Lemme know when the skinheads are stripping in front of children.
Also find the clearly delusion drawing of a tranny to be hilarious. It's a very clear look into the mind of these degenerates. No, am-hole, you don't look anything like that and stop fucking pretending.
It depends on where on the intersectional stack everyone is. If a WASPy white guy is attacking jews, they'll support the jew. But if a ghetto black guy is going around and attacking hasidic jews, then its obviously the jews fault. Same with palestinians, they're more "oppressed" so they're supported over the jews.
ummm have you not seen Netflix's new documentary about medieval Germany? Germany used to be 97% black until the colonizers genocided the indigenous LGBTQIA2S+ folx and whitewashed history
One is real and the other isn't (also the whole anti loli crusade was started by feminists who just wanted to get rid off cute female characters in anime. It's why you dont hear so much about shota). . And there is literally zero pro loli protests. What shit are they making up?
If there’s one thing conservative boomers love it’s lolicon. I would think the Venn diagram of Trannies that are into loli would be a perfect circle. Most of them became trannies from looking at yuri in the first place.
There's been a very concerted effort across fairly specific swaths of the Internet, going on about 2 years now, of troons and pedos baiting normalfags into attacking lolis/loli artists and fans. It is 100% transparent that they think the loliverse are a bunch of pedo "allies in waiting" and that if they just bring enough mainstream heat against that community then the pedos can recruit them when they have nowhere else to turn. They also SEETHE at the fact that lolicon culture is legal in most places (and decently popular online) where their fucked up child abuse isn't, so they get their rocks off attacking the loliverse anyway.
If you're into lolis sexually then you are infact a pedo. There's nothing wrong with liking anime characters. I'm personally a fan of cute parent-child interactions in Manga but sexual interest 100 percent makes a person a pedophile
Not the same thing. Stop using false equivalence. A pedophile is someone attracted to pre pubescence. It does not require anything more than a mental state. When you're being a little faggot jerking off to gay porn that means you are infact gay. Murder require an mental state and an action and to be performed against a real individual. Maybe you pedo fucks are confusing pedophilia with child molestation.
I mean, considering the alternative of fucking actual kids, I say shove a tankobon in their hands and let nature take it's course. They probably won't leave their house again until a few weeks later when they need another book of drawings.
I mean, of course it would have been better that they not been exposed to porn at a young age leading to such deviance, but it's really weird to hear the same people endorsing open air drug use funded by tax dollars in the name of "harm reduction" suddenly have an issue with perverts jacking off in the privacy of their own homes instead of outside schoolyards.
Using loli for "harm reduction" does no more help than allowing open air drug forums. Satisfying deviant sexual urges actually increases the likelihood of offending.
Focusing on the fictional to distract from the REAL threat, that's the left today just like the right and video games in the 2000s.....and some still today...
Society has a clear double standard that refuses to view women as being capable of being sexual predators. It's why I take umbrage with the whole "you're only gay because you were molested" because they will only ever consider the possibility that a young male can be sexually assaulted by an older male. You go to any article about a female teacher sexually assaulting her young, male student and the comments are full of "hur hur, where was she when I was growing up". If it was a male teacher and a female student, no one would be making those comments.
Adding to point one, society doesn't want to view any boy sexually assaulted by an older female to be a victim. He should be "lucky". Of course, this goes deeper into the idea that "it can't be rape because he got hard" and that only men can be the assailant in rape. Heck, just consider how many people make anal rape jokes about people who go to prison.
Society has a clear double standard that refuses to view women as being capable of being sexual predators.
Yup, and it pisses me off. For the response I tried looking it up...first result was as study on pedophilia...with all the pedophiles studied being males. When I'd specifically searched for rate of perpetrator. Also, the other study straight up says "Female sex offenders statistics are harder to come by as they receive less attention from researchers." While still claiming that 90% of pedophiles are men. How is this at all fucking scientific? They also are pulling a fast one by saying 5% of men are "pedophiles attracted to underage but developed girls." Like, what? That could mean 17.9 year olds. And even if it's something creepy like 15...that's still not pedophilia. It's wrong, but not pedophilia. They also seem to lump perpetrators who are of similar age to the victims into that. Again, wrong, but not (necessarily at least) pedophilia.
