Look, I get it. I can be pretty extreme, and pretty inflammatory, on some issues, at times. Which is odd, really, when you consider that I'm probably fairly close to a political "moderate", as compared to some of you.
I care far too much about certain things. Perhaps I value individual freedom more than you do. Fine. Perhaps I have less to lose than you do. Fine. Perhaps I trust the government less than you, and trust the cops, and courts, less than you do. Also fine.
But, with all that in mind, I must say that I'm finding some of the comments and posts, from some of you here, in recent days and the last couple of weeks, really do come across like some sort of... Controlled demoralisation, or something.
"Obey the law, bruh". "Think of your family, bruh". "Your job is more important than your freedom!". "They mean well!". "The pendulum always swings. It'll all be ok in the long term!". "Think of the collective good, dude!" "At least you're safe!" "You don't want a criminal record, bruh!"
I see all of this shit, and more, all over posts on this "community", now. And I really never thought I would see that, from here. Just the... Sheer amount of fear porn, and of "We should obey the government" is really quite... Disconcerting. And some of it is even coming from those of you who I normally find myself agreeing with, at least partly...
So here's my request: this isn't Reddit. Stop being so damn afraid of your respective governments. Stop being afraid to step on official toes, and to work outside the fucking law, in particular the emergency powers that these megalomaniacs have given themselves. Stop telling others to be afraid, or "You really don't wanna do that, bro". Sure, call out violence. Do not do that shit. But telling people to comply, and to just... Suck it up, and play along? You're better than that, or at least, you should be.
Sure, we need to be smart about this, and disobey in ways that are effective, and necessary. But to think the law will protect you, or that you should just play along, to keep the status quo, because you "value your job" so much? Well, I'm sorry, but that just ain't gonna cut it for some of us, anymore.
If you look at ConsumeProduct you will be able to see various people who are almost definitely paid actors trying to redirect things. On places like reddit's main page and 4chan's pol you will be able to identify them as well. Recently there have been increased funding and efforts to "control the narrative" in dissident spaces as well.
This place generally just gets dumb trolls, but I do think other people like that have came here and instantly got downvoted because they were pretty suspicious. Always look for the handshake icon, which means a new account. Or sometimes you will get accounts that have plenty of post or comment score on a different communities.win site like patriots.
Personally I haven't seen much of what you're talking about, but I haven't been reading every single thread here lately.
If you scroll down, there's at least two or three on the first page of today's posts. But it's also in the comments.
Pretty much anything about faking certificates, or disobeying the law like that - they're there.
Though it's not just new accounts. Just wait, they'll appear here, on this post, to tell me I'm wrong, I'm 100% sure.
As a "shot over the bow" for when they do: laws are not universal, boys, and just because you think obeying "muh American law" will save you? Guess what, I don't live in America. And there's quite a few of us here that don't. Let alone those of us who know just how little protection "obeying the law" gives you, when those in charge decide they want to fuck with you.
Apologies to go off topic, there, Arkana. Just preparing for the shitstorm that I'm sure is coming...
nigger and just to be safe retard faggot cunt
Am I in the clear?
Is kike worse than nigger or faggot?! To the little-hats, maybe, but if we've got an n-word pass on this site, I'd be surprised if they banned or deleted anything for just that. (to be fair, I'm quite a casual participant on the .WIN boards)
They are to me. The former knows how to do emotional manipulation and subversive tricks because they are naturally gifted with languages.
Comment Removed: Rule 16
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GAA9iPb9svw
A red sea pedestrian?
... THEM
*jews
Ut med alla svarskallar i Sverige!
If I say the above in Sweden I risk fines and up to 2 years in prison for hate crime. Just go and translate it.
I agree with you, and it's why I've personally become fond of this place. Sometimes I consider posting the old /pol/ counter intelligence guide, but then I decide it isn't necessary.
We may just be lucky to not be a target worth resources, but I'll take the luck for now if so.
What are you seeing on ConsProd?
Yes, there is an element of cultural and societal degradation. I don't think there's a dispute on the existence of problems.
I imagine your preferred focus would be to address the source of the problems, but honestly I think that's a pipe dream if one can't muster the strength to resist and live according to what they know is right. So I suggest viewing the recommendation for real life connections and activities as a stepping stone to that.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed
Just to point out a possible context to some of those type comments could be based on the situation where a person lives. If I remember correctly, you're in Australia, where things really are that bad. I always err to the side of patience and prudence, but if I believe the things coming out of there it's to the point people need to be out burning down government buildings. I would suggest that you don't get yourself arrested out of frustration or stupidity by intentionally drawing attention to yourself. It's sort of a fine line, I think what I'm trying to say is don't seek to make yourself a martyr if the attention you're getting is from the enemy. They will just laugh at you as they put you away.
The situation is not the same where I am though. Sure, some old man occupying the White House talked about vaccines recently. Yet what do I do at the moment? I go out as I please with no mask on my face, no app tracking a vaccine or giving me permission to leave. So I can understand where someone in an area like mine having trouble suggesting some one go out and get themselves arrested, etc. because the situation they are living in doesn't warrant that sort of action yet.
Yeah...
Perhaps it's a life experience thing, too? Because, like, I've been arrested before. I've been... Fucked up, by the boys in blue (not literally, before those jokes come in). I've had them try to break my bones, on more than one occasion. Because I happened to be in the wrong place, at the wrong time, amongst other things...
I've also experienced... Something worse than, but fairly similar to, probably a medium security prison (I'd rather not say what). If admittedly briefly. So...
I guess that's the position I'm coming from. I've seen people die (not in prison), in some pretty horrible ways. I've seen some immensely fucked up shit, and been... At the receiving end of some dark stuff, too. So I... I guess I just don't fear that shit, anymore.
Which is funny, isn't it? "B-b-b-bu you live in Australia!" Yes, congrats, apparently that hasn't prevented me from having a pretty fucked up life, in parts.
I'm not suggesting I have any intention of "martyring" myself, or neutering myself by getting thrown in jail for something stupid (though if it comes down to protecting my friends, obviously that's a sacrifice I am willing to make, so...), but... Maybe sometimes I forget that not everyone is at the point I am, yet. I apologize for... A lack of empathy, there, maybe. A lack of understanding of other perspectives.
Ugh, not empathy. I've come to hate that word as the leftists use it as the "I care so much about people around me" word.
I've never had any bother with any of your posts. It's those really generic ones, "All you pussies sit around and let this happen! Your forefathers would have overthrown the government a year ago and you just sit and bitch on the internet." Which if I were to do any of what they seem to hollowly suggest I'd either have to travel somewhere and seek out politicians or attack people who are at the moment on my side.
I would say protecting friends is worthy. I know myself if I were somewhere and the police were to come to haul my friends away for not wearing a mask or whatever, I'm certainly not going to just watch. If I get pissed enough I might even do something actually stupid. I'd be pretty bad if I saw them harassing kids too, just one of those things that bugs me and I'm not sure I could just watch. Even being arrested to make a statement can be fine, just if that's the case it needs to draw some attention. If no one knows about it then it's not a statement.
Yeah, I saw some kids (teens/twelvies) getting messed with at that football match I mentioned a few weeks back. That got to me. If they had been hauled out, as nearly happened, I might have... Caused a fuss. But I guess then what? They'll just arrest me as well, and then still fuck up the teenagers just as much. Which I guess is kind of part of what you are saying...
Eugh. It's so frustrating, dude. Especially, quite literally, being in that crowd at the football, and being one of like, 5 out of 2000 who saw it, willing to call it out. Like I said, I've seen shit. I guess I'm just.. Not afraid to put my neck on the line to stop other people being hurt. But for my "fellow Aussies"? Fuck no. "Keep your head down. Shut up. Stop making a scene!"
