Whoa, I think this is unfair to Imp. Not only did he post a take I could kinda agree with once in a blue moon, not only did he sometimes identify actual problems even if his proposed solutions and associated ramblings were bugfuck insane, but even his craziest 'arguments' and rants were at least kinda original. If only because the sort of femoid-despising vitriol he got up to wasn't something easy to find 15 or 10 years ago.
The new clowns just sound like the fedora'd, mean-spirited, wannabe-edgy, self-important atheists from 2005 who must fervently believe they are enlightened by their own intelligence because otherwise, their fragile glass-like ego would collapse and all that crippling insecurity they're trying to hold back would consume them. They aren't new and they don't have anything new or interesting to say, I've heard it all before I even reached puberty. If you've seen one in a Youtube comment section from back then, you've seen them all, long before Atheism+ got going and many of them ended up trooning out.
I think it's everyone responding to the insanity that is happening. Insanity has been around for a very long time, but we are in an era where it can be spotted and found. The problems can be sent over the rooftops as the insanity tries to hide it again. We have town criers and the truth smashing against each other that it is hard to watch at times.
We haven't been allowed to point towards women being corrupt as much as we can now. While we have town criers declare revenge on the patriarchy, we see Congresswoman Feinstein declared unable to take care of herself properly, but still in Congress. In Seattle we had a city councilwoman lead mobs against anyone who opposed her, and was stopped by the equally corrupt and female Mayor.
The Imp sees this and expects there to be even more corruption. Is he right? Partially.
Then we have the signs of atheists and communists specifically trying to overcome the world, by making everything worse. They tear down every statue and every sign of good things from other cultures. So the best response is to go back to Christ and rebuild the world that was imagined and must have existed beforehand. Even though we have books showing these things were happening all the time then as well.
If it gets a little strong, just change the subject. Imp loves cars, and will respond to that quickly. Everyone loves good shows and movies.
I'm suspecting imp is a shapeshifting nigga from outer space, every time I almost come close to figuring out just what his deal is I get flashbanged by reading my own imposts. I've called him a poo a spic a jew a pole a somali, nothing sticks and women keep walking tits first into his lawnmower trap of calling tits tits.
These new fedorable posters might as well be AI, I wonder how many of the specific phrases they use were taken straight from Frontpage of Reddit r/Athiesm's archives.
Regardless of how you feel about Christianity or religion in general, online atheists are always wrong and the worst people in any argument and running them off by any means necessary is always the correct move.
Do you have a fill of faith in the world walking around as an agnostic kia2win poster? A part of why I don't blow my brains out because it's so over is because I share the faith of my ancestors from sixteen hundred years of people trying to stop us from practicing.
Nah Imp has some good points, I just disagree on the origins of the problem as well as it being a woman-wide conspiracy to take down men. This stuff is just atheist trolling.
They all think they understand the Bible, that's the problem. Without Christ's transformation, the soul rejects the Bible.
1st Corinthians 2:14 But the natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; nor can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
You don't even need to go to God; The bible is, at it's core, documentation - of laws, parables, allegories, stories and cautionary tales that rely on actual historical and sociological events of the times.
In other words, there is context. Nothing occurs in a vacuum. You can't look at scripture without acknowledging the society that it comes from - and that's where alot of things get really interesting.
History is one of the easiest topics to use to lie to people, as facts and events in a vacuum can be interpreted in a number of ways, and simply engineering in omission can change the story in it's entirety.
Over time, I've begun to feel that Christianity suffers alot from 'modern' interpretations of scripture. There's reasons for it - if you really start looking at some of the lessons in context and actually thinking about it, Christianity is far from as passive as alot people love to paint it. But, for good or for ill, alot of people are very invested in carrying the martyrdom interpretation of scripture.
Most doctors these days don't have 2 functioning brain cells either when every solution comes down to "here's a pill that maybe will help with your minor problem, but it makes you constantly drowsy, it'll fuck with your sleep, oh and it also gives you ass cancer. That'll be $20 per pill."