Basically, the "studies" I found when I even looked for discussion of female perpetrators were all haphazard smear jobs with shoddy data and even worse conclusions. Honestly disgusting.
It's why I take umbrage with the whole "you're only gay because you were molested" because they will only ever consider the possibility that a young male can be sexually assaulted by an older male.
Eh, there's a massive correlation, though. Just because not all predators are men doesn't mean that abusing children can't lead to homosexuality. Completely unrelated arguments, and child molestation does lead to hypersexuality and, presumably, homosexuality. Things being done to children before they're biologically and chemically ready will absolutely mess them up, including when it comes to future sexuality.
Correlation between child abuse and homosexuality doesn't negate the possibility that women can be predators too.
You go to any article about a female teacher sexually assaulting her young, male student and the comments are full of "hur hur, where was she when I was growing up". If it was a male teacher and a female student, no one would be making those comments.
It is disturbing how open they are about it, and how it's written off as a joke.
Heck, just consider how many people make anal rape jokes about people who go to prison.
I've ranted about this before, but a pet peeve of mine is in cops shows (and other entertainment where the scenario comes up), some protagonist detective or the like - who is portrayed unquestionably as the Good Guy, not even some grey morality - will threaten a (potentially) innocent person with prison rape to get a confession. And no one - in universe or the audience - is expected to find that weird or terrible.
Eh, there's a massive correlation, though. Just because not all predators are men doesn't mean that abusing children can't lead to homosexuality. Completely unrelated arguments, and child molestation does lead to hypersexuality and, presumably, homosexuality. Things being done to children before they're biologically and chemically ready will absolutely mess them up, including when it comes to future sexuality.
Obviously, I'm not going to claim that having sex at a young age, consensual or not, isn't going to result in a warped perception of sex and sexuality. What I am saying is that I often hear a lot of people express a very myopic view of the topic that seems like it does more harm than good. I'm not going to go further than that because these arguments just devolve into shit flinging contests after 4-5 replies.
Oh, I'm aware of the thuggishness of the "justice system." And, yeah, plea deals and bullshit charges are massively abused. My point is that I object to the idea of portraying blatant rape threats as a good guy thing to do.
That certain members of the D.C criminal justice system haven't been dying of sudden long range cranial lead injection is, to me, a fucking miracle...
It's frankly amazing just how many people in many professions are going around in their day to day lives, completely unmurdered. It's a bizarre mystery, and defies reason.
That certain members of the D.C criminal justice system haven't been dying of sudden long range cranial lead injection is, to me, a fucking miracle, and it is only a matter of time until those fucking fascists push someone to it.
Mostly that the feds are really good at turning the whole of DC into denied territory for those kinds of operations. The Beltway Snipers were fairly clever and they still got caught.
It isn't wrong. I mean, the representation in this picture is laughable, but otherwise the point is made. Adult males who obsess over animated underage girls need to shut the fuck up. "But ackshually she's a thou-" No. Rightoids and mutants alike can go directly into the sun.
Anime characters, espcially lolis, typically do not resemble human beings in all but the most basic characteristics. They're not jerking off to children, they are jerking of to drawings of IMPOSSIBLY DEFORMED EXTRADIMENSIONAL ALIENS THAT EXIST OUTSIDE THE BOUNDS OF BOTH BIOLOGY AND EUCLIDEAN SPACE.
The deformations of these fictitious beings are essentially a mind-hack - they have been designed over the course of a century by thousands of human minds all fighting to create the most appealing, most adorable form they can, in order to SELL COPIES.
Just because some guy can fetishize a deformed mass of lines, does not mean he fetishizes an oily, greasy, three dimensional, human child with tiny eyes and a big snotty nose.
Say they're somehow not pedos like how dudes fucking trannies totally aren't gay. It is a fact that indulging in deviant sexual attraction makes you go deeper into it so they'll become pedophiles and more likely to offend too
Lol dude and libel is just lines on paper. What are the features those dudes are jerking off to? I've yet to understand why anyone defends this shit other than they're a pedo too. They're clearly attracted to the child like features of the drawing. Would you say this same shit if someone jacking off to some American style drawing of a child
They're clearly attracted to the child like features of the drawing
Which features would those be?