Even my Dad, who was also there, was quite happy to let other people be dragged out by their ankles, as long as it didn't affect him directly... I can't tell you how disappointing that is. :-/
They have us in a position where so many of (what used to be) 'us' are so pathetic and sheep-like that it just doesn't make sense to make an effort to defend 'us' anymore.
We are not 'us' anymore. It's not just their propaganda making us think we're the minority. I haven't even heard rumors of effective militias taking out the propagandists and their employers.
To jump on this a bit: I can't tell you how bad the media down here is. Like, I know you guys have extremely partisan media, but I'm just... Not sure people in other countries, even other Commonwealth countries, understand just how fucked the Aus/NZ media is, now...
If a journalist here could have "antivaxxers" like me killed, by doxxing us, they would. I wish I was joking... :-(
Some people have been around much longer than others, so lately I've been taking a moment to check how long people have been here.
Honestly, I don't really care what people think, I'm just going to do what I feel is right.
That said, ever since "NoNewNormal" got banned, and many of the people here post on that .win, and have been linking posts to here, we've had an influx of newfags who are definitely sketchy as hell.
The ones that are more obvious are many of the ones you've stated, or the ones telling people it's all over and to just give up and wait. Yeah, I can think of quite a few who would really like that. Even the ones who scream that people should go out and tear things down glow like the sun in my opinion. Anyone who openly advocates violence is either someone with an agenda, a sociopath, or a person who has never seen or participated in actual violence in their whole life and mistakes TV/Film/Games with reality
As for disobedience, shit yeah you should do it. But I don't recommend doing anything that can catch you a felony — unless you're looking to lose your guns, which I'm not. Those are far more important in the current climate.
Either way, I wouldn't sweat it too much. There are several different groups with a lot of money who pay people to go into these types of communities. There are even retarded activist losers who literally go around doing it for free because they have absolutely no lives and think they're some sort of big gay sneaky internet ninja. They're bound to show up and shill. It's just part of how things work these days.
Here's the thing, though. People should stop letting other people influence any of their decisions. Who gives a shit if someone disagrees with you? Are your (not you specifically, just people in general) principles and beliefs so fragile that you can cede them just to feel like you "fit in"? It's totally fine to disagree with people, even those in communities you hangout in. It doesn't make them right and you wrong, or vice versa.
Just be yourself. You know what's best for you. You can consider advice from others, but do it from a lens of how it serves your goals overall, and don't do it just because you see others hyping it. Basically: be an individual and not some mindless ideologue NPC.
Violence works. it solves problems. We outnumber our oppressors, heavily. Suicides are way up with the covid bullshit, and if a fraction of those people had chosen a different -cide, our oppressors might have been afraid to move so quickly.
But, instead, they sleep soundly at night and we're here huddled in a corner telling each other not to do anything. I fucking hate it.
No one ever said it doesn't work. But it should always be a last resort. Period.
What we're experiencing now is still very much first-world oppression compared to what true oppression is. When it reaches that point, then I wouldn't disagree at all.
We're on the rails now. We know how this ends.
There's nothing more frustrating than being told by someone who knows where we're headed that we all have a moral obligation to let the train reach the station before we take it over and put it in reverse.
If you think there's nothing else you can do besides violence, then you're doing nothing more than simply making excuses to use violence.
There's plenty you can do to fight back. It does have an affect, even if you don't notice it immediately.
The evidence of that is that they had to steal an election because momentum against them had become so massive. 13 million more votes than 2016 is not some small amount.
Participating within the system to expose their corruption or to outright stop it is something anyone can do.
You seem to think it's a very binary choice. Either a person gets violent and goes wild trying to fight back, or they do absolutely nothing — it's not.
It might come as a surprise many, but this isn't 1945. Battles like what are taking place right now are battles of optics. Especially when the opposition controls every single consumer institution in the western world. Period.
They can and will make you and everyone else look like the actual bad guys and they will succeed. January 6th is the perfect example of this.
What happened on January 6th? Not much really. Some justifiably angry people went into the Capitol building, broke a few things, and stood around. A few police officers were supposedly assaulted by questionable people, while there were others who saved them from those people. A completely unarmed woman was murdered by a trigger happy cop who was looking for a reason to kill someone, and people just sort of left after.
Ignore the fact that Police literally ushered them in. We can also ignore that we know Antifa retards and even journalists from places like CNN helped instigate and try to set off the events.
Overall, it really was a big nothing burger compared to the 6+ months of nightly violence where cities burned, countless thousands were injured, billions in damage, etc. The one unifying overall result in the aftermath was what? The people you oppose actually celebrating and foaming at the mouth that they had gotten exactly what they wanted.
That said, how was it portrayed then and how has it been portrayed since?
As if it was the most horrifying event in American history. So much so, that they juxtapose it to 9/11 and still mention it at every opportunity 9+ months later.
Whether you, or anyone else for that matter, like it or not, we live in a time where "wars" are fought not with violence, but with information and optics. It's the reason that they're so vehemently adamant on internet censorship, hiding behind the guise of "stopping misinformation" or stating that it's a "threat to democracy."
They know and fear the gathering momentum against them because it has been working.
There's a very real reason that glowies and shills have been caught countless times trying to incite people into committing acts of violence. Attempting to provoke and antagonize, or inculcate fear and desperation into the communities where they infiltrate. Because they very much know that it serves their goals. They can take it, pull any and all context, plaster it on every single consumable piece of media in the entire world, and craft their "these are violent extremists" narrative for the average normie to sit there and eat up.
What happened with Governor Whitmer last year?
Some actual anarchists were plotting some weird attack on her. People who made it explicitly clear in videos that they hated conservatives, Trump, Democrats, the entire system. These were their own words — their manifestos, if you will.
How was it portrayed by not only the media, but the glowies themselves?
"These are violent right-wing Trump supporters."
Our own Federal police institutions are just as corrupt. Which is why they labeled people over a garage rope. It's why they investigated a truck who was rightfully in his lane, instead of the van who tried running him off the road because he got upset that someone took his spot.
All of these events are portrayed as "violent right-wingers."
But why has support for their opposition continued to grow since then?
Because people are doing the work. They're spreading the truth and using information to wage war against the lies of the establishment. It is working.
We didn't just get into this mess over night. This has taken literally decades of building up to get here. If you think it's simply going to solve itself within a year or two and poof, everything goes back to normal, then you're sadly mistaken.
We have all the tools we need. What we need is people to be much more proactive in using them and spreading information. Because in this war, information is your weapon — until the time comes that they try to disarm you.
Anyway, I type really fast so any sort of rant can get out of hand. My bad, man.
I hope you enjoy your day and are doing well.
I don't think you understand force very well.
Every piece of legislation, administrative ruling, and OSHA overreach is backed up with the threat of deadly force. The named penalties may be minor - a fine here, a citation there, a revocation - but each of those penalties carries the unstated threat: "and if that doesn't stop you, or you ignore it, we will come with overwhelming force and end you."
Peaceful protest only works because it too is a credible threat of deadly force. It is a statement, the same statement every time: "Look at how many of us there are. There are enough to overrun your security, break down your doors - your walls, if we have to - and rip you to pieces with our bare hands, because that is all we have brought today. Do not make us come back tomorrow, or the next."
Your rant is pretty disjointed, so I'm not going to try to respond point-by-point.
Literally none of that is an argument whatsoever. It's just stating the plainly obvious as if it makes anything you said more meaningful.
You will always exist within some form of government. This is not an option. Unless you plan on going out and finding some completely uninhabited wilderness, which, there's absolutely zero stopping you from doing that now.
