Do Women on OnlyFans really make more than pro Athletes?
(www.youtube.com)
Comments (77)
sorted by:
Some of them, yes.
Amouranth makes millions on twitch alone, never mind her onlyfans. And she now owns a bunch of gas stations, too.
Literally all a woman has to do become a multimillionaire is look vaguely attractive and cocktease relentlessly.
Amouranth makes more money in a year than my entire family will see in a century, and all she has to do is lick a microphone while wearing a bikini.
Amouranth is nowhere near as attractive as you think a girl has to be to make that much money solely off physical appearance.
I despise simps so much.
She has a good boob job and she knows how to apply makeup (although I imagine she hasn't done it herself in quite some time at this point).
That's all a woman needs for dynastic amounts of wealth to be given to her for barely lifting a finger.
I can't even hate her for it. I can only hate the society that allowed it. I hate her simps.
I really do despise simps and our gynocentric society so much.
That feel when a woman has an IQ substantially less than 100 and she still gets to make more money than most men will ever see in their lives.
🤡 world.
She most definitely does not have a good boob job lol
When I say 'a good boob job', I don't mean that they look natural. I mean they are symmetrical, they are sitting at the right height, they're very well sized to compliment her frame, and one cannot easily distinguish where flesh ends and implant begins.
Looking natural is not actually the goal most top surgeons would shoot for. The goal is to look 'perfect'.
Amouranth got in on the ground floor of the “adolescent twitch viewer to only fans simp” pipeline. She targeted children with her softcore porn shows on a “gaming platform”, and then she collected on that investment via a literal porn platform.
I firmly believe the Mayans were right about 2012, were all just in hell now.
The Mayan calendar is misunderstood. It's about cycles. There never was an End of the calendar, we just moved into a new phase of the entire cycle. 2012 was just about when things went to hell.
I clicked on her stream tonight because it was featured. It was about 30 mins of an empty inflatable spa with a sign "getting changed into a tiny bikini"
Right? She almost looks like a trans dude lol
She looks like a classic comic book heroine/villainess, trannies look Wu and Rear Admiral "Dick" Levine, fearless commander of the United States Butt Pirates.
Women attract more viewers easily yet men retain and thus eventually grow larger audiences, because the latter have to actually put effort and entertain.
Never have seen her stream, but she's probably doing something right to enable the simping to continue beyond a glance or two at her fake tits; her ilk make you despite humanity for enabling it, but I'll acknowledge the outliers.
That said, I don't know if it's thick makeup or plastic, but her face seems strange.
She's online almost daily. She's online right now, in fact.
So she's incredibly available, which probably gives her simps a convincing illusion of being in meaningful contact with her.
Right now she's got people paying her between $25 and $100 to write their names on a pool float, or on her body. In the few minutes that I've just watched, I've witnessed her make about $400. In like five minutes.
Her camera is top quality, her microphone is top quality, her lighting is perfect, and it looks like she's even using color theory - consciously or otherwise - to make her scene pop.
She moves around a lot, she doesn't let the view of her body stay the same for long. I imagine there are dudes who'll edge to her for hours without cumming, without getting bored.
The saddest thing is, she provides all of this for free. The idiots paying, are paying for illusion of her noticing them.
Oh for sure. She knows precisely what she's doing.
I kept watching just to see her tricks, and switched to reviewing channel ban appeals where she congratulates and unbans men for apologizing for complaints about lack of fappable content, complaints her outfits, making sexual requests, criticized her ethics, etc.
One banned commenter complained that she didn't deserve what she had, and her response was 'Does ANYONE deserve millions of dollars?'. One banned commenter accused of her preying on 13 year old boys, then for whatever reason, apologized and appealed their their ban. I can only assume they hate-watched her until they ended up liking her - which amazing and terrifying to think about. To know that you can approach her with that mindset, the correct mindset, and STILL end up falling victim to the idea that you're 'hanging out with a hot girl' and giving her money as she talks you into emptying your wallet.
Looking into her bans and unbans, its very clear that she deliberately fosters a following of total doormats, and total idiots. It boggles my mind. She's worth tens of millions of dollars, and she has wageslaves paying her a day's worth of their pay for literal seconds of her acknowledgement.