The eyes the size of a grown man's fist? The noses that are so upturned as to be horizontal, and have no nostrils? The lipless mouths? The necks as thin as wrists?
The features are not even human-like, let alone child like.
Its funny how the "thousand year old" argument is used so often to mock the loli-lovers, when its mostly a literal joke to even them (which only became mainstream because of Fire Emblem Awakening selling too many copies and getting the mainstream Lefties into a niche series), and otherwise their arguments mostly consist of "its a fucking drawing bro."
Probably easier to blowup a meme argument that is (as well as anyone who actually uses it) retarded than actually engage with an actual difficult minefield like that one though.
There’s an actual argument in that anime is used to help groom a lot of the time plus two things:
The first is “if the MSM can program the left, why can’t fictional media at least have an influence”?
The second is the entire reason people are outraged over Cuties and drag queens and all that shit is because of the influence it has on kids, so why wouldn’t this stuff have at least a partial one. I know both sound super similar, but the first is more generalized and also covers “video games causing violence”, which I don’t believe is wholly true, only that video games may help push people who were already thinking about it over the edge, while the second is specific to this and actually covers “why and how would people act on this shit”.
First, anime is a medium. Children's books and story hour can be and are being used to groom children too. You can be opposed to inappropriate media that directly targets children as their audience without trying to be against that media when it only targets a niche audience of adults. Basically, don't let your children watch anime that is intended for adults.
Your second assertion is false. People cared about Cuties because actual children were involved in the production of the film. People didn't care about drag shows until they started showing up in schools and parents started bringing their children to the shows.
Im opposed to loli porn because indulging deviant sexual arousal is for a fact more likely to make someone offend and not as people like to claim divert pedophiles from molesting kids
Those actually are really good responses to both, and I do absolutely get the difference between the two, but I don’t think the general public is going to care when the pendulum swings back because all they’re gonna think is “all the people who’re trying to make my kid transition watch these weird Japanese cartoons and those cartoons have child-looking characters doing sexual shit and I don’t want it to exist”, as seen with the Satanic panic of the late 90s and early 00s due to Pokemon, MTG, DND, Yugioh, etc.
Hopefully that doesn’t happen but I don’t have faith in that.
The first is “if the MSM can program the left, why can’t fictional media at least have an influence”?
"Can have an influence" and "are a direct cause" are not the same thing. Especially as, the MSM is doing it intentionally and with purpose which will make anything far more effective. Double so over "anime directors make girls look so cute they end up looking prepubescent" which is aimless.
the entire reason people are outraged over Cutie and all that shit is because of the influence it has on kids
You are badly generalizing now. The biggest part of the outrage for Cuties (Drag queens are an entire separate issue) was over the actual kids in the movie who were being victimized and exploited, as well as both the production and Netflix for allowing it to be aired.
Which is the big problem with your line of thinking. CP has actual victims who are being harmed, and its criminality is more based on fact that it can only exist by harming those children. Loli shit has no direct victim. It can maybe after a while influence someone to victimize someone, but that is true of a lot of things. Should we have banned certain genres of books because The Collector and Catcher in the Rye influenced numerous actual murders? Or can we acknowledge that there are bigger things at play when someone takes a fictional work and then translates it to real world violence beyond "it made him do it!"
show me a SINGLE pro-loli protest. with signs. anywhere.
I have NEVER IN MY LIFE seen or heard anyone use the word "cunny" outside of degenerate leftists (I repeat myself).
i've only ever seen it used on 4chan
and an indonesian vtuber
the brits use it as the diminutive of cunt. Why they need a diminutive for cunt is beyond me?
from what I've seen is more like:
1- draw a loli
2- call it a male
3-omg, a heckin valid transgirl!
Lemme know when the skinheads are stripping in front of children.
Also find the clearly delusion drawing of a tranny to be hilarious. It's a very clear look into the mind of these degenerates. No, am-hole, you don't look anything like that and stop fucking pretending.
Lemme know when the skinheads are literally doing anything, all this talk of muh Nazis and fascist and I'm yet to find my fascist utopia to move to.
All the one's I've met just exist to be intimidating to keep the local ghetto boys from pulling some hoodrat shit. Which is a full time defensive job.
