Do Women on OnlyFans really make more than pro Athletes?
(www.youtube.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (77)
sorted by:
OnlyFans should just be straight up banned. With sports, the government actively enables them to be what they are. Many stadiums are subsidized, for example.
I'm against the practice, but the big sports leagues would still be profitable even without taxpayer money funding a portion of the cost to build stadiums.
That's just one part of the government's role. Most of those athletes also learn to play in the first place at government-funded schools. Pro sports' profits are what they are as a result of government entanglements like that throughout the system.
Hey, you have some common ground with Imp!
I always did on that. He just loves non-OF porn for retarded ass reasons, at least if you accept his feeble attempts at explaining it. I suspect the truth is a bit darker.
He says he loves it because they keep the salaries of the women down - even though it's just market mechanisms at play. OF has the same but less evenly distributed.
Ironically, if you wanted to hurt the "oppressor gender", you'd promote Onlyfans. A lot of them think they can make big bucks on that place like the tiny minority who do, and end up ruining their present and future job and boyfriend prospects for $10 a month.
But he's not exactly the most rational guy around.
My understanding is that OF provides a bit more autonomy to the performers than many other porn outlets, hence why it attracted a ton of established THOTs. I suspect Impy hates that part most of all because he wants the wamen "put in their place" by skeezy porn producers.
And of course, he reciprocates feminism Apex fallacy.