Your only posts on this sub appear to be incredible seething about people better than you, so you have no say in who this sub is for - you have contributed absolutely nothing. I suggest you and the other retarded niggerfaggot both slither back into the Atheism sub and continue jacking each other off while brainstorming novel suicide methods.
It's probably calculated subversion. Our sanctuaries of - well not quite free speech, but freer than the wider hyper-pozzed internet - are too useful to us, they have to be made less so. Propaganda and division, is still the most effective weapon they have.
The real issue here is there clearly isn't enough moralfagging. I know when I look at internet communities, I never think "It's a good community, but it needs less moralfaggotry". True progress is made when the Right preaches lots of scripture and folds their hands down, their job done, doing nothing more, then the Left going forward and doing what they were going to do anyways. That's how we got to where we are today, and in terms of progress, we've never been more progressive!
No idea what OP is going on about, I have spammers like imp, come (and all his retarded alt accounts) and benotafriad all blocked to keep these areas free of oversaturation. If you're still seeing that stuff, just block them and you'll find that post content no longer gets overwhelmed by spam.
My problem with the christians is the men are basically women in behaviour, and here is an entire thread devoted to whining and wanting people banned just confirming my theory about them. They use phrases like "deus vult" as delusional cope since they are fat, bearded losers who won't do shit to defend their beliefs. Downvotes on the left, ladies.
Are you special needs or just sub saharan african? The user "Imp" was banned from these forums. I would have thought since you started the thread you were aware of that.
Think of it it like garlic warding off vampires. Bible verses are easily ignored if you don't like them but they make gay commies seethe.
We don't have so much content that one post every day or so is significantly taking up space over other more "on-topic" content.
Of course gay commies will try to co-opt Christianity like they do everything else. Push back against them for being gay commies, not for wearing Christian skin suits.
there are people on this forum that want to reconcile promiscuous media with their own hate for promiscuity's effects on society, and who will attack anyone who tells them this is an impossibility. i think that's what he was getting at.
This nigger either really thinks he can convince KiA2, or even worse actually believes, that Christians are a bigger threat to vidya, music or movies than the Left in the Year of Our Lord MMXXIII. Lmao.
Jack Thompson did not manage to damage the videogame industry even 1/100th as badly as Anita Sarkeesian did, may the Young Turks pursue her forever in the deepest pits of Hell. He's not the one responsible for Abby Armstrong being the primary standard of beauty against which every female videogame character in the West must be measured against for acceptability by their creators, the injection of woke intersectional themes and caricatures into seemingly every other AAA game, etc. after all, she is. The most fervent Bible-thumpers of the 1980s didn't hate Star Wars as much as Rian Johnson did and even if they had, they still couldn't have hurt that franchise even 1/100th as badly as he and Kathleen Kennedy have done. And so on, so forth.
Also the 'think of the children!!!'-esque censorship drive happened primarily in the 1990s, ie. the Clinton years, and I would hardly characterize Hillary Clinton or Tipper Gore (you know, the founder & main driver of the PMRC) as Bible-thumpers. Quite the contrary. The Moral Majority-backed Reagan was in charge for the 80s and that decade's entertainment was actually a good deal steamier (for both sexes!) than ours, you would be crucified for making something like Flashdance today.
Contrary to modern revisionism from game journos, the censorship of the gaming prior and up to the end of the Thompson era was an overwhelmingly bi-partisan movement. For fucks sake, anyone need only look to Hillary Clinton and her now infamous "violent video games are like lead poisoning" speech.
Censorship in the past 70 or so years has overwhelmingly been a bi-partisan point in America, and never let the revisionists tell you otherwise.
It's always just about power. The busybodies in power didn't really care, other than they could seize the opportunity to put the federal government in charge of what goes in front of people's eyeballs.
Look at what public education has turned into to understand why.
Turns out, like censoring citizens online, it didn't actually need a federal law structure. Just useful idiots and backslapping from fellow retards in response to virtue signal points by performing censorship stopping just short of actual government employees hitting the buttons themselves.
It's always just about power. The busybodies in power didn't really care, other than they could seize the opportunity to put the federal government in charge of what goes in front of people's eyeballs.
