Look, I get it. I can be pretty extreme, and pretty inflammatory, on some issues, at times. Which is odd, really, when you consider that I'm probably fairly close to a political "moderate", as compared to some of you.
I care far too much about certain things. Perhaps I value individual freedom more than you do. Fine. Perhaps I have less to lose than you do. Fine. Perhaps I trust the government less than you, and trust the cops, and courts, less than you do. Also fine.
But, with all that in mind, I must say that I'm finding some of the comments and posts, from some of you here, in recent days and the last couple of weeks, really do come across like some sort of... Controlled demoralisation, or something.
"Obey the law, bruh". "Think of your family, bruh". "Your job is more important than your freedom!". "They mean well!". "The pendulum always swings. It'll all be ok in the long term!". "Think of the collective good, dude!" "At least you're safe!" "You don't want a criminal record, bruh!"
I see all of this shit, and more, all over posts on this "community", now. And I really never thought I would see that, from here. Just the... Sheer amount of fear porn, and of "We should obey the government" is really quite... Disconcerting. And some of it is even coming from those of you who I normally find myself agreeing with, at least partly...
So here's my request: this isn't Reddit. Stop being so damn afraid of your respective governments. Stop being afraid to step on official toes, and to work outside the fucking law, in particular the emergency powers that these megalomaniacs have given themselves. Stop telling others to be afraid, or "You really don't wanna do that, bro". Sure, call out violence. Do not do that shit. But telling people to comply, and to just... Suck it up, and play along? You're better than that, or at least, you should be.
Sure, we need to be smart about this, and disobey in ways that are effective, and necessary. But to think the law will protect you, or that you should just play along, to keep the status quo, because you "value your job" so much? Well, I'm sorry, but that just ain't gonna cut it for some of us, anymore.
I wasn't really expecting such a response. I was just playing around so I could learn. It took hours for me to read all of the replies, so I can't respond to individual points. I'll give a broader, more meta response.
You do have some form of logical consistency. I can understand about 70% of the things you say in this strict syntax style - the rest is either out of my grasp or I can intuit since I'm a low-wit and rely on my intuition to understand things. It makes me think that you have simple/normal messages but then run them through this translation to get your usual writing style. This brings me to ask: what is the goal of communication to you?
There was a a section you wrote that pointed out a strife/argument section. It made me think that you were interpreting the common purpose of communication to be arguments or attempts to persuade the other party. And you wouldn't exactly be wrong, as I see that enough. But if you're intending on taking some third option to escape that trite win/loss setup, I don't know why you wouldn't go the way I did: trying to understand how the other person thinks (no one tells you directly how they think; it is always a puzzle and they react with hostility if they figure out what you're doing).
To me, the goal of communication is to gain understanding. If I determine that there's nothing I can learn by engaging, then I do not engage. It is a very rare case for me to try to change someone's opinion, no matter how retarded I may find their view. Because I have no interest in changing minds, I am fine shifting my position and speech patterns; I avoid rigidity. You, however, appear to speak very rigidly. A casual reading would cause a bystander to think you haven't addressed anything you're responding to (this is the primary reason you're viewed as a bot) - I think I've figured it out, though I am not prepared to prove it. Even so, I struggle to understand why you take this stance when you must realize that it is not trivial to decipher the things you say.
I'll share one of my foundations: I assume everything is true and only allow my beliefs to solidify after I eliminate falsehoods by finding contradictions. I cannot explain how, but your if/then reasoning made me think of it. Maybe because I don't rank my ideas as true/false, but as "this is true enough to rely on here"/"this is not sufficiently reliable". Ideas are just tools to help me make decisions, and sometimes I gotta use a screwdriver like a hammer, and other times a saw is all I have available when opening a jar. Really, I get the feeling that we'd agree on a lot of things if not for this communicative impasse, based largely on how I'm intuiting your statements.
Apply movement to any of your "truths"...don't they constantly change? What represents truth for life when dead? Is inception truth; at your stage in life or is it now false; because you grew since then. If life is truth and death false; then why can I hold my breath to the brink of death before being forced to adapt to movement?
