Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

44
After Months of War, Trump Says Iran Has Right to Nuclear Program; "You have to use a little common sense" (newrepublic.com)
posted 1 day ago by Prof_Chaos 1 day ago by Prof_Chaos +44 / -0
After Months of War, Trump Says Iran Has Right to Nuclear Program
Trump now says it’s just “common sense” for Iran to have a nuclear program.
newrepublic.com
85 comments share
85 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (85)
sorted by:
▲ 29 ▼
– cccpneveragain 29 points 1 day ago +29 / -0

What I really want to know is what flipped on him with Israel. There's no way they like anything about any of this deal. If he cut them out they are going to have to respond with a vengeance right? I mean democrats plus enough MIGAcons and they've got what they need to kick him out of office.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 45 ▼
– horstshort 45 points 1 day ago +45 / -0

Perhaps the people actually pulling the strings got tired of Bibi being a retarded idiot. Or it's just a 6 month break before they start bombing Iran again. Like last time.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 22 ▼
– cccpneveragain 22 points 1 day ago +22 / -0

Yeah I could totally buy the six month break. That was half of what pissed me off about this one. Don't declare, "we totally completed our mission, have set Iran back years if not decades," then run right back to the same reason for starting more war with them.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– The_Shadow_of_Intent 8 points 1 day ago +8 / -0

Another bombing campaign would be pointless. You're not penetrating the missile cities or killing enough leadership to topple the regime, and you'd just close the Strait of Hormuz again as well as potentially incur damages to Gulf infrastructure.

The only way they decide to go in again imo is with ground troops, either to take out their nuclear facilities or straight up invade the country. An invasion requires massive, obvious staging across the border, though. There would be no mystery about that.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– 5Cats 4 points 1 day ago +4 / -0

Trump (and Israel) haven't touched the infrastructure like Clinton and Obama did in their wars, Serbia and Libya, eh?

That was the threat that got to this "deal". Bridges, water, power stations would destroy their internal economy, hitting the public hardest but maybe tipping them into revolution.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– The_Shadow_of_Intent 6 points 1 day ago +6 / -0

Destroying public infrastructure would 100% end the regime, no question about that. But that would mean Iran destroys the infrastructure of the whole Gulf as well. That's why they're not doing it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Prof_Chaos [S] 5 points 1 day ago +5 / -0

Dude, u/5Cats is a lying zionist kike with murder in their black heart.

The jews are a cursed people who only know trickery, thievery and murder.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– The_Shadow_of_Intent 3 points 1 day ago +3 / -0

I know 5cats is a zionist, but ease up on the rhetoric against other users

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– 5Cats 1 point 2 hours ago +1 / -0

Correct, it would harm the rest of the Gulf as well, but in the long run they'd be better off with a civilian-run Iran. I think they all know this by now.

The USA blew infrastructure up in their Serbian war under Clinton. It didn't actually help their side so they've avoided doing that since then. Even Obama's campaign in Libya didn't do that, and he's a stuttering clusterfuck who thinks he's Rommel. In fact he's Custer...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– MattTheBlack 4 points 23 hours ago +4 / -0

I mean Netanyahu has almost singlehandedly united the world against Israel in less than a generation

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– GoldenInnosStatue 3 points 1 day ago +3 / -0

6 month break theory is sound logic

ZOG needs to rearm

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 25 ▼
– WeedleTLiar 25 points 1 day ago +25 / -0

I think (((they))) thought that he'd be popular enough to keep this war going. As it stands, US soldiers are lighting their own ships on fire rather than be deployed.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– theaustrianpainter 15 points 1 day ago +15 / -0

And clogging the toilets.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– HallucinatoryBeing 5 points 1 day ago +5 / -0

I'd wager the "fires" are Pentagon code for missile hits. Same with all the "training accidents".