And it should be explicitly stated that the vast, vast majority of politicians of any label are this way. Plenty of Republicans pay lip-service to "small" government, but how many truly follow through when they hold all the power? How many really make any progress? Actions speak far louder than words, and the reality is that Republicans In Name Only (RINOs) are not the exception like the term implies.
Expansion of state power has always been a bi-partisan goal, with each "side" believing that eventually they will be the one in control to use that power For The Greater Good™. Shockingly, it never really turns out that way, does it? Maybe doing the same thing over and over and over isn't the solution?
What I mostly remember Tipper Gore for, is getting song lyrics in all the albums, which was an awesome thing, actually. It was always such a bonus if there were lyrics with the record, because, yes, often the words WERE hard to discern thanks to poppy, scratchy vinyl records played through cheap but costly, tinny-ass speakers (or hissy cassette tape played through even worse speakers.)
"Can you play 'I Ain't Jay' by The Rolling Stones?" "Excuse me, while I kiss this guy" etc
So she didn't really censor anything - the point was just so that parents would know what their kids were listening to - and her move was popular, just not for the reasons (or with the people) she intended.
Thinking further on it, I don't even really understand why there was such mockery of this, and the only people to have any reason to hate it would have been the lyrics publishers/rightsolders themselves, and/or the album publishers, but any expense related to printing lyrics would have been passed on to the customer, anyway ....
This is nothing new among leftists. Regardless of the circumstance, no matter how awful various factions act out, the nation as a whole is always, always one bad day away from turning into a Facist Christian Theocracy. Always.
you know, even if these boogeyman Ebul Kristuns (read: grifter lawyers) had "won" probably the women would still be pretty as all hell, just with dresses on instead of bikinis.
i'm starting to think this forum just wants to kinkshame the dressed women fetishists of the world! how insensitive
And my point is that that's false, Christians aren't a bigger or even equivalent threat compared to leftards. If they were, the '80s (when America had a far more moralistic President who was actually, and enthusiastically, backed by the Christian right and gave them more power than Clinton ever did) would be a vastly more forgettable and more puritanical decade than it was. I literally just provided an example for all the categories you brought up - video games (Sark vs. Thompson and their consequent effects on the industry), music (the PMRC) and movies (Disney Wars) - as to why that's the case.
Hell, even the infamous 'tabletop bad/D&D will drag you to Hell' moral panic wasn't started by the Christian right, at worst Evangelicals just joined a bandwagon which first got rolling thanks not to them but to CBS' 60 Minutes special on the subject and Mazes and Monsters (a movie directed by Steven Stern and based on a book by Rona Jaffe, neither of whom seem to be right-wingers or even Christians if you take a crack at their Early Life).
You're not entirely wrong, except the problem isn't Christians. It's nanny state mentalities.
There will always be shitty people of all stripes. Christian, atheist, man, woman, right, left. And people can get into all sorts of "well X person wasn't a Real™ Y Demographic" all they want, but it's just True Scotsman crap. So what's the solution? Eliminate all groups except your tiny sliver? Nah. Stop giving power to others. Stop letting others have power over you in any aspect of your life. People at large let some politician decide stupid shit like where they can and cannot build a garage on their property and then get up in arms when it's suggested they can also control what media you consume. The nanny state and all its over-reach has long been established. It's not been sudden. It's always been used against you in nearly every way possible. Now another group are trying (and succeeding) in using that power against you.
Statism is the issue. Cunts will always exist. Stop giving them opportunities to exert power over you. Let them fuck themselves up and no-one else. You will never control the state. You will never hold onto it indefinitely. You might build Rome, but it will eventually fall. It's the way of statism, and it always will be.
Someone will always be exercising power. There is no way to prevent that. All you can do is make sure your people are the ones with the power, and that they exercise it to do good things and not bad things.
Complaining we don't live in an anarchist utopia is just as retarded as complaining we don't live in a communist utopia.
You're right. If only we just voooooted in the right people with the right ideals at the right time with the right morals and the right background and the right.......
