Perhaps the people actually pulling the strings got tired of Bibi being a retarded idiot. Or it's just a 6 month break before they start bombing Iran again. Like last time.
Yeah I could totally buy the six month break. That was half of what pissed me off about this one. Don't declare, "we totally completed our mission, have set Iran back years if not decades," then run right back to the same reason for starting more war with them.
Another bombing campaign would be pointless. You're not penetrating the missile cities or killing enough leadership to topple the regime, and you'd just close the Strait of Hormuz again as well as potentially incur damages to Gulf infrastructure.
The only way they decide to go in again imo is with ground troops, either to take out their nuclear facilities or straight up invade the country. An invasion requires massive, obvious staging across the border, though. There would be no mystery about that.
Trump (and Israel) haven't touched the infrastructure like Clinton and Obama did in their wars, Serbia and Libya, eh?
That was the threat that got to this "deal". Bridges, water, power stations would destroy their internal economy, hitting the public hardest but maybe tipping them into revolution.
Destroying public infrastructure would 100% end the regime, no question about that. But that would mean Iran destroys the infrastructure of the whole Gulf as well. That's why they're not doing it.
Correct, it would harm the rest of the Gulf as well, but in the long run they'd be better off with a civilian-run Iran. I think they all know this by now.
The USA blew infrastructure up in their Serbian war under Clinton. It didn't actually help their side so they've avoided doing that since then. Even Obama's campaign in Libya didn't do that, and he's a stuttering clusterfuck who thinks he's Rommel. In fact he's Custer...
Perhaps the people actually pulling the strings got tired of Bibi being a retarded idiot. Or it's just a 6 month break before they start bombing Iran again. Like last time.
Yeah I could totally buy the six month break. That was half of what pissed me off about this one. Don't declare, "we totally completed our mission, have set Iran back years if not decades," then run right back to the same reason for starting more war with them.
Another bombing campaign would be pointless. You're not penetrating the missile cities or killing enough leadership to topple the regime, and you'd just close the Strait of Hormuz again as well as potentially incur damages to Gulf infrastructure.
The only way they decide to go in again imo is with ground troops, either to take out their nuclear facilities or straight up invade the country. An invasion requires massive, obvious staging across the border, though. There would be no mystery about that.
Trump (and Israel) haven't touched the infrastructure like Clinton and Obama did in their wars, Serbia and Libya, eh?
That was the threat that got to this "deal". Bridges, water, power stations would destroy their internal economy, hitting the public hardest but maybe tipping them into revolution.
Destroying public infrastructure would 100% end the regime, no question about that. But that would mean Iran destroys the infrastructure of the whole Gulf as well. That's why they're not doing it.
Dude, u/5Cats is a lying zionist kike with murder in their black heart.
The jews are a cursed people who only know trickery, thievery and murder.
Correct, it would harm the rest of the Gulf as well, but in the long run they'd be better off with a civilian-run Iran. I think they all know this by now.
The USA blew infrastructure up in their Serbian war under Clinton. It didn't actually help their side so they've avoided doing that since then. Even Obama's campaign in Libya didn't do that, and he's a stuttering clusterfuck who thinks he's Rommel. In fact he's Custer...
I mean Netanyahu has almost singlehandedly united the world against Israel in less than a generation
6 month break theory is sound logic
ZOG needs to rearm