It's kind of insane to me that there are people who are actually against what Gary did.
Remember that when Kyle Rittenhouse shot three men at a BLM riot he hit a child rapist, a domestic abuser and a burglar. The people against what Gary did are the same ones who made him do it.
While anything that reproduces by killing healthy cells is going to leave some lasting damage past when the infection itself has been wiped out, it seems telling that the risk factors for "long COVID" include things like anxiety, depression and neuroticism.
Obligatory Stonetoss: “How does this sell more Advil?”
Bad example. They're telling blacks that the doctor's only telling them not to take more painkillers because he's a racist. Telling people that it's okay to buy more of your product sells more of your product.
They have a track record of doing EVERYTHING including using libertarian groups to stop age verification and when they can't, they dip. Like they don't want to stop kids accessing porn...
Age verification is not the primary feature of these systems, it's identity verification. If Pornhub doesn't want to collect a goldmine of identity theft and blackmail material even when ordered to by the government, that's a good sign.
Kids should not have unregulated access to the internet in general. It's not just about porn - the world is full of bastards, and you should be just as worried about your kid being radicalised by climate cultists or groomed by trans activists as you are about them stumbling on some piece of degenerate porn.
In principle, I don't disagree that slowly dying from a crippling terminal illness could be worse than a clean death. In practice, I don't trust these people as far as I can throw them. Every time a country brings in these assisted dying laws, the laws are abused, and there's no reason to believe France will be any different.
It already is, and it doesn't work the way you think it does. The ones who kill themselves aren't the predators - they're not going to do it unless the law catches up with them - it's the victims. Suicide doesn't keep the cult in check, it prunes the ones who might cause trouble after they stop drinking the Kool-ade.
We should not tolerate the use of the Holocaust as a bludgeon against the Nazi's enemies and to demand tolerance of the Nazi's allies. So while she has a point, the problem she's identified is that it allows her to exist.
I feel like Eurovision has fair claim to just say "Look, you're not even in Europe anyway, and you clearly suck - GTFO."
If you disqualified every Eurovision contestent that was a worthless subversive degenerate there would hardly be anyone left.
The plagiarism from journals is the better smoking gun. With Wikipedia there is at least the possibility of the reverse being true, and that he or someone else added his dissertation to Wikipedia rather than the other way around.
He changes from "I must kill him" to merely being a witness to the dead foe.
The second still means "I must kill him." It's less blunt and more flowery, but someone who tells you the latter is still planning to be the one holding the knife.
You archive things that you might wish to refer to later, and are in any way likely to be deleted. You don't need to autistically back up the entire internet to the archive site's servers just to say God & Country is a film that exists. And if you're worried about giving them traffic, install an adblocker like a normal person.
If a man has a folder of animated porn of men, he's gay. If a man has a folder of animated porn of children, he's a pedophile. Even if he isn't committing crimes by victimising children, if he wasn't sexually attracted to children he wouldn't be collecting it.
Bringing "privilege" into it is especially stupid. What's happening to the Palestinians isn't misfortune, it's the Finding Out after decades of Fucking Around. It's like calling someone "privileged" for not being a crack addict.
You're mocking him for having a functional understanding of Bitcoin when you do not. "Burning obscene amounts of carbon is bad" isn't a left wing talking point, it's the foundation on which Bitcoin is built. Unlike the gold standard which is backed by holding valuable goods in escrow, proof of work cryptocurrency is backed by destruction. If someone genuinely does not believe the cost of processing a Bitcoin transaction is nearly prohibitive they should not trust Bitcoin, because that cost is supposed to be the thing keeping the ledger secure.