Look, I get it. I can be pretty extreme, and pretty inflammatory, on some issues, at times. Which is odd, really, when you consider that I'm probably fairly close to a political "moderate", as compared to some of you.
I care far too much about certain things. Perhaps I value individual freedom more than you do. Fine. Perhaps I have less to lose than you do. Fine. Perhaps I trust the government less than you, and trust the cops, and courts, less than you do. Also fine.
But, with all that in mind, I must say that I'm finding some of the comments and posts, from some of you here, in recent days and the last couple of weeks, really do come across like some sort of... Controlled demoralisation, or something.
"Obey the law, bruh". "Think of your family, bruh". "Your job is more important than your freedom!". "They mean well!". "The pendulum always swings. It'll all be ok in the long term!". "Think of the collective good, dude!" "At least you're safe!" "You don't want a criminal record, bruh!"
I see all of this shit, and more, all over posts on this "community", now. And I really never thought I would see that, from here. Just the... Sheer amount of fear porn, and of "We should obey the government" is really quite... Disconcerting. And some of it is even coming from those of you who I normally find myself agreeing with, at least partly...
So here's my request: this isn't Reddit. Stop being so damn afraid of your respective governments. Stop being afraid to step on official toes, and to work outside the fucking law, in particular the emergency powers that these megalomaniacs have given themselves. Stop telling others to be afraid, or "You really don't wanna do that, bro". Sure, call out violence. Do not do that shit. But telling people to comply, and to just... Suck it up, and play along? You're better than that, or at least, you should be.
Sure, we need to be smart about this, and disobey in ways that are effective, and necessary. But to think the law will protect you, or that you should just play along, to keep the status quo, because you "value your job" so much? Well, I'm sorry, but that just ain't gonna cut it for some of us, anymore.
Today I will engage you philosophically.
I can overlook some of your minor writing errors, but you really need to watch for grammatical conflicts like this. You've basically asserted that Choice itself is capable of choosing; this makes choice into a causal loop that discards the actual origin. Since this specific error is isolated here, I am calling it a mistake. Only an agent of will can make a choice (I don't think this agent must necessarily have freedom).
Ignorance is a quality of the absence of knowledge, not an absence of choice. One can have knowledge without having chosen anything, even if denying the gift of choice makes one an insect.
Parasites? A parasite takes for its own gain without granting a benefit to host in exchange. Why must your "parasite" here never be a symbiote? Perhaps the agent of will is lazy or suicidal for a moment and feels glad for suggestions...if you maintain that this subjective symbiote is an objective parasite, then I ask why an agent of will must be concerned with the objective? A life can only be borne of experience, and all experience is inherently subjective - so to focus on the objective is to focus on the unlivable, the void, the other.
In so many smoke signals you call out "Think freely! Think for yourself!" Riddles should be reserved for the times and ideas that are strongly resisted. Yes, we're all here, betraying this ideal of choice you hold aloft, but do you think us so feeble that we cannot stand simply because we seek out discourse and opinion and - dare I say - suggestion?
The only thing to despise and rebuke is if an agent of will surrenders their will, for there is no guarantee that they can retrieve it. In so doing, they may as well be called an agent of the void, but more often they may twist into the dreaded agent of the master (because they surrender their will to the will of another). ...I like to think none of us are doing that, but it is hard to say for sure.
I question the focus on nature as well. Nature is respectable, of course. Nature perserveres with its mystery forces throughout all hardship. Nature forged our gifts in its brutality yet embraces us in its apathy. But as agents of will, we have our own internal natures that grant us the power (the will) to lash out against the agents of the wilds and to shield us from the churning of the planet organ (the external, classical Nature). Our internal nature also permits us to bring ruin to ourselves, so even if you were speaking of internal nature, I would say to bear caution.
As a generality, I agree. But consider: there really are agents of will who -desire- to degrade themselves by surrendering to outside wills. It's a riddle of society and civilization. Should master/slave relations be abided? Should we throw both away as rubbish? Perhaps only the eager slave is detestable and the master acting out of pity or utility.
My personal angle is that there is a deeper corruption in the idea of society. That, despite being "social animals", we should treat such a compulsion with disdain in a flex of our muscular wills. But then maybe the inclination to "solve" such problems should be dismissed, as it is merely another aspect of our (internal) nature that seeks to bubble up through the cracks in our foundations and permeate our very wills.
I'll also reach into the esoteric and suggest that dogs don't actually respond to the stimuli of our words. We train them to respond to our wills. If your dog responds to "biscuit", it will likely respond the same to "discus" - this is taken as evidence that our stimuli-response systems are superior to a dog's, but then why would this dog respond to "solar flare" when I say it with the same intent and will as if I were saying "biscuit"? I posit that the will of command is like an arm reaching out and grasping towards the target, and that dogs only need training to learn the shape of human will (which must surely have a different shape than the will of a dog, as our internal natures differ). Similarly, our systems of training/education for society prime the agent of will to more readily surrender to suggestion; at this I think we would both sneer.
I'll add another reason in order to make a point: because it is robust to have many strong tools.
