It isn't wrong. I mean, the representation in this picture is laughable, but otherwise the point is made. Adult males who obsess over animated underage girls need to shut the fuck up. "But ackshually she's a thou-" No. Rightoids and mutants alike can go directly into the sun.
Anime characters, espcially lolis, typically do not resemble human beings in all but the most basic characteristics. They're not jerking off to children, they are jerking of to drawings of IMPOSSIBLY DEFORMED EXTRADIMENSIONAL ALIENS THAT EXIST OUTSIDE THE BOUNDS OF BOTH BIOLOGY AND EUCLIDEAN SPACE.
The deformations of these fictitious beings are essentially a mind-hack - they have been designed over the course of a century by thousands of human minds all fighting to create the most appealing, most adorable form they can, in order to SELL COPIES.
Just because some guy can fetishize a deformed mass of lines, does not mean he fetishizes an oily, greasy, three dimensional, human child with tiny eyes and a big snotty nose.
Say they're somehow not pedos like how dudes fucking trannies totally aren't gay. It is a fact that indulging in deviant sexual attraction makes you go deeper into it so they'll become pedophiles and more likely to offend too
Lol dude and libel is just lines on paper. What are the features those dudes are jerking off to? I've yet to understand why anyone defends this shit other than they're a pedo too. They're clearly attracted to the child like features of the drawing. Would you say this same shit if someone jacking off to some American style drawing of a child
Its funny how the "thousand year old" argument is used so often to mock the loli-lovers, when its mostly a literal joke to even them (which only became mainstream because of Fire Emblem Awakening selling too many copies and getting the mainstream Lefties into a niche series), and otherwise their arguments mostly consist of "its a fucking drawing bro."
Probably easier to blowup a meme argument that is (as well as anyone who actually uses it) retarded than actually engage with an actual difficult minefield like that one though.
There’s an actual argument in that anime is used to help groom a lot of the time plus two things:
The first is “if the MSM can program the left, why can’t fictional media at least have an influence”?
The second is the entire reason people are outraged over Cuties and drag queens and all that shit is because of the influence it has on kids, so why wouldn’t this stuff have at least a partial one. I know both sound super similar, but the first is more generalized and also covers “video games causing violence”, which I don’t believe is wholly true, only that video games may help push people who were already thinking about it over the edge, while the second is specific to this and actually covers “why and how would people act on this shit”.
First, anime is a medium. Children's books and story hour can be and are being used to groom children too. You can be opposed to inappropriate media that directly targets children as their audience without trying to be against that media when it only targets a niche audience of adults. Basically, don't let your children watch anime that is intended for adults.
Your second assertion is false. People cared about Cuties because actual children were involved in the production of the film. People didn't care about drag shows until they started showing up in schools and parents started bringing their children to the shows.
Those actually are really good responses to both, and I do absolutely get the difference between the two, but I don’t think the general public is going to care when the pendulum swings back because all they’re gonna think is “all the people who’re trying to make my kid transition watch these weird Japanese cartoons and those cartoons have child-looking characters doing sexual shit and I don’t want it to exist”, as seen with the Satanic panic of the late 90s and early 00s due to Pokemon, MTG, DND, Yugioh, etc.
Hopefully that doesn’t happen but I don’t have faith in that.
Im opposed to loli porn because indulging deviant sexual arousal is for a fact more likely to make someone offend and not as people like to claim divert pedophiles from molesting kids
The first is “if the MSM can program the left, why can’t fictional media at least have an influence”?
"Can have an influence" and "are a direct cause" are not the same thing. Especially as, the MSM is doing it intentionally and with purpose which will make anything far more effective. Double so over "anime directors make girls look so cute they end up looking prepubescent" which is aimless.
the entire reason people are outraged over Cutie and all that shit is because of the influence it has on kids
You are badly generalizing now. The biggest part of the outrage for Cuties (Drag queens are an entire separate issue) was over the actual kids in the movie who were being victimized and exploited, as well as both the production and Netflix for allowing it to be aired.
Which is the big problem with your line of thinking. CP has actual victims who are being harmed, and its criminality is more based on fact that it can only exist by harming those children. Loli shit has no direct victim. It can maybe after a while influence someone to victimize someone, but that is true of a lot of things. Should we have banned certain genres of books because The Collector and Catcher in the Rye influenced numerous actual murders? Or can we acknowledge that there are bigger things at play when someone takes a fictional work and then translates it to real world violence beyond "it made him do it!"
It isn't wrong. I mean, the representation in this picture is laughable, but otherwise the point is made. Adult males who obsess over animated underage girls need to shut the fuck up. "But ackshually she's a thou-" No. Rightoids and mutants alike can go directly into the sun.