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– MargarineMongoose 2 points 1 day ago +2 / -0

Wait, did that actually happen?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 23 ▼
– BuckGerbil 23 points 1 day ago +23 / -0

what flipped on him with Israel

He knows he is going to be impeached and removed from office within a year if he doesn't immediately change his tune is what flipped. The man can only be swayed by appealing to his ego, and there is no way to use that to get him to jump on a grenade for someone else.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– ScallionPancake 16 points 1 day ago +16 / -0

Maybe some focus group’s report told him being the most obvious bestest goy for israel is making even the dumbest goyim wake up and he needs to change his act really soon.

It’s all fake.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Prof_Chaos [S] 5 points 1 day ago +5 / -0

Why do you think they insisted on him taking a "Never Trumper" like Vance with him?

Vance is their insurance policy if Trump ever went off-script.

permalink parent save report block reply
View 5 more comments
▲ 23 ▼
– TheDevilMonkey 23 points 1 day ago +23 / -0

Too late to pry your lips off Bibi's diseased yid cock now Donny.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 18 ▼
– Prof_Chaos [S] 18 points 1 day ago +18 / -0

Trump is the biggest flip-flopper in American history.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– TheDevilMonkey 16 points 1 day ago +16 / -0

Indeed, he's reversed course on everything he was ranting about when this shit show started AND now we have to pay 300 billion.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– GamingTheSystem-01 4 points 1 day ago +4 / -0

So... do you want him to continue in an unwinnable war? Sunk cost fallacy into another 20 year quagmire?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– Amosis1862 15 points 1 day ago +15 / -0

He shouldn’t have fucking started it in the first place like the kikeslave he is

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– GamingTheSystem-01 2 points 1 day ago +2 / -0

Ok but hypothetically if we didn't have a time machine, what would your preferred outcome be?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Amosis1862 2 points 1 day ago +2 / -0

Execute him for high treason

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Prof_Chaos [S] 4 points 1 day ago +4 / -0

Nobody is saying that. We're saying he should have been smart enough to know it was never going to work, especially without any international support. The goal wasn't just to stop Iran's nuclear program, it was outright regime change. When has the U.S. even been able to accomplish that in the past half-century? Who controls Vietnam today? Who controls Afghanistan today? Even in Venezuela, it's still all of Maduro's people.

Trump wants to talk about "common sense" now?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– GamingTheSystem-01 2 points 1 day ago +2 / -0

>Nobody is saying that

This is literally what you are saying when you call him a flip flopper or TACO. You're saying that you don't want him to change his mind and instead stick with bad decisions.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– MattTheBlack 3 points 23 hours ago +3 / -0

If you're going to bomb a country into stone age then actually do it

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 20 ▼
– fauxgnaws 20 points 1 day ago +20 / -0

Nuclear energy program.

What dishonest reporting to not include that word.

Sure it'll be easier to make nukes with more civilian nuclear engineers, but it's not that hard anyway.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– Prof_Chaos [S] 15 points 1 day ago +15 / -0

Well, after years of saying they couldn't have any nuclear program, it's a legit headline.

And obviously they say as much in the first paragraph.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– fauxgnaws 6 points 1 day ago +6 / -0

No, they did it because they're partisan hacks not because it's legitimate.

I've never heard Trump say they couldn't have a nuclear energy program, only nuclear weapons.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Prof_Chaos [S] 9 points 1 day ago +9 / -0

Trump said no enrichment whatsoever. The original JCPOA was signed between the U.S. and the E.U and featured unprecedented, intrusive verification by the IAEA, which included continuous 24/7 monitoring and daily inspector access. Their entire energy program was an "open book" to the whole world and Trump unilaterally tore it up because he said they couldn't have ANY nuclear program whatsoever.

Satanyahoo doesn't want them to have nuclear tech and Trump did as he was told and parroted the same line. The facts are well-know at this point. Stop now before you embarrass yourself.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– TheDevilMonkey 8 points 1 day ago +8 / -0

Let him keep going. Watching these braindead cultists flail around is mildly amusing.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– fauxgnaws 3 points 1 day ago +3 / -0

You refuse to admit misleading headline is misleading. "Stop now before you embarrass yourself."