The average agent of will be glad to attain robustness. It will enable their wills to act more efficiently, to engage at different angles. It amplifies the power of the will in application - and, being the power of will, it is truly a power to aspire towards.
I will not condemn the agent of will who chooses to live narrowly and sharply, as he may accomplish great feats. But even this agent of purpose (his will is narrow to achieve this purpose or dream at all costs) would do well to have a few backup tools. When I say tool, of course, I mean figurative internal tools by which the agent of will may procure, shape, transform, and enact impulses (for lack of a better term - I mean the base particle that fills our machine wills).
Our choice of what to thing about is the issue aka in adherence to inspiration or falling for the temptation of suggested information. We always think free; yet ignorance allows us to self restrict what we think about. It's then that ignorance that corrupts ones comprehension of what "self" represents....not mind/body; but that which remains of form within flow aka liquid (blood); our shared identity within bloodlines. Blood represents the self we can sustain; while body/mind transmute back to base (form to flow aka death).
From the energy perspective...flow/form cause friction; vibration; resonance and heat; which within balance requires cooling of form through liquids (mimicking flow)...water; seed; oil; blood.
Before suggested "riddles" comes ones choice of information over inspiration, which then leads to falling for suggestion. Both riddles and secrecy are based on others wanting information; which gives those who suggest the power the withhold and freely transmute the wanted information aka acting in the name of what others consent to believe.
Nature (energy) offers ALL (flow) information to each ONE (form) within at any moment (balance/choice). The mechanic used for communication represents offer/consent and when flow offers movement; then form needs to consent to inspiration aka the consequences of perceived movement.
The main tool of deception the parasitic few utilize for suggestion of information represents "words" aka suggested idols of affixed meaning, which those who consent to them are upholding within their memory, thereby setting up self restrictions that corrupt adaptation to inspiration.
Want over need represents ignorance over adherence to self sustenance. Me passing judgements upon others represents a temptation for me aka my choice of want over need. I need to resit that; which represents an ongoing struggle, and as I pointed out before...ignorance breeds insolence in others.
I did all of this before...pointing out the weaknesses within others; talking about shirking of responsibility; the submission of free will to free will; the suicidal direction of choosing want over need etc. Each ONE needs to choose for ONEself to adhere or ignore ALL. All attempts to direct others; will only tempt them to follow you; hence yet again keeping them in ignorance of balance.
I learned/taught myself that I need to adapt to inspiration for the sustenance of self; and that on the fly adaptation to text is what works for me. I couldn't write that much off the cuffs if I would aim to change the minds of others; because their ignorance would bury my attempts effortlessly. I don't write all of this for whoever you are; but as adaption to ALL, and for the sustenance of ONEself.
Consenting to a suggested screen and believing that suggested tools of communication represent real communication, is what isolates us. The parasitic world wide web suggests the mimicry of reality within a controlled environment; where each participant is deceived to self isolate in ignorance; while believing to be part of a connected unity. This represents like always a chain of command under a suggested idol used by the few to control the ignorance of the many.
BETRA'Y, verb transitive [Latin traho.] - "to deliver into the hands of an enemy". You perceive reality through the lens of conflict (reason); hence the use of betrayal and judgement (to think about others) when suggesting discourse; yet DISCOURSE, noun [Latin , to run.] implies flow, which runs us...the reacting form within. Running into each other doesn't represent discourse, but the choice of ignorance thereof.
"Wanted" judgment of despise and rebuke aside; consent by choice to suggestion of choice represents submission; surrender of free will to free will, yet retrieval isn't the issue, since consent by choice to choice simply represents ignorance of using choice in response to balance. All it takes to "retrieve" is to choose to resist ignorance for the next choice. Each choice starts within the same momentum of balance.
Balance represents the guaranty for choice; not the consequences of choices by others within balance, which represent ever changing circumstance in need for adaptation.
Aka form suggesting temptation to lure other form back into flow. It's just a exploitation of choice; not agents in cahoots with the destructive forces of velocity. The loss through velocity is what also causes the resisting growth aka the opportunity for life.
Chain of command aka the beast system of self destruction. It represents a self perpetuating pyramid scheme; a hierarchy of corrupting based on the ignorance of free will of choice in reaction to balance for the submission to suggested choice.
We all do. Instead of master/slave; think suggestion/consent. We are being deceived to consent to use suggested words as idols of meaning for a world that does not offer words to express itself (it uses movement aka inspiration).
This idolatry a) allows the parasitic few to act in the name of the words we consent to believe the meaning of, which represents them using "spell-craft" upon us and b) it corrupted us to think in words; which represents our ego aka the inner monologue tempting us constantly to reason internally about meaning; while ignoring to adapt to inspiration outside.
The way the so called talmud is structure is based upon the mimicry of the ego; and it is being used to control the conflict of reason among others by talmudic reasoning aka the suggestion of deliberate contradiction to both sides of reason (true vs false). This represents the few using farmhands to feed the ignorance of the many; and to protect the farmhands from the conflicts of reason; the so called talmud teaches to use implication (if/then) over reason (true vs false) thereby preventing them to consent to suggested conflict (division).