A tranny isn't a groomer unless they're going out of their way to push their lifestyle in front of kids.
Someone who jerks off to lolicon drawings isn't a groomer unless they're going out of their way to show that content to kids.
Show loli porn to a kid and belong in jail.
Do your drag queen shit infront of kids and you belong in jail.
Unfortunately, only one of these things currently results in jail time.
Someone who jerks off to loli is a pedophile though
Anime characters, espcially lolis, typically do not resemble human beings in all but the most basic characteristics. They're not jerking off to children, they are jerking of to drawings of IMPOSSIBLY DEFORMED EXTRADIMENSIONAL ALIENS THAT EXIST OUTSIDE THE BOUNDS OF BOTH BIOLOGY AND EUCLIDEAN SPACE.
The deformations of these fictitious beings are essentially a mind-hack - they have been designed over the course of a century by thousands of human minds all fighting to create the most appealing, most adorable form they can, in order to SELL COPIES.
Just because some guy can fetishize a deformed mass of lines, does not mean he fetishizes an oily, greasy, three dimensional, human child with tiny eyes and a big snotty nose.
Drawings aren't people.
Say they're somehow not pedos like how dudes fucking trannies totally aren't gay. It is a fact that indulging in deviant sexual attraction makes you go deeper into it so they'll become pedophiles and more likely to offend too
Lol dude and libel is just lines on paper. What are the features those dudes are jerking off to? I've yet to understand why anyone defends this shit other than they're a pedo too. They're clearly attracted to the child like features of the drawing. Would you say this same shit if someone jacking off to some American style drawing of a child
Its funny how the "thousand year old" argument is used so often to mock the loli-lovers, when its mostly a literal joke to even them (which only became mainstream because of Fire Emblem Awakening selling too many copies and getting the mainstream Lefties into a niche series), and otherwise their arguments mostly consist of "its a fucking drawing bro."
Probably easier to blowup a meme argument that is (as well as anyone who actually uses it) retarded than actually engage with an actual difficult minefield like that one though.
There’s an actual argument in that anime is used to help groom a lot of the time plus two things:
The first is “if the MSM can program the left, why can’t fictional media at least have an influence”?
The second is the entire reason people are outraged over Cuties and drag queens and all that shit is because of the influence it has on kids, so why wouldn’t this stuff have at least a partial one. I know both sound super similar, but the first is more generalized and also covers “video games causing violence”, which I don’t believe is wholly true, only that video games may help push people who were already thinking about it over the edge, while the second is specific to this and actually covers “why and how would people act on this shit”.
First, anime is a medium. Children's books and story hour can be and are being used to groom children too. You can be opposed to inappropriate media that directly targets children as their audience without trying to be against that media when it only targets a niche audience of adults. Basically, don't let your children watch anime that is intended for adults.
Your second assertion is false. People cared about Cuties because actual children were involved in the production of the film. People didn't care about drag shows until they started showing up in schools and parents started bringing their children to the shows.
Those actually are really good responses to both, and I do absolutely get the difference between the two, but I don’t think the general public is going to care when the pendulum swings back because all they’re gonna think is “all the people who’re trying to make my kid transition watch these weird Japanese cartoons and those cartoons have child-looking characters doing sexual shit and I don’t want it to exist”, as seen with the Satanic panic of the late 90s and early 00s due to Pokemon, MTG, DND, Yugioh, etc.
Hopefully that doesn’t happen but I don’t have faith in that.
Im opposed to loli porn because indulging deviant sexual arousal is for a fact more likely to make someone offend and not as people like to claim divert pedophiles from molesting kids
"Can have an influence" and "are a direct cause" are not the same thing. Especially as, the MSM is doing it intentionally and with purpose which will make anything far more effective. Double so over "anime directors make girls look so cute they end up looking prepubescent" which is aimless.
You are badly generalizing now. The biggest part of the outrage for Cuties (Drag queens are an entire separate issue) was over the actual kids in the movie who were being victimized and exploited, as well as both the production and Netflix for allowing it to be aired.
Which is the big problem with your line of thinking. CP has actual victims who are being harmed, and its criminality is more based on fact that it can only exist by harming those children. Loli shit has no direct victim. It can maybe after a while influence someone to victimize someone, but that is true of a lot of things. Should we have banned certain genres of books because The Collector and Catcher in the Rye influenced numerous actual murders? Or can we acknowledge that there are bigger things at play when someone takes a fictional work and then translates it to real world violence beyond "it made him do it!"
Where is this supposed massive support for loli on the right?