If you want to argue some point about the Obama nuclear deal re Trump go ahead, but it's irrelevant.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Prof_Chaos [S] 6 points 1 day ago +6 / -0

Trump says Iran deal would not allow ‘any’ uranium enrichment ~ June 03, 2025

“Under our potential Agreement — WE WILL NOT ALLOW ANY ENRICHMENT OF URANIUM!” Trump said on his Truth Social network after the Axios news outlet said Washington’s offer would let Tehran enrich some of the nuclear fuel. Republican Trump also blamed predecessor Joe Biden for the impasse, saying the Democrat “should have stopped Iran a long time ago from ‘enriching.'”

... I warned you! 🙄

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– fauxgnaws 2 points 1 day ago +2 / -0

/golfclap

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– 5Cats 1 point 1 day ago +1 / -0

Again, it is entirely possible for a civilian nuclear PROGRAM without the enrichment capacity to turn them into weapons.

Iran is also a signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty, so the rest of the world should get their thumbs out of their asses and slap sown the Mullahs for good.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Prof_Chaos [S] 3 points 1 day ago +3 / -0

How about we hang Satanyahoo first for the murder of millions of civilians, you lying kike?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– 5Cats 1 point 1 day ago +1 / -0

You forget: under Obama the Russians offered to supply AND remove the fuel. It would have saved Iran a lot of money and gotten several Nuclear Power stations. Iran laughed and said no, of course.

So they could build N-power stations without being able to re-start a weapons program.
Same for 'ballistic missiles' which are relatively easy to build & mostly harmless without a Bomb on them.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Prof_Chaos [S] 3 points 1 day ago +3 / -0

No, you forget that I know you're a lying jew. I know who you are; I remember your content.

Slither back to The_Zognald, you lying jew!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– theaustrianpainter 5 points 1 day ago +5 / -0

FoxNews is speaking everyone.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– TheDevilMonkey 5 points 1 day ago +5 / -0

FoxJews

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– SR388-SAX 3 points 1 day ago +3 / -0

Yes, they're partisan hacks.

That doesn't mean that you can't also be wrong.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– fauxgnaws 1 point 1 day ago +1 / -0

Could be, but not. A college kid did it in the 70s.

Before your time I guess.

The only hard part is doing it without the Five Eyes and Mossad seeing you.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– MattTheBlack 1 point 23 hours ago +1 / -0

Nah Trump has been saying for decades that Iran cant have any nuclear at all

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– 5Cats 2 points 1 day ago +2 / -0

It is unbelievably hard to make a nuke from scratch. Look how much time, effort and money Iran pumped into just making the enriched uranium. And they still don't have enough for a Bomb!
North Korea took a lot of time and made 3-4 very small nukes (with help from China) that they tested. Hard to say if they have any left over :/

Having a civilian (power) program would probably involve Russia. They previously (under Obama) offered to supply AND remove the fuel for them, saving Iran a pile of money overall. They laughed & said no, of course.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– fauxgnaws 2 points 1 day ago +2 / -0

It's only hard when you have nation-states sabotaging your equipment, as I alluded to.

As you said, some rice farmers in NK did it.

Where do you get this weird idea that it's difficult? Hollywood?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– 5Cats 1 point 1 hour ago +1 / -0

If it's so easy? Why haven't dozens of nations and even corporations done it by now? Most nations with nuclear weapons were given them by USA, Russia or China. Usually indirectly ofc.

If you have enough fissionable material and the right trigger mechanism? It's so easy! 😆 But getting those from scratch? Lolz! Do you know how HUGE the Manhattan Project was? They only had the material for 3 of the planned 4 bombs. They couldn't make another for months after. The bulk of their efforts went into making a working trigger and using 1100 Calutrons to enrich the materials.