Languages represent the temptation to ignore inspiration; because they allow everyone to suggest information to each other and eventually we will grow out of them; which as a result will make the suggestions of others impotent. Then again...making this into a goal (want) ignores the need to wield choice in response to balance aka responsibility over the choice of ignorance and what it causes.
RESPECT', verb transitive [Latin respecto, or respectus, from respicio; re and specio, to view.] - "to regard". It represents the only source for regard.
Energy represents the self sustenance of ALL information. Internally; the loss of ongoing potentiality (flow) causing the temporary growth of potential (form) represent the balance between the forces of velocity/resistance. Lastly; temporary form adhering to self sustenance within ongoing flow represents the hardship aka the struggle for temporary chaos to sustain itself within the ongoing natural order.
MYS'TERY, noun (Latin mysterium; Gr. a secret). That's based upon ignoring ALL offered inspiration for the suggested information of other ONEs; which gives the the power to conceal meaning of suggested information from those who want it.
There's no mystery within perceived nature; only the lack of comprehension of those within. Need over want grows comprehension (potential); want over need corrupts comprehension. Your choice.
Flow doesn't require choice to cause form; form requires choice to balance within flow. Choice represent a tool limited to formed chaos; while the natural order doesn't require any tools...it represents the movement of ALL information. That movement wasn't caused by choice; it represents the loss of ALL within itself, causing the growth of the self segregated ONEs within ALL.
Brutal and apathy represent choice of evaluation upon perceived value; not flow acting in any specific way besides moving us from beginning towards end. We embrace that movement; which defines our existence as resistance to it.
Each ONE represents a seed within ALL aka each ONE potential contains ALL potentiality. To prevent each ONE to become anther ALL....the ONEs have to be temporary, hence processed by ALL for loss/growth aka self sustenance.
Each of us represents a limited potential with access to unlimited potentiality. That's what the few use suggestion for to prevent the many to comprehend...their ignored potential; which in return represents the energy the few are wielding in the name of the many and against the many. The beast system is run by those consenting to ignorance within; not by those who suggest others to run it. A parasitic exploitation of ignorance and the many "want" it.
There's no against within energy. We shape conflicts (reason) by ignorance thereof. Ask yourself this...without consenting to the suggestions of others; how could you end up in a conflict? Predator/prey are not in conflict with each other; they coexist within the same habitat. They are defined by each others coexistence. They each react by choice to balance for self sustenance...no conflict.
Flow corrupts form unless form struggles to sustain itself within flow. That's the ongoing churning of nature upon all within. The shield represents the resistance of momentum to the velocity of motion and we represent the choice within that balance. Life dies yet until then; it's balancing within momentum.
Want over need. Always a choice reacting to balance by adhering or ignoring it. As form we represent the internal reaction to flow.
I wasn't really expecting such a response. I was just playing around so I could learn. It took hours for me to read all of the replies, so I can't respond to individual points. I'll give a broader, more meta response.
You do have some form of logical consistency. I can understand about 70% of the things you say in this strict syntax style - the rest is either out of my grasp or I can intuit since I'm a low-wit and rely on my intuition to understand things. It makes me think that you have simple/normal messages but then run them through this translation to get your usual writing style. This brings me to ask: what is the goal of communication to you?
There was a a section you wrote that pointed out a strife/argument section. It made me think that you were interpreting the common purpose of communication to be arguments or attempts to persuade the other party. And you wouldn't exactly be wrong, as I see that enough. But if you're intending on taking some third option to escape that trite win/loss setup, I don't know why you wouldn't go the way I did: trying to understand how the other person thinks (no one tells you directly how they think; it is always a puzzle and they react with hostility if they figure out what you're doing).
To me, the goal of communication is to gain understanding. If I determine that there's nothing I can learn by engaging, then I do not engage. It is a very rare case for me to try to change someone's opinion, no matter how retarded I may find their view. Because I have no interest in changing minds, I am fine shifting my position and speech patterns; I avoid rigidity. You, however, appear to speak very rigidly. A casual reading would cause a bystander to think you haven't addressed anything you're responding to (this is the primary reason you're viewed as a bot) - I think I've figured it out, though I am not prepared to prove it. Even so, I struggle to understand why you take this stance when you must realize that it is not trivial to decipher the things you say.
I'll share one of my foundations: I assume everything is true and only allow my beliefs to solidify after I eliminate falsehoods by finding contradictions. I cannot explain how, but your if/then reasoning made me think of it. Maybe because I don't rank my ideas as true/false, but as "this is true enough to rely on here"/"this is not sufficiently reliable". Ideas are just tools to help me make decisions, and sometimes I gotta use a screwdriver like a hammer, and other times a saw is all I have available when opening a jar. Really, I get the feeling that we'd agree on a lot of things if not for this communicative impasse, based largely on how I'm intuiting your statements.
Apply movement to any of your "truths"...don't they constantly change? What represents truth for life when dead? Is inception truth; at your stage in life or is it now false; because you grew since then. If life is truth and death false; then why can I hold my breath to the brink of death before being forced to adapt to movement?