Sorry, but the idea that anarchy is a utopian ideal is a projection. Anarchy posits that you should solve your problems, not that problems won't exist. But please, tell me when the state will solve the problems it explicitly helps maintain?
There's a near 100% chance you're completely fine with censorship when it's Your Side™ engaging with it. Case in point, you're practically begging for censorship right now because "wah, I don't like Christianity".
You are as much someone I oppose as any other nanny state fuckwit. Even now you beg for another to solve your problems for you. You hold all the power to stop seeing this content. Hold all the power to have the experience you want. But instead, you choose to shit your pants over it and demand everyone else change to your sensibilities. Gee, I wonder who else behaves like that?
Whoa, I think this is unfair to Imp. Not only did he post a take I could kinda agree with once in a blue moon, not only did he sometimes identify actual problems even if his proposed solutions and associated ramblings were bugfuck insane, but even his craziest 'arguments' and rants were at least kinda original. If only because the sort of femoid-despising vitriol he got up to wasn't something easy to find 15 or 10 years ago.
The new clowns just sound like the fedora'd, mean-spirited, wannabe-edgy, self-important atheists from 2005 who must fervently believe they are enlightened by their own intelligence because otherwise, their fragile glass-like ego would collapse and all that crippling insecurity they're trying to hold back would consume them. They aren't new and they don't have anything new or interesting to say, I've heard it all before I even reached puberty. If you've seen one in a Youtube comment section from back then, you've seen them all, long before Atheism+ got going and many of them ended up trooning out.
You're right. I'm being unfair to Imp by comparing him to them
I think it's everyone responding to the insanity that is happening. Insanity has been around for a very long time, but we are in an era where it can be spotted and found. The problems can be sent over the rooftops as the insanity tries to hide it again. We have town criers and the truth smashing against each other that it is hard to watch at times.
We haven't been allowed to point towards women being corrupt as much as we can now. While we have town criers declare revenge on the patriarchy, we see Congresswoman Feinstein declared unable to take care of herself properly, but still in Congress. In Seattle we had a city councilwoman lead mobs against anyone who opposed her, and was stopped by the equally corrupt and female Mayor.
The Imp sees this and expects there to be even more corruption. Is he right? Partially.
Then we have the signs of atheists and communists specifically trying to overcome the world, by making everything worse. They tear down every statue and every sign of good things from other cultures. So the best response is to go back to Christ and rebuild the world that was imagined and must have existed beforehand. Even though we have books showing these things were happening all the time then as well.
If it gets a little strong, just change the subject. Imp loves cars, and will respond to that quickly. Everyone loves good shows and movies.
The trick is to document, discuss and stay sane.
Feinstein, huh?
women...
I'm suspecting imp is a shapeshifting nigga from outer space, every time I almost come close to figuring out just what his deal is I get flashbanged by reading my own imposts. I've called him a poo a spic a jew a pole a somali, nothing sticks and women keep walking tits first into his lawnmower trap of calling tits tits.
These new fedorable posters might as well be AI, I wonder how many of the specific phrases they use were taken straight from Frontpage of Reddit r/Athiesm's archives.
This trollin boy here. Top kek
He's got the retard spelling and everything. Nice word, really committed to the part.
He's sure got spirit.
What on earth! This can't be serious.
Regardless of how you feel about Christianity or religion in general, online atheists are always wrong and the worst people in any argument and running them off by any means necessary is always the correct move.
As an atheist, I 100% agree.
Agnostic, wish I could go back to Christianity. Yeah, pretty much this.
Do you have a fill of faith in the world walking around as an agnostic kia2win poster? A part of why I don't blow my brains out because it's so over is because I share the faith of my ancestors from sixteen hundred years of people trying to stop us from practicing.
Christians are right about capital A Atheists
Shut up retard.
Fuck off.
Fuck off.
Nah Imp has some good points, I just disagree on the origins of the problem as well as it being a woman-wide conspiracy to take down men. This stuff is just atheist trolling.
I rarely use the word cringe, but...
They all think they understand the Bible, that's the problem. Without Christ's transformation, the soul rejects the Bible.