She has dudes talking to her - a woman who can buy and sell their whole family three times over - like she needs them.
It's insane. Apex predator is absolutely what she is.
One of the saddest things I know is a kid whos mother died when they were a child. Their $40,000 inheritance was sealed away until they were 16. ...And they spent every fucking penny of it on Korean MMO's. It was all gone within two years.
I know, I just fucking KNOW that there are a bunch of teenage boys out there, in that exact situation, burning money that could get them an education giving it all to Amouranth. A sum of money that is life-changing to them, but is inconsequential chump-change to her.
They'll be flipping burgers until they're 70 and living in a squalid slum, Amouranth will be sunning herself by the pool of her 12 bedroom mansion compound, attended by her butler, watching her gardeners work while another million rolls in from her gas stations.
God I hope she gets shot.
I agree for the most part, but I’d caution against underestimating women like Amouranth. Nobody gets rich just by looking pretty. Her looks are the “product”, but she’s a performer, an entrepreneur, and almost certainly intelligent and a hard worker… at least more so than the average person.
It hurts to admit given how much I hate the entire influencer/OnlyFans phenomenon, but if it were that easy to be as successful as she is, more people would be doing it.
What seperates her from most women:
Most women would be disgusted at the thought of being wank fodder for 14 year old boys and the most pathetic loser adult males around.
Most women falsely believe they're ugly no matter what.
Most women can't handle online shit-talking at all.
Most women who do get into her line of work don't bother to invest in high quality equipment.
Most women are stupid and think showing more will automatically net them more money.
It's not 'hard work', though. She's working smart, not hard. The hardest thing she's doing, actually, is continuing to work. If most of us were in her financial position, we would've retired long ago.
That's the only negative judgment of her that I can really make - the greed. You have be greedy to get up in the morning and do that kind of job every day when you have that kind of money. That's a real 'fuck you, I want to be rich-rich-rich' mindset.
I can't judge her negatively for exploiting dumb idiots, because she's exploiting a level of stupid that, frankly, is beneath my respect.
I can. I hate this line of logic, and I see it a lot. Do you not think there are going to be downstream consequences to scummy people like this getting rich doing scummy things? You're seeing at the consequences already. Part of the reason she is able to get rich is because other scummy people got rich and used their earnings to invest in things like OF.
The consequence is that rich people tend to be scumbags, but that's a tale as old as time.
These rich people do things that affect all of us, though. That's why I don't like the "who cares if idiots get ripped off" crap.
It's not like there will ever be a shortage of idiots. That's why "democracy" doesn't work. Short of executing the unintelligent all you can really do is minimize the power they have to make stupid decisions.
Wrong.
Get off the internet. Touch grass.
Wat?
She's investing her cam-show earnings into other businesses. Gas stations aren't a bad move and will earn quite a bit of steady income. A lot of strippers spend recklessly and then wind up dirt poor when they're no longer attractive.
She is smarter than the average ethot, even if she looks like an alien imitating a human being.
I get that, I just didn't expect gas stations of all things.
I wouldn't have thought gas stations to be worth investing in honestly:
This is why simps need to be castrated.
Neither thots nor professional athletes should be making that much money.
Entertainment and sex has always been high earning. These are also jobs you can only do for a short part of your lifetime, often leaving people without skills for other work in the future.
So...you want the government to cap earnings or something?
I want people to ignore them. Stop giving them money, stop giving them your attention.
That's understandable. As long as we aren't forcing them to stop I have zero problems with that.
Pro athletes aren't organic. Government subsidies fund the big leagues.
Mostly in the form of subsidies relating to their stadiums.
By building them new arenas on the taxpayer dime every two or three decades or so.
Or by granting them free land. Or by giving the teams taxation powers (hotel taxes, parking revenue, development fees). Or by giving them land to build or sell real estate around the stadium in terms of condos, etc.
Government, I don't know.
But salary caps in sports I would support. I'm EU and mostly into football, but whenever I look at the MLS and their salary caps I'm kind of envious. I wouldn't mind if we had something similar for our local leagues.
How else could you achieve his stated objective?
The only way to stop people from earning that much money is government intervention.
OnlyFans should just be straight up banned. With sports, the government actively enables them to be what they are. Many stadiums are subsidized, for example.