Anything you proclaim to be true or false can be contradicted; because you can only assume as form within flow; not proclaim. Can you claim life over death or is that just ignorance of being moved towards death? Within the momentum of motion; the temporary ONE cannot claim the ongoing ALL; only use ALL of it.
I started just like that; until I ran into contradictions to whatever I believed to be true. I didn't comprehend the moving foundation to build ones assumptions upon yet. Once movement clicked into comprehension; change contradicts true and false assumption.
If/then represents the consequences of reaction to movement; while true versus false represents conflict about affixes assumptions (affixes mentally as beliefs). We are processed internally by energy as growth (form) within loss (flow) for self sustenance.
Adaptation by choice to balance within movement. Try to refocus from wanted outcomes to balance between need/want reactions and the outcomes will react to you aka you then shape outcomes within form by choice of reaction to flow. Reactions are delayed based on the choice of reaction from others (mostly ignorance); but nonetheless every ONE within ALL will react to each ONEs choices (aka transmutation within energy).
Outcome is already decided (death); which is why you don't need to make a DECIS'ION, noun - "final judgment towards end of a struggle"; but continue to struggle to sustain form within flow aka balancing within momentum. ALL represents ONEs tool for self sustenance...you just lack comprehension about how to use ONE within ALL.
Adaptation to inspiration causing you to comprehend what you can if you try aka growth of potential. Your choice evaluates the value you perceive. Why define it as a hammer if it can be used for everything...shape it instead to your needs; which are the collective needs of self sustenance.
We perceive the same ALL; but we each comprehend it based on ONEs choice based comprehension. The differences in potential represents inspiration to each other; and so adapting to perceived differences will allow us to resonate with this system.
We comprehend different angles of the same source. Resist to seek agreement with others; and instead adapt to what inspires you; which in return inspires them and you both will eventually be in balance.
As ONE within ALL you represents ALL(in)ONE aka alone. All the others represent inspiration for you to sustain ONEself; while the flow that moves them represents the constant temptation to ignore inspiration.
What if I adapt to what inspires me; for the sustenance of self aka for the growth of my own comprehension? I read text on a screen...that's not communication between senses; it's suggested technology set up as a substitute for communication, which allows parasites to shape input; processing and output by means of endless suggestion.
They suggest instant messaging to mimic movement; emojis to mimic emotions; avatars to mimic identity; voting to mimic choice; audiovisuals to mimic perception; auto-correct to mimic manual correction; suggested explanations to mimic comprehension and so on...fiction to mimic reality in accordance to the transhumanism agenda of exchanging 1 (natural reality) with 0 (digital fiction) by suggesting us to consent to ignore the former for the latter.
As for goals...as form (life) within flow (inception towards death); the outcomes is predefined at entrance; which puts all the value upon balancing (choice of need), not seeking outcomes (choice of want). Temporary form within ongoing flow isn't outcome oriented; because velocity of flow represents direction; form is balance oriented, hence needed adaptation by choice of reaction.
You have a free will of choice; because you're within a balance (inception/death) defined by movement, which you react to. You are not within past, present; future...but within the ever changing moment(um) of motion as form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
I couldn't write at this level or this much if I would aim to write for others; only to be met with majority insults and ignorance. Instead I write for the sustenance of self; which grows my own potential; which in return grows the ecosystem of ONEself within ALL; which then automatically causes unity among those around me who choose to do the same.
U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness" doesn't represent seeking agreement with the choices of others for unity; but each using choice in adherence to balance for the sustenance of ONEself. As form within flow we each represent ONE within ALL. Comprehending this represents gaining self discernment, and afterwards ONE comprehends enough to start questioning ALL perceived; which then leads to the comprehension that ALL represents ONE in energy aka the energizer of the flow we exist in response to.
The parasitic few use suggestion of affixed meaning to deceive the many to ignore being within movement. Allow yourself to question movement; ongoing movement; constant change. How can you believe the suggested affixed states of past; present and future...when "time" represents the measurement of ongoing movement (tick, tick, tick...)?
All of this aside...how you choose to react upon what you read represents your choice between suggested information (want) or perceived inspiration (need). If you choose want; then you will want to believe or not believe the information I suggest to you, but if you act upon inspiration...neither me as the source; nor you believing or not believing it have any role within you choosing to adapt to inspiration.
Whatever you react to...try to use need over want; inspiration over information, and implication (if/then) over reason (true vs false).
At inception you cannot speak any language; yet you use your free will of choice to react to balance. You choose to adapt to what inspires you; predominately the need for water; food and shelter. Nobody needs to explain this to you; you quickly comprehend how to sustain yourself by choosing need over want, yet you also teach/learn yourself the consequences of want; when you torture you family unit with wanted attention that you don't need.
In short...learning by doing aka adaptation to perceived inspiration to build comprehension of the perceived. That is what suggested languages are deceiving us to ignore; because all words are suggested to us by the choices of others; and consenting to believe them; represents a) our ignorance of using choice upon balance and b) giving others the power to act in the name of the meaning they suggested us to consent to.
