I’m pro abortion because of who’s getting abortions, but someone that’s pro choice tried arguing with me the other day when I said abortion wasn’t ever a right. They said it is because of the right to bodily autonomy. I said you have two bodies in this situation so it’s hard to draw the line as to when both have the right to bodily autonomy as it’s not like we let mothers kill their babies after they pop up and there’s at least a period of time before that when it’s not any different. There’s never any coherent response to that. You know your side is fucked when you can’t actually address or discuss an issue but have to rely on metaphors and slogans indefinitely.
At least with me I can say I think plenty of abortion might be murder but I’m okay with that because of who’s doing it. Then I just point to a photo of pretty much any women’s march attendee, or ghetto welfare folks. I’m okay if they kill their babies and don’t breed in the same way you’d be okay with a warring tribe of crazy people chopping off each other’s limbs. “Great, you do that and disappear from existence. Let me know if you need help.”
I’m pro abortion because of who’s getting abortions
I disagree with this sentiment as it enables the exact degeneracy that created the cultural problem to begin with. If the only answer is to let degenerates kill their children then who will they work on to continue their legacy? Foucault was a gay pedophile who died of aids, he is also the most cited social scientist in history, he has no children, yet plenty of others' children have taken his mantle. Abortion does not guarantee degenerate children just as poverty does not guarantee generational poverty. The more we enable and bastardize truth for convenience, the more those that promote convenience win.
I completely understand taking moral issue with me being okay with leftists murdering an innocent child of their own, but the Foucault argument doesn’t really work because him having had children isn’t why his ideas became influential to other people’s children. Speaking of Foucault: it is kind of weird than any time you look into a leftist ideal, they’re creepy deranged pedophiles that often lived a life of unemployment and child rape. We’re going around taking down statues of Jefferson but praising people like that?
More on the topic: I don’t believe children are blank slates and have over time taken to seeing people as family lines and units. I agree that killing an unborn or newly born baby is murdering an innocent child in most cases. In this context, however, I am okay with that because I see it as self castration if someone is willing to do that in many of the cases we find of someone using it as contraception in a way that’s now said with deranged pride. I think the most morally righteous and respectable person in most cases would be willing to upturn their entire life for their unborn child, provided it didn’t ruin the life of the child in the process and make the effort pointless. That person would not abort their babies. More people like that will have kids. Less people that are somewhat the opposite over time will have less kids. I see that as the long game and a viable way out of this mess we’re in with few great alternatives being put on the table.
In some ways it’s also self domestication. People I think shouldn’t breed are going to breed less than people I think should breed more. I look a crazy and deranged obese blue haired ham planet in the eye asking to kill her own child to end her family line, and I say “thank you for your service.”
I never understood the bodily autonomy argument and if you really question them on it you can tell they never believed in it either.
Eventually it boils down to them admitting they don't care and they think you should be able to murder children on a whim whenever you don't want them as a parent.
Eventually this will change to the "right" to murder anyone they disagree with.
Eventually this will change to the "right" to murder anyone they disagree with.
Hawaiian Judge: "Yes, it is clear from the facts of this case that this stunning and brave transgender woman who stands before me did intentionally end the life of a transphobic suspected insurrectionist - who might I add was never on record publicly denouncing Trump - but she reasonably believed his silence was violence, and that his existence posed a pending threat of genocide to people like her. I'll allow it."
A breach baby is roe v wade? Show me you don’t understand basic human biology without saying it…
Zero understanding of medicine either. Yet, I bet these people were telling all of the plebs to mask up and vaccinate in order to follow the science™.
They know. They don't care. An article the other day compared ectopic pregnancies and miscarriages to abortions.
I’m pro abortion because of who’s getting abortions, but someone that’s pro choice tried arguing with me the other day when I said abortion wasn’t ever a right. They said it is because of the right to bodily autonomy. I said you have two bodies in this situation so it’s hard to draw the line as to when both have the right to bodily autonomy as it’s not like we let mothers kill their babies after they pop up and there’s at least a period of time before that when it’s not any different. There’s never any coherent response to that. You know your side is fucked when you can’t actually address or discuss an issue but have to rely on metaphors and slogans indefinitely.
At least with me I can say I think plenty of abortion might be murder but I’m okay with that because of who’s doing it. Then I just point to a photo of pretty much any women’s march attendee, or ghetto welfare folks. I’m okay if they kill their babies and don’t breed in the same way you’d be okay with a warring tribe of crazy people chopping off each other’s limbs. “Great, you do that and disappear from existence. Let me know if you need help.”
I disagree with this sentiment as it enables the exact degeneracy that created the cultural problem to begin with. If the only answer is to let degenerates kill their children then who will they work on to continue their legacy? Foucault was a gay pedophile who died of aids, he is also the most cited social scientist in history, he has no children, yet plenty of others' children have taken his mantle. Abortion does not guarantee degenerate children just as poverty does not guarantee generational poverty. The more we enable and bastardize truth for convenience, the more those that promote convenience win.
All of them are savages?
Remove the welfare state.
Simple as.
Exactly, the (((subversive))) media today is enough to pervert the minds of children even of the most loving and reactionary of parents.
I completely understand taking moral issue with me being okay with leftists murdering an innocent child of their own, but the Foucault argument doesn’t really work because him having had children isn’t why his ideas became influential to other people’s children. Speaking of Foucault: it is kind of weird than any time you look into a leftist ideal, they’re creepy deranged pedophiles that often lived a life of unemployment and child rape. We’re going around taking down statues of Jefferson but praising people like that?
More on the topic: I don’t believe children are blank slates and have over time taken to seeing people as family lines and units. I agree that killing an unborn or newly born baby is murdering an innocent child in most cases. In this context, however, I am okay with that because I see it as self castration if someone is willing to do that in many of the cases we find of someone using it as contraception in a way that’s now said with deranged pride. I think the most morally righteous and respectable person in most cases would be willing to upturn their entire life for their unborn child, provided it didn’t ruin the life of the child in the process and make the effort pointless. That person would not abort their babies. More people like that will have kids. Less people that are somewhat the opposite over time will have less kids. I see that as the long game and a viable way out of this mess we’re in with few great alternatives being put on the table.
In some ways it’s also self domestication. People I think shouldn’t breed are going to breed less than people I think should breed more. I look a crazy and deranged obese blue haired ham planet in the eye asking to kill her own child to end her family line, and I say “thank you for your service.”
I never understood the bodily autonomy argument and if you really question them on it you can tell they never believed in it either.
Eventually it boils down to them admitting they don't care and they think you should be able to murder children on a whim whenever you don't want them as a parent.
Eventually this will change to the "right" to murder anyone they disagree with.
Hawaiian Judge: "Yes, it is clear from the facts of this case that this stunning and brave transgender woman who stands before me did intentionally end the life of a transphobic suspected insurrectionist - who might I add was never on record publicly denouncing Trump - but she reasonably believed his silence was violence, and that his existence posed a pending threat of genocide to people like her. I'll allow it."