Anything you proclaim to be true or false can be contradicted; because you can only assume as form within flow; not proclaim. Can you claim life over death or is that just ignorance of being moved towards death? Within the momentum of motion; the temporary ONE cannot claim the ongoing ALL; only use ALL of it.
I started just like that; until I ran into contradictions to whatever I believed to be true. I didn't comprehend the moving foundation to build ones assumptions upon yet. Once movement clicked into comprehension; change contradicts true and false assumption.
If/then represents the consequences of reaction to movement; while true versus false represents conflict about affixes assumptions (affixes mentally as beliefs). We are processed internally by energy as growth (form) within loss (flow) for self sustenance.
Adaptation by choice to balance within movement. Try to refocus from wanted outcomes to balance between need/want reactions and the outcomes will react to you aka you then shape outcomes within form by choice of reaction to flow. Reactions are delayed based on the choice of reaction from others (mostly ignorance); but nonetheless every ONE within ALL will react to each ONEs choices (aka transmutation within energy).
Outcome is already decided (death); which is why you don't need to make a DECIS'ION, noun - "final judgment towards end of a struggle"; but continue to struggle to sustain form within flow aka balancing within momentum. ALL represents ONEs tool for self sustenance...you just lack comprehension about how to use ONE within ALL.
Adaptation to inspiration causing you to comprehend what you can if you try aka growth of potential. Your choice evaluates the value you perceive. Why define it as a hammer if it can be used for everything...shape it instead to your needs; which are the collective needs of self sustenance.
We perceive the same ALL; but we each comprehend it based on ONEs choice based comprehension. The differences in potential represents inspiration to each other; and so adapting to perceived differences will allow us to resonate with this system.
We comprehend different angles of the same source. Resist to seek agreement with others; and instead adapt to what inspires you; which in return inspires them and you both will eventually be in balance.
As ONE within ALL you represents ALL(in)ONE aka alone. All the others represent inspiration for you to sustain ONEself; while the flow that moves them represents the constant temptation to ignore inspiration.
What if I adapt to what inspires me; for the sustenance of self aka for the growth of my own comprehension? I read text on a screen...that's not communication between senses; it's suggested technology set up as a substitute for communication, which allows parasites to shape input; processing and output by means of endless suggestion.
They suggest instant messaging to mimic movement; emojis to mimic emotions; avatars to mimic identity; voting to mimic choice; audiovisuals to mimic perception; auto-correct to mimic manual correction; suggested explanations to mimic comprehension and so on...fiction to mimic reality in accordance to the transhumanism agenda of exchanging 1 (natural reality) with 0 (digital fiction) by suggesting us to consent to ignore the former for the latter.
As for goals...as form (life) within flow (inception towards death); the outcomes is predefined at entrance; which puts all the value upon balancing (choice of need), not seeking outcomes (choice of want). Temporary form within ongoing flow isn't outcome oriented; because velocity of flow represents direction; form is balance oriented, hence needed adaptation by choice of reaction.
You have a free will of choice; because you're within a balance (inception/death) defined by movement, which you react to. You are not within past, present; future...but within the ever changing moment(um) of motion as form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
I couldn't write at this level or this much if I would aim to write for others; only to be met with majority insults and ignorance. Instead I write for the sustenance of self; which grows my own potential; which in return grows the ecosystem of ONEself within ALL; which then automatically causes unity among those around me who choose to do the same.
U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness" doesn't represent seeking agreement with the choices of others for unity; but each using choice in adherence to balance for the sustenance of ONEself. As form within flow we each represent ONE within ALL. Comprehending this represents gaining self discernment, and afterwards ONE comprehends enough to start questioning ALL perceived; which then leads to the comprehension that ALL represents ONE in energy aka the energizer of the flow we exist in response to.
The parasitic few use suggestion of affixed meaning to deceive the many to ignore being within movement. Allow yourself to question movement; ongoing movement; constant change. How can you believe the suggested affixed states of past; present and future...when "time" represents the measurement of ongoing movement (tick, tick, tick...)?