Rules and laws exists in literally every society throughout all of history. If you think you'll escape it somehow, then I hate to break it to ya, but it's not happening.
Go ahead and show me where I said we should just "ride it out until the end" — you won't be able to. You can say you haven't given up, but that statement alone already demonstrates that you believe it's a forgone conclusion, so don't even bother.
You can pretend it's "disjointed" because you don't have any meaningful way to respond. Pretend that you've been "fighting back" by sitting on your ass and screaming on the internet. It'll totally do the trick. You'll fit in with all the other depressed nihilists who can't be bothered to get off the internet and actually do some of the countless things available to push back against them.
Mandatory vaccinations are almost certainly coming to Australia, and NSW is planning to forcibly isolate single people, who live alone, and who test positive, in hotels, "for their own good". Not travellers. Locals. Because they can.
So I'm not so sure about that, anymore, where I am. I think we've moved beyond that into "oppressive near-fascist state" territory... :-(
If I seem extreme to some people, it's because THE SITUATION IN AUSTRALIA IS WORSE THAN YOU REALISE.
Just... Bear that in mind, folks. "First world problems" my arse...
I'm more than aware of the problems in Australia because I follow it closely since I have family in Victoria.
On a meta-level, it's definitely shit and the most authoritarian place out of all the others by a pretty vast margin presently, but ultimately, what we're still seeing is oppression-lite. I'm not saying that to be inflammatory or uncaring of the plight of the people, but true oppression is a much darker and tyrannical force. It's most assuredly still oppression in every conceivable sense, but compared to where they can take it, and what they can do, we're still very much in the beginning stages.
Right now, it's like they're trying to force people over that edge so that they're the ones who initiate violence, so that they have an excuse to go to that very dark place, where people are literally tossed away in camps, abused, subjected to torture, and ultimately disposed of. Now, that may be a a pretty hyperbolic way of envisioning where they're heading, but it's probably not far from the truth of what they're trying to accomplish.
The crazy thing is that they're so lost in the ideological obsession, and so convinced that what they're doing is righteous, that even this very conversation that all the people here are participating in would be labeled as "conspiracy" — even though it's a reflection of the very present reality that they seem completely unable to see.
Last, as in "first, but also last"? Or last in the sense of waiting until there's absolutely nothing left worth saving?
In Earl Turners diary, that accelerated oppression is what ultimately turned the people against their oppressors, as it began to affect their daily lives. When your enemies control the media, it's going to take the personal experience to begin to raise counter-narrative questions.
But wait, I'm not one of the terrorists. Why am I being oppressed too?
Crab bucket, yep. The puppetized masses with their strings available for harvest.
This is a good take, cheers.
Yeah, honestly, a lot of it is just entertaining, at this point...
I'm waiting for the screaming to start, on this one. And it will, I'm sure.
As you say, NNN came here (partly), and I'm 100% sure some of the trolls who helped destroy it followed, too...
Just look at LockdownSkepticism, and how cucked and fearful that place is now (pretty sure they literally blocked me, for attempting to post that vid from hotel quarantine I shared here the other day). If any of the folks from there followed over here, as well..? I can just imagine how that might affect the quality of discussion...
Fuck Reddit, man. Even if I discovered this place through it, originally. Seriously, there's so much we can "thank" that place for, this included. Even now we're off it...
Speaking of illegal shit, if Anonymous or whatever ever decides to DDOS Reddit or something? Man, I'll be cheering that shit on. Not that' it'll work, of course, but anything that denies Reddit traffic? Has to be a good thing, IMHO.
It happens everywhere. There are a subset group of people who are absolutely addicted to conflict and seeking attention; they can't help themselves. They typically don't go out much and they're willing to take any interaction the can get, or use it as a type of therapy to vent their miserable life and crippling depression. You'll see them pop-up in every community that doesn't follow the dogma prescribed by the mainstream consumerism cult. The very idea that there are people who don't agree with them is something they can't fathom or tolerate.
Reddit is trash. The only board I ever used there was KiA, because at the time it was where the relevant conversations with regard to the corruption in gaming/entertainment were taking place, and the moment this place popped up I gladly abandoned that shithole. You'll be better off without them.
Anons barely exist anymore. Occupy Wall Street brought in a huge amount of normies and the place really hasn't been the same since. Before then, they'd get the random small mainstream attention for doing something, but nothing that screwed the boards up more than that.
Who knows, maybe one day people will inherit the spirit and remember not to take shit so seriously and that it's ok to just do shit for lulz. But my hopes aren't high.
Some of us are real people who are just black-pilled to hell.
Otherwise known as realists.
The forging documents thread appears to be somewhat of an outlier in sentiment...though I do think there's merit in not doing that, i.e. not giving the political game itself legitimacy, avoiding potential incarceration, etc.
This community has seen many bursts of new users over time, and we're in the midst of a new one. I don't think the overall forum quality has necessarily improved with any of those, but participation has increased; whether that's a net positive is subjective.
If you compare us to other (WIN) communities, we're doing pretty well in terms of how limited trolls and obvious shills are. Some exist, but it's not a particular deluge yet.
Well we did just become a lifeboat for the OmegaCanada guys, would make sense we'd have a lot of first time posters around here.
Not every doomer is a DnC shill.
Many are just idiots who took the black pill suppository and the idea of other people taking action bruises their ego.
Then you have the ones who intentionally push broken ideologies and worldviews that very obviously will never achieve meaningful change. Again, some are just dumb. Think "All Lives Matter" or the ones who vehemently argue that jewish tribalism isn't an issue.
Generally it's rather easy to tell apart the shills, just see whether they're able to say things like nigger, spic, kike, etc, or if they can acknowledge and discuss outside topics like national socialism, zionism, racial/sexual divergence, etc, without becoming a sperg'd out contrarian.
Black pilled people would be thrilled to see their claims ("no one will ever do anything") proven wrong.
The reason they're black pilled in the first place is because no one ever does anything.
There does seem to be an influx of ~new posters of questionable taste.
Yup. Agreed...
I mean, they were going to come eventually, weren't they? :-/
This place is becoming more widely known, especially to damn Redditors, so... I suppose they bring their shitty statism with them, hey?
And look, I fully support their right to speak freely. But if you think I give a damn about some anonymous American telling me to "follow the law" in my own fucking country, because "Think of your job, bruh", bwahaha, really?
As you and I have both said, the trouble is when people start to apply their own morals to others, and thinking that everyone is in the same situation. Because newsflash? We ain't.
Just had a new user "accuse" me of racism, for asking how someone could detect an Asian if they don't believe different races have different characteristics and abilities.
If the new mandates were as much of a hail mary go at the working class as I suspect, there might be a chance to put the breaks on this whole thing over here. I just hope people wake up, and honestly I wish I saved every single memory-hole to expediate that.
I read about your situation... as someone considered an honorary bogan by some, I salute you. I wish you well and that if you're on smoko, I hope they leave you alone.
Weird, I haven't encountered that at all. If people are saying defeatest things, fuck em.
I'm reasonably confident we have at least some level of infiltration, though I don't know that I could accurately identify who is controlled opp vs who's just a dumbass.
At some threshold this will need to be abandoned. The only good reasons to discourage violence are reasons of morality and effectiveness. It is extremely difficult to wield violence in such a way that it will effect a positive change rather than simply make one a murderer.
Depends on what you consider a positive change.
The situation our species is in now is unsalvageable. Our overpopulation alone guarantees a near-extinction level event in our upcoming future. Whether they're doing it because of the overpopulation, the imminent polar flip ("associated in the past with great extinctions"), or direct orders from satan, there is little that could be done to the elites to make things any worse.