Ukraine has a large group of Nazi's running around
At that point leftists will turn around and adore Nazis.
"Uh, you can't criticize them, sweetie. Nazis are a protected class."
They only reason they can hate Nazis because of the Jews.
If it wasn't for that, they would champion them as champions of animal rights.
Leftist hate jews outside of the moguls who support and fund their shit
It depends on where on the intersectional stack everyone is. If a WASPy white guy is attacking jews, they'll support the jew. But if a ghetto black guy is going around and attacking hasidic jews, then its obviously the jews fault. Same with palestinians, they're more "oppressed" so they're supported over the jews.
Has anyone ever had the balls to try and pull "the Nazis are an indigenous minority" on an oppression olympics cultist, just to see what happens?
It'd be especially fun to see them apply their "indigenous knowledge and folklaw is always valid" to Hitler's views on Jewish conspiracy.
One is real and the other isn't (also the whole anti loli crusade was started by feminists who just wanted to get rid off cute female characters in anime. It's why you dont hear so much about shota). . And there is literally zero pro loli protests. What shit are they making up?
Anime characters aren't human beings.
If there’s one thing conservative boomers love it’s lolicon. I would think the Venn diagram of Trannies that are into loli would be a perfect circle. Most of them became trannies from looking at yuri in the first place.
Leave the lolis alone.
There's been a very concerted effort across fairly specific swaths of the Internet, going on about 2 years now, of troons and pedos baiting normalfags into attacking lolis/loli artists and fans. It is 100% transparent that they think the loliverse are a bunch of pedo "allies in waiting" and that if they just bring enough mainstream heat against that community then the pedos can recruit them when they have nowhere else to turn. They also SEETHE at the fact that lolicon culture is legal in most places (and decently popular online) where their fucked up child abuse isn't, so they get their rocks off attacking the loliverse anyway.
Do not help them.
If you're into lolis sexually then you are infact a pedo. There's nothing wrong with liking anime characters. I'm personally a fan of cute parent-child interactions in Manga but sexual interest 100 percent makes a person a pedophile
And enjoying violent videogames 100% makes someone a murderer. How do you go through life being this big of a fucking retard?
Not the same thing. Stop using false equivalence. A pedophile is someone attracted to pre pubescence. It does not require anything more than a mental state. When you're being a little faggot jerking off to gay porn that means you are infact gay. Murder require an mental state and an action and to be performed against a real individual. Maybe you pedo fucks are confusing pedophilia with child molestation.
Apparently the answer is "with persistence."
I mean, considering the alternative of fucking actual kids, I say shove a tankobon in their hands and let nature take it's course. They probably won't leave their house again until a few weeks later when they need another book of drawings.
I mean, of course it would have been better that they not been exposed to porn at a young age leading to such deviance, but it's really weird to hear the same people endorsing open air drug use funded by tax dollars in the name of "harm reduction" suddenly have an issue with perverts jacking off in the privacy of their own homes instead of outside schoolyards.
Using loli for "harm reduction" does no more help than allowing open air drug forums. Satisfying deviant sexual urges actually increases the likelihood of offending.
How many flags do pro-Loli people have? How many Loli-lovers are histrionic over Loli "genocides"? Is Loliphobe in the dictionary?
I agree with this entirely. Yes you, discord mod, ARE on equal standing with your imagined pedophile opposition.
Perhaps even worse since you want to share with kids what gets your rocks off.
Focusing on the fictional to distract from the REAL threat, that's the left today just like the right and video games in the 2000s.....and some still today...
Just mention Dr. Pizza, Amir0x, Abtin, SethTheProgrammer, or Dr. Pizza and watch them flail.
Troons are even repellent in minimalistic cartoons drawn by themselves. Or so I assume it was.
The US is going to go full Nazi soon and the Zog alonside religious fundamentalists will be the cause again.
Two things:
Society has a clear double standard that refuses to view women as being capable of being sexual predators. It's why I take umbrage with the whole "you're only gay because you were molested" because they will only ever consider the possibility that a young male can be sexually assaulted by an older male. You go to any article about a female teacher sexually assaulting her young, male student and the comments are full of "hur hur, where was she when I was growing up". If it was a male teacher and a female student, no one would be making those comments.