All of this aside...how you choose to react upon what you read represents your choice between suggested information (want) or perceived inspiration (need). If you choose want; then you will want to believe or not believe the information I suggest to you, but if you act upon inspiration...neither me as the source; nor you believing or not believing it have any role within you choosing to adapt to inspiration.
Whatever you react to...try to use need over want; inspiration over information, and implication (if/then) over reason (true vs false).
At inception you cannot speak any language; yet you use your free will of choice to react to balance. You choose to adapt to what inspires you; predominately the need for water; food and shelter. Nobody needs to explain this to you; you quickly comprehend how to sustain yourself by choosing need over want, yet you also teach/learn yourself the consequences of want; when you torture you family unit with wanted attention that you don't need.
In short...learning by doing aka adaptation to perceived inspiration to build comprehension of the perceived. That is what suggested languages are deceiving us to ignore; because all words are suggested to us by the choices of others; and consenting to believe them; represents a) our ignorance of using choice upon balance and b) giving others the power to act in the name of the meaning they suggested us to consent to.
From a different perspective...movement causes sound; we respond to sound by shaping it with choice. Words suggest meaning; while tricking us to ignore the source of sound; which is ongoing movement; which predefines ALL meaning for each ONE within. In other words..balance represents ALL value; choice within balance represents evaluation aka the highest value in existence.
Example money...the few suggest substitute value (money) to deceive the many to consent to believe it; while ignoring to use choice for evaluation of balance. Afterwards the few suggest usury to consolidate all the consented to monetary value. Why? To out value access to value for the choices of the many.
Your win vs loss conflict is based on a) your choice to ignore that life is balance and not outcome oriented and b) versus is based on ignorance of coexistence (within energy). When you consent to any suggestion by believing or not believing it, then you cause the conflict of reason (true versus false) between those who consented.
The few use suggestion (-isms) to cause division (reason) among the many, and since the many choose want over need to consent to suggested -isms; they react to balance by choice of ignorance; which in return corrupts their comprehension. Those within reason think they can win over false with truth, when in reality there's neither false nor true information offered through movement; only constant change as inspiration.
Every other life-form in vicinity perceives; comprehends and reacts to "grass"; without anyone suggesting them that it's called "grass". Movement contains the meaning our senses perceive as inspiration; while the word "grass" corrupts us to ignore this. When movement shapes grass to hey, and I proclaim it to be grass; others will reason with me about my false proclamation. True vs false are all word based aka suggested spell-craft.
Form to flow by choice of reaction represents communication aka resonance (balance). The parasites suggest us to believe that communication means from one to another aka form choice to choice aka from teacher of knowledge to student of understanding. The few suggest meaning; the many consent to ignore the source of ALL meaning. The few use suggestion to domesticate free will of choice and the many consent to it by free will of choice. Consent to suggestion represents submission of free will to free will of others aka ignorance of balance; of reality; of natural law; of ALL existence.
Understanding isn't based on your choice of want (your goals); but upon your choice of need while resisting the temptation of wants. Comprehension is build by reaction to perception aka adaptation to inspiration; not consent to believe suggested information by others.
From the energy perspective...ongoing flow represents electric velocity; while temporary form within represents magnetic resistance. To sustain resistance requires form to transmute electric velocity into magnetic resistance...perceiving inspiration; followed by choice based transmutation into comprehended information. That's how ONE sustains ONEself by choosing to adhere to ALL. You represent temporary growth (choice) within ongoing loss (balance), and you need to utilize the power of loss to sustain the power of growth.
Choosing to believe me; does not represent comprehending it for yourself. No other can teach/learn you to comprehend reality; you need to choose reality by your own free will of choice aka need over want. Your want of goals is supplied endlessly by the parasitic few who suggest the many to want "progress"; which for life represents towards death. You are within constant progress (flow) and need your choice of reaction to balance within for resistance (form).