I don't think I have ever raised suspicion as a troll or paid actor around here, but I am guilty of some mild forms of the sentiments you mention.
I don't want to sugarcoat reality in my comments: I do think we are hurtling towards an inflection point; a metaphorical rubicon that will need to be crossed. I just think every possible option needs to be exhausted before that.
There are some very dire consequences for resistance to actual goverment overreach, especially when we aren't sure just how far they are willing to go. Based the treatment of 1/6 prisoners - I suspect the distance is further than we reckoned a year ago.
My philosophy is very much "be prepared, but continue to resist through civil disobedience." There are further options and they aren't off the table yet.
Having said that, violating my bodily autonomy in order to earn a living is a RED LINE IN THE SAND, and i say that with a Trumpian conviction, not a Barrackian one.
I am, unfortunately, still for sale. Offers are still open, people!
Of course, if I WERE a shill, I'd say that anyways to throw around irony suspicion. AND obviously I wouldn't say no to a SECOND shill job if I did have one anyways. Which I don't. These people are hiring new handshake accounts when my premium two-month-ish old I think account is prime real estate? Damn shame. But I guess as someone who can actually type in proper English and dank memes, my fees are too steep when it can be outsourced to the fifty cent army.
...
We have reached the point where the only logical recommendation is violence.
And that's a bit of a problem, at least for me because I agree with the peace church interpretation of Christ's teachings.
So at best all I can do is look the other way and think may god love you and your cause, you bloody damned fools.
That was a specific situation in which cultural beliefs and practices played a huge role. It's not a general prescription. Your enemies today are not going to be embarrassed and humiliated by calling out their attacks.
That doesn't matter.
The message is that the morality of the self IS an island. There are no extenuating circumstances.
You know me, I'm just an old firebrand classic liberal. Disobeying the government, especially when it's fucking retarded, is part and parcel.
That said...eat the government. I hear aussie tastes like cow with all that nasty fucking vegemite they consume. Toast them with pineapple and chili sauce.
As with everything in life take what you want and leave the rest.
After 25 years in the internet i know that those people exist but the fear of their existence can and will poison a medium.
https://i.imgur.com/qgU3R7J.jpg
This place seems to relegate those of us 'banned' from reddit in my case moderators for a sub threw me under the bus because I was opposing their libcuck agenda. Also the faction of people banned for spamming nigger or some so called obscenity. If people are maintaining the reddit party line they might be agents shills etc or it's time to steal the source code because free open internet is a threat to communism...
I'm beginning to think most people are essentially a herd of sheep that are owned by the elites.
Starting?
Are you by any chance a homosexual?
Because seriously, I remember a few weeks ago where you said you were going away because we were joking about Taliban taking back Afghanistan, and muh poor wahmens or some stupid shit like that. You were being histrionic back then, and you're doing it again now. I suggest you calm your nips; buy some nice aloe vera balm and slowly rub it into your nipples, and while you're at it, try to work on your gross abuse of ellipses.
Thank you, Agent.
You know, it would be funny if I was, because then I would be getting paid to be here, lol.
But I assure you, hand over heart, I am about as far away from a glowy as you could possibly, possibly be.
I think there's some other people here who could probably even verify that, by now.
Don't get me wrong, I'm sure others here probably are, and you have every reason to suspect me, but I'm so fucking not, it's not even funny.
I'm just an angry, broken human being, who is utterly sick of this shit. If someone would pay to be a spy, or as you say, agent? That'd be fucking great, thanks. I could really use the money.
I'm sorry to bring the burden of meta analysis, but I actually wondered about it after reading your OP purely because of the purity spiral angle. Purity spirals are used to tear communities apart. Openly suggesting that there are feds in our midst puts me on guard - even though I agree with you! Psyops is a murky field that breeds paranoia and cynicism. Just wanted to let you know that angle of doubt.
Having said that, I think you're still being taken seriously for the most part. I do not read the entirety of your post history, but I see a lot of the exchanges that occur in your threads and you get a lot of great, sincere advice. Do not allow some bad advice to spoil that value, even if it spoils your mood.
I'm fine. It's just that the situation in Aus is very dire, and perhaps it's hard for people to appreciate that.
Like, look, some things in Canada are worse, and some in parts of the US are worse, but where I live is headed for such a breaking point (they banned Ivermectin prescriptions, this week), that I just... It's getting very hard, now.
I really did not think we would fall so far, so fast. I think I'm still... Coming to terms with that fact.
I get it. I think the primary cause of misunderstanding the aus gravity is just that we're all primed to hear stuff about the USA, since that seems to be a major culture war hub of the world (some say we export it to other nations). And I suppose a bunch of us may be americans.
I also understand something I think you said earlier, about how you doubted how bad things were at first. That's some kind of psychology thing I've forgotten the name of, but it isn't limited to geo-politics or culture wars. It can be a very bitter pill for a person to accept that something wrong is happening. A symptom of civility, perhaps; we're all ready to put on our social masks and go to training camp or the factory, then come home for beer and tv because that's what "happiness" is and we can tough out any compromise for that baited hook.
The older guys often chime in to remark that things have been getting bad much longer than each of us has noticed - then we all start doing history research and associated rabbit holes of education.
I wonder if the world is starting to notice aus-land? Or if people remain wrapped up in their own local problems (which is understandable to a degree).
Just keep doing the best you can, bro. Not much other advice I can give. Your efforts will compound within yourself to grant you strength within and without that will aid you in the trials to come (and if by some miracle, the trials never come, you can enjoy your strength in peace). If you can obtain allies, even better. We might give some good advice here, but remember we can't substitute a real friend that has your back.
Part of what you wrote sounded a bit glowie-ish, but then you qualified it in such a way that it didn't sound that way. You do sound way too sincere to be a glowie. Normally, glowies post 5-word incitements to violence.
That said, resistance needs a strategy. You need collective action. There is no point to you, on your own, deciding to bring great trouble on yourself if it gains nothing. Especially if you can use the money, since you would lose your job. As you say, you are angry and broken. But that may not be the best place to take irreversible decisions.
I am not opposed to anything in principle. But if there is a cost, any action needs to have a benefit that is worth the cost.
Yeah, yeah, I know it did. I just find it amusing, because I'm just some fucking angry internet loser on the other side of the world. I would fucking LOVE to be getting paid to promote this shit. Because then maybe, just maybe, they would let me leave this fucking country, before shit completely falls apart...
Anyway, thanks. I'm just... Fucking over it. I'm not expecting to do shit, because literally nothing I do, involving "violence" or whatever, will have any impact, anyway.
Mandatory vaccinations are being proposed, here, now. Not just mandates. Literally forcing people to take the jab.
In NSW, the plan is that single people, in isolation, will be forced into hotel quarantine. Not travellers. Locals. So they will lose the right to remain in their own home. "For their own health".
So I apologize for... The anger, and the rhetoric. But when I say things are getting worse here, every day, and no one is doing anything at all to fight back, I mean it.
If this isn't a literal police state, I do not know what is. So yeah. :-/
Australia? Considering the terror regime there imposed, with great acclamation from the idiot population, this seems less of a good idea.
Before you do something, you have to be aware of what the costs are, and what the potential benefits are.
That one has to resist.
There is not always something that one can definitely do. But do what you can in every circumstance. You can begin with persuasion of people. See if you can pierce the propaganda.
I don't like that the .wins have all become some hybrid of the same community.
Also, OP, this kind of paranoia is a sign of being "extremely online". You could use an Internet break.
Just unplug your internet OP, the glowies can't get to you if you don't give them the opportunity to do so.
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) our free will of choice represents a reaction to balance, and form balancing within flow represents resistance (form) within velocity (flow) aka "controlled opposition".
All are.
I actually missed this autism a bit.