Adding to point one, society doesn't want to view any boy sexually assaulted by an older female to be a victim. He should be "lucky". Of course, this goes deeper into the idea that "it can't be rape because he got hard" and that only men can be the assailant in rape. Heck, just consider how many people make anal rape jokes about people who go to prison.
Yup, and it pisses me off. For the response I tried looking it up...first result was as study on pedophilia...with all the pedophiles studied being males. When I'd specifically searched for rate of perpetrator. Also, the other study straight up says "Female sex offenders statistics are harder to come by as they receive less attention from researchers." While still claiming that 90% of pedophiles are men. How is this at all fucking scientific? They also are pulling a fast one by saying 5% of men are "pedophiles attracted to underage but developed girls." Like, what? That could mean 17.9 year olds. And even if it's something creepy like 15...that's still not pedophilia. It's wrong, but not pedophilia. They also seem to lump perpetrators who are of similar age to the victims into that. Again, wrong, but not (necessarily at least) pedophilia.
Basically, the "studies" I found when I even looked for discussion of female perpetrators were all haphazard smear jobs with shoddy data and even worse conclusions. Honestly disgusting.
Eh, there's a massive correlation, though. Just because not all predators are men doesn't mean that abusing children can't lead to homosexuality. Completely unrelated arguments, and child molestation does lead to hypersexuality and, presumably, homosexuality. Things being done to children before they're biologically and chemically ready will absolutely mess them up, including when it comes to future sexuality.
Correlation between child abuse and homosexuality doesn't negate the possibility that women can be predators too.
It is disturbing how open they are about it, and how it's written off as a joke.
I've ranted about this before, but a pet peeve of mine is in cops shows (and other entertainment where the scenario comes up), some protagonist detective or the like - who is portrayed unquestionably as the Good Guy, not even some grey morality - will threaten a (potentially) innocent person with prison rape to get a confession. And no one - in universe or the audience - is expected to find that weird or terrible.
15 year olds now look like 20 anyways.
Obviously, I'm not going to claim that having sex at a young age, consensual or not, isn't going to result in a warped perception of sex and sexuality. What I am saying is that I often hear a lot of people express a very myopic view of the topic that seems like it does more harm than good. I'm not going to go further than that because these arguments just devolve into shit flinging contests after 4-5 replies.
Also, even Spongebob Squarepants has made a prison rape joke. That's how normalized it is
Oh, I'm aware of the thuggishness of the "justice system." And, yeah, plea deals and bullshit charges are massively abused. My point is that I object to the idea of portraying blatant rape threats as a good guy thing to do.
It's frankly amazing just how many people in many professions are going around in their day to day lives, completely unmurdered. It's a bizarre mystery, and defies reason.
You can be held in jail for a long time without charges though.
Mostly that the feds are really good at turning the whole of DC into denied territory for those kinds of operations. The Beltway Snipers were fairly clever and they still got caught.
actually any male sexually assaulted by any female.
It isn't wrong. I mean, the representation in this picture is laughable, but otherwise the point is made. Adult males who obsess over animated underage girls need to shut the fuck up. "But ackshually she's a thou-" No. Rightoids and mutants alike can go directly into the sun.
A tranny isn't a groomer unless they're going out of their way to push their lifestyle in front of kids.
Someone who jerks off to lolicon drawings isn't a groomer unless they're going out of their way to show that content to kids.
Show loli porn to a kid and belong in jail.
Do your drag queen shit infront of kids and you belong in jail.
Unfortunately, only one of these things currently results in jail time.
Someone who jerks off to loli is a pedophile though
Anime characters, espcially lolis, typically do not resemble human beings in all but the most basic characteristics. They're not jerking off to children, they are jerking of to drawings of IMPOSSIBLY DEFORMED EXTRADIMENSIONAL ALIENS THAT EXIST OUTSIDE THE BOUNDS OF BOTH BIOLOGY AND EUCLIDEAN SPACE.
The deformations of these fictitious beings are essentially a mind-hack - they have been designed over the course of a century by thousands of human minds all fighting to create the most appealing, most adorable form they can, in order to SELL COPIES.
Just because some guy can fetishize a deformed mass of lines, does not mean he fetishizes an oily, greasy, three dimensional, human child with tiny eyes and a big snotty nose.