I'm against the practice, but the big sports leagues would still be profitable even without taxpayer money funding a portion of the cost to build stadiums.
That's just one part of the government's role. Most of those athletes also learn to play in the first place at government-funded schools. Pro sports' profits are what they are as a result of government entanglements like that throughout the system.
Hey, you have some common ground with Imp!
I always did on that. He just loves non-OF porn for retarded ass reasons, at least if you accept his feeble attempts at explaining it. I suspect the truth is a bit darker.
He says he loves it because they keep the salaries of the women down - even though it's just market mechanisms at play. OF has the same but less evenly distributed.
Ironically, if you wanted to hurt the "oppressor gender", you'd promote Onlyfans. A lot of them think they can make big bucks on that place like the tiny minority who do, and end up ruining their present and future job and boyfriend prospects for $10 a month.
But he's not exactly the most rational guy around.
Pro sports are already heavily intervened in by the government. Who funds the stadiums? The government. Who threatens to move to another city if the government won't build them a new stadium? The owners. Who gets special exemptions from anti-trust laws? The leagues, which in any other industry would be a Cartel.
Don't pretend the owners of these teams are some Randian archetype of the "noble Capitalist in existential conflict with the evil government".
I never suggested the team owners are noble capitalists lol. I simply asked him how he would go about preventing someone from earning a specific amount of money.
How do you do it? By making it a condition of all those perks granted by the government. Don't want those conditions? You don't get the perks.
Should you do it? That's another question.
Yeah. He said "should". One of the dumbest words in the English language.
Should means you want people to conform to your values. Why? Because it benefits you. When you say "should" you are saying, "I have no solutions. I don't even understand the issues. I just want things my way because it benefits me most and fuck you."
That does not follow.
But they can definitely face a higher tax rate.
It's hard to say what they "should" make considering milliions of people are willing to give both parties money to do what they do. I don't agree with it either but there's obviously a market for all of this.
You get mad about being called a communist then post shit like this.
I don't, I get a chuckle out of it.
I agree, but, to be fair, only the top earners make good money. Most of them don't make much.
Apex fallacy. The top 0.1% make that $1.5M a month, the majority make nothing.
Someone wrote a crawler script that counted OF subs and money earned, found out that 99% of girls there make $0-$500. Not a month, but total. $0 to $500 total. Pathetic that women would sell their dignity, if they even had any, for $0 - $500.
OF is like a pyramid scheme where the top earners encourage others to join. Maybe there is a referral program or something.
Â
I think it must do with modern women's sense of narcissism. Hypergamy as well. They are all aiming for the best of the best and burning themselves out.
ive thought about this long ago. It has to do with the internet becoming majority use for social media.
Before social media a woman would get her praise and affirmation from her local community, people in her city/area, people she went to school with, whatever.
With the takeover of the internet by social media women can cast their net near globally, with the only barrier being language. A woman, if she chooses, can get praise and confirmation from thousands of men online, if not millions, also fueled with the rampant non-human social media activity. All of it fuels even a 4/10 womans ego such that she thinks much higher of herself than she normally would. The internet eschews reality, and the more one uses it the more distorted your grasp on reality is.
This is also why troons live most of their lives online and not IRL.
Socialism and E-Thottery are some of the most profitable grifts people can have.
The lowest played player in the MLB is paid $200,000 a year.
So yeah, by a lot.
Minimum salary in 2022 was just negotiated to rise to 700k in baseball.
Your point still stands.
It's a little more complicated because minor league players get paid a pro-rated daily rate while they are in the big leagues and a split salary where they earn next to nothing on the farm.
But in theory, the minimum pro-rated daily wage the shittiest player in baseball can earn is still 700k for the 184 day or so regular season.
It should be noted that a good chunk of that money comes from singular sources. Well off people with nothing better to do... although it wouldn't surprise me if some of these accounts are used for money laundering.
aka simpwhales
Stuff like this has me kind of rooting for a deep (deep) depression just to watch what happens to these THOTs.
I hate this disgusting whore so much
LA Weekly 2021:
"A model whose rank in the 50th percentile will take home 136 dollars per month."
"Once you get in the top quarter of models you can expect to be taking home 2,500 per month."