How many banks disabled the accounts of people calling for “white genocide” or “#killallmen”? And here people complain when I say this won’t be resolved peacefully
Bad statement, women tend to be far more nepotistic but as for it being genetic or inherent is disputable. I would rather argue women are far more susceptible to operant and social conditioning compared to men as our testosterone makes us inherently disagreeable and competitive versus women whose hormones value a conformist ideologue to appease their emotional state.
Bro I detest Imp's psychosis as much as the next poster but he's correct in this instance.
It makes sense from an evolutionary psychology perspective. Women are the bottle neck on the propagation of the species so everyone has a preference for them because they are not disposable the way men are.
That was all a smoke screen. Kanye criticized Kushner and the ADL uncharacteristically went after him for it claiming it was antisemitism. Really they just wanted an excuse to silence him because like it or not he's a big voice and has done alot to make inroads to designated democrat voters
They don't want people using their services who damage their reputation.
This is such a ridiculous, old-fashioned excuse that I wanted to reply to the guy in the other thread who said the same thing. I remember thinking this was wrong a decade ago when people were boycotting advertisers unless they pulled ads from Fox News or certain websites. People who grew up after the 1950s do not make an association between the products shown in 2 minute ad breaks and the content they are paying for. We know it's a service to sell a product. And this isn't even that kind of relationship. There's no implicit sponsorship at all. Literally nobody knew or cared where Kanye kept his money except for him and the bank.
They have some sort of vindictive asshole department that decides who to debank for brownie points with the NWO. They're very particular about which unsavory characters they target.
This is excellent. It will wake a lot of his fans, particularly blacks, to the true nature of the regime.
Hitler did some good thing as well. Stalin did too. Is that praising Hitler or Stalin? You can say good things about one but not the other, and the one you can say good things about just happened to be allied with the countries who silence you (and who were complicit in the cover-up of the Katyn Massacre).
I never said anything of the sort. How absurd. Is that why you think I called you a Nazi? No, the reason for that is because you seemed to suggest that the Nazis were better than what came before.
I've wondered how that is consistent with the Christianity you espouse. But then again, you also hold some bizarre views on race that are inconsistent with Christianity.
It's not something that I'd ever say. Nor can you produce any receipts. I was trying to give you the benefit of the doubt that you just misremembered as opposed to lying.
Vaccines have nothing to do with left or right. If you think 80%+ of your own population is 'leftist', including Donald Trump and your Ron DeSantis, then you must truly be doomed.
Mao ended a chaotic period of warlordism and united the Chinese people. Despite some mistakes, he created the necessary culture and enviornment for China to have a shot at competing as a major power on the world stage. You may not like the way it was done, but you also don't appreciate that the Chinese people see themselves as a larger organism with no regard for the individual.
Che Guevara enabled Cuba, and helped several other countries, to define their own destiny free of western exploitation, particularly by a mafia run industry of vice. Even more importantly, he saved his people from the cultural acid that is liberalism.
Stalin purged all the violent psychopaths that had been placed into power by the revolution. It would have been insane to allow those people to run the country. He even reversed some of the cultural decay caused by the revolution. His greatest achievement was rallying his people to defeat an existensial threat to the motherland.
Xi is doing a great job of caring for his people. He has not only repelled all attempts at western subversion, but has captured the elite of rival powers. The Han have never been in a more powerful position.
Oh, so that's why he refuses to do anything about China's aging population, water problems, and housing speculation? China is a paper mansion on a house of sand and Xi's bloviating does nothing to solve the main issues of his country.
He has not only repelled all attempts at western subversion
Only because he's been actively subverting the West with rampant drug smuggling while using Western property to launder money.
As always, the important question is, "compared to what?"
Oh, so that's why he refuses to do anything about China's aging population
Would you prefer he does the Canadian solution by suiciding them all? Every country has a demographic problem of some sort. At least Xi isn't intentionally mutilating the next generation and trying to replace his people with foreigners.
water problems
How's that American southwest doing again? Xi is playing his hand as best he can to secure resources for his people, which is quite an accomplishment considering Europe is made of coal and about to freeze.
housing speculation
Throwing stones in a glass house.
Only because he's been actively subverting the West with rampant drug smuggling while using Western property to launder money.
