If a man has a folder of animated porn of men, he's gay. If a man has a folder of animated porn of children, he's a pedophile. Even if he isn't committing crimes by victimising children, if he wasn't sexually attracted to children he wouldn't be collecting it.
I'll give you that, but we don't prosecute people for their predilections. Only their actions. You have to extend logic to the point where distribution of this pornography is a harm to the child. Which isnt' that hard to do. In the case of porn featuring actual children. Your victim in the Loli case is not very sympathetic (or real).
If a man has a folder of animated porn of men, he's gay. If a man has a folder of animated porn of children, he's a pedophile. Even if he isn't committing crimes by victimising children, if he wasn't sexually attracted to children he wouldn't be collecting it.
I'll give you that, but we don't prosecute people for their predilections. Only their actions. You have to extend logic to the point where distribution of this pornography is a harm to the child. Which isnt' that hard to do. In the case of porn featuring actual children. Your victim in the Loli case is not very sympathetic (or real).
Yeah but people on here vehemently argue against how liking loli makes you a pedophile