Ideally a man’s incentive for success should come from providing for his family. It is best if men settle down you to avoid men wasting women’s reproductive years.
If you go through her replies, she does detail some of her own dating history.
Sounds like she's post-wall, single, with no children.
She complains about some dude traumatizing her in her 20s so she sat out the market until 34. Then she complains that the tried to heal by dating a tech CEO, but got the ick because he was too autistic.
The problem here is that the typical woman doesn't have the capability to make good decisions, but they were given rights anyway. None of this would have happened if she'd been left under the control of her father until a young lad with potential to be a good husband came courting.
This is the key point that makes this whole thing an utter farce. It takes two people to get married, so how you gonna justify punishing men for women not being interested?
At least as relevant, is that it only takes one person to have an ugly, messy divorce.
If one of the married partners decides that she is going to be an unreasonable bitch and not stop fighting until she has destroyed the other... well; what is the guy going to do about it? Give up? Fight back? Leave the country?
My body, my choice.
And you just know any man she locks down isn't the one who's going to get all the use out of her reproductive years.
If she'll let herself get married at all that is.
If you go through her replies, she does detail some of her own dating history.
Sounds like she's post-wall, single, with no children.
She complains about some dude traumatizing her in her 20s so she sat out the market until 34. Then she complains that the tried to heal by dating a tech CEO, but got the ick because he was too autistic.
One of the worst, most retarded female dating histories I have ever read
The problem here is that the typical woman doesn't have the capability to make good decisions, but they were given rights anyway. None of this would have happened if she'd been left under the control of her father until a young lad with potential to be a good husband came courting.
This is the key point that makes this whole thing an utter farce. It takes two people to get married, so how you gonna justify punishing men for women not being interested?
At least as relevant, is that it only takes one person to have an ugly, messy divorce.
If one of the married partners decides that she is going to be an unreasonable bitch and not stop fighting until she has destroyed the other... well; what is the guy going to do about it? Give up? Fight back? Leave the country?
About 80% of divorces are initiated by women.
Guarantee there were endless average looking beta males that would have desperately married her, but she wouldn't have given them a chance.
I.e. men exist to serve the wants and needs of women