Happy Anniversary
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (24)
sorted by:
Lol it even has the lazer eyes, fucking great.
Why Gary why?
Gary wasn't confident that the Law and the State would do this on his behalf. And he was probably right. Certainly the perpetrator's expression isn't that of someone expecting a swift trial and summary execution after an inevitable "guilty" verdict.
For all those thinking the rot set in sometime around 2014, perhaps it set it in a great deal earlier...
The rot has been present for decades if not centuries. Communist subversion of the US has been at work for longer than anyone still alive. The weather underground and other leftists getting light sentences and academic positions was proof of corruption well before most people here were politically aware or even alive. The CIA's operations have caused unbelievable damage to the fabric of our nation and they predate the civil rights act.
"Why not" is the real question.
How has society gotten so cucked that this was even asked? No medieval peasant would wonder why a father would kill his son's abuser.
Link.
good lad
Oh no, wha-what happened? Oh no, how terrible! That's just, that's just awful. How terrible, oh nooooo!
insert Willy Wonka meme here
It's kind of insane to me that there are people who are actually against what Gary did. It's truly hard to imagine the kind of person (that isn't themselves a pedophile), who is so utterly brain rotted to think that what Gary did wasn't swift and deserved justice.
Like, I understand why this needs to be illegal but I also 10000% understand why he did it.
Also have to give odd props to the state- not for the initial 2nd degree murder charge but the manslaughter deal w/ probation & community service with no jail time seems like as fair a deal as they can give.
Personally, I don't. I have no issues with vigilantism like this with the simple clause being that you being convinced someone is guilty doesn't absolve you of criminality if someone you target is innocent.
Basically, this shouldn't be illegal so long as the target is objectively guilty. I have zero issues with this.
Historically there were a few crimes that were technically illegal but always acquitted. Killing someone in a duel, killing a man for sleeping with your wife, etc. This probably qualifies. The state would basically say "please don't pop off like this again, but we get it." That's when the state identified with the people it rules though, instead of viewing us as commodities.
The defense argument was insane though. Probably legally necessary but reading it makes my brain hurt. Something about "he went temporarily insane from trauma...". Bullshit. Guy fucked with his kid, so he made him un-alive. It's the most sane and understandable instinct a father can have.
That's just people being stuck in an idealized world where perfect is the enemy of good.
Because realistically, if everyone acted like Gary did we'd have innocent men dropping dead constantly because "he touched me wrong!" is an easy claim to make and women/children constantly do it over nothing. Gary's case isn't like that, but laws aren't built on exceptions but consistent application.
So its the opposite of being brain rotted, its them being so naive to the rot of the world that they still think the justice system works and can be trusted to deal with these things in a civilized manner.
Remember that when Kyle Rittenhouse shot three men at a BLM riot he hit a child rapist, a domestic abuser and a burglar. The people against what Gary did are the same ones who made him do it.
To be fair, at least the Kyle situation was politically charged and mainly by the mass media, so that explains some of the division due to partisan lines. Can't really say the same for Gary.
Are they, though? Maybe just like how many in 2016 didn't vote for Trump, rather they voted for "Not Hillary", this is more of a case of not being against of what Gary did, but rather not wanting to be shot like Jeff for doing similar things, or at least entertaining the idea of similar things.
so mike collins seems kinda based, but is he?
Trying to imagine any politician in Canada making such a post.
Feeling out of the loop.
Its a still taken moments before Gary (with the cap and laser eyes) shoots Jeff Doucet as he is taken by the police to his trial. Jeff Doucet kidnapped and raped Gary's son.
wiki link
The picture is a frame from a video of the guy with laser eyes (Gary Plauche) shooting and killing the other guy who was being walked through the airport by the police. The other guy had kidnapped and molested Gary's son. Gary got a slap on the wrist for the "crime", and is celebrated as a hero by the right wing.
Hadn't heard of this. Fucking legend.