India = A free Candu reactor from Canada that spits out highly enriched uranium as a by-product, plus triggers from America.
Pakistan = power station from Russia that shortens the enrichment cycle, plus more materials & the trigger from them too.
NK = China basically gave them everything except the final design. That would have been too blatant!

IDK where Israel got their Bombs from. South Africa helped, probably the UK too.

The sabotage of an illegal nuclear weapons program is "a bad thing" now? 🙄

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– tralbolh 1 point 22 hours ago +1 / -0

Making nukes isn't hard. Refining U235 and prospecting the ore is. There is a reason so few countries had managed it even before the NNPT. Not to mention making a decent delivery mechanism, though Iran seems to have managed there.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– Unknownsailor 13 points 1 day ago +13 / -0

You are still gonna get impeached, Donald boy. Nothing will change that now.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Prof_Chaos [S] 9 points 1 day ago +9 / -0

I honestly think it could happen if he doesn't play ball. I think they've set the stage for Vance afterward -- who really would be Satanyahoo's president -- and all the MAGA shills are ready to drop their pants for him in exchange for a job and to go back to "the good ol' days" of Bush-era Neocon-ism. But I think plenty of young people are seeing that being a Republican doesn't mean what they've been told it means. Tons of young people are seeing that no matter who "wins" an election, there's always that small foreign cabal that always gets what they want.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– TheDevilMonkey 13 points 1 day ago +13 / -0

Vote red, vote blue, either way you get the jew. 🦨💨🇮🇱

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– BuckGerbil 2 points 1 day ago +2 / -0

Then he has really painted himself into a corner with no allies to watch his back. Serves him right. I hope they hang him.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Prof_Chaos [S] 7 points 1 day ago +7 / -0

I think he did that during the "Sumer of Love" when he refused to deploy the National Guard and let American cities burn. Democrats had organized everything to have him convicted by a stacked NYC jury before he called Miriam Adelson and "bent the knee" for Israhell. That was the deal: he'll give them the Oval Office in exchange for his freedom.

Adelson called off his political "execution" in exchange for war on Iran. That's absolutely what happened. How else did the charges just go up in smoke? It was a rigged trial with a stacked jury in a deep blue jurisdiction. They actually amended, wrote and passed new laws in Albany just to prosecute Trump. They had everything they needed after years of planning the outcome.

... but both sides work for Israhell and Trump bent the knee.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– SocraticMethod1 4 points 1 day ago +4 / -0

At this point, maybe not?

With all redistricting and the fact dems have done nothing to GAIN voters other than go 'orange man bad', they could still not have the numbers to take anything.

Now you can argue neocons and RINOs joining to impeach Trump, but they don't have the numbers with Democrats to follow through and the cost of doing so is too big

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– BuckGerbil 5 points 1 day ago +5 / -0

Democrats haven't had to gain any voters. Epstein and Iran have run off enough Republican voters that they will be just fine. And they were on the brink of total collapse after the 2024 election. All they had to do to dominate the upcoming midterms was nothing at all. They will have the numbers to do it after then.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Snuck_King 3 points 1 day ago +3 / -0

They can just print voters.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– 5Cats 2 points 1 day ago +2 / -0

You mean like the Dems have been doing for 10+ years now? 😋
Did the mayoral "vote" in LA escape your notice? The result after election day is impossible without cheating. Not even "one in a million" it's literally impossible. Same for the 120K votes for Biden "found overnight" eh?
Other LA returns saw big numbers for the 2 Dems and zero for the Repub. Not "a few" he got zero, 0.0, which again is impossible but oh well!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– blyat56 11 points 1 day ago +11 / -0

Most raped man alive.