The parasites always suggest the inversion of reality; because there are only two choices within balance...self sustenance or ignorance aka need or want; yet choosing ignorance causes billions of suggested choices (oh sweet temptations).
There's the suggested inversion of everything (ALL)...ONEs choice to ignore it for the suggestion of "nothingness" by other ONEs. Can you tell me where nature offers your perception "nothing"? We are domesticated to use these words without ever questioning the source of them. Pure ignorance.
Each of us represents the sole authority over ONEself within ALL aka the free will of choice. Changing the choices of others represents ignorance of free will; which then allows the tool of suggestion to subvert the free will of others to submit to your choice.
Change represents flow aka the inspiration flow represents for the form within. You need to change your choice by reacting to inspiration (constant change). That's called adaptation aka balancing as form within flow.
That's resistance of form to flow aka balancing within momentum. Keep doing this mentally and physically.
I shape languages back towards origin; hence repetition. The few suggested languages as idols of meaning and then kept building their tower of babel (heb. confusion; disorder) upon it until it collapses and the build upon the remains. They suggest complexity to hide simplicity, yet our ignorance deceives us to use the complexity of consented to beliefs to prevent ourselves to question the simplicity of nature.
A book is a good example...before opening it; it already implies my choice as the target; those who ignore my free will of choice as the origin, and endless suggestions hidden within deception in-between. Once you comprehend access to ALL through inspiration; the information suggested by others becomes a temptation to fall for.
Adding to this...I don't offer (no threads started) and I don't judge (no up/down votes given); which keeps me in balance, and so if others react to what I adapted to; I have then a reference point between their potential (comprehension) and mine; which I then try to also balance.
It's always about the wants of others; while ignoring needs. Meanwhile I dissect whatever inspires me for my own sustenance (need); just not for the wants of others. Those who comprehend this use me by throwing topics at me; just like I use others for inspiration.
Those who want responses; want others to consent to what they suggest; hence them building sides for the conflict of reason. I don't perceive conflict anymore; I comprehend that ONEness of ALL (energy) underneath, and therefore don't consent to any suggested conflicts, and as it turns out; without reason; most have very few things to say...they make a lot of noise tho.
Reacting by free will of choice is being perceived by the many as unnatural behavior; as artificial intelligence...what does that imply for the ignorance of the many? Once I comprehended -isms; they all fell away as self imposed restriction upon my comprehension. To believe (anything) represents perceiving reality through the lens of the suggested meaning by others. It represents stagnation in ignorance of adaptation.
Beliefs aren't true or false; the reaction of believing suggestions represents ignorance of being choice in reaction to balance. True vs false (reason) represents reaction to consenting to suggested meaning.
Btw: Bot; from robot [from Latin roboro, from robur, strength.]
What you read represents the growth of another; not yours. You still need to adapt to what inspires to build your own comprehension. This is on you. I learned/thought myself that resisting my own ignorance (need over want) is what's needed to grow understanding of this world; and not the information others are suggesting me.
It took me close to a decade to allow myself to question the existence of the laws of nature without the religious connotations attached to it. My beliefs prevented me from questioning myself; yet after I did; everything fell into place, and it was only me choosing to resist the temptation to ignore what I perceive for what I consented to believe. There was nobody to blame but own choice of ignorance.
Lacking self discernment as being ONE within ALL is based on ONEs choice within ALL. How do you tell the ignorant to choose to not be ignorant anymore; when ignorance is based on shirking responsibility over choice upon balance? The last thing they want to do is questioning themselves and the parasites suggest them both others to follow and others to blame aka both sides that distract form choice based balance in-between.
How about instead of struggling to comprehend; you struggle to adapt to perceived? Need over want. You want to understand; and you want to believe (X-files sleight of hand); and you want others to tell you what to do, but you don't need any of that.
Grab anything I write and utilize if/then (implication) upon it; without the want for true vs false outcome. See where it leads you and acknowledge whatever beliefs that will prevent you from further implicating. Start a list; until you cannot ignore the restriction through -isms anymore. Your choice.