Sure. First you have to understand who Marx was writing to. Europe had a much more rigid class structure. It can be best described as tri-part: those who work, those who fight, those who pray. The rise of the merchant class through the industrial revolution had disrupted the old relationship, where the warrior class was paternalistic towards the peasant and trades classes. Part of this disruption was the rise a new class, the proletariat, which was a psuedo-mechanical workforce that doesn't exist in the west anymore. Marx was trying to restore a noblesse oblige that would allow the increasingly debased proles to find a renewed sense of meaning in their lives.
Most of his critiques were highly reactionary and not too distant from those of Carlyle. The quiet quitting phenomenon is precisely due to the alienation of the people from their labor. No one derives meaning from developing or selling a digital platform to manage deliverables.
As for Marx's predictions of the future, he was almost entirely correct, as across the modern world the people own the means of production that are managed by a dictatorship of proletarianized elites.
On a slight tangent, nothing in Marx's economic descriptions can't be found in Adam Smith.
Spez: As for your dismissal of commie accomplishments, what is the alternative? Would it be better for China to be embroiled in massive and bloody feuds? For Cuba to continue as a degenerate mafia run vice state similar to Colombia? For violent psychopaths to control every level of Russian society or live under German occupation? For China to succumb to feminism and sodomy?
I don't disagree, although this was an excercise in defending the reds. China may have even better off under Imperial Japan, but that is an entirely different conversation.
Before the communist uprising, they weren't having that many problems. But authoritarians do love authoritarians. China still has massive problems with people not happy with the communist utopia.
There is no such thing as a non-authoritarian politics. That is a silly rhetorical trick so that any opposition will voluntarily disarm politcally. Even the most radical ancap wants to enforce their will on those around them to create ancapistan, and, if they don't, they won't be able maintain acapistan.
In the wake of WW1 there was a serious threat of Soviet backed communist uprisings throughout Europe. The Biennio Rosso almost destroyed Italy until Mussolini saved the day. Bavaria had a close call with Rosa Luxembourg. The German people were rightly terrified. In 1933 the Holodomor was in full swing, and Germans who had been invited to work the land in Ukraine wrote back to their distant cousins that the judeo-Bolsheviks were starving them. That was the final straw needed to propel Hitler to power.
The Fuhrer put an end to the child prostitutes and had bonfires for child porn, both of which were largely the result of Jewish influences. By wretching German monetary policy from the control of Jewish bankers, he was to able to recover the German economy from the effects of Versailles.
Intervening in neighboring countries was completely justified. Czechoslovakia was treating Germans in their territory unfairly and the border areas were majority German. With the British guaranteeing them, Polish communists were emboldened to murder and torture Germans in lands that had been cruelly ripped from the Fatherland after WW1. The Soviet army was very explicitly an offensive force. Both Poland and Finland had learned twice that Russians massing on the border would soon surge across without warning. Attacking first was the only hope for the survival of the German people.
Hitler's biggest mistake was misjudging Churchill and Roosevelt's lust to obliterate the European continent with a second world war.
Actually all of them fall under the simple premise of the many supporting the important few. Whether or not you despise the ideology doesn’t stop it from existing today in the USA, in fact it is currently the largest premise of life here. Then again this was always the end result of communism.
How many banks disabled the accounts of people calling for “white genocide” or “#killallmen”? And here people complain when I say this won’t be resolved peacefully
Kanye says some "antisemitic" comments. Banks closes his accounts
.....hmmmmmmmmm
“Jewish power” has officially entered the mainstream discourse.
Odd since you agree women have nepotism but no other ethnic or social group can
Bad statement, women tend to be far more nepotistic but as for it being genetic or inherent is disputable. I would rather argue women are far more susceptible to operant and social conditioning compared to men as our testosterone makes us inherently disagreeable and competitive versus women whose hormones value a conformist ideologue to appease their emotional state.
Bro I detest Imp's psychosis as much as the next poster but he's correct in this instance.
It makes sense from an evolutionary psychology perspective. Women are the bottle neck on the propagation of the species so everyone has a preference for them because they are not disposable the way men are.
Have you considered the alternative possibility that people just disagree with you?
That was all a smoke screen. Kanye criticized Kushner and the ADL uncharacteristically went after him for it claiming it was antisemitism. Really they just wanted an excuse to silence him because like it or not he's a big voice and has done alot to make inroads to designated democrat voters
Like fuck they are.
This is such a ridiculous, old-fashioned excuse that I wanted to reply to the guy in the other thread who said the same thing. I remember thinking this was wrong a decade ago when people were boycotting advertisers unless they pulled ads from Fox News or certain websites. People who grew up after the 1950s do not make an association between the products shown in 2 minute ad breaks and the content they are paying for. We know it's a service to sell a product. And this isn't even that kind of relationship. There's no implicit sponsorship at all. Literally nobody knew or cared where Kanye kept his money except for him and the bank.