1st Corinthians 2:14 But the natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; nor can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
You don't even need to go to God; The bible is, at it's core, documentation - of laws, parables, allegories, stories and cautionary tales that rely on actual historical and sociological events of the times.
In other words, there is context. Nothing occurs in a vacuum. You can't look at scripture without acknowledging the society that it comes from - and that's where alot of things get really interesting.
History is one of the easiest topics to use to lie to people, as facts and events in a vacuum can be interpreted in a number of ways, and simply engineering in omission can change the story in it's entirety.
Over time, I've begun to feel that Christianity suffers alot from 'modern' interpretations of scripture. There's reasons for it - if you really start looking at some of the lessons in context and actually thinking about it, Christianity is far from as passive as alot people love to paint it. But, for good or for ill, alot of people are very invested in carrying the martyrdom interpretation of scripture.
Actually, this is a website for non-retarded people. Sorry, door's that way, don't let it hit you in the ass on your way out.
He seems like he is mad that his dad told him to stop being a butt pirate.
I'm fine with it hitting handle-first.
So, why are you on it?
It's okay, sweetie. One day, you might have two functioning brain cells. The doctors aren't hopeful, though.
Most doctors these days don't have 2 functioning brain cells either when every solution comes down to "here's a pill that maybe will help with your minor problem, but it makes you constantly drowsy, it'll fuck with your sleep, oh and it also gives you ass cancer. That'll be $20 per pill."
Nah, it's more a case of "you tow the fucking line or we'll strip you off your license".
>unironically using "sweetie" as an insult
Go back to fucking Tumblr.
You don't put a comma, there
Its not for anybody. We aren't a "specific interest" forum. Its interests are designed by the people who engage with it and upvote it.
That's why there is a 2 up there, because this entire place was born out of "stop telling us what we are allowed to talk about" from the original.
It especially isn't for faggot atheist redditors.
Your only posts on this sub appear to be incredible seething about people better than you, so you have no say in who this sub is for - you have contributed absolutely nothing. I suggest you and the other retarded niggerfaggot both slither back into the Atheism sub and continue jacking each other off while brainstorming novel suicide methods.
Gay commies have hated Christians since forever.
It's probably calculated subversion. Our sanctuaries of - well not quite free speech, but freer than the wider hyper-pozzed internet - are too useful to us, they have to be made less so. Propaganda and division, is still the most effective weapon they have.
The real issue here is there clearly isn't enough moralfagging. I know when I look at internet communities, I never think "It's a good community, but it needs less moralfaggotry". True progress is made when the Right preaches lots of scripture and folds their hands down, their job done, doing nothing more, then the Left going forward and doing what they were going to do anyways. That's how we got to where we are today, and in terms of progress, we've never been more progressive!
No idea what OP is going on about, I have spammers like imp, come (and all his retarded alt accounts) and benotafriad all blocked to keep these areas free of oversaturation. If you're still seeing that stuff, just block them and you'll find that post content no longer gets overwhelmed by spam.
I guess you're one of them
My problem with the christians is the men are basically women in behaviour, and here is an entire thread devoted to whining and wanting people banned just confirming my theory about them. They use phrases like "deus vult" as delusional cope since they are fat, bearded losers who won't do shit to defend their beliefs. Downvotes on the left, ladies.
No this is making fun of them. It's woman like behavior to assume that mockery means banning
Are you special needs or just sub saharan african? The user "Imp" was banned from these forums. I would have thought since you started the thread you were aware of that.
I don't come to this subreddit for Christcuckery or Moralfagging.
Gay commies hate anything to do with Christianity and that makes us trench buddies no matter what your belief system.
Is gta more important to you or is not living surrounded by tranny freaks more important to you?
Think of it it like garlic warding off vampires. Bible verses are easily ignored if you don't like them but they make gay commies seethe.
We don't have so much content that one post every day or so is significantly taking up space over other more "on-topic" content.
Of course gay commies will try to co-opt Christianity like they do everything else. Push back against them for being gay commies, not for wearing Christian skin suits.
