who stands before me did intentionally end the life of a transphobic suspected insurrectionist - who might I add was never on record publicly denouncing Trump - but she reasonably believed his silence was violence, and that his existence posed a pending threat of genocide to people like her. I'll allow it."
I saw the first episode of the show at a friend's house this weekend. I thought it was meh at best and unnecessarily gory.
Spoilers for it:
King has to decide whether to have his child cut open from his wife during an impacted pregnancy. He authorizes it without telling his wife and she dies during the procedure then the child dies shortly after birth.
How the fuck does this twisted scenario help espouse their pro abortion views?
The woman and the child would have both died anyway if the king chose to do nothing.
There was no way to kill the child and save the mother in this scenario.
The creators are virtue signalling blindly with this.
All this scene shows is that medieval child birth was very dangerous and that the king is a pussy who won't even tell his wife his decision.
Instead of killing the child in the womb like the left likes, the scene involves essentially killing the mother to save the child and thus then seeing both die anyway.
The show was gratuitously gory and put in random sex scenes for no reason.
The most obnoxious woke thing about the show as the dialogue between the queen saying "lol women are baby machines, that's all we're good for" and her tomboy daughter who wants to ride dragons and be a warrior even though she looks like a munchkin. It was on the nose and cringe.
The only other woke thing was the weird inclusion of a token black guy.
There is nothing about abortion in the episode, this was just some hollywood type virtue signalling to the media.
The woman and the child would have both died anyway if the king chose to do nothing. There was no way to kill the child and save the mother in this scenario.
What arest thou talking about? If neigh for the warlock Trumpthalzar, and the powerful golems he erected to enforce his will regarding abortion, and his hatred of women, thy king's wife would still be here, amongst the living. Curse thee, thy foulest Trumpthalzar! Curse thee, and thoust blackest magik!"
Apparently they were just bad at delivering babies. You can deliver breach babies vaginally. It's higher risk, which is why it doesn't happen that often, but it's far from "Sophie's choice" or whatever
They don't have a coherent plot; the actors look like spooks, ghouls, and mongoloids; they are throwing in everything woke/netflix adaptation they can think of; and it's still not enough.
Solution: Sensationalist violence and political grandstanding.
A breach baby is roe v wade? Show me you don’t understand basic human biology without saying it…
Zero understanding of medicine either. Yet, I bet these people were telling all of the plebs to mask up and vaccinate in order to follow the science™.
They know. They don't care. An article the other day compared ectopic pregnancies and miscarriages to abortions.
I’m pro abortion because of who’s getting abortions, but someone that’s pro choice tried arguing with me the other day when I said abortion wasn’t ever a right. They said it is because of the right to bodily autonomy. I said you have two bodies in this situation so it’s hard to draw the line as to when both have the right to bodily autonomy as it’s not like we let mothers kill their babies after they pop up and there’s at least a period of time before that when it’s not any different. There’s never any coherent response to that. You know your side is fucked when you can’t actually address or discuss an issue but have to rely on metaphors and slogans indefinitely.
At least with me I can say I think plenty of abortion might be murder but I’m okay with that because of who’s doing it. Then I just point to a photo of pretty much any women’s march attendee, or ghetto welfare folks. I’m okay if they kill their babies and don’t breed in the same way you’d be okay with a warring tribe of crazy people chopping off each other’s limbs. “Great, you do that and disappear from existence. Let me know if you need help.”
I disagree with this sentiment as it enables the exact degeneracy that created the cultural problem to begin with. If the only answer is to let degenerates kill their children then who will they work on to continue their legacy? Foucault was a gay pedophile who died of aids, he is also the most cited social scientist in history, he has no children, yet plenty of others' children have taken his mantle. Abortion does not guarantee degenerate children just as poverty does not guarantee generational poverty. The more we enable and bastardize truth for convenience, the more those that promote convenience win.
All of them are savages?
Just curious. Thanks for clarifying. As for Mr Sowell, I’m currently reading Basic Economics
Remove the welfare state.
Simple as.
Exactly, the (((subversive))) media today is enough to pervert the minds of children even of the most loving and reactionary of parents.
I completely understand taking moral issue with me being okay with leftists murdering an innocent child of their own, but the Foucault argument doesn’t really work because him having had children isn’t why his ideas became influential to other people’s children. Speaking of Foucault: it is kind of weird than any time you look into a leftist ideal, they’re creepy deranged pedophiles that often lived a life of unemployment and child rape. We’re going around taking down statues of Jefferson but praising people like that?
More on the topic: I don’t believe children are blank slates and have over time taken to seeing people as family lines and units. I agree that killing an unborn or newly born baby is murdering an innocent child in most cases. In this context, however, I am okay with that because I see it as self castration if someone is willing to do that in many of the cases we find of someone using it as contraception in a way that’s now said with deranged pride. I think the most morally righteous and respectable person in most cases would be willing to upturn their entire life for their unborn child, provided it didn’t ruin the life of the child in the process and make the effort pointless. That person would not abort their babies. More people like that will have kids. Less people that are somewhat the opposite over time will have less kids. I see that as the long game and a viable way out of this mess we’re in with few great alternatives being put on the table.
In some ways it’s also self domestication. People I think shouldn’t breed are going to breed less than people I think should breed more. I look a crazy and deranged obese blue haired ham planet in the eye asking to kill her own child to end her family line, and I say “thank you for your service.”
I never understood the bodily autonomy argument and if you really question them on it you can tell they never believed in it either.
Eventually it boils down to them admitting they don't care and they think you should be able to murder children on a whim whenever you don't want them as a parent.
Eventually this will change to the "right" to murder anyone they disagree with.
Hawaiian Judge: "Yes, it is clear from the facts of this case that this stunning and brave transgender woman who stands before me did intentionally end the life of a transphobic suspected insurrectionist - who might I add was never on record publicly denouncing Trump - but she reasonably believed his silence was violence, and that his existence posed a pending threat of genocide to people like her. I'll allow it."
I saw the first episode of the show at a friend's house this weekend. I thought it was meh at best and unnecessarily gory.
Spoilers for it:
King has to decide whether to have his child cut open from his wife during an impacted pregnancy. He authorizes it without telling his wife and she dies during the procedure then the child dies shortly after birth.
How the fuck does this twisted scenario help espouse their pro abortion views?
The woman and the child would have both died anyway if the king chose to do nothing. There was no way to kill the child and save the mother in this scenario.
The creators are virtue signalling blindly with this.
All this scene shows is that medieval child birth was very dangerous and that the king is a pussy who won't even tell his wife his decision.
Instead of killing the child in the womb like the left likes, the scene involves essentially killing the mother to save the child and thus then seeing both die anyway.
The show was gratuitously gory and put in random sex scenes for no reason.
The most obnoxious woke thing about the show as the dialogue between the queen saying "lol women are baby machines, that's all we're good for" and her tomboy daughter who wants to ride dragons and be a warrior even though she looks like a munchkin. It was on the nose and cringe.
The only other woke thing was the weird inclusion of a token black guy.
There is nothing about abortion in the episode, this was just some hollywood type virtue signalling to the media.
Why are pedes watching this crap?
Many on the right are hooked on bread and circuses as much as lefty NPCs. Just different variants.
What arest thou talking about? If neigh for the warlock Trumpthalzar, and the powerful golems he erected to enforce his will regarding abortion, and his hatred of women, thy king's wife would still be here, amongst the living. Curse thee, thy foulest Trumpthalzar! Curse thee, and thoust blackest magik!"
Yes but it's still not as stupid as the new Saint's Row preaching to you about abortion when you try to quit a mission
That is one of the dumbest things I’ve seen since gaming has been corrupted
Clearly the "doctor" in the show should have stuck a knife into the mother's cunt and chopped that baby up.
Apparently they were just bad at delivering babies. You can deliver breach babies vaginally. It's higher risk, which is why it doesn't happen that often, but it's far from "Sophie's choice" or whatever
Anyone watch the show? I was just going to listen to the Nerdrotic review. Plus it’s hard to support GRRM when he can’t finish his main series
I saw the first episode.
I thought it was meh at best. They had an unnecessary amount of gore and random sex scenes for no reason like in season 1 of GOT.
I enjoy the Mortal Kombat games and I still think this episode had unnecessary amounts of gore.
The thing I enjoyed the most in the episode was Matt Smith's performance as Daemon Targaryen and Rhys Ifans's performance as Otto Hightower.
Pretty much every actor is a soy boy these days.
That is why I have no respect for the opinions of any of these actors.
Their job is to shut up and play pretend.
They did the Rangz of Kangz to GRRM's story on this one. This scene wasn't in the book.
Uh it's been a while since I read world of fire and ice, but I recall the guy who celebrated a dead baby was a bad guy in this fantasy universe.
See, I'd argue the OJ simpson touchdown dance at the beginning of naked gun 3 has more relevancy to abortion than this nonsense.
Great scene. Although not as funny as him going down the stadium stairs in the first one
I dont remember abortion clinics in game of thrones.
I'm the books there is something called 'moon tea' which noble women drink to induce miscarriages.
They have reflect modern times
"Tansy!"
I don't know if it was in the TV series, but it was in the books--abortifacient herbs. It was a pretty big plot point actually.
Ouch! Too soon.
So it'll be dated and forgotten as soon as it drops
Show's name checks out
"Entertainment?"
OH MY GOD, SHUT THE FUCK UP!
... wouldn't it have been filmed before Roe v Wade was overturned though?
They don't have a coherent plot; the actors look like spooks, ghouls, and mongoloids; they are throwing in everything woke/netflix adaptation they can think of; and it's still not enough.
Solution: Sensationalist violence and political grandstanding.
Up next: Hardcore nudity and cancellation.
Okay, what's the incest about?