Autism aka aut; form autos (self) and -ism (suggestion by another towards consent to ignore self). To consent to believe any suggested -ism implies using free will of choice to submit to the free will of choice of those who suggest meaning in exchange for consent to believe it.
Autism represents a deliberate contradiction in terms; suggest to a) corrupt comprehension of those who consent to it; b) as a sleight of hand for those with eyes to see and c) as a vetting process to test who falls for the temptation and who doesn't.
Haha, I deserve this.
I can't really follow the thought process, though. I understand the words and phrases, but the arranged ideas aren't making sense.
Let me go out on a limb and say that I am not seriously diagnosing you with autism, it's just lazy shorthand that means you're not well-integrated into expected norms.
You consented to words and phrases others suggested to you as meaning, and now I rearranged those words and phrases by my free will of choice; which contradict your consented to meanings aka your beliefs.
Consenting by free will of choice to believe or not believe the suggested meanings of others (suggested by their free will of choice) does not represent you comprehending what you're perceiving.
Choice cannot understand this world if it chooses among the suggested choices of others. Choice represents a response to balance; a balance caused by movement. We represent form (life) within flow (inception towards death). We are in-between predefined natural opposites (a beginning aka inception and an end aka death).
Nature does not use words to define what nature means, it moves all within; which our senses perceive as inspiration to react to by choice. Doing so (adaptation to perceived inspiration) grows our comprehension (understanding) about what we perceive.
Our other choice is ignorance to do that, and that caused parasites to suggest us words as meaning for nature, in exchange for our consent to believe them; while ignoring nature as the only source. They use suggestion of temptation; while acting as a parasite in-between perception and comprehension; which is where our free will of choice operates. Nature (flow/form) operates as offer/consent, hence us representing choice in reaction to balance (balance offers; choice reacts). The parasites deceive us to ignore balance for...choice suggests; choice consents.
Suggestions domesticates free will of choice into submitting to the choices of others.
Sensing represents perception, and since you read what I wrote; you perceived it aka sensed it. What's lacking is comprehension (understanding of perceived). To grow comprehension; one needs to adapt to what the perceived inspires one to react to.
Try to resist viewing what you read as true or false information (aka reasoning about suggested information). Instead try to adapt to it by means of implication (if/then) and keep doing. Why? Because if/then implies consequences of reaction within movement, so you start learning/teaching yourself to adapt to movement instead of to affixed meanings (true or false) of suggested words.
Example..."grass is green". Wait a bit and grass turns to hey aka it moves its meaning. That's why nature doesn't brand anything; because it constantly changes; but our choice allows us to ignore this; which others exploit ruthlessly. No other life-form requires "grass" to be called "grass" to be able to perceive; react to and comprehend its function within movement; they instead instinctively adapt to movement; to constant change.
We never question why teaching a dog word based commands to follow is called domestication; while educating each other to consent to believe words suggested by others is called being civilized...
Today I will engage you philosophically.
I can overlook some of your minor writing errors, but you really need to watch for grammatical conflicts like this. You've basically asserted that Choice itself is capable of choosing; this makes choice into a causal loop that discards the actual origin. Since this specific error is isolated here, I am calling it a mistake. Only an agent of will can make a choice (I don't think this agent must necessarily have freedom).
Ignorance is a quality of the absence of knowledge, not an absence of choice. One can have knowledge without having chosen anything, even if denying the gift of choice makes one an insect.
Parasites? A parasite takes for its own gain without granting a benefit to host in exchange. Why must your "parasite" here never be a symbiote? Perhaps the agent of will is lazy or suicidal for a moment and feels glad for suggestions...if you maintain that this subjective symbiote is an objective parasite, then I ask why an agent of will must be concerned with the objective? A life can only be borne of experience, and all experience is inherently subjective - so to focus on the objective is to focus on the unlivable, the void, the other.
In so many smoke signals you call out "Think freely! Think for yourself!" Riddles should be reserved for the times and ideas that are strongly resisted. Yes, we're all here, betraying this ideal of choice you hold aloft, but do you think us so feeble that we cannot stand simply because we seek out discourse and opinion and - dare I say - suggestion?
The only thing to despise and rebuke is if an agent of will surrenders their will, for there is no guarantee that they can retrieve it. In so doing, they may as well be called an agent of the void, but more often they may twist into the dreaded agent of the master (because they surrender their will to the will of another). ...I like to think none of us are doing that, but it is hard to say for sure.
I question the focus on nature as well. Nature is respectable, of course. Nature perserveres with its mystery forces throughout all hardship. Nature forged our gifts in its brutality yet embraces us in its apathy. But as agents of will, we have our own internal natures that grant us the power (the will) to lash out against the agents of the wilds and to shield us from the churning of the planet organ (the external, classical Nature). Our internal nature also permits us to bring ruin to ourselves, so even if you were speaking of internal nature, I would say to bear caution.
As a generality, I agree. But consider: there really are agents of will who -desire- to degrade themselves by surrendering to outside wills. It's a riddle of society and civilization. Should master/slave relations be abided? Should we throw both away as rubbish? Perhaps only the eager slave is detestable and the master acting out of pity or utility.
My personal angle is that there is a deeper corruption in the idea of society. That, despite being "social animals", we should treat such a compulsion with disdain in a flex of our muscular wills. But then maybe the inclination to "solve" such problems should be dismissed, as it is merely another aspect of our (internal) nature that seeks to bubble up through the cracks in our foundations and permeate our very wills.
I'll also reach into the esoteric and suggest that dogs don't actually respond to the stimuli of our words. We train them to respond to our wills. If your dog responds to "biscuit", it will likely respond the same to "discus" - this is taken as evidence that our stimuli-response systems are superior to a dog's, but then why would this dog respond to "solar flare" when I say it with the same intent and will as if I were saying "biscuit"? I posit that the will of command is like an arm reaching out and grasping towards the target, and that dogs only need training to learn the shape of human will (which must surely have a different shape than the will of a dog, as our internal natures differ). Similarly, our systems of training/education for society prime the agent of will to more readily surrender to suggestion; at this I think we would both sneer.
I'll add another reason in order to make a point: because it is robust to have many strong tools.
The average agent of will be glad to attain robustness. It will enable their wills to act more efficiently, to engage at different angles. It amplifies the power of the will in application - and, being the power of will, it is truly a power to aspire towards.
I will not condemn the agent of will who chooses to live narrowly and sharply, as he may accomplish great feats. But even this agent of purpose (his will is narrow to achieve this purpose or dream at all costs) would do well to have a few backup tools. When I say tool, of course, I mean figurative internal tools by which the agent of will may procure, shape, transform, and enact impulses (for lack of a better term - I mean the base particle that fills our machine wills).
Our choice of what to thing about is the issue aka in adherence to inspiration or falling for the temptation of suggested information. We always think free; yet ignorance allows us to self restrict what we think about. It's then that ignorance that corrupts ones comprehension of what "self" represents....not mind/body; but that which remains of form within flow aka liquid (blood); our shared identity within bloodlines. Blood represents the self we can sustain; while body/mind transmute back to base (form to flow aka death).
From the energy perspective...flow/form cause friction; vibration; resonance and heat; which within balance requires cooling of form through liquids (mimicking flow)...water; seed; oil; blood.
Before suggested "riddles" comes ones choice of information over inspiration, which then leads to falling for suggestion. Both riddles and secrecy are based on others wanting information; which gives those who suggest the power the withhold and freely transmute the wanted information aka acting in the name of what others consent to believe.
Nature (energy) offers ALL (flow) information to each ONE (form) within at any moment (balance/choice). The mechanic used for communication represents offer/consent and when flow offers movement; then form needs to consent to inspiration aka the consequences of perceived movement.