The slippery slope is not a fallacy, it's fucking pattern recognition.
there are people on this forum that want to reconcile promiscuous media with their own hate for promiscuity's effects on society, and who will attack anyone who tells them this is an impossibility. i think that's what he was getting at.
This nigger either really thinks he can convince KiA2, or even worse actually believes, that Christians are a bigger threat to vidya, music or movies than the Left in the Year of Our Lord MMXXIII. Lmao.
Jack Thompson did not manage to damage the videogame industry even 1/100th as badly as Anita Sarkeesian did, may the Young Turks pursue her forever in the deepest pits of Hell. He's not the one responsible for Abby Armstrong being the primary standard of beauty against which every female videogame character in the West must be measured against for acceptability by their creators, the injection of woke intersectional themes and caricatures into seemingly every other AAA game, etc. after all, she is. The most fervent Bible-thumpers of the 1980s didn't hate Star Wars as much as Rian Johnson did and even if they had, they still couldn't have hurt that franchise even 1/100th as badly as he and Kathleen Kennedy have done. And so on, so forth.
Also the 'think of the children!!!'-esque censorship drive happened primarily in the 1990s, ie. the Clinton years, and I would hardly characterize Hillary Clinton or Tipper Gore (you know, the founder & main driver of the PMRC) as Bible-thumpers. Quite the contrary. The Moral Majority-backed Reagan was in charge for the 80s and that decade's entertainment was actually a good deal steamier (for both sexes!) than ours, you would be crucified for making something like Flashdance today.
Contrary to modern revisionism from game journos, the censorship of the gaming prior and up to the end of the Thompson era was an overwhelmingly bi-partisan movement. For fucks sake, anyone need only look to Hillary Clinton and her now infamous "violent video games are like lead poisoning" speech.
Censorship in the past 70 or so years has overwhelmingly been a bi-partisan point in America, and never let the revisionists tell you otherwise.
Tipper Gore was neither a Christian nor right-wing, despite what the jacka
lss above would have us believe.The anti-media fervor in the 80s through the 00s may have been puritanical, but its vanguard was primarily comprised of moralizing leftists.
It's always just about power. The busybodies in power didn't really care, other than they could seize the opportunity to put the federal government in charge of what goes in front of people's eyeballs.
Look at what public education has turned into to understand why.
Turns out, like censoring citizens online, it didn't actually need a federal law structure. Just useful idiots and backslapping from fellow retards in response to virtue signal points by performing censorship stopping just short of actual government employees hitting the buttons themselves.
And it should be explicitly stated that the vast, vast majority of politicians of any label are this way. Plenty of Republicans pay lip-service to "small" government, but how many truly follow through when they hold all the power? How many really make any progress? Actions speak far louder than words, and the reality is that Republicans In Name Only (RINOs) are not the exception like the term implies.
Expansion of state power has always been a bi-partisan goal, with each "side" believing that eventually they will be the one in control to use that power For The Greater Good™. Shockingly, it never really turns out that way, does it? Maybe doing the same thing over and over and over isn't the solution?
What I mostly remember Tipper Gore for, is getting song lyrics in all the albums, which was an awesome thing, actually. It was always such a bonus if there were lyrics with the record, because, yes, often the words WERE hard to discern thanks to poppy, scratchy vinyl records played through cheap but costly, tinny-ass speakers (or hissy cassette tape played through even worse speakers.)
"Can you play 'I Ain't Jay' by The Rolling Stones?" "Excuse me, while I kiss this guy" etc
So she didn't really censor anything - the point was just so that parents would know what their kids were listening to - and her move was popular, just not for the reasons (or with the people) she intended.
Thinking further on it, I don't even really understand why there was such mockery of this, and the only people to have any reason to hate it would have been the lyrics publishers/rightsolders themselves, and/or the album publishers, but any expense related to printing lyrics would have been passed on to the customer, anyway ....