Drawings aren't people.
Say they're somehow not pedos like how dudes fucking trannies totally aren't gay. It is a fact that indulging in deviant sexual attraction makes you go deeper into it so they'll become pedophiles and more likely to offend too
You don't understand. Once you take the 2Dpill, actual, real people are pig disgusting.
Lol dude and libel is just lines on paper. What are the features those dudes are jerking off to? I've yet to understand why anyone defends this shit other than they're a pedo too. They're clearly attracted to the child like features of the drawing. Would you say this same shit if someone jacking off to some American style drawing of a child
Which features would those be?
The eyes the size of a grown man's fist? The noses that are so upturned as to be horizontal, and have no nostrils? The lipless mouths? The necks as thin as wrists?
The features are not even human-like, let alone child like.
Anime characters are not humans, and the ones drawn to be cute do not even resemble humans.
Nobody jacks off to western art because it's too realistic and therefore unfappable. Which proves my point.
Its funny how the "thousand year old" argument is used so often to mock the loli-lovers, when its mostly a literal joke to even them (which only became mainstream because of Fire Emblem Awakening selling too many copies and getting the mainstream Lefties into a niche series), and otherwise their arguments mostly consist of "its a fucking drawing bro."
Probably easier to blowup a meme argument that is (as well as anyone who actually uses it) retarded than actually engage with an actual difficult minefield like that one though.
There’s an actual argument in that anime is used to help groom a lot of the time plus two things:
The first is “if the MSM can program the left, why can’t fictional media at least have an influence”?
The second is the entire reason people are outraged over Cuties and drag queens and all that shit is because of the influence it has on kids, so why wouldn’t this stuff have at least a partial one. I know both sound super similar, but the first is more generalized and also covers “video games causing violence”, which I don’t believe is wholly true, only that video games may help push people who were already thinking about it over the edge, while the second is specific to this and actually covers “why and how would people act on this shit”.
First, anime is a medium. Children's books and story hour can be and are being used to groom children too. You can be opposed to inappropriate media that directly targets children as their audience without trying to be against that media when it only targets a niche audience of adults. Basically, don't let your children watch anime that is intended for adults.
Your second assertion is false. People cared about Cuties because actual children were involved in the production of the film. People didn't care about drag shows until they started showing up in schools and parents started bringing their children to the shows.
Im opposed to loli porn because indulging deviant sexual arousal is for a fact more likely to make someone offend and not as people like to claim divert pedophiles from molesting kids
Those actually are really good responses to both, and I do absolutely get the difference between the two, but I don’t think the general public is going to care when the pendulum swings back because all they’re gonna think is “all the people who’re trying to make my kid transition watch these weird Japanese cartoons and those cartoons have child-looking characters doing sexual shit and I don’t want it to exist”, as seen with the Satanic panic of the late 90s and early 00s due to Pokemon, MTG, DND, Yugioh, etc.
Hopefully that doesn’t happen but I don’t have faith in that.
"Can have an influence" and "are a direct cause" are not the same thing. Especially as, the MSM is doing it intentionally and with purpose which will make anything far more effective. Double so over "anime directors make girls look so cute they end up looking prepubescent" which is aimless.
You are badly generalizing now. The biggest part of the outrage for Cuties (Drag queens are an entire separate issue) was over the actual kids in the movie who were being victimized and exploited, as well as both the production and Netflix for allowing it to be aired.
Which is the big problem with your line of thinking. CP has actual victims who are being harmed, and its criminality is more based on fact that it can only exist by harming those children. Loli shit has no direct victim. It can maybe after a while influence someone to victimize someone, but that is true of a lot of things. Should we have banned certain genres of books because The Collector and Catcher in the Rye influenced numerous actual murders? Or can we acknowledge that there are bigger things at play when someone takes a fictional work and then translates it to real world violence beyond "it made him do it!"
Where is this supposed massive support for loli on the right?
I don't like any of this shit and the loli dudes are pedos too. However one is directly going after children and it's not the loli pedoa
if there's one thing most degenerates should be agreeing on, bare minimum, it is that kids should not be involved.
Historically, eunuchs were used as servants. Especially as servants to women.