Anyway, I support ICBMs being aimed at Tel Aviv no matter who holds the button. Maybe they'll finally behave.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– TheDevilMonkey 4 points 1 day ago +4 / -0

The only way there will be anything even remotely resembling peace in the middle east is if pissrael no longer holds a monopoly on nukes.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– dookiebutter8675309 10 points 1 day ago +10 / -0

WTF is going on here? Can we just worry about the US?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– TheDevilMonkey 10 points 1 day ago +10 / -0

Cool it with the antisemitism Adolf.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– dookiebutter8675309 6 points 1 day ago +6 / -0

Lol. I hope thats sarcasm.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– TheDevilMonkey 6 points 1 day ago +6 / -0

It is fren. 👍

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– alucard13mmfmj 5 points 1 day ago +5 / -0

Epstein files was the most important thing to get rid of part of the tiny hats influence.. how many politicians, ceos, and etc are blackmailed for doing pedo stuff..

So far.. none of the pedos got sent to prison. Only one that got a stern talking to was prince andrew.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– The_Shadow_of_Intent 4 points 1 day ago +4 / -0

HAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHA yeah we lost

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Prof_Chaos [S] 5 points 1 day ago +5 / -0

Well, Israhell lost. "We" were just the Shabbos goys doing their dirty work ... but yeah.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 3 points 1 day ago +3 / -0

Some common sense. Better late than never. He also pointed out that it's bizarre to try to deny Iran ballistic missiles, and that it's their own damn money the neocons think they own.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– nikgtasa 2 points 1 day ago +2 / -0

Mossad controls Iran through puppets who agreed to send their bioweapons to other counties as rapefugees to accelerate the kalergi whilst speedrunning its nuclear program to then bomb a country or two for fun to get all teh blame for it and get bombed for oblivion.

Probably not but would be funny.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– BetterNameUnfound 2 points 1 day ago +2 / -0

What are you going to do about it?

Sit here and type?

Mm-hmm.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Prof_Chaos [S] 5 points 1 day ago +5 / -0

What are you going to do about it?

Also sit here and type?

Mm-hmm.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– BetterNameUnfound 2 points 1 day ago +2 / -0

Why would I?

I know it's going to work out.

You don't think so.

YOU do something about it.

The Left does.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– TheDevilMonkey 2 points 1 day ago +2 / -0

Trust the Kracken, release the plan... 3,689,745D chess!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– BetterNameUnfound 2 points 1 day ago +2 / -0

Then do something about it, lazy-bones.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TheDevilMonkey 1 point 1 day ago +1 / -0

Good idea! I'll tweet in impotent rage like Trump.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– hilboggins 1 point 1 day ago +1 / -0

it'd be nice if true.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– 5Cats 1 point 1 day ago +1 / -0

Them having a peaceful program to make power was always "on the table". Russia would supply the fuel & also take back ALL the waste too.
Iran laughed about that deal, even though it gave them several nuclear power stations. They never intended to use it for power.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Prof_Chaos [S] 2 points 1 day ago +2 / -0

Russia would supply the fuel & also take back ALL the waste too.

Trump/ Israhell REJECTED that offer on it's face because they were intent on killing Iranians and confident they could flip the regime. They rejected it the same day it was proposed because the goal was always to kill Iranians and destroy their country.

Iran laughed about that deal ...

Another LIE. Iran welcomed the deal. Iranian negotiators were willing to send their uranium to Russia as a compromise, since they're close trade partners and BRIC members. It was Trump/ Israhell that blocked the transfer to Russia.

I know your content. You're a fuck jew, so slither back to the The_Zognald were you belong, you lying serpent!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– 5Cats 1 point 2 hours ago +1 / -0

Why would Trump "reject" a deal that was made by Obama when Obama was PotUS? He wasn't even in politics back then. That was supposed to be part of "The Obama Agreement" that gave Iran billions and guaranteed they'd get a nuclear weapon even if they had followed the terms. But they didn't.

NOW Iran wants to send their illegally (under the NPT which Iran signed & their Obama Agreement) enriched uranium to Russia for storage. Of course they do! They know they'll get it all back eventually. Trump rightfully said no to that, lolz!

Go suck Antonio's tiny cock, lolz! I'm a Jew? Says who? YOU? Retard.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy