“I spent my 20s and early 30s going to school for a useless degree and then climbing the corporate ladder. I fucked 50 guys over that period but couldn’t secure commitment from any of them. Now I’m 38, my biological clock is at defcon 5, and I’ve somehow raised my standards for a mate. Why isn’t this working? Can I sue the men who fucked me but didn’t given me children? Can the government penalize them on my behalf?”
Imagine thinking that men are wasting women’s reproductive years when they spend 80% of their fertility window doing everything except have children and then refuse to settle down with anyone except Chad.
Ideally a man’s incentive for success should come from providing for his family. It is best if men settle down you to avoid men wasting women’s reproductive years.
If you go through her replies, she does detail some of her own dating history.
Sounds like she's post-wall, single, with no children.
She complains about some dude traumatizing her in her 20s so she sat out the market until 34. Then she complains that the tried to heal by dating a tech CEO, but got the ick because he was too autistic.
The problem here is that the typical woman doesn't have the capability to make good decisions, but they were given rights anyway. None of this would have happened if she'd been left under the control of her father until a young lad with potential to be a good husband came courting.
This is the key point that makes this whole thing an utter farce. It takes two people to get married, so how you gonna justify punishing men for women not being interested?
At least as relevant, is that it only takes one person to have an ugly, messy divorce.
If one of the married partners decides that she is going to be an unreasonable bitch and not stop fighting until she has destroyed the other... well; what is the guy going to do about it? Give up? Fight back? Leave the country?
It was a big talking point in the "manosphere" over a decade ago that the "bachelor tax" was inevitable. Especially after the "incel" menace got big, this was always the inevitable end goal of that dehumanization.
Its especially guaranteed because one of the few groups who are "thriving" in this economy are adult men with no families and their autism (the cause of said singledom) means they have awkwardly large amounts of money from like an IT job. Often the degenerate beasts who spend all day gooning in VRchat as an anime girl, or commissioning furry art, and other hedonism.
Women will see this ick factory of a man who dares be wealthy without paying the pussy tax, and it will infuriate them. They want his resources, like all women do, but cannot put the ick aside enough to beta bux him. So instead they run to daddy, like all women do, government and demand he fixes this injustice.
Luckily the erosion of purchasing power of the dollar along with importing infinity jeets with H1Bs already took care of the "tech autists with too much disposable income" problem.
Other than being obvious ragebait that's why she's pushing this. She can't get commitment from the caliber of man she feels entitled to and expects the rest of society to move heaven and earth so she can have what she wants. You can't even blame her too much since since our gynocentric society has been doing exactly that her entire life.
Taxation for basic infrastructure and services makes perfect sense. We’re an order of magnitude beyond that.
What we really need is automatic repeal of every ounce of spending every four years. We have no mechanism to reliably prevent infinite growth of government spending.
Taxation for basic infrastructure and services makes perfect sense
Most things make perfect sense until the government gets involved, and they find ways to pull failure from simplicity.
One of my personal anti-tax pet peeves is how much I do not believe road workers deserve human rights, let alone my money, for the service they provide.
The problem with that is the one the US has right now: the treason party will hold the good spending hostage until you let them staple free food for foreign invaders onto the bill.
I'm a childless adult male homeowner and when I add up property taxes and sales taxes and gas taxes and nickel and dime local taxes, it's well over 30% of my $60k income stolen by the government to give to people who don't work.
Two days a week working for free. I don't get a fucking dime from the government. Last time I claimed unemployment, they made me pay a bunch of it back.
I can't start a family working for free two days a week. The purpose of the system is to prevent me from doing so.
Its already been said, but really, this is obvious rage bait and a distraction. Much more important shit we should be focusing on besides this long nose trick
I don't think she realises but even as short as a century ago, being a Bachelor past a certain age would get you shunned from society. It was widely recognised that you weren't a serious Man if you were unmarried. Jobs went to "Stable reliable family men" Cities had bachelor quarters where all the unmarried men lived.
Of course there was also a steady supply of Marriageable Women at the time so a Man that chose not to marry was with good reason viewed with suspicion. Societal pressure against Bachelors is the traditional norm, not just from her but from Men as well. You don't want single Men sniffing around your Wife.
He avoids posting anything negative about Jewish women. He really just hates White women, and it's not the woke enbies he hates. It's mothers. He hates them because they have White children.
Why are feminists so obsessed with making men get married? I thought marriage was oppression? I thought it was bad for women? I thought it was a patriarchal concept? So why is it so wrong for men to pick LTRs over marriage? Why aren't those feminist women getting on their knees and proposing with an expensive ring?
Should I check Early life, or is it obvious?
I mean.... it's just women avoiding accountability. Early Life doesn't even need to factor in.
The account owner promotes herself as some sort of "sex advocate".
You mean slut
I tried that once but dropped out of sex law school
“No, Neo. I'm trying to tell you that when you're ready, you won't have to…”
Just checked, that was easy https://x.com/jess_ann_pin/status/1925675628092600464
https://tenor.com/view/every-single-time-berg-stein-gif-4656881768786966485
I didn’t see anything related to that, but she did have her clit severed at 18
Actual removal or just the hood so it looks better?
“I spent my 20s and early 30s going to school for a useless degree and then climbing the corporate ladder. I fucked 50 guys over that period but couldn’t secure commitment from any of them. Now I’m 38, my biological clock is at defcon 5, and I’ve somehow raised my standards for a mate. Why isn’t this working? Can I sue the men who fucked me but didn’t given me children? Can the government penalize them on my behalf?”
Imagine thinking that men are wasting women’s reproductive years when they spend 80% of their fertility window doing everything except have children and then refuse to settle down with anyone except Chad.
Go extinct, bitches lol
My body, my choice.
And you just know any man she locks down isn't the one who's going to get all the use out of her reproductive years.
If she'll let herself get married at all that is.
If you go through her replies, she does detail some of her own dating history.
Sounds like she's post-wall, single, with no children.
She complains about some dude traumatizing her in her 20s so she sat out the market until 34. Then she complains that the tried to heal by dating a tech CEO, but got the ick because he was too autistic.
One of the worst, most retarded female dating histories I have ever read
The problem here is that the typical woman doesn't have the capability to make good decisions, but they were given rights anyway. None of this would have happened if she'd been left under the control of her father until a young lad with potential to be a good husband came courting.
This is the key point that makes this whole thing an utter farce. It takes two people to get married, so how you gonna justify punishing men for women not being interested?
At least as relevant, is that it only takes one person to have an ugly, messy divorce.
If one of the married partners decides that she is going to be an unreasonable bitch and not stop fighting until she has destroyed the other... well; what is the guy going to do about it? Give up? Fight back? Leave the country?
About 80% of divorces are initiated by women.
Guarantee there were endless average looking beta males that would have desperately married her, but she wouldn't have given them a chance.
I.e. men exist to serve the wants and needs of women
It was a big talking point in the "manosphere" over a decade ago that the "bachelor tax" was inevitable. Especially after the "incel" menace got big, this was always the inevitable end goal of that dehumanization.
Its especially guaranteed because one of the few groups who are "thriving" in this economy are adult men with no families and their autism (the cause of said singledom) means they have awkwardly large amounts of money from like an IT job. Often the degenerate beasts who spend all day gooning in VRchat as an anime girl, or commissioning furry art, and other hedonism.
Women will see this ick factory of a man who dares be wealthy without paying the pussy tax, and it will infuriate them. They want his resources, like all women do, but cannot put the ick aside enough to beta bux him. So instead they run to daddy, like all women do, government and demand he fixes this injustice.
Luckily the erosion of purchasing power of the dollar along with importing infinity jeets with H1Bs already took care of the "tech autists with too much disposable income" problem.
Obvious rage bait from a parasite.
Totally a shit test. Would result in fewer "economically viable" options for women, though they'd vote for it anyway and further mankind's demise
Yup. She likely doesn't have kids, or a man.
Other than being obvious ragebait that's why she's pushing this. She can't get commitment from the caliber of man she feels entitled to and expects the rest of society to move heaven and earth so she can have what she wants. You can't even blame her too much since since our gynocentric society has been doing exactly that her entire life.
And the solution to the test is to repel the 19th.
Boy, I wonder why young men aren't working hard anymore. It is a mystery.
Come. And. Take. It.
Bitch.
Lol. They already take 25% via federal, state and local taxes. Then they nickel and dime you every step of the way.
Yeah, you don't have to lecture me on that shit, I'm right there with you. Preaching to the choir.
Taxation is theft.
Taxation for basic infrastructure and services makes perfect sense. We’re an order of magnitude beyond that.
What we really need is automatic repeal of every ounce of spending every four years. We have no mechanism to reliably prevent infinite growth of government spending.
Most things make perfect sense until the government gets involved, and they find ways to pull failure from simplicity.
One of my personal anti-tax pet peeves is how much I do not believe road workers deserve human rights, let alone my money, for the service they provide.
The problem with that is the one the US has right now: the treason party will hold the good spending hostage until you let them staple free food for foreign invaders onto the bill.
At this point that is probably by design. The bureaucracy existing to perpetuate itself, etc...
Hm, I wonder if I can expand my portfolio by providing a shadow banking service and taxless market access.
I'm a childless adult male homeowner and when I add up property taxes and sales taxes and gas taxes and nickel and dime local taxes, it's well over 30% of my $60k income stolen by the government to give to people who don't work.
Two days a week working for free. I don't get a fucking dime from the government. Last time I claimed unemployment, they made me pay a bunch of it back.
I can't start a family working for free two days a week. The purpose of the system is to prevent me from doing so.
This is the shit that causes uncontrollable guffawing when feminist try the we are egalitarian line.
Its already been said, but really, this is obvious rage bait and a distraction. Much more important shit we should be focusing on besides this long nose trick
In her replies, she answered many times that she was just trying to be "provocative" regarding her dumb misandrist proposals.
"I was only pretending to be retarded."
aren’t men already the only net positive payers of tax?
Yes.
https://files.catbox.moe/bl17ui.jpg
Only net positive taxpayers should have the right to vote!
Chad and Tyrone ruined their lives and "all (other) men" have to pay?
Btw, they are called choices because they have consequences...
I don't think she realises but even as short as a century ago, being a Bachelor past a certain age would get you shunned from society. It was widely recognised that you weren't a serious Man if you were unmarried. Jobs went to "Stable reliable family men" Cities had bachelor quarters where all the unmarried men lived.
Of course there was also a steady supply of Marriageable Women at the time so a Man that chose not to marry was with good reason viewed with suspicion. Societal pressure against Bachelors is the traditional norm, not just from her but from Men as well. You don't want single Men sniffing around your Wife.
For tax purposes, I now identify as a 'woman'.
Use their own rules against them.
LOL, I'll just marry myself.
''Bro we're getting married.''
Is this the natalism that imp keeps going on about?
Can we unban imp? Rofl haha.
Holy shit.
Imp is like a distraction from who this vile cunt really is (yes she is j*wish)
He avoids posting anything negative about Jewish women. He really just hates White women, and it's not the woke enbies he hates. It's mothers. He hates them because they have White children.
He'll say the grooming gangs are feminist propaganda and those girls were just faking it.
But this doesn't extend to the women who were at that music festival on October 7th.
Why are feminists so obsessed with making men get married? I thought marriage was oppression? I thought it was bad for women? I thought it was a patriarchal concept? So why is it so wrong for men to pick LTRs over marriage? Why aren't those feminist women getting on their knees and proposing with an expensive ring?
Huh, maybe TheImpossible1 was onto something. Way I see it, women should pay extra taxes as reparations for Feminism
Community note has just been added: