I completely understand taking moral issue with me being okay with leftists murdering an innocent child of their own, but the Foucault argument doesn’t really work because him having had children isn’t why his ideas became influential to other people’s children. Speaking of Foucault: it is kind of weird than any time you look into a leftist ideal, they’re creepy deranged pedophiles that often lived a life of unemployment and child rape. We’re going around taking down statues of Jefferson but praising people like that?

More on the topic: I don’t believe children are blank slates and have over time taken to seeing people as family lines and units. I agree that killing an unborn or newly born baby is murdering an innocent child in most cases. In this context, however, I am okay with that because I see it as self castration if someone is willing to do that in many of the cases we find of someone using it as contraception in a way that’s now said with deranged pride. I think the most morally righteous and respectable person in most cases would be willing to upturn their entire life for their unborn child, provided it didn’t ruin the life of the child in the process and make the effort pointless. That person would not abort their babies. More people like that will have kids. Less people that are somewhat the opposite over time will have less kids. I see that as the long game and a viable way out of this mess we’re in with few great alternatives being put on the table.

In some ways it’s also self domestication. People I think shouldn’t breed are going to breed less than people I think should breed more. I look a crazy and deranged obese blue haired ham planet in the eye asking to kill her own child to end her family line, and I say “thank you for your service.”