From a different perspective...movement causes sound; we respond to sound by shaping it with choice. Words suggest meaning; while tricking us to ignore the source of sound; which is ongoing movement; which predefines ALL meaning for each ONE within. In other words..balance represents ALL value; choice within balance represents evaluation aka the highest value in existence.
Example money...the few suggest substitute value (money) to deceive the many to consent to believe it; while ignoring to use choice for evaluation of balance. Afterwards the few suggest usury to consolidate all the consented to monetary value. Why? To out value access to value for the choices of the many.
Your win vs loss conflict is based on a) your choice to ignore that life is balance and not outcome oriented and b) versus is based on ignorance of coexistence (within energy). When you consent to any suggestion by believing or not believing it, then you cause the conflict of reason (true versus false) between those who consented.
The few use suggestion (-isms) to cause division (reason) among the many, and since the many choose want over need to consent to suggested -isms; they react to balance by choice of ignorance; which in return corrupts their comprehension. Those within reason think they can win over false with truth, when in reality there's neither false nor true information offered through movement; only constant change as inspiration.
Every other life-form in vicinity perceives; comprehends and reacts to "grass"; without anyone suggesting them that it's called "grass". Movement contains the meaning our senses perceive as inspiration; while the word "grass" corrupts us to ignore this. When movement shapes grass to hey, and I proclaim it to be grass; others will reason with me about my false proclamation. True vs false are all word based aka suggested spell-craft.
Form to flow by choice of reaction represents communication aka resonance (balance). The parasites suggest us to believe that communication means from one to another aka form choice to choice aka from teacher of knowledge to student of understanding. The few suggest meaning; the many consent to ignore the source of ALL meaning. The few use suggestion to domesticate free will of choice and the many consent to it by free will of choice. Consent to suggestion represents submission of free will to free will of others aka ignorance of balance; of reality; of natural law; of ALL existence.
Understanding isn't based on your choice of want (your goals); but upon your choice of need while resisting the temptation of wants. Comprehension is build by reaction to perception aka adaptation to inspiration; not consent to believe suggested information by others.
From the energy perspective...ongoing flow represents electric velocity; while temporary form within represents magnetic resistance. To sustain resistance requires form to transmute electric velocity into magnetic resistance...perceiving inspiration; followed by choice based transmutation into comprehended information. That's how ONE sustains ONEself by choosing to adhere to ALL. You represent temporary growth (choice) within ongoing loss (balance), and you need to utilize the power of loss to sustain the power of growth.
Choosing to believe me; does not represent comprehending it for yourself. No other can teach/learn you to comprehend reality; you need to choose reality by your own free will of choice aka need over want. Your want of goals is supplied endlessly by the parasitic few who suggest the many to want "progress"; which for life represents towards death. You are within constant progress (flow) and need your choice of reaction to balance within for resistance (form).
The parasites always suggest the inversion of reality; because there are only two choices within balance...self sustenance or ignorance aka need or want; yet choosing ignorance causes billions of suggested choices (oh sweet temptations).
There's the suggested inversion of everything (ALL)...ONEs choice to ignore it for the suggestion of "nothingness" by other ONEs. Can you tell me where nature offers your perception "nothing"? We are domesticated to use these words without ever questioning the source of them. Pure ignorance.
Each of us represents the sole authority over ONEself within ALL aka the free will of choice. Changing the choices of others represents ignorance of free will; which then allows the tool of suggestion to subvert the free will of others to submit to your choice.
Change represents flow aka the inspiration flow represents for the form within. You need to change your choice by reacting to inspiration (constant change). That's called adaptation aka balancing as form within flow.
That's resistance of form to flow aka balancing within momentum. Keep doing this mentally and physically.
I shape languages back towards origin; hence repetition. The few suggested languages as idols of meaning and then kept building their tower of babel (heb. confusion; disorder) upon it until it collapses and the build upon the remains. They suggest complexity to hide simplicity, yet our ignorance deceives us to use the complexity of consented to beliefs to prevent ourselves to question the simplicity of nature.
A book is a good example...before opening it; it already implies my choice as the target; those who ignore my free will of choice as the origin, and endless suggestions hidden within deception in-between. Once you comprehend access to ALL through inspiration; the information suggested by others becomes a temptation to fall for.
Adding to this...I don't offer (no threads started) and I don't judge (no up/down votes given); which keeps me in balance, and so if others react to what I adapted to; I have then a reference point between their potential (comprehension) and mine; which I then try to also balance.
It's always about the wants of others; while ignoring needs. Meanwhile I dissect whatever inspires me for my own sustenance (need); just not for the wants of others. Those who comprehend this use me by throwing topics at me; just like I use others for inspiration.
Those who want responses; want others to consent to what they suggest; hence them building sides for the conflict of reason. I don't perceive conflict anymore; I comprehend that ONEness of ALL (energy) underneath, and therefore don't consent to any suggested conflicts, and as it turns out; without reason; most have very few things to say...they make a lot of noise tho.