The main tool of deception the parasitic few utilize for suggestion of information represents "words" aka suggested idols of affixed meaning, which those who consent to them are upholding within their memory, thereby setting up self restrictions that corrupt adaptation to inspiration.
Want over need represents ignorance over adherence to self sustenance. Me passing judgements upon others represents a temptation for me aka my choice of want over need. I need to resit that; which represents an ongoing struggle, and as I pointed out before...ignorance breeds insolence in others.
I did all of this before...pointing out the weaknesses within others; talking about shirking of responsibility; the submission of free will to free will; the suicidal direction of choosing want over need etc. Each ONE needs to choose for ONEself to adhere or ignore ALL. All attempts to direct others; will only tempt them to follow you; hence yet again keeping them in ignorance of balance.
I learned/taught myself that I need to adapt to inspiration for the sustenance of self; and that on the fly adaptation to text is what works for me. I couldn't write that much off the cuffs if I would aim to change the minds of others; because their ignorance would bury my attempts effortlessly. I don't write all of this for whoever you are; but as adaption to ALL, and for the sustenance of ONEself.
Consenting to a suggested screen and believing that suggested tools of communication represent real communication, is what isolates us. The parasitic world wide web suggests the mimicry of reality within a controlled environment; where each participant is deceived to self isolate in ignorance; while believing to be part of a connected unity. This represents like always a chain of command under a suggested idol used by the few to control the ignorance of the many.
BETRA'Y, verb transitive [Latin traho.] - "to deliver into the hands of an enemy". You perceive reality through the lens of conflict (reason); hence the use of betrayal and judgement (to think about others) when suggesting discourse; yet DISCOURSE, noun [Latin , to run.] implies flow, which runs us...the reacting form within. Running into each other doesn't represent discourse, but the choice of ignorance thereof.
"Wanted" judgment of despise and rebuke aside; consent by choice to suggestion of choice represents submission; surrender of free will to free will, yet retrieval isn't the issue, since consent by choice to choice simply represents ignorance of using choice in response to balance. All it takes to "retrieve" is to choose to resist ignorance for the next choice. Each choice starts within the same momentum of balance.
Balance represents the guaranty for choice; not the consequences of choices by others within balance, which represent ever changing circumstance in need for adaptation.
Aka form suggesting temptation to lure other form back into flow. It's just a exploitation of choice; not agents in cahoots with the destructive forces of velocity. The loss through velocity is what also causes the resisting growth aka the opportunity for life.
Chain of command aka the beast system of self destruction. It represents a self perpetuating pyramid scheme; a hierarchy of corrupting based on the ignorance of free will of choice in reaction to balance for the submission to suggested choice.
We all do. Instead of master/slave; think suggestion/consent. We are being deceived to consent to use suggested words as idols of meaning for a world that does not offer words to express itself (it uses movement aka inspiration).
This idolatry a) allows the parasitic few to act in the name of the words we consent to believe the meaning of, which represents them using "spell-craft" upon us and b) it corrupted us to think in words; which represents our ego aka the inner monologue tempting us constantly to reason internally about meaning; while ignoring to adapt to inspiration outside.
The way the so called talmud is structure is based upon the mimicry of the ego; and it is being used to control the conflict of reason among others by talmudic reasoning aka the suggestion of deliberate contradiction to both sides of reason (true vs false). This represents the few using farmhands to feed the ignorance of the many; and to protect the farmhands from the conflicts of reason; the so called talmud teaches to use implication (if/then) over reason (true vs false) thereby preventing them to consent to suggested conflict (division).
Languages represent the temptation to ignore inspiration; because they allow everyone to suggest information to each other and eventually we will grow out of them; which as a result will make the suggestions of others impotent. Then again...making this into a goal (want) ignores the need to wield choice in response to balance aka responsibility over the choice of ignorance and what it causes.
RESPECT', verb transitive [Latin respecto, or respectus, from respicio; re and specio, to view.] - "to regard". It represents the only source for regard.
Energy represents the self sustenance of ALL information. Internally; the loss of ongoing potentiality (flow) causing the temporary growth of potential (form) represent the balance between the forces of velocity/resistance. Lastly; temporary form adhering to self sustenance within ongoing flow represents the hardship aka the struggle for temporary chaos to sustain itself within the ongoing natural order.
MYS'TERY, noun (Latin mysterium; Gr. a secret). That's based upon ignoring ALL offered inspiration for the suggested information of other ONEs; which gives the the power to conceal meaning of suggested information from those who want it.
There's no mystery within perceived nature; only the lack of comprehension of those within. Need over want grows comprehension (potential); want over need corrupts comprehension. Your choice.
Flow doesn't require choice to cause form; form requires choice to balance within flow. Choice represent a tool limited to formed chaos; while the natural order doesn't require any tools...it represents the movement of ALL information. That movement wasn't caused by choice; it represents the loss of ALL within itself, causing the growth of the self segregated ONEs within ALL.
Brutal and apathy represent choice of evaluation upon perceived value; not flow acting in any specific way besides moving us from beginning towards end. We embrace that movement; which defines our existence as resistance to it.
Each ONE represents a seed within ALL aka each ONE potential contains ALL potentiality. To prevent each ONE to become anther ALL....the ONEs have to be temporary, hence processed by ALL for loss/growth aka self sustenance.
Each of us represents a limited potential with access to unlimited potentiality. That's what the few use suggestion for to prevent the many to comprehend...their ignored potential; which in return represents the energy the few are wielding in the name of the many and against the many. The beast system is run by those consenting to ignorance within; not by those who suggest others to run it. A parasitic exploitation of ignorance and the many "want" it.
There's no against within energy. We shape conflicts (reason) by ignorance thereof. Ask yourself this...without consenting to the suggestions of others; how could you end up in a conflict? Predator/prey are not in conflict with each other; they coexist within the same habitat. They are defined by each others coexistence. They each react by choice to balance for self sustenance...no conflict.
Flow corrupts form unless form struggles to sustain itself within flow. That's the ongoing churning of nature upon all within. The shield represents the resistance of momentum to the velocity of motion and we represent the choice within that balance. Life dies yet until then; it's balancing within momentum.
Want over need. Always a choice reacting to balance by adhering or ignoring it. As form we represent the internal reaction to flow.
I wasn't really expecting such a response. I was just playing around so I could learn. It took hours for me to read all of the replies, so I can't respond to individual points. I'll give a broader, more meta response.
You do have some form of logical consistency. I can understand about 70% of the things you say in this strict syntax style - the rest is either out of my grasp or I can intuit since I'm a low-wit and rely on my intuition to understand things. It makes me think that you have simple/normal messages but then run them through this translation to get your usual writing style. This brings me to ask: what is the goal of communication to you?
There was a a section you wrote that pointed out a strife/argument section. It made me think that you were interpreting the common purpose of communication to be arguments or attempts to persuade the other party. And you wouldn't exactly be wrong, as I see that enough. But if you're intending on taking some third option to escape that trite win/loss setup, I don't know why you wouldn't go the way I did: trying to understand how the other person thinks (no one tells you directly how they think; it is always a puzzle and they react with hostility if they figure out what you're doing).
To me, the goal of communication is to gain understanding. If I determine that there's nothing I can learn by engaging, then I do not engage. It is a very rare case for me to try to change someone's opinion, no matter how retarded I may find their view. Because I have no interest in changing minds, I am fine shifting my position and speech patterns; I avoid rigidity. You, however, appear to speak very rigidly. A casual reading would cause a bystander to think you haven't addressed anything you're responding to (this is the primary reason you're viewed as a bot) - I think I've figured it out, though I am not prepared to prove it. Even so, I struggle to understand why you take this stance when you must realize that it is not trivial to decipher the things you say.