We don't need to speculate. They backed down because it mostly affected sluts.
They have some sort of vindictive asshole department that decides who to debank for brownie points with the NWO. They're very particular about which unsavory characters they target.
In response to Kanye accussing Jews of running the media and banks, Jews have banned West from the media and banks.
"Don't you dare say the Jews control the banks, otherwise you'll have your bank account closed!"
This is excellent. It will wake a lot of his fans, particularly blacks, to the true nature of the regime.
Hitler did some good thing as well. Stalin did too. Is that praising Hitler or Stalin? You can say good things about one but not the other, and the one you can say good things about just happened to be allied with the countries who silence you (and who were complicit in the cover-up of the Katyn Massacre).
According to you, pointing out that the Wehrmacht was heavily comprised of conscripts and non party members makes someone a Nazi. So yeah I guess so.
I never said anything of the sort. How absurd. Is that why you think I called you a Nazi? No, the reason for that is because you seemed to suggest that the Nazis were better than what came before.
I've wondered how that is consistent with the Christianity you espouse. But then again, you also hold some bizarre views on race that are inconsistent with Christianity.
You absolutely did, probably the biggest clue besides being a fake vaccine pusher, that you are a leftist.
It's not something that I'd ever say. Nor can you produce any receipts. I was trying to give you the benefit of the doubt that you just misremembered as opposed to lying.
Vaccines have nothing to do with left or right. If you think 80%+ of your own population is 'leftist', including Donald Trump and your Ron DeSantis, then you must truly be doomed.
You're a liar. Among other things. Doubly so about the fake vaccine.
See, still no receipts about any of your claims, just mindless sperging.
All cause I called you out for your sympathy for the Nazi regime.
Typical reddit scum. Called out on bullshit, and all you do is bleat "source! source!"
While of course never providing anything of your own. You're not only a liar and a leftist, you're also a hypocrite.
Only an idiot praises or defends Hitler. I don't think Kanye is that dumb.
If you can't reasonably defend Hitler or Stalin or whatever evil person you want, you don't understand them or the conflicts they were involved in.
Defend Mao, Guevara, Stalin and Xi.
That's easy.
Mao ended a chaotic period of warlordism and united the Chinese people. Despite some mistakes, he created the necessary culture and enviornment for China to have a shot at competing as a major power on the world stage. You may not like the way it was done, but you also don't appreciate that the Chinese people see themselves as a larger organism with no regard for the individual.
Che Guevara enabled Cuba, and helped several other countries, to define their own destiny free of western exploitation, particularly by a mafia run industry of vice. Even more importantly, he saved his people from the cultural acid that is liberalism.
Stalin purged all the violent psychopaths that had been placed into power by the revolution. It would have been insane to allow those people to run the country. He even reversed some of the cultural decay caused by the revolution. His greatest achievement was rallying his people to defeat an existensial threat to the motherland.
Xi is doing a great job of caring for his people. He has not only repelled all attempts at western subversion, but has captured the elite of rival powers. The Han have never been in a more powerful position.
o7 mega based!
If Mao had better ideology and economic policy he would have been great.
It takes a strong man to unite a country, too bad he untied it around really shitty ideas which led to famine.
Oh, so that's why he refuses to do anything about China's aging population, water problems, and housing speculation? China is a paper mansion on a house of sand and Xi's bloviating does nothing to solve the main issues of his country.
Only because he's been actively subverting the West with rampant drug smuggling while using Western property to launder money.
As always, the important question is, "compared to what?"
Would you prefer he does the Canadian solution by suiciding them all? Every country has a demographic problem of some sort. At least Xi isn't intentionally mutilating the next generation and trying to replace his people with foreigners.
How's that American southwest doing again? Xi is playing his hand as best he can to secure resources for his people, which is quite an accomplishment considering Europe is made of coal and about to freeze.
Throwing stones in a glass house.
The revenge for the opium wars is going great.
That is a large amount of propaganda.
Mao sure did unify China with killing the chinese...
Che Guevara sure did fight western exploitation by exploiting and killing people.
Stalin sure cleaned up the violent psychopaths he didn't like by being a violent psychopath himself.
Xi is doing an amazing job in persecuting his people.