Reacting by free will of choice is being perceived by the many as unnatural behavior; as artificial intelligence...what does that imply for the ignorance of the many? Once I comprehended -isms; they all fell away as self imposed restriction upon my comprehension. To believe (anything) represents perceiving reality through the lens of the suggested meaning by others. It represents stagnation in ignorance of adaptation.
Beliefs aren't true or false; the reaction of believing suggestions represents ignorance of being choice in reaction to balance. True vs false (reason) represents reaction to consenting to suggested meaning.
Btw: Bot; from robot [from Latin roboro, from robur, strength.]
What you read represents the growth of another; not yours. You still need to adapt to what inspires to build your own comprehension. This is on you. I learned/thought myself that resisting my own ignorance (need over want) is what's needed to grow understanding of this world; and not the information others are suggesting me.
It took me close to a decade to allow myself to question the existence of the laws of nature without the religious connotations attached to it. My beliefs prevented me from questioning myself; yet after I did; everything fell into place, and it was only me choosing to resist the temptation to ignore what I perceive for what I consented to believe. There was nobody to blame but own choice of ignorance.
Lacking self discernment as being ONE within ALL is based on ONEs choice within ALL. How do you tell the ignorant to choose to not be ignorant anymore; when ignorance is based on shirking responsibility over choice upon balance? The last thing they want to do is questioning themselves and the parasites suggest them both others to follow and others to blame aka both sides that distract form choice based balance in-between.
How about instead of struggling to comprehend; you struggle to adapt to perceived? Need over want. You want to understand; and you want to believe (X-files sleight of hand); and you want others to tell you what to do, but you don't need any of that.
Grab anything I write and utilize if/then (implication) upon it; without the want for true vs false outcome. See where it leads you and acknowledge whatever beliefs that will prevent you from further implicating. Start a list; until you cannot ignore the restriction through -isms anymore. Your choice.
ER'ROR, noun [Latin error from erro, to wander.] As form within flow we represent "the type of guys that like to roam around and never settle down" aka a wanderer, and yet we're moved as form by flow, hence in reaction to movement aka resisting the temptation to "roam around, around, around, around..."
In other words...ongoing flow represents the natural order; temporary form within the chaos struggle for self sustenance. We represent the error that allows growth of potential.
Go hard at anything that inspires you and resist to believe vs not-believe (reason) aka ignoring it; just use if/then (implication) and keep doing it.
GRAM'MAR, noun [Latin grammatica; Gr. a letter, to write.] Nature doesn't write; it doesn't brand anything by words; it moves us; which allows us to shape sound into words; which we then suggest to each other as meaning; while ignoring that ALL meaning is predefined within flow for the ONEs (form) reacting to it.
ALL value is within balance; ONE reacts by choice of evaluation to it for balancing aka self sustenance of form within flow...not to define value to each other; while ignoring that flow constantly change all values. Perceiving that constant change with our senses represents inspiration demanding adaptation by choice of reaction...and yet we can choose to ignore this (aka falling for temptation).
We don't need to watch for conflicts; cause there are none within energy (flow/form). What we perceive as conflicts represents "reason" aka our suggested assumptions of true versus false in ignorance of flow; of movement; of constant change. We are being deceived through suggestion (-isms) to divide ourselves by reason into arguing about affixed meaning (idols of true or false); while choosing to ignore this system of movement (energy) that demands us to constantly adapt to movement.
The origin of choice represents balance as form (life) within flow (inception towards death). Choice represents reaction to balance aka resistance of form within the momentum of flow; reacting to the consequences of velocity (flow) upon resistance (form).
As for the choices...resistance within movement represents the state of balance, hence the need for adaptation by balancing through choice of reaction...so form needs to adapt to flow, yet choice within balance requires choice between natural opposites. Why? Because form is defined by flow as moving from beginning towards end aka in-between natural opposites in balance with each other; hence having a choice in-between.
Need aka self sustenance by adaption represents one choice; the other choice represents the temptation of ignorance. It's the ongoing velocity of flow that constantly tempts the resisting temporary form within to say "fuck that struggle; I go with the flow". That represents the choice of want over need; which within balance implies the ignorance of need.
That's the origin...balance/choice as the foundation and need/want as the "free" will of choice reacting to the "dom"-iance of balance aka the free-dom of temporary growth (form) within ongoing loss (flow).
Now... choosing want over need aka ignorance over adherence to self sustenance is where the magic happens. What can ONE ignore ALL for? The suggestions of other ONEs aka endless choices suggested to those who ignore that only balance offers ALL.
How can offer by ALL and suggestion by another ONE happen simultaneously you may ask? ALL offers inspiration through movement to ONEs senses; hence the need for ongoing adaptation to inspiration. Other ONEs suggest affixed information (-isms) towards our free will of choice in exchange for consent to believe/not believe that those suggested -isms represent true/false information. No matter what we choose; we will then find ourselves stuck within the conflict of reason (true versus false) between believers vs non-believers.