This is nothing new among leftists. Regardless of the circumstance, no matter how awful various factions act out, the nation as a whole is always, always one bad day away from turning into a Facist Christian Theocracy. Always.
if only
Surely, comrades, you do not want Jones back?
you know, even if these boogeyman Ebul Kristuns (read: grifter lawyers) had "won" probably the women would still be pretty as all hell, just with dresses on instead of bikinis.
i'm starting to think this forum just wants to kinkshame the dressed women fetishists of the world! how insensitive
And my point is that that's false, Christians aren't a bigger or even equivalent threat compared to leftards. If they were, the '80s (when America had a far more moralistic President who was actually, and enthusiastically, backed by the Christian right and gave them more power than Clinton ever did) would be a vastly more forgettable and more puritanical decade than it was. I literally just provided an example for all the categories you brought up - video games (Sark vs. Thompson and their consequent effects on the industry), music (the PMRC) and movies (Disney Wars) - as to why that's the case.
Hell, even the infamous 'tabletop bad/D&D will drag you to Hell' moral panic wasn't started by the Christian right, at worst Evangelicals just joined a bandwagon which first got rolling thanks not to them but to CBS' 60 Minutes special on the subject and Mazes and Monsters (a movie directed by Steven Stern and based on a book by Rona Jaffe, neither of whom seem to be right-wingers or even Christians if you take a crack at their Early Life).
Furthermore it was zealous Catholics Antonin Scalia and Samuel Alito who helped strike down California's ban on the sale of 'violent' vidya to kids under a certain age, and the former (probably the most hard-right Justice the country has had post-FDR years, right up there alongside Thomas) penned the majority opinion. The person who came up with that law was not a Republican, much less any other sort of right-winger, or a Christian himself.
Are you a homo? That seems like something a homo would complain about.
You're not entirely wrong, except the problem isn't Christians. It's nanny state mentalities.
There will always be shitty people of all stripes. Christian, atheist, man, woman, right, left. And people can get into all sorts of "well X person wasn't a Real™ Y Demographic" all they want, but it's just True Scotsman crap. So what's the solution? Eliminate all groups except your tiny sliver? Nah. Stop giving power to others. Stop letting others have power over you in any aspect of your life. People at large let some politician decide stupid shit like where they can and cannot build a garage on their property and then get up in arms when it's suggested they can also control what media you consume. The nanny state and all its over-reach has long been established. It's not been sudden. It's always been used against you in nearly every way possible. Now another group are trying (and succeeding) in using that power against you.
Statism is the issue. Cunts will always exist. Stop giving them opportunities to exert power over you. Let them fuck themselves up and no-one else. You will never control the state. You will never hold onto it indefinitely. You might build Rome, but it will eventually fall. It's the way of statism, and it always will be.
Someone will always be exercising power. There is no way to prevent that. All you can do is make sure your people are the ones with the power, and that they exercise it to do good things and not bad things.
Complaining we don't live in an anarchist utopia is just as retarded as complaining we don't live in a communist utopia.
You're right. If only we just voooooted in the right people with the right ideals at the right time with the right morals and the right background and the right.......
Sorry, but the idea that anarchy is a utopian ideal is a projection. Anarchy posits that you should solve your problems, not that problems won't exist. But please, tell me when the state will solve the problems it explicitly helps maintain?
Maybe your retarded ass should just leave. The West was founded and based on pro-Christian sentiments and morals.
Why don't you start posting based Quran quotes to balance it out?
There's a near 100% chance you're completely fine with censorship when it's Your Side™ engaging with it. Case in point, you're practically begging for censorship right now because "wah, I don't like Christianity".
You are as much someone I oppose as any other nanny state fuckwit. Even now you beg for another to solve your problems for you. You hold all the power to stop seeing this content. Hold all the power to have the experience you want. But instead, you choose to shit your pants over it and demand everyone else change to your sensibilities. Gee, I wonder who else behaves like that?
Muslims and the Left are also super censorship happy. It's just what they censor differ from one another.
Be on guard for ALL sorts of censorship. Pitbulling just the Christians is exactly what the OTHER censors want you to do.
Oh, and keep your eye on rising Hindu fundamentalism, that'll be fun as it spreads out of India.