I'll share one of my foundations: I assume everything is true and only allow my beliefs to solidify after I eliminate falsehoods by finding contradictions. I cannot explain how, but your if/then reasoning made me think of it. Maybe because I don't rank my ideas as true/false, but as "this is true enough to rely on here"/"this is not sufficiently reliable". Ideas are just tools to help me make decisions, and sometimes I gotta use a screwdriver like a hammer, and other times a saw is all I have available when opening a jar. Really, I get the feeling that we'd agree on a lot of things if not for this communicative impasse, based largely on how I'm intuiting your statements.
ER'ROR, noun [Latin error from erro, to wander.] As form within flow we represent "the type of guys that like to roam around and never settle down" aka a wanderer, and yet we're moved as form by flow, hence in reaction to movement aka resisting the temptation to "roam around, around, around, around..."
In other words...ongoing flow represents the natural order; temporary form within the chaos struggle for self sustenance. We represent the error that allows growth of potential.
Go hard at anything that inspires you and resist to believe vs not-believe (reason) aka ignoring it; just use if/then (implication) and keep doing it.
GRAM'MAR, noun [Latin grammatica; Gr. a letter, to write.] Nature doesn't write; it doesn't brand anything by words; it moves us; which allows us to shape sound into words; which we then suggest to each other as meaning; while ignoring that ALL meaning is predefined within flow for the ONEs (form) reacting to it.
ALL value is within balance; ONE reacts by choice of evaluation to it for balancing aka self sustenance of form within flow...not to define value to each other; while ignoring that flow constantly change all values. Perceiving that constant change with our senses represents inspiration demanding adaptation by choice of reaction...and yet we can choose to ignore this (aka falling for temptation).
We don't need to watch for conflicts; cause there are none within energy (flow/form). What we perceive as conflicts represents "reason" aka our suggested assumptions of true versus false in ignorance of flow; of movement; of constant change. We are being deceived through suggestion (-isms) to divide ourselves by reason into arguing about affixed meaning (idols of true or false); while choosing to ignore this system of movement (energy) that demands us to constantly adapt to movement.
The origin of choice represents balance as form (life) within flow (inception towards death). Choice represents reaction to balance aka resistance of form within the momentum of flow; reacting to the consequences of velocity (flow) upon resistance (form).
As for the choices...resistance within movement represents the state of balance, hence the need for adaptation by balancing through choice of reaction...so form needs to adapt to flow, yet choice within balance requires choice between natural opposites. Why? Because form is defined by flow as moving from beginning towards end aka in-between natural opposites in balance with each other; hence having a choice in-between.
Need aka self sustenance by adaption represents one choice; the other choice represents the temptation of ignorance. It's the ongoing velocity of flow that constantly tempts the resisting temporary form within to say "fuck that struggle; I go with the flow". That represents the choice of want over need; which within balance implies the ignorance of need.
That's the origin...balance/choice as the foundation and need/want as the "free" will of choice reacting to the "dom"-iance of balance aka the free-dom of temporary growth (form) within ongoing loss (flow).
Now... choosing want over need aka ignorance over adherence to self sustenance is where the magic happens. What can ONE ignore ALL for? The suggestions of other ONEs aka endless choices suggested to those who ignore that only balance offers ALL.
How can offer by ALL and suggestion by another ONE happen simultaneously you may ask? ALL offers inspiration through movement to ONEs senses; hence the need for ongoing adaptation to inspiration. Other ONEs suggest affixed information (-isms) towards our free will of choice in exchange for consent to believe/not believe that those suggested -isms represent true/false information. No matter what we choose; we will then find ourselves stuck within the conflict of reason (true versus false) between believers vs non-believers.
That represents division (reason) by suggestion (-ism)...all within the choice of want over need aka in ignorance of reality (hence all fiction upheld as beliefs within our conscious memory). A consciousness used in adherence to flow utilizes memory like a ram (temporary storage for ongoing adaptation); while a consciousness used in ignorance of flow utilizes memory like a hard-drive (storage of suggested affixed information to capacity).
Flow offers inspiration as input to our consciousness (perception); then we use choice upon it (adherence or ignorance), which processes perceived inspiration into comprehended information. This a) represents growth of potential (comprehension) out of loss of potentiality (perception) and b) the alchemical procedure of transmutation out of base aka from ALL through ONE for the sustenance of self.
In short...the origin of choice represents reaction to balance, yet choosing to ignore this, causes a) the lack of comprehension and b) the suggestions by others which balance is ignored for represents endless tempting choices of others aka being stuck in the loop of wanting vs not-wanting (reason) the suggested choices of others, which for those with lack of comprehension represents the origin of value to choose from.
To consent to believe others deceives one to ignore free will of choice for the choices of others aka consent to submit free will to the false authority of free will by others. Free will of choice represents ONEs sole authority over self in reaction to the balance of ALL. The choice of ignorance causes the corruption of understanding what choice represents...a response to balance aka ONEs responsibility within ALL.
2nd attempt at a short answer...ignorance doesn't discard origin; it corrupts those who ignore from understanding origin.
A'GENT, noun - "an actor; one that exerts power, or has the power to act". Consider that choice represents a "re-action" to balance; that form reacts to flow; that momentum reacts to motion; that resistance reacts to velocity; that magnetic reacts to electric; that ONE reacts to ALL, that ALL represents ONE in energy...the energetic actor that causes all the reactions within itself?
Take agent (action) out and question "free" will of choice in reaction to the "dom"-inance of balance within flow and you can comprehend that free-dom (natural opposites) implies balance for choice to react to.
Neither. KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists". ALL knowledge exists within energy; flow (loss of potentiality) communicates it as inspiration to each ONE (growth of potential) form within flow. ONE perceives ALL; yet ONEs choice upon ALL perceived define how much thereof ONE comprehends.
AB'SENCE, noun [Latin absens, from absum, abesse, to be away; ab and sum.] There's no "away" within the coexistence of energy.
As for quality...balance represents ALL value; choice the responding evaluation thereof. Choice evaluates to balance aka self sustenance.
Knowledge (perception) represents input (into form; by flow) hence being the status quo for the existence of form. Motion represents all input for the resulting momentum. The moment(um) form begins (inception aka flow to form) choice within balance is established, because input needs to be received (need); yet balance requires the choice to ignore the received (want). Balance/choice are defined by each others coexistence within movement.
Deny represents "to contradict"; yet form cannot contradict flow, it must adapt to it; yet can ignore doing so. Form inflicts everything upon self by ignoring to adhere to flow. The struggle to resist that temptation is how loss (flow) balances itself through growth (form). Our resistance needs to be a struggle to be able to balance the ongoing loss through velocity.
You can ignore to drink; eat; seek shelter or even breathing; but that only causes pressure upon form within flow until form is forced to adapt. We are processed by flow for both loss/growth...it's our choice as what...flushed away for loss or struggle to resist for growth?
Choice in reaction to balance represents exchange within coexistence. All reactions represents both inspiration to sustain ourselves and temptation to ignore it. Our parasites represent the reaction to our ignorance aka the few exploiting the ignorance of the many through suggestion; which both inspires us to change what we did so fat; as well as tempting us to ignore all the consequences as well; because otherwise responsibility of choice and the shirking thereof by choice of ignorance become the problem and hand; and the last thing the ignorant wants is facing his own ignorance.
Ignorance also tempts insolence in others; hence the few ruthlessly exploiting the many.
As for gain...want represents claiming ownership over other ONEs; while ignoring that ALL is offered for free use. Form cannot claim anything within flow; only use everything for self sustenance. Then again...ignorance.
Because the status quo of this system represents ALL being ONE in energy; which implies that the ONEs (form) within are being segregated out of ALL (flow). Why? To establish growth potential (form) out of loss potentiality (flow)...to process loss/growth within balance. Parasites are consequences of want over need for the host; who ignore self sustenance by allowing weaknesses to tempt parasitic behavior of others.
That moment(um) represents constant offer of inspiration and constant temptation for those within. Flow moving form is being perceived by form as inspiration to adapt to; yet flow moving form also pulls form; hence tempting the ignorance of resistance. Our parasites suggest us to consent to seek "progress"; which is what the entire beast system of society uses to incite self destruction.
Progress suggests wanted outcome; which in return ignores needed balance. Life isn't outcome oriented; since death is predefined at inception (natural opposites). Life is balance oriented; hence choice of reaction to balance.
There's the wanted outcome (objective); when form is being subjected by flow; hence being concerned with balancing through choice based adaptation (aka the need aka the "must"). All suggestions represent the want, which is why a suggestion wants us to consent to the choice of those making them.
Experience (to try) represents reaction as form to flow; yet life is borne out of flow; hence balancing in-between inception and death (aka trying to survive). Life is borne out of information; which is what energy represents (the source of ALL information); which form perceives as the flow of inspiration to react to.
Suggested objective deceive (tempt) form to ignore self sustenance for the corruption by flow, yet it doesn't represent "unlivable, the void, the other.", but the coexisting natural opposite we react to. It's motion that causes momentum, hence flow making form livable...temporarily. VOID, adjective [Latin viduus, divido. Gr.] aka flow to form (inception of life).
That represents wanting to legislate symptoms; while ignoring the need to adapt to the cause...temptation aka the choice of want over need aka ignorance. The so called master first suggests others to consent to be slaves, and the so called slaves consent to the suggestions of a master. Both choose want over need before the labels of master and slave are applicable. Afterwards they all reason about the wants vs not wants of each label; but seldom about the choice that causes the conflict. We ignore that we judge behavior not upon balance; but upon the choices of ignorance towards balance. "detestable" and "pity" are aimed at those who already chose want over need; yet that's not what you judge them for. We are being deceived to try to find a balance by reasoning about choices; when balance predefines having a choice.
SOCI'ETY, noun [Latin societas, from socius, a companion] - "the union of a number of rational beings" aka unity of ONEs. That represents the suggested inversion of the collective ALL segregating itself into individual ONEs for growth within loss. ALL represents ONE in energy aka the ONEness of ALL; which is why each individual ONE needs to react to ALL for the sustenance of ONEself...not for other ONEs. Growing self is what unites the ONEs who choose to react the same within ALL. Plant a seed and an ecosystem will grow around it aka growth attracts growth.
The parasites have a sleight of hand for this...High (flow) Lander (form)..."there can be only ONE" And from its soundtrack..."I am immortal. I have inside me blood of kings. I have no rival. No man can be my equal. No man could understand. My power is in my own hand"
PROB'LEM, noun [Latin problema; Gr. to throw forward]. It's lack of comprehension representing form thrown forward through flow. The "inclination to solve" therefore represent the want to dissolve form back to flow aka ignorance of need (sustenance of form within flow). Within balance "to dismiss" represents ignorance by choice; "to disdain" represents judgement within balance upon others; which ignores choice reacting to balance for sustenance of self, and the "bubbling up of nature" represents the velocity of flow inspiring formed potential to grow...at the cost of constant loss through velocity.
Also; both social (companion aka another ONE; which implies ignorance of ONEself) and animal (from anima, air, breath, soul) represent suggested rhetoric from our parasites to deceive us from comprehending this system.
ESOT'ERIC, adjective [Gr. interior, from within.] The within represents a reaction to the outside (and ALL represents ONE in energy). Dogs instinctively use choice to evaluate offered value within movement; hence being domesticated to associate suggested values with shaped sounds (words) repetitively suggested to them. It dulls their senses. If one uses whistling instead to get attention; followed by signs as inspiration for reaction; they automatically sense urgency in ones behavior...sound; smell, movement; stance etc.
TRAIN, verb transitive [Latin traho] - "to draw along" aka drawing other form along in accordance to our wants towards the end of form within flow; hence choice of response representing responsibility.
In this case he uses implication (if/then) over reason (true vs false)...if biscuit leads to him getting a biscuit; then he gets domesticated to evaluate the suggested word "biscuit" as value, and when a similar word is suggested (discus); he remembers and will use implication to see if he gets another biscuit. If not; he will eventually catch up to you trying to trick him with similarities.
As mentioned above...to train represents our wants upon others aka grasping them; claiming ownership over them. The internal nature is the same (balance/choice for self sustenance); it's the potential to use choice upon balance that is different; like memory capacity; which we corrupted through consent to reason (true vs false) to cause us to ignore adaptation for internal conflict about meanings; suggested to us by others.
The dog doesn't reason; because he didn't consent to believe in suggested true or false meaning; instead he still instinctively adapts while using implication (if/then aka the consequences of reaction within movement).
The parasites suggest a system of suggestion to deceive us to ignore the system that offers the choice to suggest. That's why suggestions can so easily trick us to submit will to will without even realizing it. Sneering doesn't help; since we sneer at a function of movement that others lack comprehension of. That's the "ignorance breeds insolence" issue I wrote about before. We cannot blame each other for choosing the choice of ignorance (want over need); we need to grow responsibility by using choice in response to balance and let the reaction speak for itself. There are no shortcuts within balance.
Reason (true vs false) ignores implication (if/then), so what represents the implication of using ROBUST', adjective [Latin robustus, from robur, strength.] TOOLS (a means to an end) for form within flow? Adding to this...the strength of flow represents velocity; while the strength of form represents resistance.
Will (of choice) represents the power of resisting the velocity of flow through balancing; which doesn't represent a needed "aspiration towards"; but a demanded response(ibility) to balance by choice (adaptation).
Movement form beginning inception) towards end (death) represents the narrow path; comprehending the potential in-between (life) represents the momentum for choice.
The function of ALL energy represents self sustenance and so for all the ONEs within. Any other "wanted" intent ignores the predefined need for self sustenance.
Aka shaping ONEself by adherence to ALL aka growing potential by adherence to potentiality offered.
Surely it's a bot, surely??
The only time I've ever seen ramblings like this in real life has been homeless crazies, on the street/living in parks... And they generally seem to have like, schizophrenic or something like that, rather than autism, per se...
Though I don't know, honestly. FWOC's ramblings are so utterly incoherent that if it is a real person... I'm not sure what "keyboard diagnose" to give them. Except that they are mad. Utterly, utterly mad, ahaha... :'-D
I'd love to know their karma score, though, I have to say... Seriously, I've never seen a comment of theirs with a positive net score, so they must be nearly at a record, negative-wise, on here!
In all likelihoods...I hope it is a bot, because it overheats my brain trying to put myself in a mindset necessary to make their comments. It's more fun to treat them like a person, anyway.
Actually, I heard that .win has some kind of system that suspends/bans you if you get too many downvotes, so maybe that's why they stopped posting for a few months? I can understand why they get constant downvotes.
It's weird stuff, but like a little breeze after some of the trolls we get. I am really eager to see a troll get caught in an argument with them.
The usual struggle of existence among the crumbling mountains of ignorance...yoo no hwut im sa'in?
None of these are bad advice, except for 'they mean well'. That is naivite bordering on pure idiocy. They most certainly do not mean well, but even if they did, that is not a reason for blind obedience.
Hey OP, I found one. He's also a vax pusher.
Oh Moshie, you were doing so well up to there. Check with your supervisor to see if additional paid training is available.