That represents division (reason) by suggestion (-ism)...all within the choice of want over need aka in ignorance of reality (hence all fiction upheld as beliefs within our conscious memory). A consciousness used in adherence to flow utilizes memory like a ram (temporary storage for ongoing adaptation); while a consciousness used in ignorance of flow utilizes memory like a hard-drive (storage of suggested affixed information to capacity).
Flow offers inspiration as input to our consciousness (perception); then we use choice upon it (adherence or ignorance), which processes perceived inspiration into comprehended information. This a) represents growth of potential (comprehension) out of loss of potentiality (perception) and b) the alchemical procedure of transmutation out of base aka from ALL through ONE for the sustenance of self.
In short...the origin of choice represents reaction to balance, yet choosing to ignore this, causes a) the lack of comprehension and b) the suggestions by others which balance is ignored for represents endless tempting choices of others aka being stuck in the loop of wanting vs not-wanting (reason) the suggested choices of others, which for those with lack of comprehension represents the origin of value to choose from.
To consent to believe others deceives one to ignore free will of choice for the choices of others aka consent to submit free will to the false authority of free will by others. Free will of choice represents ONEs sole authority over self in reaction to the balance of ALL. The choice of ignorance causes the corruption of understanding what choice represents...a response to balance aka ONEs responsibility within ALL.
2nd attempt at a short answer...ignorance doesn't discard origin; it corrupts those who ignore from understanding origin.
A'GENT, noun - "an actor; one that exerts power, or has the power to act". Consider that choice represents a "re-action" to balance; that form reacts to flow; that momentum reacts to motion; that resistance reacts to velocity; that magnetic reacts to electric; that ONE reacts to ALL, that ALL represents ONE in energy...the energetic actor that causes all the reactions within itself?
Take agent (action) out and question "free" will of choice in reaction to the "dom"-inance of balance within flow and you can comprehend that free-dom (natural opposites) implies balance for choice to react to.
Neither. KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists". ALL knowledge exists within energy; flow (loss of potentiality) communicates it as inspiration to each ONE (growth of potential) form within flow. ONE perceives ALL; yet ONEs choice upon ALL perceived define how much thereof ONE comprehends.
AB'SENCE, noun [Latin absens, from absum, abesse, to be away; ab and sum.] There's no "away" within the coexistence of energy.
As for quality...balance represents ALL value; choice the responding evaluation thereof. Choice evaluates to balance aka self sustenance.
Knowledge (perception) represents input (into form; by flow) hence being the status quo for the existence of form. Motion represents all input for the resulting momentum. The moment(um) form begins (inception aka flow to form) choice within balance is established, because input needs to be received (need); yet balance requires the choice to ignore the received (want). Balance/choice are defined by each others coexistence within movement.
Deny represents "to contradict"; yet form cannot contradict flow, it must adapt to it; yet can ignore doing so. Form inflicts everything upon self by ignoring to adhere to flow. The struggle to resist that temptation is how loss (flow) balances itself through growth (form). Our resistance needs to be a struggle to be able to balance the ongoing loss through velocity.
You can ignore to drink; eat; seek shelter or even breathing; but that only causes pressure upon form within flow until form is forced to adapt. We are processed by flow for both loss/growth...it's our choice as what...flushed away for loss or struggle to resist for growth?
Choice in reaction to balance represents exchange within coexistence. All reactions represents both inspiration to sustain ourselves and temptation to ignore it. Our parasites represent the reaction to our ignorance aka the few exploiting the ignorance of the many through suggestion; which both inspires us to change what we did so fat; as well as tempting us to ignore all the consequences as well; because otherwise responsibility of choice and the shirking thereof by choice of ignorance become the problem and hand; and the last thing the ignorant wants is facing his own ignorance.
Ignorance also tempts insolence in others; hence the few ruthlessly exploiting the many.
As for gain...want represents claiming ownership over other ONEs; while ignoring that ALL is offered for free use. Form cannot claim anything within flow; only use everything for self sustenance. Then again...ignorance.
Because the status quo of this system represents ALL being ONE in energy; which implies that the ONEs (form) within are being segregated out of ALL (flow). Why? To establish growth potential (form) out of loss potentiality (flow)...to process loss/growth within balance. Parasites are consequences of want over need for the host; who ignore self sustenance by allowing weaknesses to tempt parasitic behavior of others.
That moment(um) represents constant offer of inspiration and constant temptation for those within. Flow moving form is being perceived by form as inspiration to adapt to; yet flow moving form also pulls form; hence tempting the ignorance of resistance. Our parasites suggest us to consent to seek "progress"; which is what the entire beast system of society uses to incite self destruction.
Progress suggests wanted outcome; which in return ignores needed balance. Life isn't outcome oriented; since death is predefined at inception (natural opposites). Life is balance oriented; hence choice of reaction to balance.
There's the wanted outcome (objective); when form is being subjected by flow; hence being concerned with balancing through choice based adaptation (aka the need aka the "must"). All suggestions represent the want, which is why a suggestion wants us to consent to the choice of those making them.
Experience (to try) represents reaction as form to flow; yet life is borne out of flow; hence balancing in-between inception and death (aka trying to survive). Life is borne out of information; which is what energy represents (the source of ALL information); which form perceives as the flow of inspiration to react to.