In summary, you may as well defend Marx too.
Sure. First you have to understand who Marx was writing to. Europe had a much more rigid class structure. It can be best described as tri-part: those who work, those who fight, those who pray. The rise of the merchant class through the industrial revolution had disrupted the old relationship, where the warrior class was paternalistic towards the peasant and trades classes. Part of this disruption was the rise a new class, the proletariat, which was a psuedo-mechanical workforce that doesn't exist in the west anymore. Marx was trying to restore a noblesse oblige that would allow the increasingly debased proles to find a renewed sense of meaning in their lives.
Most of his critiques were highly reactionary and not too distant from those of Carlyle. The quiet quitting phenomenon is precisely due to the alienation of the people from their labor. No one derives meaning from developing or selling a digital platform to manage deliverables.
As for Marx's predictions of the future, he was almost entirely correct, as across the modern world the people own the means of production that are managed by a dictatorship of proletarianized elites.
On a slight tangent, nothing in Marx's economic descriptions can't be found in Adam Smith.
Spez: As for your dismissal of commie accomplishments, what is the alternative? Would it be better for China to be embroiled in massive and bloody feuds? For Cuba to continue as a degenerate mafia run vice state similar to Colombia? For violent psychopaths to control every level of Russian society or live under German occupation? For China to succumb to feminism and sodomy?
China would have been better off if the nationalists won and the whole place was run like Taiwan.
I don't disagree, although this was an excercise in defending the reds. China may have even better off under Imperial Japan, but that is an entirely different conversation.
Before the communist uprising, they weren't having that many problems. But authoritarians do love authoritarians. China still has massive problems with people not happy with the communist utopia.
Why do lefists all defend leftists?
There is no such thing as a non-authoritarian politics. That is a silly rhetorical trick so that any opposition will voluntarily disarm politcally. Even the most radical ancap wants to enforce their will on those around them to create ancapistan, and, if they don't, they won't be able maintain acapistan.
I am a capitalist. I view socialism and leftists like yourself as the enemy.
Do the neonazis know you like Marx?
Now defend Israel, Soros, Netanyahu and Golda Meir.
You're a born spin doctor.
Now do Hitler!
In the wake of WW1 there was a serious threat of Soviet backed communist uprisings throughout Europe. The Biennio Rosso almost destroyed Italy until Mussolini saved the day. Bavaria had a close call with Rosa Luxembourg. The German people were rightly terrified. In 1933 the Holodomor was in full swing, and Germans who had been invited to work the land in Ukraine wrote back to their distant cousins that the judeo-Bolsheviks were starving them. That was the final straw needed to propel Hitler to power.
The Fuhrer put an end to the child prostitutes and had bonfires for child porn, both of which were largely the result of Jewish influences. By wretching German monetary policy from the control of Jewish bankers, he was to able to recover the German economy from the effects of Versailles.
Intervening in neighboring countries was completely justified. Czechoslovakia was treating Germans in their territory unfairly and the border areas were majority German. With the British guaranteeing them, Polish communists were emboldened to murder and torture Germans in lands that had been cruelly ripped from the Fatherland after WW1. The Soviet army was very explicitly an offensive force. Both Poland and Finland had learned twice that Russians massing on the border would soon surge across without warning. Attacking first was the only hope for the survival of the German people.
Hitler's biggest mistake was misjudging Churchill and Roosevelt's lust to obliterate the European continent with a second world war.
Brilliant!
You have a fine talent for steel-manning (a stupid term) rebuttals to arguments so well-worn they might as well be on stone tablets.
Actually all of them fall under the simple premise of the many supporting the important few. Whether or not you despise the ideology doesn’t stop it from existing today in the USA, in fact it is currently the largest premise of life here. Then again this was always the end result of communism.
Defend Israel now.
That only a dumb person defends Hitler. (and Stalin, Mao, Xi etc)
Because for that, they must be fond or like them in some way.
Jester, my man, you're literally a severely autistic, deeply inbred goblin creature. Rocks and glass houses, google it.
Hm, was wondering why I haven't seen DrJester.
That explains a lot.
I am not him, I am not that ugly.
What did he do with you leftists? Scare you with his ugly face?
To sum up your argument:
Kanye used to attack women, and he was able to create a billion dollar empire while doing so
now that he’s attacking Jews, he’s being systematically wiped off the social and financial map
you think this proves that women, not Jews, run the world
Game of identify "You can't criticize those who rule over you" : games' journalist difficulty mode.