Suggested objective deceive (tempt) form to ignore self sustenance for the corruption by flow, yet it doesn't represent "unlivable, the void, the other.", but the coexisting natural opposite we react to. It's motion that causes momentum, hence flow making form livable...temporarily. VOID, adjective [Latin viduus, divido. Gr.] aka flow to form (inception of life).
That represents wanting to legislate symptoms; while ignoring the need to adapt to the cause...temptation aka the choice of want over need aka ignorance. The so called master first suggests others to consent to be slaves, and the so called slaves consent to the suggestions of a master. Both choose want over need before the labels of master and slave are applicable. Afterwards they all reason about the wants vs not wants of each label; but seldom about the choice that causes the conflict. We ignore that we judge behavior not upon balance; but upon the choices of ignorance towards balance. "detestable" and "pity" are aimed at those who already chose want over need; yet that's not what you judge them for. We are being deceived to try to find a balance by reasoning about choices; when balance predefines having a choice.
SOCI'ETY, noun [Latin societas, from socius, a companion] - "the union of a number of rational beings" aka unity of ONEs. That represents the suggested inversion of the collective ALL segregating itself into individual ONEs for growth within loss. ALL represents ONE in energy aka the ONEness of ALL; which is why each individual ONE needs to react to ALL for the sustenance of ONEself...not for other ONEs. Growing self is what unites the ONEs who choose to react the same within ALL. Plant a seed and an ecosystem will grow around it aka growth attracts growth.
The parasites have a sleight of hand for this...High (flow) Lander (form)..."there can be only ONE" And from its soundtrack..."I am immortal. I have inside me blood of kings. I have no rival. No man can be my equal. No man could understand. My power is in my own hand"
PROB'LEM, noun [Latin problema; Gr. to throw forward]. It's lack of comprehension representing form thrown forward through flow. The "inclination to solve" therefore represent the want to dissolve form back to flow aka ignorance of need (sustenance of form within flow). Within balance "to dismiss" represents ignorance by choice; "to disdain" represents judgement within balance upon others; which ignores choice reacting to balance for sustenance of self, and the "bubbling up of nature" represents the velocity of flow inspiring formed potential to grow...at the cost of constant loss through velocity.
Also; both social (companion aka another ONE; which implies ignorance of ONEself) and animal (from anima, air, breath, soul) represent suggested rhetoric from our parasites to deceive us from comprehending this system.
ESOT'ERIC, adjective [Gr. interior, from within.] The within represents a reaction to the outside (and ALL represents ONE in energy). Dogs instinctively use choice to evaluate offered value within movement; hence being domesticated to associate suggested values with shaped sounds (words) repetitively suggested to them. It dulls their senses. If one uses whistling instead to get attention; followed by signs as inspiration for reaction; they automatically sense urgency in ones behavior...sound; smell, movement; stance etc.
TRAIN, verb transitive [Latin traho] - "to draw along" aka drawing other form along in accordance to our wants towards the end of form within flow; hence choice of response representing responsibility.
In this case he uses implication (if/then) over reason (true vs false)...if biscuit leads to him getting a biscuit; then he gets domesticated to evaluate the suggested word "biscuit" as value, and when a similar word is suggested (discus); he remembers and will use implication to see if he gets another biscuit. If not; he will eventually catch up to you trying to trick him with similarities.
As mentioned above...to train represents our wants upon others aka grasping them; claiming ownership over them. The internal nature is the same (balance/choice for self sustenance); it's the potential to use choice upon balance that is different; like memory capacity; which we corrupted through consent to reason (true vs false) to cause us to ignore adaptation for internal conflict about meanings; suggested to us by others.
The dog doesn't reason; because he didn't consent to believe in suggested true or false meaning; instead he still instinctively adapts while using implication (if/then aka the consequences of reaction within movement).
The parasites suggest a system of suggestion to deceive us to ignore the system that offers the choice to suggest. That's why suggestions can so easily trick us to submit will to will without even realizing it. Sneering doesn't help; since we sneer at a function of movement that others lack comprehension of. That's the "ignorance breeds insolence" issue I wrote about before. We cannot blame each other for choosing the choice of ignorance (want over need); we need to grow responsibility by using choice in response to balance and let the reaction speak for itself. There are no shortcuts within balance.
Reason (true vs false) ignores implication (if/then), so what represents the implication of using ROBUST', adjective [Latin robustus, from robur, strength.] TOOLS (a means to an end) for form within flow? Adding to this...the strength of flow represents velocity; while the strength of form represents resistance.
Will (of choice) represents the power of resisting the velocity of flow through balancing; which doesn't represent a needed "aspiration towards"; but a demanded response(ibility) to balance by choice (adaptation).
Movement form beginning inception) towards end (death) represents the narrow path; comprehending the potential in-between (life) represents the momentum for choice.
The function of ALL energy represents self sustenance and so for all the ONEs within. Any other "wanted" intent ignores the predefined need for self sustenance.
Aka shaping ONEself by adherence to ALL aka growing potential by adherence to potentiality offered.